Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: *dun dun dun*

  Printable Version
Mustang Forum >> General Mustang Forums >> Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion >> RE: *dun dun dun* Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/23/2005 11:38:02 PM   
Fat Nick

 

439whp=12.80s?
Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003
From: Virginia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fat Nick

Let me get this straight, you posted a link to a Honda pr about a new motor on a Mustang site, and you didn't expect to get **** talked/laughed at. Damn how dumb can you be? It's all good that Honda is supposedly going to make this, but I personally will believe it when I see it, and all of this supposed technology is going to make this car cost what? Let's see the underpowered new NSX is near $90k and runs 13's. A new Mustang is $25k and runs 13's. NSX = Rip-off.

If you get so god damn pussy-hurt about Mustang owners bashing your Hondas, then go the somewhere the **** else.


I posted a link to competition. I figured hey, these people on this board are pretty smart. They'd like to know the possibility of any competition they could have out on the streets. Let's post it up and see what they say. No surprise here, I get bashing and complete stupidity from people who only care about Mustangs.

It seems to me that you're the one who's butthurt that your precious slow ass 14 second V8 can't even compare to the C30 3.0V6 that's already in the NSX. But now that you have a car that would decimate it, you're going to sit here and childishly call names over an internet board?

The NSX isn't a 1/4 mile car. It's a track car, and will compete with the Corvette and Viper in all aspects. I love it when people think every car is built solely to get down the 1320 fast.

I guess buying an SRT10 for 80k isn't a rip off... I don't see why though, it's only a second quicker in the quarter and will turn the same lap times if not worse with it's wonderful 1500 lb engine weighing the nose down.

NSX = rip off if you're stupid enough to only realize one aspect of what automobiles are built for.

Lastly, all opinions matter. But they matter more if you're going to have something worthwhile to say. It seems all you want to do is talk about teabagging and all this high school nonsense.

Seriously now, do any of you really appreciate any car for what it's worth? Or are you only about that spiffy little 281 under the running horse? This brand loyalty nonsense gets old really fast, don't you think?



Viper is much more superior car to the NSX, more power and not mention better times. A NSX is a ****ing rip-off no matter how the **** you look at it. Brand loyalty, all you seem to care about is your little "H' or "A" on the hood.

My opinion is this: Hondas and Acuras ****ing suck dick and the owners of them can suck my ****ing dick as well and if you don't like it **** off. Where is your little Honda forums? You are one of the many reasons this site has gone down hill in the past few years.

You still seem pussy-hurt, I guess Jon didn't make his teabagging appt., that's too bad, oh well you have 1/2 of the rest this forum hanging all over your nuts so I guess you will be alright.

_____________________________

05 GTO M6: A few mods :)
439/421

(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 21
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/23/2005 11:55:40 PM   
Obsol3te



Posts: 5819
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Obsol3te's photo gallery
Nick of Fat, bring it down a notch?
Ok?

As for the link, not really enough info for me to care enough about.
They just stated they'll be making a car stouting a honda v10 for their new supercar.


_____________________________

R331 Stroker @ 8.5:1

313RWHP 339RWTQ (N/A)
423RWHP 518RWTQ (N20)

(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 22
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 12:23:37 AM   
Guest

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fat Nick

Viper is much more superior car to the NSX, more power and not mention better times. A NSX is a ****ing rip-off no matter how the **** you look at it. Brand loyalty, all you seem to care about is your little "H' or "A" on the hood.

My opinion is this: Hondas and Acuras ****ing suck dick and the owners of them can suck my ****ing dick as well and if you don't like it **** off. Where is your little Honda forums? You are one of the many reasons this site has gone down hill in the past few years.

You still seem pussy-hurt, I guess Jon didn't make his teabagging appt., that's too bad, oh well you have 1/2 of the rest this forum hanging all over your nuts so I guess you will be alright.


Wow. You're straying from the topic so you can try to personally insult me. We could have been having an intelligent conversation but you've taken it upon yourself to sit here and throw excuses at me that I've heard and laughed at for the past year and a half while being on this board. This site didn't go downhill because I came here, this site has gone downhill because of people who sit here and whine about how this is a mustang forum and they don't like other cars and Mustangs rule blah blah blah. Opinions are one thing but when you turn this into two pages of telling me I'm pussy hurt or how you don't care yet continue to come back, it ruins the thread and it ruins the fun atmosphere this place USED to have before people like yourself showed up.

One last thing; If I'm brand loyal to H or A... why have I owned a Ford product? and more importantly, why the hell would I even be on this board in the first place?

Get over it already. I showed some information to people, do I care if you think the NSX is a waste of money? nope. Do I care what board I'm on? nope.

_____________________________


(in reply to Fat Nick)
  Post #: 23
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 12:29:30 AM   
Obsol3te



Posts: 5819
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Obsol3te's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fat Nick

Viper is much more superior car to the NSX, more power and not mention better times. A NSX is a ****ing rip-off no matter how the **** you look at it. Brand loyalty, all you seem to care about is your little "H' or "A" on the hood.

My opinion is this: Hondas and Acuras ****ing suck dick and the owners of them can suck my ****ing dick as well and if you don't like it **** off. Where is your little Honda forums? You are one of the many reasons this site has gone down hill in the past few years.

You still seem pussy-hurt, I guess Jon didn't make his teabagging appt., that's too bad, oh well you have 1/2 of the rest this forum hanging all over your nuts so I guess you will be alright.


Wow. You're straying from the topic so you can try to personally insult me. We could have been having an intelligent conversation but you've taken it upon yourself to sit here and throw excuses at me that I've heard and laughed at for the past year and a half while being on this board. This site didn't go downhill because I came here, this site has gone downhill because of people who sit here and whine about how this is a mustang forum and they don't like other cars and Mustangs rule blah blah blah. Opinions are one thing but when you turn this into two pages of telling me I'm pussy hurt or how you don't care yet continue to come back, it ruins the thread and it ruins the fun atmosphere this place USED to have before people like yourself showed up.

One last thing; If I'm brand loyal to H or A... why have I owned a Ford product? and more importantly, why the hell would I even be on this board in the first place?

Get over it already. I showed some information to people, do I care if you think the NSX is a waste of money? nope. Do I care what board I'm on? nope.


Becuase your friend owned one and he was all stuck-up and cocky and you wanted to know why?
Or something along those lines

_____________________________

R331 Stroker @ 8.5:1

313RWHP 339RWTQ (N/A)
423RWHP 518RWTQ (N20)

(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 24
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 12:39:24 AM   
Guest
haha! my friend sold his long before I signed up. I wanted to learn about them. So I showed up here.

_____________________________


(in reply to Obsol3te)
  Post #: 25
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 1:29:52 AM   
ponytx


Posts: 168
Joined: 4/29/2005
Status: offline
hmmm...I figured Honda would be working on a V2....j/k

(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 26
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 1:08:40 PM   
Fat Nick

 

439whp=12.80s?
Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Look damnit, I don't like you, and yes you like many of the other newbies on this site have ruined it. The main reason I come on here is to sell stuff. That is about it. You want to learn about Ford's and yet you bash them. Then you get mad when I'm on a Mustang forum bashing a overpriced Acura. Get the **** over it.

If I wanted to talk about a Honda I would go to a Honda forum, not a Mustang forum. I come here to talk about Mustangs, now you posted something about a Honda which is okay I guess, but when you start talking **** about Ford's I'm not going to put up with it. Your not welcome here. This site is lucky I'm not a mod, it would have about 1/2 the members it has now.

_____________________________

05 GTO M6: A few mods :)
439/421

(in reply to ponytx)
Post #: 27
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 1:16:10 PM   
Guest
Hey FatNick, I am not a n00b. Fact is you've been here 16 days longer than I have. whoopty for you. Frankly, I could care less if you liked me or not. I'm not on here to make friends. I'm on here to learn and pass on information that is even remotely interesting to read about. If you want to live your life in ignorance, far be it from me to stop it. But I didn't make you stay in this thread so you could throw childish insults and stupidity about like you own the place.

It's rather pathetic that you hate someone you simply don't know. If you didn't want to read about honda's you could have opened the link, closed it and hit back to leave the thread. But nope, you took it upon yourself to tell me first that a car is a POS, that you hate me, and that you don't care about Hondas. Like I care in the slightest.

Why'd you stick with the thread?

Anyway, I didn't make fun of Mustangs... I made fun of Ford and their pathetic engineering skills because they've sat there and let their nameplate get embarrassed over and over by the bowtie in power, torque, and speed. So now you're going to get mad at ME because I point out the obvious just like EVERY OTHER person in here who gets it and KNOWS that it's correct? Get over yourself already. You'll never become a moderator because after this display of 12 year old name calling and whiney crybaby crap everyone who reads this knows you're not mature enough to care for a plant sitting in your bedroom.

< Message edited by 2000Si -- 7/24/2005 1:17:10 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Fat Nick)
  Post #: 28
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 5:42:33 PM   
2000GT4.6


Team MF Member #2046
Posts: 12516
Joined: 1/22/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
2000GT4.6's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si


quote:

ORIGINAL: justingt

O yes 590 horsepower...and just enough torque to make a lug to a quarter turn....looky here honda boy this is a MUSTANG forum that means the guys here want POWER! That means they want torque to EXCEED the horespower of the engine for nice low end torque and it's all well and good for them to debut a V10 super car but guess what?? domestics have been there and done that and there's no way that a V10 will make it to production model status. Go worship the H in some jap-in-the-box forum!


haha! Wow Mustangs make a wopping 42 ft lbs over its hp production... is that supposed to amaze me in the slightest? If Ford would get their heads out of their asses and start by throwing down at least a 350 ci engine, I'd be even more impressed. All Ford has ever cared about is making affordable to buy cars but don't give two ****s about quality of product in the slightest. Now, if they'd put some quality and at least try to over engineer a few of their products they might realize that the potential of these 281s far exceeds 305 naturally aspirated hp.

Listen here domestic e-thug, if you're not impressed with a 4.0L V8 making 590 hp then you really need to look up the definition of "POWER!".

And since you don't know what you're talking about, the 4.0 also made 383 ft lbs of torque. What did the 5.0 make? 300 ft lbs? really? hmmm... Yeah go stick your head in a pool until you're just about to pass out. Maybe a near death experience will tell you that even Mustang enthusiasts enjoy a little bit of variety on the road and don't care about what car manufacturer puts out decent power levels, as long as they put them out.

Lastly, if you don't believe an 8 page HONDA PRESS RELEASE about a production V10, then there truely is no help for you and your feeble mind.

Be gone with your close minded Domestics only attitude. You give true car enthusiasts a bad name.


Im not saying that i agree with HIM in the slightest, but I do have a thing or two to say about "Ford Quality". Ford is absolutly insane about quailty. I work EVERYDAY (well at least 6 out of 7) at a factory that is a supplier to Ford. Ford is a total pain in the ASS to work for. I have seen things been rejected on a 20K car because the paint was scratched in a area you CAN'T SEE with the car completely assembled.

Nothing is allowed to pass, every part has to be perfect. That explains part scrap rate in the 50 percentile!

I can honestly say the only people that don't bitch constantly are Mitsubishi. They are not QUITE as bad about small visual quality problems (espcially one you cannot see)

BTW about the last "bowtie" comment. Hello, Ford GT anyone?? How about the 03-04 cobra??? And I hate to tell ya what the results are when you race a Iroc Camaro and a Foxbody, but they don't end up with the 'roc winning.

So ford introduced a competely NEW line of engines, and lagged behind. But they know that power doesn't sell, and they new that something down the line was gonna happen like the new 3V motor. The 4.6 has been in "performance development' for only 9 years, GM has had over 40 to perfect the near 350 CI pushrod engine.

In just nine years they have developed 320 HP out of a N/A 4.6 (dohc), they have upped the horsepower in the "Cheap" V8 mustang over 75HP (probably more, it is just so purposely detuned. See tune only dynos making 300+ RWHP), made close to 400 RWHP with a factory supercharged 4.6L, the list goes on and on. Modular engine performance is only going one way... up.

BTW, yes I know the Vette is making 400 RWHP N/A. But the mustang was never ment to compete with the vette. I don't want the mustang to compete with the vette. I like being able to AFFORD to buy the dammed thing (and not have to buy a 20 year old one).

< Message edited by 2000GT4.6 -- 7/24/2005 5:49:50 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 29
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/24/2005 7:08:05 PM   
Fat Nick

 

439whp=12.80s?
Posts: 812
Joined: 10/16/2003
From: Virginia
Status: offline
I Ovals of Blue!

ObsoEdit: Nick, settle down. I've warned you once already. All you're doing is trying to start a fight. STOP

< Message edited by Obsol3te -- 7/24/2005 7:19:44 PM >


_____________________________

05 GTO M6: A few mods :)
439/421

(in reply to 2000GT4.6)
Post #: 30
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 2:12:20 AM   
doobs


Posts: 1386
Joined: 5/1/2005
Status: offline
doobs's photo gallery
2000 just don't even respond to this thread.. people are so uptight about a little thing such as putting something about hondas new prototype engine on this site...if you came to this site to learn just about mustangs then don't click on the links that have to deal with other cars. jesus im sick of this brand loyalty shizat
quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

Hey FatNick, I am not a n00b. Fact is you've been here 16 days longer than I have. whoopty for you. Frankly, I could care less if you liked me or not. I'm not on here to make friends. I'm on here to learn and pass on information that is even remotely interesting to read about. If you want to live your life in ignorance, far be it from me to stop it. But I didn't make you stay in this thread so you could throw childish insults and stupidity about like you own the place.

It's rather pathetic that you hate someone you simply don't know. If you didn't want to read about honda's you could have opened the link, closed it and hit back to leave the thread. But nope, you took it upon yourself to tell me first that a car is a POS, that you hate me, and that you don't care about Hondas. Like I care in the slightest.

Why'd you stick with the thread?

Anyway, I didn't make fun of Mustangs... I made fun of Ford and their pathetic engineering skills because they've sat there and let their nameplate get embarrassed over and over by the bowtie in power, torque, and speed. So now you're going to get mad at ME because I point out the obvious just like EVERY OTHER person in here who gets it and KNOWS that it's correct? Get over yourself already. You'll never become a moderator because after this display of 12 year old name calling and whiney crybaby crap everyone who reads this knows you're not mature enough to care for a plant sitting in your bedroom.



_____________________________

05' GT Vert
BorlaStingers
JLTII w/ Brenspeed93 tune
255/40 KDW2 on 18" 06+black bullitts
GT500 spoiler
Painted blackout

(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 31
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 9:16:53 AM   
98LS1


Posts: 7041
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery
I bleed Ford blue.

_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to doobs)
Post #: 32
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 12:05:03 PM   
99saleen351r



Posts: 1899
Joined: 1/1/2005
From: Assachusetts
Status: offline
99saleen351r's photo gallery
Why bother responding if you hate it so much?????If you didnt like what he posted move on!!!!I found it quite interesting but i do agree 2000 can be alittle hostile every now and then,but just cause its not a stang doesnt mean it sucks.I think the NSX needs a new engine cause the one now is slow as ****.You can talk of other things on this forum you know

_____________________________


99 Saleen 351r,Vortech S,4k, 565rwh 557.7trq. Msd,O/F X,power pipe,48 pnd inj,Forged motor,twisted wedge heads, fuel system,275 pulley,Snow methanol

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 33
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 2:04:00 PM   
doobs


Posts: 1386
Joined: 5/1/2005
Status: offline
doobs's photo gallery
exactly

_____________________________

05' GT Vert
BorlaStingers
JLTII w/ Brenspeed93 tune
255/40 KDW2 on 18" 06+black bullitts
GT500 spoiler
Painted blackout

(in reply to 99saleen351r)
Post #: 34
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 2:14:27 PM   
redass02gt



Posts: 7040
Joined: 4/21/2005
Status: offline
fat nick is correct, sir!
stupid hondas.
the nsx is way overpriced, and I wish I had a c6, c5, c4 or any other vette, just like the 60 year olds, except I'd get tickets in mine. 2000si is just here to mess wiht our minds, like al queda.

_____________________________

Pitchforks and torches are the answers to all of our nation's problems. KOBE4MVP

(in reply to doobs)
Post #: 35
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 5:48:22 PM   
72MachOne99GT


Posts: 5554
Joined: 12/17/2004
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Status: online
72MachOne99GT's photo gallery
how many people have to say shut the hell up about this crap before you get the point redass?

god, its like a bunch of freaking sixth grade girls on this site...

read the post/link,
give it some thought
then respond

how difficult is that?

_____________________________

Hopefully running by the weekend.
Gonna run her good too!

(in reply to redass02gt)
Post #: 36
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 6:05:29 PM   
redass02gt



Posts: 7040
Joined: 4/21/2005
Status: offline
seventh grade, jerk.

_____________________________

Pitchforks and torches are the answers to all of our nation's problems. KOBE4MVP

(in reply to 72MachOne99GT)
Post #: 37
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 6:17:11 PM   
72MachOne99GT


Posts: 5554
Joined: 12/17/2004
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Status: online
72MachOne99GT's photo gallery
i wasnt tryign to be a jerk, (and i didnt mean to just use your name, i just didnt list the other ones) im just saying that its ridiculas the things there are arguments over

for gods sake its a CONCEPT or a RUMOR and sometimes these things come true

didnt mean to be dick like
just trying to make a point

_____________________________

Hopefully running by the weekend.
Gonna run her good too!

(in reply to redass02gt)
Post #: 38
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 6:23:30 PM   
redass02gt



Posts: 7040
Joined: 4/21/2005
Status: offline
isn't "forum" internet language for "argument place"?? cause the only difference between an argument and a discussion is that in an discussion everyone owns a stang and in an argument one guy owns a honda and the others own stangs.

_____________________________

Pitchforks and torches are the answers to all of our nation's problems. KOBE4MVP

(in reply to 72MachOne99GT)
Post #: 39
RE: *dun dun dun* - 7/25/2005 6:28:21 PM   
Guest

quote:

ORIGINAL: 98LS1

I bleed Ford blue.




_____________________________


(in reply to 98LS1)
  Post #: 40
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang >> General Mustang Forums >> Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17917
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14525
addermk213981
ride of the 13707
hotrods_n_bo13323
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211977
1slo8511741

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.