Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> General Tech >> Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller Page: [1]

Mustang Forums Sponsor
 

General Tech Forum Sponsored by Edelbrock


Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/16/2008 7:19:21 PM   
super6wheelman

 

Posts: 230
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: CT
Status: offline
Whats the difference?
What are the ups/downs of each?
Is one more powerful?


Thanks in advance

_____________________________

1986 Mustang Hatch 2.3L,.....37,331miles

1965 Mustang Coupe 289,....44,267miles
Post #: 1
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/17/2008 6:36:26 PM   
my little red 90

 

Posts: 111
Joined: 11/21/2007
From: Bakersfield, CA
Status: offline
Hydraulic lifter cams require almost no attention. Solid lifters do require some maintainance, though if installed with good hardware, they are not too much trouble. Solid lifters will usually allow more RPM, so if properly spec'ed out they should build more HP.

_____________________________

A hot rodder at heart since the '50's.

(in reply to super6wheelman)
Post #: 2
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/17/2008 7:11:41 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5452
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
Solid roller cams generally have more agressive profiles than hydraulic roller. The trade off is more noise and a bit of extra maintenece(though not much) for more power.

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to my little red 90)
Post #: 3
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/18/2008 3:46:11 PM   
super6wheelman

 

Posts: 230
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: CT
Status: offline
Thanks-so the solid roller is more powerful, more Rpm capable, and more maintenance.
What do you need to do to keep them maintained?
Are solid roller cams streetable?

Thanks again


_____________________________

1986 Mustang Hatch 2.3L,.....37,331miles

1965 Mustang Coupe 289,....44,267miles

(in reply to 67mustang302)
Post #: 4
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/18/2008 3:58:53 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5452
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
The right solid roller can be streetable, and you need adjustable valvetrain since you have to set lash. They only need periodic adjusting/checking. If you use good parts then maybe a couple times a year. If you race a lot then you can play it safe and check every few months or after every time you race.

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to super6wheelman)
Post #: 5
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/18/2008 5:08:37 PM   
super6wheelman

 

Posts: 230
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: CT
Status: offline
Ok thats resonable-what would you reccomend using in a Turbo V6 build-up?

_____________________________

1986 Mustang Hatch 2.3L,.....37,331miles

1965 Mustang Coupe 289,....44,267miles

(in reply to 67mustang302)
Post #: 6
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/18/2008 5:24:58 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5452
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
Try posting in a V6 related section, there are several guys on here with killer turbo 6 setups.

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to super6wheelman)
Post #: 7
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/18/2008 9:16:20 PM   
Jfsram

 

Posts: 824
Joined: 1/29/2007
Status: offline
The solid cams are not as reliable but it's not the fact that they are solid that makes them that way.
It's the spring pressures related to most solid lifter cams. As 67Mustang said, they have aggressive profiles. To keep a lifter on the downside of a lobe at high rpm you need some killer valve springs.


_____________________________

65 Belevedere
69 Super Bee
87 Ram
93 Mustang
94 LHS

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/754650

(in reply to 67mustang302)
Post #: 8
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/18/2008 11:15:54 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5452
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
I've seen some of Comp's listings, and they had a OTS solid roller for 351W that they listed as "easy on parts." You could get a solid roller with a more gentle ramp rate to save it from beating the valvetrain up.

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to Jfsram)
Post #: 9
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/19/2008 8:23:19 AM   
GreyStang

 

Posts: 2478
Joined: 4/19/2005
Status: offline
I wouldn't put a solid lifter cam in a car that's mostly stock or even just mildly modified. They'll give a race engine extra power at HIGH rpm's, they won't enough good to a mildy modified engine to make them worth the trouble.

And you don't need a solid lifter cam on a turbocharged engine



_____________________________



2002 GT convertible
1999 Yamaha 1100 Virago

(in reply to 67mustang302)
Post #: 10
RE: Hydrolic Cam vs Solid Roller - 5/19/2008 5:45:30 PM   
my little red 90

 

Posts: 111
Joined: 11/21/2007
From: Bakersfield, CA
Status: offline
and that's the truth!

_____________________________

A hot rodder at heart since the '50's.

(in reply to GreyStang)
Post #: 11
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> General Tech
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14535
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511777

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.