haha! I love how you post a Saleen biased web page, where as I posted a comparo from a third party test. They don't even show half the supercars out there.
The 05 Saleen takes the 2003 Koenigsegg by a whopping .1 second in the quarter now... with an extra 95 horses now.
_____________________________
92 honda accord, 1.5L twin turbo @ 18# 100 shot Sony Cam Panasonic heads Yamaha Intake AEM computer Kumho 285/60/14 front 215/50/14 rear 385 at the wheels 19.23 1/4 @ 67.0
haha! I love how you post a Saleen biased web page, where as I posted a comparo from a third party test. They don't even show half the supercars out there.
The 05 Saleen takes the 2003 Koenigsegg by a whopping .1 second in the quarter now... with an extra 95 horses now.
Sorry but your wrong again. The Enzo WAS the fastest car produced up to 2004. Do some research and fine some facts. Not just your wrong opinion.
what the hell is my opinion?! What did I state that was my opinion? I looked at all three links, two of which I provided. The Saleen site said it ran .1 second faster than the koenigsegg. wow what a title! it's .1 seconds faster w00000.... God you're a moron, I'm basing this off the websites with the times and somehow it's still my opinion?
Besides that I never said the koenegsegg is faster than the enzo, I just said that the Saleen S7 IS NOT THE FASTEST PRODUCTION CAR BUILT. Jesus, stop putting words into my mouth.
< Message edited by 2000Si -- 6/5/2005 12:05:34 AM >
haha! I love how you post a Saleen biased web page, where as I posted a comparo from a third party test. They don't even show half the supercars out there.
The 05 Saleen takes the 2003 Koenigsegg by a whopping .1 second in the quarter now... with an extra 95 horses now.
Sorry but your wrong again. The Enzo WAS the fastest car produced up to 2004. Do some research and fine some facts. Not just your wrong opinion.
what the hell is my opinion?! What did I state that was my opinion? I looked at all three links, two of which I provided. The Saleen site said it ran .1 second faster than the koenigsegg. wow what a title! it's .1 seconds faster w00000.... God you're a moron, I'm basing this off the websites with the times and somehow it's still my opinion?
Besides that I never said the koenegsegg is faster than the enzo, I just said that the Saleen S7 IS NOT THE FASTEST PRODUCTION CAR BUILT. Jesus, stop putting words into my mouth.
Well your wrong. You provide a link to a 2 year old car. Duhhhhhhhhh. The car now has 200HP MORE this year, therefore its faster. So yes, its the fastest production car ever built on this entire planet ever in the history of cars. Show me a faster car or just shut the flock up.
_____________________________
Offical member #5 of Joe99es is a F***ing Tool club
haha! I love how you post a Saleen biased web page, where as I posted a comparo from a third party test. They don't even show half the supercars out there.
The 05 Saleen takes the 2003 Koenigsegg by a whopping .1 second in the quarter now... with an extra 95 horses now.
Sorry but your wrong again. The Enzo WAS the fastest car produced up to 2004. Do some research and fine some facts. Not just your wrong opinion.
what the hell is my opinion?! What did I state that was my opinion? I looked at all three links, two of which I provided. The Saleen site said it ran .1 second faster than the koenigsegg. wow what a title! it's .1 seconds faster w00000.... God you're a moron, I'm basing this off the websites with the times and somehow it's still my opinion?
Besides that I never said the koenegsegg is faster than the enzo, I just said that the Saleen S7 IS NOT THE FASTEST PRODUCTION CAR BUILT. Jesus, stop putting words into my mouth.
Well you never said the koenegsegg is faster than the Enzo? Ok. So you say the Enzo is faster then, right? Good. Becasue the Saleen is faster than the Enzo. So haaaaahaaaaaaaaaaa
_____________________________
Offical member #5 of Joe99es is a F***ing Tool club
Holy **** dude, 2000si knows his **** dude, so back off, youre just posting conjecture, it says right on the site from the link YOU posted, and i quote: "One of the fastest production engines on the market" "ONE", not "THE" got it, dude, i hate "RICERS" as you call it just as much as you do but dont go calling 2000si a TOOL or ricer, he knows his **** and backs it up with articles and links of proof, so back off. just an aside, Joe, shut up, youre still a ****ing moron.
quote:
ORIGINAL: tomabram
quote:
ORIGINAL: Joe99es
What are you talking about
2005 Saleen S7
1) Best Handling? -- NO 2) Highest Top Speed -- NO 3) Fastest Quarter Mile -- NO
WTF are you talking about
You really are dumb. Saleen S7 10.7 1/4 mile Yes, fastest car EVER made. Show me a faster stock production car. ricer tool boy.
You do realize that you're getting mad at me because the Saleen is only .1 second faster than the Koenigsegg?
Is that really something to brag about? A race that close would come down to driver skill, meaning it's disputable. But still, I've yet to see any real proof behind that time besides the time printed on SALEENS WEBSITE.
*cough* biased
Seriously, get over it already. Your ugly ass S7 is damn near EVEN with the koenigsegg. whoopty do.
Holy **** dude, 2000si knows his **** dude, so back off, youre just posting conjecture, it says right on the site from the link YOU posted, and i quote: "One of the fastest production engines on the market" "ONE", not "THE" got it, dude, i hate "RICERS" as you call it just as much as you do but dont go calling 2000si a TOOL or ricer, he knows his **** and backs it up with articles and links of proof, so back off. just an aside, Joe, shut up, youre still a ****ing moron.
quote:
ORIGINAL: tomabram
quote:
ORIGINAL: Joe99es
What are you talking about
2005 Saleen S7
1) Best Handling? -- NO 2) Highest Top Speed -- NO 3) Fastest Quarter Mile -- NO
WTF are you talking about
You really are dumb. Saleen S7 10.7 1/4 mile Yes, fastest car EVER made. Show me a faster stock production car. ricer tool boy.
well thats correct. the car is not the fastest, its the quickest. Thats the arguement. Fastest is top speed, quick is 1/4 mile which the Saleen clearly is #1. So go back to where you came from. And like I said before, show me a quicker 1/4 mile stock production car. I provided proof. Until you show yours, this topic is CLOSED.
_____________________________
Offical member #5 of Joe99es is a F***ing Tool club
dude jesus christ, get a ****ing life .. buy a viper then send it to hennessey and get the twin turbo setup and youll run 8's all day and be street legal as any , or buy a vette and send it to lingenfelter and youll get zero to sixty in 1.8 seconds, and be a helluva lot cheaper then any saleen s7
You do realize that you're getting mad at me because the Saleen is only .1 second faster than the Koenigsegg?
Is that really something to brag about? A race that close would come down to driver skill, meaning it's disputable. But still, I've yet to see any real proof behind that time besides the time printed on SALEENS WEBSITE.
*cough* biased
Seriously, get over it already. Your ugly ass S7 is damn near EVEN with the koenigsegg. whoopty do.
faster is faster. dont matter if its .00000000000001 sec or 2 days. your WRONG. admit it like a man. No hard feelings.
_____________________________
Offical member #5 of Joe99es is a F***ing Tool club
dude jesus christ, get a ****ing life .. buy a viper then send it to hennessey and get the twin turbo setup and youll run 8's all day and be street legal as any , or buy a vette and send it to lingenfelter and youll get zero to sixty in 1.8 seconds, and be a helluva lot cheaper then any saleen s7
dont change the subject because you guys (or kids) are wrong. Take the beating like a man (or kid in your case).
_____________________________
Offical member #5 of Joe99es is a F***ing Tool club
I'm not going to admit being wrong to .1 second when;
a. the time ran comes down to the driver behind the wheel. b. the proof (and I use that term loosely) is debatable.
I've already stated my reasons why, but you seem to think that .1 second REALLY makes it so veeeeery much faster. I'm done with this, anything you have to say after this post just shows you like to argue just to argue.
I'm not going to admit being wrong to .1 second when;
a. the time ran comes down to the driver behind the wheel. b. the proof (and I use that term loosely) is debatable.
I've already stated my reasons why, but you seem to think that .1 second REALLY makes it so veeeeery much faster. I'm done with this, anything you have to say after this post just shows you like to argue just to argue.
Still argue with written proof. No its not much faster but bottom line is that IT IS FASTER.
_____________________________
Offical member #5 of Joe99es is a F***ing Tool club
he was in on who bangs your mom next tonight also? Damn, thats like 100 dudes already.
quote:
ORIGINAL: tomabram
quote:
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
Your lack of reading comprehension astounds me.
Really, do you even think before you type?
Your lack of brain knowledge astounds me. I guess whoever crosses the finish line last WINS. Grow up loser.
haha you tell me to grow up with a post right above it that has a mom joke in it? wow.
Like I said, you believe you're right but you don't seem to want to listen to reason. There's just no getting through to you.
Now if you could show me an unbiased time slip of the S7 actually running </= 10.7, I'd concede. But so far you haven't proved anything except that the koenigsegg and S7 are basically even since times that close come down to the driver. Even being someone with limited intelligence and a big ego, you surely can admit that .1 isn't that big of a difference and can be lost by a simple misshift or a bad launch.
Pay special attention to the spot I bolded, and actually try to do it instead of coming back with "your mom" or "you're a stupid head poopy pants" type response.
Printable Version
RE: Saleen s7 - 
