I have 1.25" hubcentric spacers on stock 8 inch bullitts...and it looks great.
and definitely make sure you go with hubcentric spacers
_____________________________
2004 Competition Orange Mustang GT Cobra R Front Fascia, Sequential Tail Lights, Pypes O/R X pipe, Pypes Violator Cat-back, Hurst Shifter, FRAM Air Hog Drop-In
Any thing done to a car to give it the apperance of performance without actually adding any performance is rice.
Yes 99blackponygt he is the exception.
Actiualy, i was going to get 10.5 inch wheels in the rear but im told thier weight negates the gain from the extra width. So im going with 9inch wheels, and im not gunna dish out all that money for a tucked in set of wheels. Sooo going with 9 inch wheels and spacers over 10.5 inch wheels is actualy for performance, thus not making it ricer.
Besides, ricer is and gving your car a clean look are 2 totaly different things.
< Message edited by RipTide7 -- 5/14/2008 9:04:33 PM >
_____________________________
98 Mustang GT: Ford Racing: 4.10s, P.I. Intake manifold, B springs. Cervinis ram air hood, custom seat delete, flowmasters cut axle back.
Any thing done to a car to give it the apperance of performance without actually adding any performance is rice.
Yes 99blackponygt he is the exception.
Actiualy, i was going to get 10.5 inch wheels in the rear but im told thier weight negates the gain from the extra width. So im going with 9inch wheels, and im not gunna dish out all that money for a tucked in set of wheels. Sooo going with 9 inch wheels and spacers over 10.5 inch wheels is actualy for performance, thus not making it ricer.
Besides, ricer is and gving your car a clean look are 2 totaly different things.
+1
I didn't want/couldn't find my wheels is 10.5". I also wanted lighter wheels for street driving. My 9's are only 21.5 lbs which is a good bit lighter than even the stock wheels.