Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Other >> Mustang Videos >> RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 3:45:06 AM   
miglet

 

Posts: 207
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
k. colbalt ss's stock are not fast at all. when my 96 gt was stock /w exhaust my friends colbalt ss would beat me by about 1-2 car lengths at about 140mph, theres not a chance in hell he can beat a 99+ gt by that much

(in reply to Bad04OrngGT)
Post #: 61
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 7:54:22 AM   
turbostang21

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bad04OrngGT


quote:

ORIGINAL: ZW99GT


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bad04OrngGT

i could waste him on my 05 yfz450 thats a fair comparison i think


Dude those things are sick!!!!!!!!!!!! I had a 03 400ex with white bros header and pipe. It ran a 9.3 @66 mph.I got ass raped by a yfz450. That thing was hitting 74 in the 1/8! You need to take it to a 1/8 track. I dont know what was done to it, but it could have been stock. Bad04, have you ever raced a 450R? Those things are supposed to be comp for the yfz. Im a honda man myself, but i dont think they are as fast as the Yamaha.


if i could figure out this fax machine i would send some pics but im yet to do that.. in my garage we keep all my buddies bikes..2 have honda's 400ex's and 1 has a 450r..a z400 a 660raptor and another yfz450 and a banshee
The only competition i get is from justins yfz 450..its close with the 450r and the 660 on topend..but down low they cant touch me.. mine is bored..jetted, got both powernows..k&n no lid, sprocket, full exhaust, rethal bar, full skid plates, nerf bars, custom grips, 6pack rack, front bumper.. its for sale little over 10k invested its an 05 sellin it for like 5grand im go about 175lbs and i can get it up in 4 gears


first of all...a fast quad would waste almost any car until its top speed. you say your 450 is faster than a banshee?? i have a bunch of buddies with quads. my friends banshee with just a boost bottle, drag pipes, carbs will toast my other friends 450r with about the same mods as you (minus the bore but that doesn't do squat unless its a big bore kit), it's not even close on the street. i have a quadracer with a 330 big bore kit and a bunch of other goodies...it's pretty tough to beat. i love 2 stoke, but im getting sick of rebuilding them, haha. i'm thinking of selling out to a 4 stroke next quad. most of us sold street bikes to get quads and it was a damn good decision imo. too bad they're trying to close down a bunch of our riding spots

(in reply to Bad04OrngGT)
Post #: 62
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 7:59:28 AM   
turbostang21

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
why the hell would you buy a cobalt ss after owning camaros and trans ams?? i could see for your daily driver, but to come here and argue that they're fast... btw it was really weird to hear that blower whine and not have the car go anywhere hahaha

< Message edited by turbostang21 -- 12/5/2005 8:00:11 AM >

(in reply to turbostang21)
Post #: 63
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 8:33:25 AM   
Bad04OrngGT


Posts: 217
Joined: 10/26/2005
Status: offline
turbostang i even give them guys a head start and I still beat them by then begin of 3rd..2 strokes are nice but u got to stay in the throttle all the time...i like 2 strokes i had a blaster and i loved that thing... love the smell 2..but if ur goin to get a 4 stroke go check out the new 700cc fuel injected raptor 6spd...baddddaaaaaa$$$$$$$$$

_____________________________


04 Gt 5spd. few mods..

06 Gixxer 1000

(in reply to turbostang21)
Post #: 64
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 9:57:31 AM   
turbostang21

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bad04OrngGT

turbostang i even give them guys a head start and I still beat them by then begin of 3rd..2 strokes are nice but u got to stay in the throttle all the time...i like 2 strokes i had a blaster and i loved that thing... love the smell 2..but if ur goin to get a 4 stroke go check out the new 700cc fuel injected raptor 6spd...baddddaaaaaa$$$$$$$$$

yeah i heard about that, i'm sure it's sick! i'm thinking about keeping my quadracer and getting a lifted 4x4 for trail riding and just demolishing anything. after years of kick starting... electric start and reverse are luxuries that are starting to appeal to me. where do you ride??

(in reply to Bad04OrngGT)
Post #: 65
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 4:36:38 PM   
Bad04OrngGT


Posts: 217
Joined: 10/26/2005
Status: offline
Turbostang.. I live in the ohio valley.. 2 mins from wheeling wv, on the ohio side.. its all hills and woods around here alot of abandon strip mines and quarrys..

_____________________________


04 Gt 5spd. few mods..

06 Gixxer 1000

(in reply to turbostang21)
Post #: 66
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 4:55:20 PM   
ZW99GT



Team MF Member #099
Posts: 6446
Joined: 11/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bad04OrngGT

turbostang i even give them guys a head start and I still beat them by then begin of 3rd..2 strokes are nice but u got to stay in the throttle all the time...i like 2 strokes i had a blaster and i loved that thing... love the smell 2..but if ur goin to get a 4 stroke go check out the new 700cc fuel injected raptor 6spd...baddddaaaaaa$$$$$$$$$


2 Strokes are the shiz for racing. Im not a racer, so a 4 is alot better suited for my kinda riding. Turbo stang, banshees used to be hot **** (still my favorite quad ever), but that damn yfz450 will spank that ass. I cant see the new 700 raptor even getting close to it. The Kawasaki 700 (cant remember the name of it, IT was a sport) was a flop. My 400ex roasted it in the 1/8.

_____________________________

4cly Fox springs 4 sale! $40 + ship, PM me.



If bottles are for babies, why does everyone else cry about it?


(in reply to Bad04OrngGT)
Post #: 67
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 5:13:51 PM   
codyss


Posts: 527
Joined: 11/30/2005
Status: offline
I wasn't trying to start a war guys. Like I have allready ran a 14.4 @ 99mph in 100% stock form. That isn't slow unless you are comparing it to a 03/04 Cobra or a LS1.

If a 14.4 in a Cobalt SS is slow then that means that the 99-04 GT is slow as well. But instead of realizing GT's run low-mid 14's all of the time you all need to act as if they are 13 second 1/4 killing machines.

Everyone who is arguing with me has no clue what the hell they are talking about anyway.

I love the " lots of whine but going nowhere " comments. It was obviously passing the GT.



_____________________________

2005 CHEVROLET COBALT SS/SC
- GMPP STAGE 2
- GM DRILLED & SLOTTED ROTORS

Pictures of my Cobalt SS/SC and my other cars:
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/cody02ss/my_photos


(in reply to ZW99GT)
Post #: 68
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 5:30:42 PM   
pj1010


Posts: 971
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: codyss

I wasn't trying to start a war guys. Like I have allready ran a 14.4 @ 99mph in 100% stock form. That isn't slow unless you are comparing it to a 03/04 Cobra or a LS1.

If a 14.4 in a Cobalt SS is slow then that means that the 99-04 GT is slow as well. But instead of realizing GT's run low-mid 14's all of the time you all need to act as if they are 13 second 1/4 killing machines.

Everyone who is arguing with me has no clue what the hell they are talking about anyway.

I love the " lots of whine but going nowhere " comments. It was obviously passing the GT.




I believe everyone was referring to the END of the video. Even you can admit that **** looks silly going to slow with that huge whine. So far, we have seen ONE video of a Cobalt beating some mustang. No matter your argument, at the end of the day you are still driving a sissy ass cobalt...it's queer dude. Seriously dude...how do you go from all those cars to a damn COBALT?

(in reply to codyss)
Post #: 69
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 5:43:52 PM   
TT_Stang


Posts: 156
Joined: 10/22/2005
Status: offline
I hate the fact that you compare the 99 to the 2000-04 GT's the 99 is the faster car but almost a 1/2 sec. I think the 04 0-60 is around 6 sec and the 99 is 5.4 so clearly your 6 sec plus car can not beat a car that is obvouisly quicker hmmmm...... case closed. My 99 walks a lot of cars here in vegas Ive with a kill list a mile long. but any race I have also had my a$$ handed to by some impresive cars. (TT supra, Camaro SS, Z28, Corvette's, also an evo by 1/2 car).


You say that you run a 14.4 @ 99 thats impresive for a car with a little over 200 hp and no torque. (remember that torque get you there Hp keeps you there). can u post a timeslip for your car or better yet a video so we might have the slightiest inclination that it could be you and not a car you found on the Net.

The Cars on you sig. were they actually yours or cars that you seen when you were driving around town? or possably your parents, friends, relatives. Or the cars that you've got your A$$ handed too by.

_____________________________

2007 White GT Acquired
1999 Black GT sold


Chuck Norris doesn't teabag women; he potato sacks'um

(in reply to codyss)
Post #: 70
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 5:47:52 PM   
pj1010


Posts: 971
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TT_Stang

I hate the fact that you compare the 99 to the 2000-04 GT's the 99 is the faster car but almost a 1/2 sec. I think the 04 0-60 is around 6 sec and the 99 is 5.4 so clearly your 6 sec plus car can not beat a car that is obvouisly quicker hmmmm...... case closed. My 99 walks a lot of cars here in vegas Ive with a kill list a mile long. but any race I have also had my a$$ handed to by some impresive cars. (TT supra, Camaro SS, Z28, Corvette's, also an evo by 1/2 car).


You say that you run a 14.4 @ 99 thats impresive for a car with a little over 200 hp and no torque. (remember that torque get you there Hp keeps you there). can u post a timeslip for your car or better yet a video so we might have the slightiest inclination that it could be you and not a car you found on the Net.

The Cars on you sig. were they actually yours or cars that you seen when you were driving around town? or possably your parents, friends, relatives. Or the cars that you've got your A$$ handed too by.


Agreed...his list doesn't make any sense. That's like having a Cobra and saying ehh I got tired of being a bad ass so I went with a v-6

(in reply to TT_Stang)
Post #: 71
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 5:59:47 PM   
Bad04OrngGT


Posts: 217
Joined: 10/26/2005
Status: offline
What make the 99 gt faster than the 04 gt cause that is what you read in a magazine.. I thought it was the same exact car????

_____________________________


04 Gt 5spd. few mods..

06 Gixxer 1000

(in reply to pj1010)
Post #: 72
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 6:01:54 PM   
marcuslee842


Posts: 531
Joined: 3/28/2005
Status: offline
Do Maxima's and Altima's really beat 99-04 GT's!!!!!!!!!!!??????! Those are grandparent cars!!!!

_____________________________

99 GT (AUTO)
UD pullies, shift kit, Super 40's, 75mm TB, Plenum, Diablo Tuner, K&N FIPK, 4.10's

(in reply to Bad04OrngGT)
Post #: 73
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 6:08:45 PM   
65 LT1

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TT_Stang

I hate the fact that you compare the 99 to the 2000-04 GT's the 99 is the faster car but almost a 1/2 sec. I think the 04 0-60 is around 6 sec and the 99 is 5.4 so clearly your 6 sec plus car can not beat a car that is obvouisly quicker hmmmm...... case closed. My 99 walks a lot of cars here in vegas Ive with a kill list a mile long. but any race I have also had my a$$ handed to by some impresive cars. (TT supra, Camaro SS, Z28, Corvette's, also an evo by 1/2 car).


You say that you run a 14.4 @ 99 thats impresive for a car with a little over 200 hp and no torque. (remember that torque get you there Hp keeps you there). can u post a timeslip for your car or better yet a video so we might have the slightiest inclination that it could be you and not a car you found on the Net.

The Cars on you sig. were they actually yours or cars that you seen when you were driving around town? or possably your parents, friends, relatives. Or the cars that you've got your A$$ handed too by.


first off your a fcking idiot
have you even seen the vid...not from a dig
second why are you talking about car lists
who puts upcoming mods in theretrying to make a bigger list i guess
third where are you getting this info, prove those #s
and do some research on those things
191whp is the lowest ive seen(on mustang dyno) from one in stock trim
and up to 217(got a video of that one see attachment)it has a drop in K&N

sorry attachment might be jacked so you can check it out here

Click here to watch chevys-got-another-freak




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by 65 LT1 -- 12/5/2005 6:23:37 PM >


_____________________________

1965 c-10 pickup
full 97LT1 eng/trans swap
13.9@97

(in reply to TT_Stang)
Post #: 74
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 7:43:26 PM   
AmericanRicer87


Posts: 747
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
Dude i have a 2000 GT 5sp. I have previously owned a Cobalt SS Supercharged and i sold it to my ricer ass friend. My GT has and will hand him his ass over and over again and all i have is a cold air intake and some flow master mufflers and a test pipe. try racing someone who can drive, or learn to drive the car yourself.
quote:

ORIGINAL: codyss

Why is it that 90% of the posts here that talk **** about the SS are made by people who I could beat in my slow little Cobalt SS.

It doesn't matter what the roll mph was a Cobalt SS will kill a 99-04 GT from any mph. Except for under 30mph because then I just spin through first and second.

Face it a GT cannot compete with F-Bodies, Maximas, Altimas and now Cobalt SS's.

Hmmmm, Now I remember why I sold my GT.

What excusses are you all going to have when you run into a Stage 2 Cobalt SS?







< Message edited by AmericanRicer87 -- 12/5/2005 7:48:00 PM >

(in reply to codyss)
Post #: 75
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 8:57:34 PM   
TT_Stang


Posts: 156
Joined: 10/22/2005
Status: offline
65LT1 here you go for the spec on the 99 mustang (http://www.mustangtuning.com/99.html). Wow like I said a little over 200Hp i think 17hp is a little over dont you? here you go for the 2004 GT (http://ford.jbcarpages.com/Mustang/2004/index4.php). oh yea the specs on the cobalt (http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2005/09/08/142358.html). 99 GT 5.5 0-60 04, GT 6.0, Cobalt 6.1

Bad04OrngGt I dont know the reasons why but all the places that I look for in specs state that the 04 is a slower car then the 99 mustang.

Does it F@^kING matter that Iam giving informative information that seems to be Correct.

I stated the 99 Gt is 5.4 I was off by .1 sue me and the 04 6.0 got that one and the cobalt wow can you guess it yes I said 6 plus it is 6.1 damn that was close.

Racing is done from a dig right I mean the last time I was at the track it was. I cant remember the last time we just kept rolling down the 1/4 mile, maybe were you live?

Question for you 65LT1 would you race from a roll or a dig?

For my sig they are on order so if you would like me to change to bad just waiting to get them installed. If you want to get technical then look at the sig from codySS upcoming mod GM stage 2. Seems like couple of people do it!

< Message edited by TT_Stang -- 12/5/2005 9:01:14 PM >


_____________________________

2007 White GT Acquired
1999 Black GT sold


Chuck Norris doesn't teabag women; he potato sacks'um

(in reply to AmericanRicer87)
Post #: 76
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/5/2005 10:39:15 PM   
757GT

 

Posts: 2435
Joined: 5/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: codyss

I wasn't trying to start a war guys. Like I have allready ran a 14.4 @ 99mph in 100% stock form. That isn't slow unless you are comparing it to a 03/04 Cobra or a LS1.

If a 14.4 in a Cobalt SS is slow then that means that the 99-04 GT is slow as well. But instead of realizing GT's run low-mid 14's all of the time you all need to act as if they are 13 second 1/4 killing machines.

Everyone who is arguing with me has no clue what the hell they are talking about anyway.

I love the " lots of whine but going nowhere " comments. It was obviously passing the GT.





Nice try kissing up, you are slow, my GT owns you.

_____________________________

2005 Black GT Auto, SLP Loud Mouth exhaust, bassani on road x-pipe, Tunable Induction full CAI, Steeda charge motion plates, steeda ud pullies, 3:73s, SCT tuned by Brent Hughs
Best E.T. 12.82@107.48

(in reply to codyss)
Post #: 77
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/6/2005 1:43:05 AM   
65 LT1

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
from a dig of course
but i was under the assumption we were .
debating the first vid on this forum.
17hp to the ground over stock rating yeah not that much at all
can you not see the vid i posted?
stock boost is 12psi and that is what he is running
And now that i look closely he is at 221 at the ground
with the k&n.what do the stangs laydown, 5.0 or 4.6.
let me answer that for you
THE SAME!

and ive personley seen barley over 200 from a 97 befor w/flows

actually i like the article
but the auto channel...yeah.
this is a cool quote form that article though,

"with a torque surge that feels more like its coming from a big V8 than a small-bore four."

wow let me turn the knife now

"The powertrain choices were significantly upgraded for 1999. The base model got a revised 3.8L V6 which now produced 193 horsepower at 5250 rpm and 225 ft-lbs of torque at 3000 rpm. The GT got an extensively upgraded SOHC 4.6L V8, with new heads, cams, and intake manifolds. The upgrades resulted in 260 horsepower at 5250 rpm and 302 ft-lbs of torque at 4000 rpm. The DOHC Cobra motor was advertised as having 320 horsepower at 6000 rpm and 317 ft-lbs of torque at 4750 rpm from the factory. In reality, however, the motor produced closer to 305 horsepower. Thus, Ford was forced to retrofit the Cobras with new intake manifolds, exhaust systems, and computer calibrations to make the advertised 320 horses."

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME I NEEDED THIS LINK TO ARGUE A COUPLE GUYS ON HERE
THAT DIDNT BELIEVE THAT.THIS IS JUST HILARIOUS MAN.
THE COBRA MOTOR WOULD BARLEY LAY DOWN 240 OUT OF THE SHOW ROOM

AHEM... thanks for the laughs man!





< Message edited by 65 LT1 -- 12/6/2005 12:45:06 PM >


_____________________________

1965 c-10 pickup
full 97LT1 eng/trans swap
13.9@97

(in reply to 757GT)
Post #: 78
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/6/2005 6:54:54 AM   
pj1010


Posts: 971
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline
Christ.....get teh **** out of here **** face.

(in reply to 65 LT1)
Post #: 79
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS - 12/6/2005 8:06:32 AM   
jdaniel


Posts: 9173
Joined: 4/3/2004
Status: offline
jdaniel's photo gallery
Yeah, this guy is a tool. How you get 240 from 320 and a 10% drivetrain loss... I have no idea. What a tool.

_____________________________


Dyno video

(in reply to pj1010)
Post #: 80
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang >> Other >> Mustang Videos
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Ride of the Month
May 2008
1989 351W Hatch

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17404
nanaki14549
dan04cobra14383
88bluegt14311
ride of the 13295
addermk213286
hotrods_n_bo13191
2000gt4.612443
mustangman0211597
1slo8511496

New Vendors
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls
BrandMotion
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
Brenspeed's Saleen Superchargers

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.