439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
Why in the hell are you guys all over his nuts? WTF? Either way, I guess I'll start going on Honda websites bashing Hondas etc. when I don't even belong there. Of course, that's right they would all stick together and more than likely ban me from the site. Seems to be they should call this Honda forums seeing as there are as many of them as Mustangs on here. I have to say this has to be the only website I've been on in my life that has this kind of mentality in it's members.
It's called a forum to argue. This site is ridiculous.
< Message edited by Fat Nick -- 7/25/2005 6:44:53 PM >
Why in the hell are you guys all over his nuts? WTF? Either way, I guess I'll start going on Honda websites bashing Hondas etc. when I don't even belong there. Of course, that's right they would all stick together and more than likely ban me from the site. Seems to be they should call this Honda forums seeing as there are as many of them as Mustangs on here. I have to say this has to be the only website I've been on in my life that has this kind of mentality in it's members.
It's called a forum to argue. This site is ridiculous.
Head on over to honda-tech. Try to flame them and then shoot me a link. I'll love watching you get torn apart by the Honda and Domestic guys that sit around on that board.
I don't see what your problem is though... I know you don't care about Honda or Acura, so why did you even bother to comment with arguementative nonsense?
It just makes no sense. You come here, you bitch and complain because I made a thread about something other than a Ford and now you're up in arms that someone who doesn't have a Mustang right now is on a Mustang board.
Tell me, without swearing or namecalling why this is so important to you that NOTHING but Fords is EVER discussed on this board? Because if you're really THAT passionate about it, don't bother going into kills where Mustang OWNERS put up threads about Imports all the time.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
Well, your buddy Obsolite pm'ed me about you. I pm'ed him back. The last time I checked this is MUSTANG FORUMS, it's ok to talk about a Honda, but when one person disagrees with you, you start off dissing, Fords, Mustangs, and their owners, which I take personally. And yes, I feel as though you have no right to be here. You drive a Honda and you cause problems, it's not like I'm the first person that has lit into you.
There is plenty of other sites where, the main forum topic is the Ford Mustang and they have nowhere near the idiots and non-Mustang instigators this site has. If I wanted to talk to non-Mustang people then I wouldn't go to a Mustang site.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: doobs
cry?
Stfu, doobs the noobs, you haven't been here anywhere near long enough to know what you're talking about. So stay out of it before you look like an idiot.
Well, your buddy Obsolite pm'ed me about you. I pm'ed him back. The last time I checked this is MUSTANG FORUMS, it's ok to talk about a Honda, but when one person disagrees with you, you start off dissing, Fords, Mustangs, and their owners, which I take personally. And yes, I feel as though you have no right to be here. You drive a Honda and you cause problems, it's not like I'm the first person that has lit into you.
There is plenty of other sites where, the main forum topic is the Ford Mustang and they have nowhere near the idiots and non-Mustang instigators this site has. If I wanted to talk to non-Mustang people then I wouldn't go to a Mustang site.
Ok let's just set the record straight here. First. You got PM'd because YOU caused the problems. I simply posted a link and you started off with insulting a car company I enjoy learning about, YOU started insulting me, and then YOU started the rest of this nonsense which is why this thread is now three pages of you telling me you hate Hondas.
I have just as much right to be here as you do. The fact that you own the car this forum is for is simply irrelevant, I'm here to learn about the car. If you've actually paid attention to any of my posts within the tech sections, you would have noticed my asking LOT'S of questions about 4.6s and 5.0s. But all you seem to notice are what's in the Off topic, Rumors and Videos section. Some participant of this site you are.
I drive a Honda yes, but I'm not the one causing problems on this board. It's people like you who think they can sit here and talk trash like a teenager are the ones who are causing problems. You've been told to stop three times. YOUR posts have been edited, mine haven't. Does that not tell you anything, anything at all?
YOU are causing the problems. Hell, YOU just admitted that YOU started causing the problems.
quote:
it's not like I'm the first person that has lit into you.
Yes, People "lit" into me because I disagree with them. I am allowed to do that, as are you. **HOWEVER** I'm not saying you're now allowed to disagree with me.
I simply posted a link and you took it upon yourself to tell me what I've seen and dismissed hundreds of times now after being here for a year and a half. It's not my problem that you have no tolerance for other people, it's not my problem you have no tolerance for learning about other car manufcaturers and their past, present and future products. Most importantly here, it's not my problem that you have a biased opinion against a topic in a certain thread that you could have willfully left at any time.
Lets recap this. I post link. You insult. I take what you're doing to me and dish it right back at you, you get pissed because you can't take it. I laugh at you, you curse at me. Ob PMs you, you cry about it in public view further disrupting the point of the thread.
So, now you see why I'm getting a little annoyed with you causing problems and then trying to blame it on me.
If I've said this once, I've said it over and over... Get Over It.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
Look, your opinion means ****. Obviously you seem to cause problems, because yes, many others despise you, lit into you, argued with you, cussed at you, etc.
Seems to me, that your the first person I've really pissed off on here.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
quote:
ORIGINAL: justingt
WOOOW man pop a mydol and come back when that time of the month has passed...u wanna talk about only caring aboutmaking affordable cars you drive a honda I suggest you shut the **** up about that. The fact that it's a press release makes a big diff to u? They didn't like swear away all their possesions on it...they can release whatever they want to the press it's just PR till it comes out...3 months later they could say well we decided not to do that be umm we're a bunch of blubbering vaginass and well burble blurd bla blooooo...seriously man 42 lbs/ft over is beter then -207 you idiot. O and about 350 ci may i remind you of the cobra R or the 5.4 litre available in the F150 today your an idiot
blah blah blah. You're sitting here trying to debate me with speculative arguementative nonsense. First off, the 5.4 isn't even 350 ci, and the Corvette outproduced it two years later with the introduction of the 405 hp LS6. What happened to Fords 5.4 small block? ah yes, it was too good of an engine so it was downgraded to truck duty where it was tuned for torque, drivability and towing capacity. So please, don't start rambling about truck engines since it's completely inane to the topic at hand.
And yes, I know the 2000 Cobra R came with the 5.4 making 385/385. With a limited run of 300 units, 270 in public circulation and 13 of them have been wrecked, there's MAYBE 257 of them out there. Do you really think that makes a whole lot of difference with hundreds of thousands of 281s on the road? Seriously.
-207 ft lbs. That's brilliant, I've never seen someone try to insult a 1.6L like that. I mean, wow. Just wow. Who would have thought a small displacement engine designed for top end power wasn't going to make massive amounts of torque?!?!?
I just wish you had something to say that actually made any sense. It's hard to argue with a know-it-all attitude, because no matter how hard I try, it's like trying to educate a child with ADD.
Anyway, I don't care what torque production is on any engine. When you're dragging you spend maybe 5% of the time down in the torque band. After that it's all up to horsepower to keep you going. Like it or not, Honda already is a pretty good competitor to you and your badass Mustang thanks to an unbelievably large aftermarket support.
Look, your opinion means ****. Obviously you seem to cause problems, because yes, many others despise you, lit into you, argued with you, cussed at you, etc.
Seems to me, that your the first person I've really pissed off on here.
So that makes my count: 1
Where are you at?
EXACTLY.
Who cares? I don't care who you've pissed off or who I've pissed off. Fact is more than half the people on here will PM me with Import questions. Most people enjoy insight from a different point of view. Except what? Two biased people who can't seem to get the point they can leave threads they don't care about?
Answer my questions for a change. Maybe then we could have a decent intelligent conversation. Seems all you want to do is argue inane topics.
Just remember one thing; I don't snap back until I'm snapped at. If you don't like it, and "my opinion means ****" why should I care? The fact that I came in here and only laughed at 98LS1s comment and then returned to find another arguementative statement shows me that you really do just want to argue.
< Message edited by 2000Si -- 7/25/2005 7:36:13 PM >
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
I'm done with you. You're not worth my time. The only reason you're loved so much and the mods have to stick up for you, is because you're a top poster. It would make the site look bad if the top poster was banned.
haha! They told you to shutup because you helped to send this off topic. Hence why you were edited several times.
And the mods don't care about top posters being banned, they care about people with a sense of reality and knowledge who will stick around and ask/answer questions.
I think it's funny that you hate this board because people don't agree with everything you say. I get chopped on all the time, and I have biased people throw jabs at me all the time. But that's why I like this board, challenges are a good thing. I live up to it, but all you do is tell people to "STFU noob!"
I was done with this thread an entire page ago, but you took it upon yourself to keep it going without any provacation from me. It seems you're not as done as you think you are. Now you're just backstepping to save face. You don't come here to talk to Non-Mustang owners, yet here you are talking to me, over... and over again.
Now, go ahead and come back at me with some witty distasteful comment. It's become your legacy on this board, I mean.. after a year and a half you come out of the closet in the past three days and tell me you hate me... bottle things up much?
"< NSX successor > We are now focused on the development of a new model to succeed the NSX for a new era. We would like to debut a new super sports car equipped with a V10 engine in 3 to 4 years. Please look forward to seeing the NSX successor."
This is a statement of desire on the part of Honda, not even a statement of intent. So, that leaves some doubt as to whether or not this will ever come to pass. For 90% of the nation and 99% of us on this forum, this is something we'll never be able to afford, anyway! What, are you planning on trading your 2000Si in on one? That should leave you with payments of about $2,500 a month for 10 years, plus insurance.
The NSX is a nice car. But comparing it to what we drive? Uh, uh. The NSX is purpose built frame up to handle and go really fast. For the sticker, it had damned well better. For HALF that money, a trained monkey could buy a 2V Mustang and use the rest to buy mods. Then, with change still in his pocket, monkey boy stomps the p!ss out of the NSX in the 1/4.
Yeah, our Ford will never handle like the NSX, no matter what we do. But, we don't have to fill the tank with sake to have a good time, either.
This is the mustang forum, dude. If folks PM you with import questions, that's great. But you had to know that this would incite hard feelings, and yet you did it anyway. Congratulations.
< Message edited by 04BlueGT -- 7/25/2005 8:13:29 PM >
Christ, no I did not think this would incite anything. I'm not a mind reader, and I cannot tell what peoples intentions will be.
Anyway, I posted this because it is interesting information... and whatever Honda engineers set their minds to they accomplish. I wouldn't blow things off quite so easily. But thanks for the semi intelligent conversation.
I guess I missed the memo, to be fast you must have 350cuin engine
Actually, only 346!
Dood...honestly, is it worth all this? Who cares that Honda is coming out with a V10....he only attacked the quality of Ford...which is understandable...like I have room to talk...
You either have a huge import problem, or have been outran by an import in the close past. If you only want to know about Mustangs, where does that leave you when you line up with me? It's nice to know a little about everything.
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: 98LS1
quote:
ORIGINAL: Fat Nick
I guess I missed the memo, to be fast you must have 350cuin engine
Actually, only 346!
Dood...honestly, is it worth all this? Who cares that Honda is coming out with a V10....he only attacked the quality of Ford...which is understandable...like I have room to talk...
You either have a huge import problem, or have been outran by an import in the close past. If you only want to know about Mustangs, where does that leave you when you line up with me? It's nice to know a little about everything.
I'll give you that. The last import I lost to was a E46 M3 about 5-6 months ago, since then the only things I've raced were a couple C5 Vettes with some wins and losses.
I posted a link to competition. I figured hey, these people on this board are pretty smart. They'd like to know the possibility of any competition they could have out on the streets. Let's post it up and see what they say. No surprise here, I get bashing and complete stupidity from people who only care about Mustangs.
It seems to me that you're the one who's butthurt that your precious slow ass 14 second V8 can't even compare to the C30 3.0V6 that's already in the NSX. But now that you have a car that would decimate it, you're going to sit here and childishly call names over an internet board?
The NSX isn't a 1/4 mile car. It's a track car, and will compete with the Corvette and Viper in all aspects. I love it when people think every car is built solely to get down the 1320 fast.
I guess buying an SRT10 for 80k isn't a rip off... I don't see why though, it's only a second quicker in the quarter and will turn the same lap times if not worse with it's wonderful 1500 lb engine weighing the nose down.
NSX = rip off if you're stupid enough to only realize one aspect of what automobiles are built for.
Lastly, all opinions matter. But they matter more if you're going to have something worthwhile to say. It seems all you want to do is talk about teabagging and all this high school nonsense.
Seriously now, do any of you really appreciate any car for what it's worth? Or are you only about that spiffy little 281 under the running horse? This brand loyalty nonsense gets old really fast, don't you think?
This is a MUSTANG FORUM...if it were a general car forum your arguement would be valid but it isnt so its no....just give UP!
JustinGT's sig: 01 performance red mustang deluxe gt 04 crimson red mustang gt premium convertible 01 white excursion 26 cylinders of domestic pride
Dude, 8 x 3 does not equal 26....it's 24....24 cylinders of domestic stupidity...
Unless, of course, you got the ultra rare 01 White Excursion CobraX with the V10.....
439whp=12.80s? Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003 From: Virginia Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: civicious
quote:
ORIGINAL: justingt
quote:
I posted a link to competition. I figured hey, these people on this board are pretty smart. They'd like to know the possibility of any competition they could have out on the streets. Let's post it up and see what they say. No surprise here, I get bashing and complete stupidity from people who only care about Mustangs.
It seems to me that you're the one who's butthurt that your precious slow ass 14 second V8 can't even compare to the C30 3.0V6 that's already in the NSX. But now that you have a car that would decimate it, you're going to sit here and childishly call names over an internet board?
The NSX isn't a 1/4 mile car. It's a track car, and will compete with the Corvette and Viper in all aspects. I love it when people think every car is built solely to get down the 1320 fast.
I guess buying an SRT10 for 80k isn't a rip off... I don't see why though, it's only a second quicker in the quarter and will turn the same lap times if not worse with it's wonderful 1500 lb engine weighing the nose down.
NSX = rip off if you're stupid enough to only realize one aspect of what automobiles are built for.
Lastly, all opinions matter. But they matter more if you're going to have something worthwhile to say. It seems all you want to do is talk about teabagging and all this high school nonsense.
Seriously now, do any of you really appreciate any car for what it's worth? Or are you only about that spiffy little 281 under the running horse? This brand loyalty nonsense gets old really fast, don't you think?
This is a MUSTANG FORUM...if it were a general car forum your arguement would be valid but it isnt so its no....just give UP!
JustinGT's sig: 01 performance red mustang deluxe gt 04 crimson red mustang gt premium convertible 01 white excursion 26 cylinders of domestic pride
Dude, 8 x 3 does not equal 26....it's 24....24 cylinders of domestic stupidity...
Unless, of course, you got the ultra rare 01 White Excursion CobraX with the V10.....
Dumb noob, why are you here? Most Excursions are V10's. The 5.4 V8 came in some but not many. And the other V8 being either the 7.3 or 6.0 turbo-diesel is usually a $4-5k option so most don't have that as well.
After previously working at a Ford dealership, about 65% of Excursions are V10 equipped the others are V8 or Diesel.
Printable Version
RE: *dun dun dun* - 
