|
StupidTodd -> RE: Turbo Questions (5/6/2008 9:16:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: adarraza What would be the difference of getting a intercooled turbo vs a non-intercooled performance wise. Somewhere between 80-150 hp. quote:
Also would the non-intercooled be bad for the engine? Every power adder and ever drivetrain modification has the potential to be "bad" for the engine. It's the price you pay to play. quote:
lastly would the PH Turbo non-intercooled be the best option to get the Fastest/cheapest 0-60 and hp/tq? There's an old saying: Fast, Cheap, Good - Pick two, cuz you ain't getting the other one. Cheapest is nitrous. A turbo kit is the most expensive. Turbo (so far) has made the most power/fastest times. quote:
and my last question wat would the estimateed 0-60 be of a stang with tune and a turbo? Intercooled = prolly in the mid/low 12s... maybe high 11s Nonintercooled = prolly in the high 12s to mid 13s
|
|
|
|