View Full Version : Mustang Forums Presidential Election


03_gt_woowee
05-09-2008, 11:53 AM
i dunno if this has been done but i want to see something.. if the election was held on mf who would win. this way we can see how people are voting and it stay confidential and we can debate here

edit one drawback to this is that votes will change after a democratic nominee is elected .. some may just vote for the other dem. or some will dislike the other dem so much they may vote for mccain but this is just for a broad idea

35thAnni99GT
05-09-2008, 12:08 PM
Your title fooled me. I thought it was an election for someone IN mf. I'm sorry, but being a business owner I'm biased towards who will help my interests. McCain.

mcburns36
05-09-2008, 12:08 PM
How about "None of the above".

03_gt_woowee
05-09-2008, 12:11 PM
fixed

EvoStang
05-09-2008, 12:43 PM
How about "I'm too lazy to vote".

rmodel65
05-09-2008, 12:45 PM
Ron Paul FTMFW

Hisss04Cobra
05-09-2008, 12:51 PM
McCain ftw.

kngdaka
05-09-2008, 12:52 PM
ORIGINAL: rmodel65

Ron Paul FTMFW


I will vote for Ron Paul so long as he somehow makes it to the ballot.

SumterBoy
05-09-2008, 12:55 PM
I'm gonna vote for who ever comes up with a good solution on lowering gas prices. It cost me $50 to fill up yesterday, that is ridiculous.

03_gt_woowee
05-09-2008, 01:00 PM
ron paul is a moron:eek:

kngdaka
05-09-2008, 01:02 PM
ORIGINAL: 03_gt_woowee

ron paul is a moron:eek:


Sorry, I forgot that Americans hate people who make sense.

rmodel65
05-09-2008, 01:05 PM
well then you want Paul, no govt interference in the transactions of the oil industry. well cut cali off from the us and then there will be no more liberals and we can drill and build new refinery's[8D]

heck china is drilling off of our coast closer than we will let American corps do it:( all because people dont want to look out and see a pump[:@]

66JameStang
05-09-2008, 01:06 PM
The persons responsible for this are the people who make thier money buying and selling currency, The falling dollar can largely be attributed to people playing with money... They can not hold out forever though!:D

As For the Election McCain FTW!!!!

99GTvert
05-09-2008, 01:52 PM
ORIGINAL: SumterBoy

I'm gonna vote for who ever comes up with a good solution on lowering gas prices. It cost me $50 to fill up yesterday, that is ridiculous.


yeah, the price of gas is the only real issue in america.
LOL

kngdaka
05-09-2008, 02:02 PM
ORIGINAL: 99GTvert

ORIGINAL: SumterBoy

I'm gonna vote for who ever comes up with a good solution on lowering gas prices. It cost me $50 to fill up yesterday, that is ridiculous.


yeah, the price of gas is the only real issue in america.
LOL



Exactly what I was thinking. But it really is all people care about. Usually presidential approval ratings go up and down with the price of gas

mattlowe01
05-09-2008, 02:05 PM
I nominate matt lowe for president of the United States of America. In doing so, I will make Off Topic the new Congress.

99GTvert
05-09-2008, 02:10 PM
ORIGINAL: kngdaka


ORIGINAL: 99GTvert

ORIGINAL: SumterBoy

I'm gonna vote for who ever comes up with a good solution on lowering gas prices. It cost me $50 to fill up yesterday, that is ridiculous.


yeah, the price of gas is the only real issue in america.
LOL



Exactly what I was thinking. But it really is all people care about. Usually presidential approval ratings go up and down with the price of gas


DUDE SHORT TERM > LONG TERM!!!

redass02gt
05-09-2008, 02:10 PM
ORIGINAL: rmodel65

well then you want Paul, no govt interference in the transactions of the oil industry. well cut cali off from the us and then there will be no more liberals and we can drill and build new refinery's[8D]

heck china is drilling off of our coast closer than we will let American corps do it:( all because people dont want to look out and see a pump[:@]



I think what you mean to say is that the US will get rid of california so the US can have half the economy it used to have.

for the record, I'm all for CA not being part of the US. California does not benefit by being part of the US, yet the US benefits greatly by having the technology, economy and agriculture of california.

Margarita Girl
05-09-2008, 02:15 PM
Welcome to California!
http://a.abcnews.com/images/Entertainment/apg_bh90210_060829_ssh.jpg

timothyrw
05-09-2008, 02:59 PM
ah, resort to the stereotype... classic...

ORIGINAL: kngdaka


ORIGINAL: 03_gt_woowee

ron paul is a moron:eek:


Sorry, I forgot that Americans hate people who make sense.

timothyrw
05-09-2008, 03:01 PM
clinton is done for. take her off.

Visage
05-09-2008, 03:03 PM
MG thats a perfect picture, but your leaving out the Illegal mexicans sneaking in in the background, that blonde is actually a hooker on the weekends, and that white guy with the fro is a hippy from Humbolt

acascianelli
05-09-2008, 03:13 PM
They all fail...

Lizardbreath
05-10-2008, 03:47 AM
ORIGINAL: redass02gt

ORIGINAL: rmodel65

well then you want Paul, no govt interference in the transactions of the oil industry. well cut cali off from the us and then there will be no more liberals and we can drill and build new refinery's[8D]

heck china is drilling off of our coast closer than we will let American corps do it:( all because people dont want to look out and see a pump[:@]



I think what you mean to say is that the US will get rid of california so the US can have half the economy it used to have.

for the record, I'm all for CA not being part of the US. California does not benefit by being part of the US, yet the US benefits greatly by having the technology, economy and agriculture of california.



I completely agree 100%. We, as a state, can do MUCH better by ourselves then we could with the current system we have.

SXGT
05-10-2008, 03:51 AM
basically if you are poor it is in your best interest to vote for Hilary. If you are rich you can go ahead and vote for "GW McCain" and expect some tax breaks and never a free hand out.

one isn't better then the other , they just favor different groups in different ways. Hillary favors me for the next 4 years as Iam not a wealthy and have no health insurance, so I will vote for her.



if GW bush was running for office again would you vote for him? well if you vote for McCain thats what you are doing. Capitalism by nature will rip this nation apart, people are NOT poor because they are not hard working its a class system wall they are bound by. Its time for a socialist movement. Marx himself said that capitalism must resort to socialism to sustain itself.

Hisss04Cobra
05-10-2008, 05:45 AM
Glass wall theories are for women and non white American's typically.

You, hopefally, fall under neither of these branches.

Xemeth
05-10-2008, 08:45 AM
ORIGINAL: SXGT

basically if you are poor it is in your best interest to vote for Hilary. If you are rich you can go ahead and vote for "GW McCain" and expect some tax breaks and never a free hand out.

one isn't better then the other , they just favor different groups in different ways. Hillary favors me for the next 4 years as Iam not a wealthy and have no health insurance, so I will vote for her.



if GW bush was running for office again would you vote for him? well if you vote for McCain thats what you are doing. Capitalism by nature will rip this nation apart, people are NOT poor because they are not hard working its a class system wall they are bound by. Its time for a socialist movement. Marx himself said that capitalism must resort to socialism to sustain itself.


Bull****. Suck a dick you liberal pussy.

Hisss04Cobra
05-10-2008, 09:20 AM
ORIGINAL: Xemeth

ORIGINAL: SXGT

basically if you are poor it is in your best interest to vote for Hilary. If you are rich you can go ahead and vote for "GW McCain" and expect some tax breaks and never a free hand out.

one isn't better then the other , they just favor different groups in different ways. Hillary favors me for the next 4 years as Iam not a wealthy and have no health insurance, so I will vote for her.



if GW bush was running for office again would you vote for him? well if you vote for McCain thats what you are doing. Capitalism by nature will rip this nation apart, people are NOT poor because they are not hard working its a class system wall they are bound by. Its time for a socialist movement. Marx himself said that capitalism must resort to socialism to sustain itself.


Bull****. Suck a dick you liberal pussy.



Good input.

I must assume with Your vast knowledge of our economic system and the statistics provided that deal with people who have an income below the poverty level, that You are correct in stating that SXGT's 'liberal pussy' is wrong.

Or is it that You have no idea what You are talking about and, basically, are the equivalent of a big blubbering vagina?

Xemeth
05-10-2008, 11:19 AM
ORIGINAL: Hisss04Cobra

ORIGINAL: Xemeth

ORIGINAL: SXGT

basically if you are poor it is in your best interest to vote for Hilary. If you are rich you can go ahead and vote for "GW McCain" and expect some tax breaks and never a free hand out.

one isn't better then the other , they just favor different groups in different ways. Hillary favors me for the next 4 years as Iam not a wealthy and have no health insurance, so I will vote for her.



if GW bush was running for office again would you vote for him? well if you vote for McCain thats what you are doing. Capitalism by nature will rip this nation apart, people are NOT poor because they are not hard working its a class system wall they are bound by. Its time for a socialist movement. Marx himself said that capitalism must resort to socialism to sustain itself.


Bull****. Suck a dick you liberal pussy.



Good input.

I must assume with Your vast knowledge of our economic system and the statistics provided that deal with people who have an income below the poverty level, that You are correct in stating that SXGT's 'liberal pussy' is wrong.

Or is it that You have no idea what You are talking about and, basically, are the equivalent of a big blubbering vagina?



You know "you" isn't a proper noun, right? Unless you're talking directly to God himself, in which case "you" would be used like "He", or "Him."

But anyway, I wouldn't say I have a "vast" knowledge of the American economic system, but the statement that SXGT made was basically saying that poop people are poor because class dictates they are poor, and cannot relieve themselves of being in the lower class. In which I responded, "Bull ****." (it censored the whole word, and only put 4 ****).

And that is bull ****. People aren't poor because they are chosen to be in that social class at birth or something. Your successfulness in life (in America at least) has to do with your own motivation and willingness to work at what you want. There's plenty of oppurtinities for anyone to become rich and successful. Nobody is saying "No, you're poor now, you have to be poor forever no matter what you do!" Granted some people have it easier than others, but it is complete bull **** to say that there is a "class system wall" that keeps poor people poor.

Hisss04Cobra
05-10-2008, 11:30 AM
I usually capitolize You to signify that the person is important.

I like to try to make people feel good sometimes.

;)

Ride Of The Month
05-10-2008, 12:00 PM
are any of you old enough to vote?


you should only be capitalized if it is the first word in a sentence, but only douchebags will bring up things like that in a forum discussion, unless the person MAKING the errors is going on about how bright he or she may be...in the event that someone is going on about how good their school is, or how bright they are, that is an automatic excuse to point out spelling and grammtical errors.

when i write, my grammar is spot-on, but on the forums, i dont put much effort into watching for spelling, grammar, or key-stroke errors unless im repremanding someone, or some other "official" business.

Xemeth
05-10-2008, 12:01 PM
ORIGINAL: Hisss04Cobra

I usually capitolize You to signify that the person is important.

I like to try to make people feel good sometimes.

;)



Well since that's the case I'll disregard the blubbering vagina comment.[8D]

Ride Of The Month
05-10-2008, 12:04 PM
present company, included, of course...

Burnsy
05-10-2008, 12:51 PM
I love George W. Bush, he is the man. And I laugh when people act they are smarter than our president. Granted, he's not very good at public speaking, but at least he stands for something.

Ride Of The Month
05-10-2008, 01:09 PM
Ive not had much of a problem with many of his ideas, but you have to admit, the guy sounds like a complete moron when he speaks.

SXGT
05-10-2008, 11:45 PM
I like a lot of stuff bush does , but not this war, but it seems to be the one that matters the most at this point. ANYWAY

Back it up before the name calling , The fact of the matter is that the biggest determining factor to someone's future income is the income of their parents yeah some poor people make it to the big time but most poor people stay poor even when working hard or doing two jobs. The cost of living has become way to much and that is why I support an economy that lowers that cost , or a socialist movement.