Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: Parish vs Eclipse

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Other >> Mustang Videos >> RE: Parish vs Eclipse Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 4:04:16 PM   
Derf00

 

Posts: 5470
Joined: 2/22/2005
Status: offline
well my S/C TT Yugo with go-fast stickers and screaming mach 1 paint will beat all of you.

(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 21
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 4:56:12 PM   
whiteyford0212


Posts: 272
Joined: 2/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joe99es


quote:

ORIGINAL: whiteyford0212

cheap small ford motors huh?...so why is it that a viper powered 04 ram only runs .3 faster in the 1/4 than an 04 lightning...chip and pulley swap, its over


Your comparing a stock truck, which is heavier then a lightning.. vs a modified lightning? Nice comparison, if you want a real comparison, compare the top of the line mustang VS the 05 viper which runs 11.5 - 11.7 in the quartermile stock



YOU MAKE ABSOLUTLEY NO SENSE AT ALL, PLEASE SHUT OFF YUR COMPUTER
STOCK FOR STOCK ITS ONLY .3 TENTHS QUICKER, PRETTY IMPRESSIVE
SO NOW COMPARE A MUSTANG TO A VIPER, RIIIIIIGHT


_____________________________

cobra intake, gt40 heads, e-cam w/ 1.7rr's, 3.73's, etc..


(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 22
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 7:02:48 PM   
sickspeedgt


Posts: 752
Joined: 2/16/2005
Status: offline
sickspeedgt's photo gallery
the eclipse and viper might run close quarter times (i find it hard to believe, but i don't know anything about mitsu's) but i'd be 500 bucks that after the 1/4 the viper is raping the he!! out of that eclipse, no way it could keep up. the eclipse probably tops out around 135ish i know that viper could do 150 easy

_____________________________




(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 23
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 7:22:48 PM   
pearlsport

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 5/8/2005
Status: offline
you're right you don't know anything about the mitsubishis ;)

(in reply to sickspeedgt)
Post #: 24
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 7:40:00 PM   
Joe99es

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
The viper is a 190 something mph car

(in reply to pearlsport)
Post #: 25
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 7:47:36 PM   
Joe99es

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
you say chip and pulley swap its all over... well modify the ram with the same amount of cash also, and it'll still come out first.. its not really fair saying that a modified something will beat a stock something

I went to the track last night for wednesdays street night and there was a silver 04 lightning there, honestly it didnt seem very fast at all, it got beat by quite afew cars, i also saw a civic hatchback beat a 03 mustang GT in a race and a kenne bell cobra get romped by a LT1 style camaro, its all about the money you put into it

< Message edited by Joe99es -- 5/12/2005 7:48:53 PM >

(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 26
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 9:36:30 PM   
CIZ58


Posts: 87
Joined: 11/22/2004
From: Jersey
Status: offline
everyone seems to forget that that the race we are talking about was between a 4000+lb blocky 4speed automatic truck and a sleek little coupe/hatch at highway speeds.


_____________________________

94 Mustang GT Conv. - 5sp


(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 27
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 10:11:33 PM   
wafrodon

 

Posts: 88
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Lincoln, NE
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CIZ58

everyone seems to forget that that the race we are talking about was between a 4000+lb blocky 4speed automatic truck and a sleek little coupe/hatch at highway speeds.



Ha to call a 700+HP 1000TQ truck blocky is a little under-appreciating (new word) but yes they are both very fast and the truck does do very well for being ....quite 'stock'.

_____________________________

95 GT 5.0 5 speed
Yeah I write long questions STFU!
TEAL IS FO REAL!

(in reply to CIZ58)
Post #: 28
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/12/2005 10:53:57 PM   
Guest

quote:

ORIGINAL: CIZ58

everyone seems to forget that that the race we are talking about was between a 4000+lb blocky 4speed automatic truck and a sleek little coupe/hatch at highway speeds.



uh... yeah.

As waf said, 700 hp, 1000 ft lbs torque spraying. Parish runs 10.6s on a 100 shot... yet the Eclipse was still pulling on him.

Care to try again?

_____________________________


(in reply to CIZ58)
  Post #: 29
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 1:53:36 AM   
2000GT4.6


Team MF Member #2046
Posts: 12516
Joined: 1/22/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
2000GT4.6's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si


quote:

ORIGINAL: CIZ58

everyone seems to forget that that the race we are talking about was between a 4000+lb blocky 4speed automatic truck and a sleek little coupe/hatch at highway speeds.



uh... yeah.

As waf said, 700 hp, 1000 ft lbs torque spraying. Parish runs 10.6s on a 100 shot... yet the Eclipse was still pulling on him.

Care to try again?


He wasn't spraying, didnt have the 10 second tires on it, and more than likely didn't have it set at max boost.



_____________________________


(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 30
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 1:55:15 AM   
Guest
So he ran a 12 then? I think that's what he ran on full boost with no nitrous... Either way, whoopty do. It's doesn't matter seeing as how the Eclipse was just as fast, if not a wee bit faster.



_____________________________


(in reply to 2000GT4.6)
  Post #: 31
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 1:59:39 AM   
2000GT4.6


Team MF Member #2046
Posts: 12516
Joined: 1/22/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
2000GT4.6's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joe99es

you say chip and pulley swap its all over... well modify the ram with the same amount of cash also, and it'll still come out first.. its not really fair saying that a modified something will beat a stock something

I went to the track last night for wednesdays street night and there was a silver 04 lightning there, honestly it didnt seem very fast at all, it got beat by quite afew cars, i also saw a civic hatchback beat a 03 mustang GT in a race and a kenne bell cobra get romped by a LT1 style camaro, its all about the money you put into it


Not that I give a ****, but I just love proving you wrong.

Lets even forget the extreme cost of the SRT-10 vs the lightning. (Throw price of buying it out).

200 bucks (for an expensive one) for the pully
500 bucks (once again very expensive) for a tune or programmer

So ya got 700 bucks to modify the ram. The lightning is making, what, 80 more RWHP. Good luck.

Its the same argument about the 03 cobras. Its not that you can spend money on it and make it faster, its that you can spend 1500 bucks on it and make 470~ RWHP (up from an average 380 rwhp).

So you can ADD more RWHP than a large majority of 4cyl come with STOCK for 1500 dollars, and all of it can be done in your DRIVEWAY (pully, programmer, aftercat, xpipe) in about 3 hours.

_____________________________


(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 32
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 2:02:23 AM   
2000GT4.6


Team MF Member #2046
Posts: 12516
Joined: 1/22/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
2000GT4.6's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

So he ran a 12 then? I think that's what he ran on full boost with no nitrous... Either way, whoopty do. It's doesn't matter seeing as how the Eclipse was just as fast, if not a wee bit faster.




The point is that its a FREAKING TRUCK. Its like driving a wall down the road. They are crusing along and go from a high roll? The import has EVERYTHING going for it, and once again, its a FREAKING TRUCK. It outwieghs the eclipse by what, 3 times over??

This is your arguement that 4cyl are as good or better to modify??

Seriously 2000si, I have a higher opinion of you than that, don't sit here and say that a 4cyl are as easy and as good a choice to modify as a 8cyl car.


_____________________________


(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 33
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 2:05:15 AM   
Joe99es

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
700 Bones to work with

Headers / Intake / Maybe one other thing

Net good power gains aswell on a V10 502

< Message edited by Joe99es -- 5/13/2005 2:06:19 AM >

(in reply to 2000GT4.6)
Post #: 34
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 2:08:34 AM   
2000GT4.6


Team MF Member #2046
Posts: 12516
Joined: 1/22/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
2000GT4.6's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Joe99es

700 Bones to work with

Headers / Intake / Maybe one other thing

Net good power gains aswell on a V10 502


I think ya need to do a price check on headers for a V10 Ram. My V8 headers ran just at 600 bucks. And good luck finding an intake for a V10 that isnt a custom setup (BUCKS).

So your pretty much left with what, nitrous? Please.

Not to mention that nothing you mentioned (or everything put together) will gain anywhere near 90 RWHP.

< Message edited by 2000GT4.6 -- 5/13/2005 2:11:25 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 35
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 2:34:59 AM   
Guest

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6


quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

So he ran a 12 then? I think that's what he ran on full boost with no nitrous... Either way, whoopty do. It's doesn't matter seeing as how the Eclipse was just as fast, if not a wee bit faster.




The point is that its a FREAKING TRUCK. Its like driving a wall down the road. They are crusing along and go from a high roll? The import has EVERYTHING going for it, and once again, its a FREAKING TRUCK. It outwieghs the eclipse by what, 3 times over??

This is your arguement that 4cyl are as good or better to modify??

Seriously 2000si, I have a higher opinion of you than that, don't sit here and say that a 4cyl are as easy and as good a choice to modify as a 8cyl car.



Who cares? Seriously?! That truck as it sat in that video was ABLE to run 10s, it has and can run TENS in the quarter mile.

How it's shaped has absolutely NOTHING to do with this, stop trying to make excuses for the truck. It got beat and everybody knows what the truck is capable of running, yet it still lost. What's your malfunction? Why are you not realizing that the shape and "it being a wall" has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it was running on par and being slightly pulled by a four banger? Might I remind you that 90% of the people here think a four cylinder is inferior to ANYTHING with a V8?

_____________________________


(in reply to 2000GT4.6)
  Post #: 36
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 2:42:17 AM   
Joe99es

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
edit

< Message edited by Joe99es -- 5/13/2005 6:37:22 AM >

(in reply to 2000GT4.6)
Post #: 37
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 12:36:02 PM   
2000GT4.6


Team MF Member #2046
Posts: 12516
Joined: 1/22/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
2000GT4.6's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si


quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6


quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

So he ran a 12 then? I think that's what he ran on full boost with no nitrous... Either way, whoopty do. It's doesn't matter seeing as how the Eclipse was just as fast, if not a wee bit faster.




The point is that its a FREAKING TRUCK. Its like driving a wall down the road. They are crusing along and go from a high roll? The import has EVERYTHING going for it, and once again, its a FREAKING TRUCK. It outwieghs the eclipse by what, 3 times over??

This is your arguement that 4cyl are as good or better to modify??

Seriously 2000si, I have a higher opinion of you than that, don't sit here and say that a 4cyl are as easy and as good a choice to modify as a 8cyl car.



Who cares? Seriously?! That truck as it sat in that video was ABLE to run 10s, it has and can run TENS in the quarter mile.

How it's shaped has absolutely NOTHING to do with this, stop trying to make excuses for the truck. It got beat and everybody knows what the truck is capable of running, yet it still lost. What's your malfunction? Why are you not realizing that the shape and "it being a wall" has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it was running on par and being slightly pulled by a four banger? Might I remind you that 90% of the people here think a four cylinder is inferior to ANYTHING with a V8?


The entire point that he was trying to make is that 4cyl are as good or better to modify as a v8, because this truck has all kinds of money in it and runs 10s AT THE STRIP. I am not doubting that the eclipse is fast in any right, but thats a pretty stupid example to use to "prove" his point. Its a FREAKING TRUCK. I would be embarrassed to have the kind of money the eclipse has dumped into it and just barely beat a truck that isn't running to full potential (not that my car could beat that truck, but I don't have a ton of cash in it either).

At some point or another in the back of your mind and joes too your both going to have to accept that it is cheaper and easyer to modify almost any V8 than a 4cyl, and all things being equal a V8 will provide the most power for a set price range. You can set any price that you want, and I guarentee you can make more power with a V8 than any 4cyl of your choice.

Im not saying that all 4cyl are slow, or that they are impossible to make fast. However, they are not going to run as fast and still be streetable, they are going to cost more money, and its going to be tougher to get them to go as fast.

_____________________________


(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 38
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 12:59:02 PM   
rob_731

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 3/3/2005
Status: offline
WHAT IS THIS ANYWAY A v-8 smashing site, or a mustang bashing site, i cant figure it out all you guys with the 10 sec ricers go play and have fun with yr ps2 and dont forget to watch" too fast to furious some more "

(in reply to Joe99es)
Post #: 39
RE: Parish vs Eclipse - 5/13/2005 3:49:18 PM   
Joe99es

 

Posts: 268
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
Yes and what do your precious mustangs get in MPG? I know its not 28 mpg like some 4 cylinders out there, a Mazda Protege with a simple GTX 1.8 Liter Engine Swap, which you can find for a little over a grand ( stock engine, just swapped into the protege ) the car will run 13's on the stock motor swap.. now mod the bitch and there you go

< Message edited by Joe99es -- 5/13/2005 3:50:30 PM >

(in reply to rob_731)
Post #: 40
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Other >> Mustang Videos
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14535
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511780

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.