Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

1/4 times

  Printable Version
Mustang Forum >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip >> 1/4 times Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
1/4 times - 10/23/2005 12:40:40 AM   
*Blk_96_Stang_GT*


Posts: 1093
Joined: 8/21/2005
From: Illinois
Status: offline
*Blk_96_Stang_GT*'s photo gallery
I finally got the strip for the first time, and man was it fun! my times sucked but it was still fun.
Best
rct-.228
60'-2.295
1/8-9.981
1/4-15.316
mph-89.67

There were over 100mustangs there and there was five 03-04 cobras running in the 11's, it was just a blast even tho my times sucked ass, didnt except much for my firts time tho

< Message edited by *Blk_96_Stang_GT* -- 10/23/2005 12:41:18 AM >


_____________________________




PI Swap,BBK O/R H-Pipe,BBK CAI,Steeda UDP's,Flowmasters,Eibach Lowering Spring,3:73s
Post #: 1
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 11:22:29 AM   
TommyV8

 

Posts: 4026
Joined: 7/26/2004
From: St. Louis, MO
Status: offline
Lemme be the first to tell you: get that 60 foot down! Your first purchase at this point should be sticky tires, then if it's an auto a torque converter.

_____________________________

2002 Camaro Z28
Automatic, stock converter, 2.73 gears
Airbox lid, longtube headers, catless Y-pipe, cutout, Nitto drag radials
12.72 @ 108.62 1.93 60 ft


(in reply to *Blk_96_Stang_GT*)
Post #: 2
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 7:45:07 PM   
jthorn9



Posts: 11583
Joined: 9/19/2005
From: Pearl River, Louisiana
Status: offline
jthorn9's photo gallery
Dude what the hell happened, my 98 can hit the 1/4 mile doing 85 and its a slow as hell automattic. God what's wrong with the 94-98s.

_____________________________

Stock 00 Mustang V6
95 Mustang GT
277 rwhp 360lbs rwtq
My Car Domain Page
My Mustang Site Page


(in reply to *Blk_96_Stang_GT*)
Post #: 3
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 8:14:42 PM   
PipsBlackStang

 

Posts: 1133
Joined: 7/26/2004
Status: offline
WTF 15.3 @ 89.67??? My 2000 V6 trapped 88.71mph and its a slow piece of an auto.

_____________________________

2000 Mustang GT Vert- Vortech CAI 342.87hp 336.42tq Tuned by Tim @ MPH

(in reply to *Blk_96_Stang_GT*)
Post #: 4
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 8:17:24 PM   
marks86

 

Posts: 107
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline
96 was the heaviest year for a mustang.. i think thats a problem

(in reply to PipsBlackStang)
Post #: 5
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 8:21:00 PM   
PipsBlackStang

 

Posts: 1133
Joined: 7/26/2004
Status: offline
That may be 1 problem but I can almost say for certainty that my 96 even though it is a 5spd and I havent taken it to the track yet will trap in the 90's.

_____________________________

2000 Mustang GT Vert- Vortech CAI 342.87hp 336.42tq Tuned by Tim @ MPH

(in reply to marks86)
Post #: 6
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 8:25:11 PM   
PipsBlackStang

 

Posts: 1133
Joined: 7/26/2004
Status: offline
I know its probably not written in stone but just checking out the specs on the 94-98 GT's the 96 came out the lightest.

These are all curb weights that I got from edmunds.com
1994-3276Lb
1995-3280Lb
1996-3077Lb
1997-3288Lb
1998-3227Lb

Than again that could have been the only manual and all the rest where autos. It doesnt go into enough detail.


_____________________________

2000 Mustang GT Vert- Vortech CAI 342.87hp 336.42tq Tuned by Tim @ MPH

(in reply to *Blk_96_Stang_GT*)
Post #: 7
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 10:51:27 PM   
jthorn9



Posts: 11583
Joined: 9/19/2005
From: Pearl River, Louisiana
Status: offline
jthorn9's photo gallery
Wait a minute I think I have the answer. 96 was the first year that the 4.6L was released and if I recal the 96 was one of the worst years ever for the V8, in other words, you might be having some engine malfuctions and difficulties. Yea just for the hell of it earlier after I read the post I had to go get gas since I was nearly empty and on this long strip of road on my street I hit 86-87 mph. Now my tank was almost empty and I was running on 93 octane gas. Oh, just had to say that the 93 octane put me at 407 miles on my tank, usually I get about 325, and yes that is with some flooring it involved.

_____________________________

Stock 00 Mustang V6
95 Mustang GT
277 rwhp 360lbs rwtq
My Car Domain Page
My Mustang Site Page


(in reply to PipsBlackStang)
Post #: 8
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 10:54:38 PM   
dc_mann8



Posts: 2986
Joined: 10/6/2004
From: PEI, Canada
Status: offline
pretty low trap speed..

_____________________________




(in reply to PipsBlackStang)
Post #: 9
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 10:55:06 PM   
PipsBlackStang

 

Posts: 1133
Joined: 7/26/2004
Status: offline
Ummm they used the 4.6 in Crown Vic's in like 1990. So that wouldnt be it.

_____________________________

2000 Mustang GT Vert- Vortech CAI 342.87hp 336.42tq Tuned by Tim @ MPH

(in reply to jthorn9)
Post #: 10
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 10:55:52 PM   
PipsBlackStang

 

Posts: 1133
Joined: 7/26/2004
Status: offline
I guess autos are just dogs.

_____________________________

2000 Mustang GT Vert- Vortech CAI 342.87hp 336.42tq Tuned by Tim @ MPH

(in reply to PipsBlackStang)
Post #: 11
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 11:03:23 PM   
jthorn9



Posts: 11583
Joined: 9/19/2005
From: Pearl River, Louisiana
Status: offline
jthorn9's photo gallery
Well its not the engine, its every thing around it, see Ford basically made their decision at the last minute to can the 5.0, and my theory is that they seriously screwed up on the 96s, there are just too many people with a 96 GT that has problems.

_____________________________

Stock 00 Mustang V6
95 Mustang GT
277 rwhp 360lbs rwtq
My Car Domain Page
My Mustang Site Page


(in reply to PipsBlackStang)
Post #: 12
RE: 1/4 times - 10/23/2005 11:49:36 PM   
*Blk_96_Stang_GT*


Posts: 1093
Joined: 8/21/2005
From: Illinois
Status: offline
*Blk_96_Stang_GT*'s photo gallery
I dont really have any problems with the car its just slow, and im not sure if the guy was telling me the truth about the 3:73's that are in the car, cause my rpms at 65 are the same as my friends stock 94 Z28 at 65mph, but then again my speedo is off by about 10mph so idk, its just slow

< Message edited by *Blk_96_Stang_GT* -- 10/23/2005 11:50:49 PM >


_____________________________




PI Swap,BBK O/R H-Pipe,BBK CAI,Steeda UDP's,Flowmasters,Eibach Lowering Spring,3:73s

(in reply to *Blk_96_Stang_GT*)
Post #: 13
RE: 1/4 times - 10/24/2005 2:51:38 AM   
sicride

 

Posts: 227
Joined: 2/13/2005
Status: offline
As far as the gears thing, comparing your mph to a Z28 doesn't prove anything at all. You can compare to another 96GT with stock gears same tranny and see what the RPMS are (coasting at a certain speed if you're an auto), otherwise your comparison is likely to be inaccurate and tell you absolutely nothing. As far as your times, so what they're a little on the low side. Keep practicing. Your 60' can come down and you can break into the 14's.

As Jthorn- 85 and 89 is a pretty significant difference in trap speeds... even 87 and 89 is significant.


sucks to have a dog stang, but as long as you enjoy driving it- who cares?!

(in reply to *Blk_96_Stang_GT*)
Post #: 14
RE: 1/4 times - 10/24/2005 9:28:51 AM   
PipsBlackStang

 

Posts: 1133
Joined: 7/26/2004
Status: offline
Jack up your car and have someone spin one of your rear tires 1 full revolution and you count how many times the driveshaft spins. Use a piece of chalk to mark the tire and driveshaft so its easier to tell and that just use common sense.
3 and a quarter turns-- 3.27's
3 and a half turns-- --- 3.55's
3 and 3 quarter turns-- 3.73's
almost 4 turns-- --- 3.90's
ect...

Because I dont believe you have 3.73's.. But that still doesnt make up 3-4 MPH your not getting. Try some octane booster or something, or do nothing if your happy with your car as it is.

< Message edited by PipsBlackStang -- 10/24/2005 9:30:28 AM >


_____________________________

2000 Mustang GT Vert- Vortech CAI 342.87hp 336.42tq Tuned by Tim @ MPH

(in reply to sicride)
Post #: 15
RE: 1/4 times - 10/24/2005 11:09:51 AM   
sk8erdudex



Posts: 399
Joined: 2/23/2005
From: SLC, Utah
Status: offline
I can tell you exactly what happened. It was the 3.73's They are great gears and will get you off the line quick. But when you don't have the horsepower to push them at high speeds your trap suffers. I lost 5-6 mph when I installed my 4.10's. Get yourself a PI swap.

_____________________________


97 Mustang GT BBK CAI, BBK H-Pipe straight piped catback, Cold Fusion Wet Kit 100 shot, Motive 4.10's
Stage 2 Dual Friction clutch

(in reply to PipsBlackStang)
Post #: 16
RE: 1/4 times - 10/24/2005 11:44:01 AM   
*Blk_96_Stang_GT*


Posts: 1093
Joined: 8/21/2005
From: Illinois
Status: offline
*Blk_96_Stang_GT*'s photo gallery
Wanna give me a grand? then ill get a PI Swap. Im gonna jack up my car today and see if it really does have 3:73's, and i think my tranny might be having problems as well because on some of the runs i would have to lay off the gas for it to shift into 2nd gear...prolly shoulda said that before.

_____________________________




PI Swap,BBK O/R H-Pipe,BBK CAI,Steeda UDP's,Flowmasters,Eibach Lowering Spring,3:73s

(in reply to sk8erdudex)
Post #: 17
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14535
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511780

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.