Posts: 810
Joined: 5/15/2005 From: Smithfield. RI Status: offline
O yes 590 horsepower...and just enough torque to make a lug to a quarter turn....looky here honda boy this is a MUSTANG forum that means the guys here want POWER! That means they want torque to EXCEED the horespower of the engine for nice low end torque and it's all well and good for them to debut a V10 super car but guess what?? domestics have been there and done that and there's no way that a V10 will make it to production model status. Go worship the H in some jap-in-the-box forum!
_____________________________
2001 GT - C&L 80 mm maf/ CAI kit, magnapacks, bullit pedals, pony floor mats, mustang letter inserts, mach 1 chin spoiler, mach 1 grill delete, 17x8 bullit wheels, SCT 93 Octane tune, 75 mm TB/Plenum, billet peices, white face gauges...ran 14.071!
O yes 590 horsepower...and just enough torque to make a lug to a quarter turn....looky here honda boy this is a MUSTANG forum that means the guys here want POWER! That means they want torque to EXCEED the horespower of the engine for nice low end torque and it's all well and good for them to debut a V10 super car but guess what?? domestics have been there and done that and there's no way that a V10 will make it to production model status. Go worship the H in some jap-in-the-box forum!
haha! Wow Mustangs make a wopping 42 ft lbs over its hp production... is that supposed to amaze me in the slightest? If Ford would get their heads out of their asses and start by throwing down at least a 350 ci engine, I'd be even more impressed. All Ford has ever cared about is making affordable to buy cars but don't give two ****s about quality of product in the slightest. Now, if they'd put some quality and at least try to over engineer a few of their products they might realize that the potential of these 281s far exceeds 305 naturally aspirated hp.
Listen here domestic e-thug, if you're not impressed with a 4.0L V8 making 590 hp then you really need to look up the definition of "POWER!".
And since you don't know what you're talking about, the 4.0 also made 383 ft lbs of torque. What did the 5.0 make? 300 ft lbs? really? hmmm... Yeah go stick your head in a pool until you're just about to pass out. Maybe a near death experience will tell you that even Mustang enthusiasts enjoy a little bit of variety on the road and don't care about what car manufacturer puts out decent power levels, as long as they put them out.
Lastly, if you don't believe an 8 page HONDA PRESS RELEASE about a production V10, then there truely is no help for you and your feeble mind.
Be gone with your close minded Domestics only attitude. You give true car enthusiasts a bad name.
Posts: 810
Joined: 5/15/2005 From: Smithfield. RI Status: offline
WOOOW man pop a mydol and come back when that time of the month has passed...u wanna talk about only caring aboutmaking affordable cars you drive a honda I suggest you shut the **** up about that. The fact that it's a press release makes a big diff to u? They didn't like swear away all their possesions on it...they can release whatever they want to the press it's just PR till it comes out...3 months later they could say well we decided not to do that be umm we're a bunch of blubbering vaginass and well burble blurd bla blooooo...seriously man 42 lbs/ft over is beter then -207 you idiot. O and about 350 ci may i remind you of the cobra R or the 5.4 litre available in the F150 today your an idiot
_____________________________
2001 GT - C&L 80 mm maf/ CAI kit, magnapacks, bullit pedals, pony floor mats, mustang letter inserts, mach 1 chin spoiler, mach 1 grill delete, 17x8 bullit wheels, SCT 93 Octane tune, 75 mm TB/Plenum, billet peices, white face gauges...ran 14.071!
WOOOW man pop a mydol and come back when that time of the month has passed...u wanna talk about only caring aboutmaking affordable cars you drive a honda I suggest you shut the **** up about that. The fact that it's a press release makes a big diff to u? They didn't like swear away all their possesions on it...they can release whatever they want to the press it's just PR till it comes out...3 months later they could say well we decided not to do that be umm we're a bunch of blubbering vaginass and well burble blurd bla blooooo...seriously man 42 lbs/ft over is beter then -207 you idiot. O and about 350 ci may i remind you of the cobra R or the 5.4 litre available in the F150 today your an idiot
blah blah blah. You're sitting here trying to debate me with speculative arguementative nonsense. First off, the 5.4 isn't even 350 ci, and the Corvette outproduced it two years later with the introduction of the 405 hp LS6. What happened to Fords 5.4 small block? ah yes, it was too good of an engine so it was downgraded to truck duty where it was tuned for torque, drivability and towing capacity. So please, don't start rambling about truck engines since it's completely inane to the topic at hand.
And yes, I know the 2000 Cobra R came with the 5.4 making 385/385. With a limited run of 300 units, 270 in public circulation and 13 of them have been wrecked, there's MAYBE 257 of them out there. Do you really think that makes a whole lot of difference with hundreds of thousands of 281s on the road? Seriously.
-207 ft lbs. That's brilliant, I've never seen someone try to insult a 1.6L like that. I mean, wow. Just wow. Who would have thought a small displacement engine designed for top end power wasn't going to make massive amounts of torque?!?!?
I just wish you had something to say that actually made any sense. It's hard to argue with a know-it-all attitude, because no matter how hard I try, it's like trying to educate a child with ADD.
Anyway, I don't care what torque production is on any engine. When you're dragging you spend maybe 5% of the time down in the torque band. After that it's all up to horsepower to keep you going. Like it or not, Honda already is a pretty good competitor to you and your badass Mustang thanks to an unbelievably large aftermarket support.
They Call Me TRex Posts: 8517
Joined: 1/19/2005 Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: justingt
O yes 590 horsepower...and just enough torque to make a lug to a quarter turn....looky here honda boy this is a MUSTANG forum that means the guys here want POWER! That means they want torque to EXCEED the horespower of the engine for nice low end torque and it's all well and good for them to debut a V10 super car but guess what?? domestics have been there and done that and there's no way that a V10 will make it to production model status. Go worship the H in some jap-in-the-box forum!
DOOD COME ON NOW!
You don't know Si at all.....I bet he knows more about mustangs than you do.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
Let me get this straight, you posted a link to a Honda pr about a new motor on a Mustang site, and you didn't expect to get **** talked/laughed at. Damn how dumb can you be? It's all good that Honda is supposedly going to make this, but I personally will believe it when I see it, and all of this supposed technology is going to make this car cost what? Let's see the underpowered new NSX is near $90k and runs 13's. A new Mustang is $25k and runs 13's. NSX = Rip-off.
If you get so god damn pussy-hurt about Mustang owners bashing your Hondas, then go the somewhere the **** else.
< Message edited by Fat Nick -- 7/23/2005 7:24:24 PM >
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: justingt
WOOOW man pop a mydol and come back when that time of the month has passed...u wanna talk about only caring aboutmaking affordable cars you drive a honda I suggest you shut the **** up about that. The fact that it's a press release makes a big diff to u? They didn't like swear away all their possesions on it...they can release whatever they want to the press it's just PR till it comes out...3 months later they could say well we decided not to do that be umm we're a bunch of blubbering vaginass and well burble blurd bla blooooo...seriously man 42 lbs/ft over is beter then -207 you idiot. O and about 350 ci may i remind you of the cobra R or the 5.4 litre available in the F150 today your an idiot
Finally someone on this ****ing site with some god damn balls to talk **** to Honda boy, everyone else sticks up for him and let's him ****ing teabag them like Lipton and suck him off when he's done.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: JonBeast
quote:
ORIGINAL: justingt
O yes 590 horsepower...and just enough torque to make a lug to a quarter turn....looky here honda boy this is a MUSTANG forum that means the guys here want POWER! That means they want torque to EXCEED the horespower of the engine for nice low end torque and it's all well and good for them to debut a V10 super car but guess what?? domestics have been there and done that and there's no way that a V10 will make it to production model status. Go worship the H in some jap-in-the-box forum!
DOOD COME ON NOW!
You don't know Si at all.....I bet he knows more about mustangs than you do.
Like your ****ing opinion matters. BTW, Honda-boy called, your late for your teabagging appointment.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
quote:
ORIGINAL: 04GTMustangRob
man, that was just too long to read. give us a quick synopsis.
Read my first post, I told you EXACTLY where to scroll to and read....
quote:
ORIGINAL: redass02gt
gimme a vette instead.
Why? So you can be like every other 60 year old man on the road?
Vette is real car, you can't handle it. Not to mention you can probably buy 3 for the price of the new NSX heap. **** a NSX, for that price, give me a GT-3.
Let me get this straight, you posted a link to a Honda pr about a new motor on a Mustang site, and you didn't expect to get **** talked/laughed at. Damn how dumb can you be? It's all good that Honda is supposedly going to make this, but I personally will believe it when I see it, and all of this supposed technology is going to make this car cost what? Let's see the underpowered new NSX is near $90k and runs 13's. A new Mustang is $25k and runs 13's. NSX = Rip-off.
If you get so god damn pussy-hurt about Mustang owners bashing your Hondas, then go the somewhere the **** else.
I posted a link to competition. I figured hey, these people on this board are pretty smart. They'd like to know the possibility of any competition they could have out on the streets. Let's post it up and see what they say. No surprise here, I get bashing and complete stupidity from people who only care about Mustangs.
It seems to me that you're the one who's butthurt that your precious slow ass 14 second V8 can't even compare to the C30 3.0V6 that's already in the NSX. But now that you have a car that would decimate it, you're going to sit here and childishly call names over an internet board?
The NSX isn't a 1/4 mile car. It's a track car, and will compete with the Corvette and Viper in all aspects. I love it when people think every car is built solely to get down the 1320 fast.
I guess buying an SRT10 for 80k isn't a rip off... I don't see why though, it's only a second quicker in the quarter and will turn the same lap times if not worse with it's wonderful 1500 lb engine weighing the nose down.
NSX = rip off if you're stupid enough to only realize one aspect of what automobiles are built for.
Lastly, all opinions matter. But they matter more if you're going to have something worthwhile to say. It seems all you want to do is talk about teabagging and all this high school nonsense.
Seriously now, do any of you really appreciate any car for what it's worth? Or are you only about that spiffy little 281 under the running horse? This brand loyalty nonsense gets old really fast, don't you think?
Posts: 810
Joined: 5/15/2005 From: Smithfield. RI Status: offline
quote:
I posted a link to competition. I figured hey, these people on this board are pretty smart. They'd like to know the possibility of any competition they could have out on the streets. Let's post it up and see what they say. No surprise here, I get bashing and complete stupidity from people who only care about Mustangs.
It seems to me that you're the one who's butthurt that your precious slow ass 14 second V8 can't even compare to the C30 3.0V6 that's already in the NSX. But now that you have a car that would decimate it, you're going to sit here and childishly call names over an internet board?
The NSX isn't a 1/4 mile car. It's a track car, and will compete with the Corvette and Viper in all aspects. I love it when people think every car is built solely to get down the 1320 fast.
I guess buying an SRT10 for 80k isn't a rip off... I don't see why though, it's only a second quicker in the quarter and will turn the same lap times if not worse with it's wonderful 1500 lb engine weighing the nose down.
NSX = rip off if you're stupid enough to only realize one aspect of what automobiles are built for.
Lastly, all opinions matter. But they matter more if you're going to have something worthwhile to say. It seems all you want to do is talk about teabagging and all this high school nonsense.
Seriously now, do any of you really appreciate any car for what it's worth? Or are you only about that spiffy little 281 under the running horse? This brand loyalty nonsense gets old really fast, don't you think?
This is a MUSTANG FORUM...if it were a general car forum your arguement would be valid but it isnt so its no....just give UP!
_____________________________
2001 GT - C&L 80 mm maf/ CAI kit, magnapacks, bullit pedals, pony floor mats, mustang letter inserts, mach 1 chin spoiler, mach 1 grill delete, 17x8 bullit wheels, SCT 93 Octane tune, 75 mm TB/Plenum, billet peices, white face gauges...ran 14.071!
wtf happened up there^^^, i clicked on dun dun dun cause i wanted to see something cool not too people, well, make that three people bitching about ****
i know it isnt easy to put up with other peoples opinions, but god damn, come on
_____________________________
Hopefully running by the weekend. Gonna run her good too!
Printable Version
*dun dun dun* - 
You have no idea just how many times I've heard that lame ass excuse. 
