Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News

Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > General Tech




Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2005, 01:21 AM   #1
Velvet Leopard
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 45
Default 2.3L must go

Hewwo, guys. I have a 1993 LX Notchback with the stock 2.3L 4 cylinder. I like this engine okee, but I want to pull it out and add a much more powerful (torque-wise) mill. I was thinking of adding in a 1972 351W pulled from a stout Galaxy. I have this engine and the mechanic had very recently rebiult it with new parts and blueprinted it with 1968 (or 1969 can't remember) stats. I here this mill has awesome torque numbers. Would this be an adequat mill or can I go better? Also, just to be curious and see what all I have to work with, what is the biggest (in physical dimensions) engine I can fit into my little PonyCat without doing awesomely major cutting and welding to the front end? I thank your time. =^.^=
__________________
"I am afriad we have awoken a sleeping giant." Said the Chevy to the Charger after getting smoked by the PonyCat.
Velvet Leopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Old 10-13-2005, 03:22 AM   #2
DR8907
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 876
Default RE: 2.3L must go

A 351 Windsor is more than adequate. Some people here have 408s... so you could always go bigger - but the 351W is a good choice. Also try posting in the 5.0 section.
__________________

RIP
DR8907 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005, 01:59 PM   #3
Tim37
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,908
Default RE: 2.3L must go

they make kits to put 460's in foxes but that 351 will do ya very nice. like Velvet Leopard said if ya want you can stroke it to a 408. the 72 block is a good block stronger than the latemodel 351's i am guessing it has 69 heads some consider them to be the best production windsor heads. i have seen some stout cars with similar set ups to what you are planning.
__________________
Quote:
ORIGINAL: MoparMan87

oh no... I just cut mikehawke with a knife.... and im not drunk...
If sex is a pain in the @$$ then your doing it wrong.
00 GT
97 GT
Tim37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2005, 10:35 PM   #4
Velvet Leopard
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 45
Default RE: 2.3L must go

Sweet. I found out the engine is the stock 351W from a 1971 Ford Gran Tourino. Not sure what the block number and head numbers are though. I do believe they are '69 heads though. It has a 2-barrel carb intake minus the carb.I may stroke it later, but now I just want tit to run in the car.
__________________
"I am afriad we have awoken a sleeping giant." Said the Chevy to the Charger after getting smoked by the PonyCat.
Velvet Leopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors









New Sponsors


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.