Computer Geek, how c@n I h3lp u? Posts: 14694
Joined: 8/23/2004 Status: offline
actually, stock vs stock, if there's 2 excellent drivers racing a 99+ GT and an srt4, the srt4 WILL beat the GT. you have a better chance of seeing an srt4 run a 13.9 than you do a 99+ GT. but most srt4 owners are kids that don't know how to drive and will only race from a roll, cause the srt4 can't get out of the hole, especially if you can't drive em.
Posts: 7155
Joined: 4/27/2004 From: I live in Canada, eh Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: codyss
A) I bought my Cobalt SS because my LS1's got boring
B) I would bet anyone here with a stock GT $100 that within 3 runs they wouldn't see 13's
C) My Cobalt SS bone stock runs 148mph, how fast is a GT? Without gears after 4th ends at about 120mph it takes another 20 minutes to even hit 140mph.
Back from the dead or not people need to stop being so ignorant and stupid. The average times for a 99-04 GT are not 13.8 to 14.1 more like 14.1-14.8 with a very good driver. And like I said before the 99-04 GT will easily beat a Cobalt SS of the line but I have more than enough top end to catch up. From a roll even a GT will look very bad.
I wouldn't own the cars that I have and then buy this one if it wasn't fast.............
it's not fast and you are weird. go away. You annoy us all.
Printable Version
RE: Cobalt SS vs. 2003 GT - 
. 
