compression calutator (Full Version)

Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> General Tech

compression calutator

  

C/Note -> compression calutator (11/5/2005 11:16:11 PM)

I QUICK WAY TO GET COMPRESSION RAITOS..WHAT YOU THINK..? http://www.timmcamis.com/engine_size_compress.html

  
C/Note -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (11/5/2005 11:18:01 PM)

I DIDNT KNOW WHAT SECTION TO PUT IT IN,,? HOPE IT HELPS OUT[:)]

DR8907 -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (11/6/2005 12:49:19 AM)

Nice tool - this should be a sticky.

C/Note -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (11/6/2005 9:14:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DR8907

Nice tool - this should be a sticky.
YES STICKY...CHECK THIS ONE OUT TOO.. http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm

C/Note -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (11/7/2005 10:48:46 PM)

well than f /you mods ..dont make it one...[8D]

tripsevn7 -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (11/8/2005 1:02:44 AM)

damn son calm down, didnt see it, yep good info will sticky now take your meds nossy

C/Note -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (11/8/2005 1:03:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tripsevn7

damn son calm down, didnt see it, yep good info will sticky now take your meds nossy
its cool....i wasnt talking about you though ...every one else...thses new mods ....whats the forums coming to ...[&:]

1975ssnova -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (8/9/2006 5:02:07 PM)

Cool tool , have to keep that one tucked away.

JMD -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (3/5/2007 7:13:50 PM)

I ran both of these tools, they came out about almost a point higher than my calculations for my sons engine, so I ran my figures again, same result. Has anyone else checked these links against their own figures? Seeing that BOTH of these came out higher than my figures, it seems that it is probably my math that is suspect, but I would like to know for sure!!

Colorado_Mustang -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (3/5/2007 10:15:41 PM)

The first link calculates 13.385:1, versus 13.847:1 for pure math.

Close enough...if I didn't already have a spreadsheet with all this stuff built in.

JMD -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (3/7/2007 12:09:55 PM)

Yea,,,, I did have a "math issue" I was failing to add the total cumbustion chamber volume to the cylinder displacement prior to dividing. OOPS.

So, I guess I will be running 11 to 1 instead of 10 to 1, hopefully my cam selection and the altitude I am at will help a little.[:)]

There are some cool calculators in this section.[8|]

Are you running at 13 to 1 CR? If so what are your octane requirements? To be honest I am a little concerned at running 11 to 1, even with my alum heads, my camshaft selection, and my home elevation of about 4,000 feet.

(I would like to hear that you have no problems running pump gas, but .... tell me the truth anyway, I can take it!!!)

Colorado_Mustang -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (3/7/2007 7:54:21 PM)

Yes, that is my 390HP.  I run 91 octane pump gas and have taken out about 6 degrees of timing.  It would definitely like more octane, but at 8 mpg, she isn't going to have a diet of racing gas.  Only treats.

My 12.5:1 302 runs on 91 octane with about 4 degrees taken out.

I'm around 5k feet.

EDIT:

Forgot to mention a little known tidbit about your local octane rating.  91 octane gas in Denver isn't the same octane as 91 octane in LA.  The octane rating uses the elevation of the target area in determining what the octane rating will be.  This is part of the reason why your owner's manual says to use 87 octane no matter what elevation you are at (at least my '03 GT says that).  I'm pretty sure racing fuels aren't rated this way.

hellas85stang -> RE: compression calutator (3/8/2007 2:28:22 PM)

my set up says about a 10.5 comp, the calculater says 10.3//// not enuff to makae a diff and make me mad ..lol  i cam get a smaller gasket thickness nexttime..

JMD -> RE: MAKE A STICKY LOOK IN SEE (3/11/2007 10:05:46 PM)

Hmm...

So, then gas bought at a higher elevation should be cheaper to produce than gas sold at sea level,,, I don't imagine that the high elevation consumer ever sees this benifit...

kenash -> RE: compression calutator (3/19/2007 1:41:43 PM)

Hey C/Note,

Here's another great calculatorL http://kb-silvolite.com/calc.php?action=comp

I found this while researching my own compresssion issue.
Thanks for this alternative.

Good luck

Dyno_Ron -> RE: compression calutator (4/21/2007 1:14:43 AM)

Here are a couple more:

http://www.virtualengine2000.com/ProgramDownload.htm

[image]http://www.virtualengine2000.com/images/Calcul2.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.virtualengine2000.com/images/Calculator2006_Small.jpg[/image]

MustangEnthusiast -> RE: compression calutator (4/30/2007 8:25:07 PM)

Nice, definitely book marking this :D

the new nos/man -> RE: compression calutator (5/4/2007 4:17:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kenash

Hey C/Note,

Here's another great calculatorL http://kb-silvolite.com/calc.php?action=comp

I found this while researching my own compresssion issue.
Thanks for this alternative.

Good luck
thanks man .. dam i got 2500 hits ,  yes i was c/note at one time. its fairly close the link i had . like some one else said has anybody checked to a real blueprinted eng? i havent .all i got to be is close. with 262 / 274 at .050 lift.and .701 lift, it dont matter if i got 12to1 or 11.5 to1 on the spray baby 408w.

johnnyhou -> RE: compression calutator (9/24/2007 6:00:35 PM)

 Is a calutator a hybrid between cauliflower and potatoes?

kenash -> RE: compression calutator (9/25/2007 4:45:04 AM)

As so it may seem......Oh my, the pen is mightier than the sword!
Have a great day, anyway!

  

Page: [1]

Return to Mustang Forums home page or view the Full Version of this page.