Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

1993 - 2000

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Other >> Off Topic >> 1993 - 2000 Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 10:18:20 PM   
SXGT


Posts: 2254
Joined: 4/3/2004
From: Louisville, Ky
Status: offline
SXGT's photo gallery
I don;t what the world was thinking , nor did i have the best most insight on life back then. So when Bill Clinton was in office. who was complaining and why? A bunch of rich people not getting tax beaks? was that all?

Who lived through Bill Clinton here and hated it? I remember the day he was inaugurated but I was young.


ALSO dont bring up anything about monica lewinkski because that is his personal life nothing to do with foreign policy , taxes , ect.

_____________________________



Don''''t be too proud of this technological terror you''''ve constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of Big Oil.
Post #: 1
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 10:20:23 PM   
mustangcat



Posts: 756
Joined: 6/14/2007
From: SC, New Mexico
Status: offline
He also reduced the national unemployment rate to it's lowest point in 35 years.

I liked Bill...I don't like his psycho wife, but I like him.


_____________________________


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jfsram
People buy Mustangs for speed. People buy Neons for value and economy.

(in reply to SXGT)
Post #: 2
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 10:27:07 PM   
03_gt_woowee


Posts: 214
Joined: 7/29/2006
Status: offline
he killed our military numbers

_____________________________



screw global warming
http://mysite.verizon.net/mhieb/WVFossils/ice_ages.html

(in reply to mustangcat)
Post #: 3
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 10:30:11 PM   
Burnsy


Posts: 2080
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: online
how bout when he let us get attacked over and over and over... and did nothing about it. embassies, U.S.S. Cole, Somalia, etc.

or about how he sat there and ****ted about the meaning of the word genocide and whether Rwanda was one, while we were not deeply involved in any conflict

or how more soldiers died in active duty during his tenure than G. W's even though there was no war under clinton.???....

or how the economy bubble that he came into from Reagan and Bush burst because he did nothing while in office, hence the tech stock/dot com company crashes.

but he balanced the budget and made regime change in Iraq official U.S. policy


_____________________________

-Mike

(in reply to mustangcat)
Post #: 4
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 10:38:18 PM   
SXGT


Posts: 2254
Joined: 4/3/2004
From: Louisville, Ky
Status: offline
SXGT's photo gallery
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_more_soldiers_die_during_bill_clintons.html

Actually, even counting non-combat fatalities, more military personnel died during the first six years of George Bush's tenure than during the entire eight years that Bill Clinton was in office.




_____________________________



Don''''t be too proud of this technological terror you''''ve constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of Big Oil.

(in reply to Burnsy)
Post #: 5
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 10:57:45 PM   
Burnsy


Posts: 2080
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: online
yeah, that was posted in haste, just something I had heard. and hard to believe at that.


But even just looking at that chart, considering we have been in a war during virtually all of Bush's tenure, clintons numbers still look WAYYY too high


_____________________________

-Mike

(in reply to SXGT)
Post #: 6
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 11:23:24 PM   
SXGT


Posts: 2254
Joined: 4/3/2004
From: Louisville, Ky
Status: offline
SXGT's photo gallery
It may surprise many to learn that there are so many military deaths during peacetime. But this is just the law of averages at work. In 1993 the military had 1.7 million men and women in uniform. During that same year, 1,175 of them died from accidents, homicide, suicide and illness. That makes the 1993 non-hostile death rate for military personnel 69.1 per 100,000. That's actually fairly low; the rate for all Americans age 20 to 29 is about 97.5. Today's military is considerably smaller, with just under 1.4 million personnel.



_____________________________



Don''''t be too proud of this technological terror you''''ve constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of Big Oil.

(in reply to Burnsy)
Post #: 7
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/4/2008 11:28:34 PM   
Burnsy


Posts: 2080
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: online
...yeah and i dont need you to keep copying and pasting...i went to the site. it doesn't change the fact that clintons numbers look way too high, no matter how the site tries to explain it.

i dont really know why we are arguing this though, i said that i posted that part of my post in haste.


_____________________________

-Mike

(in reply to SXGT)
Post #: 8
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 6:13:34 AM   
spoke2go1


Posts: 438
Joined: 3/18/2007
From: woodstock georgia
Status: offline
spoke2go1's photo gallery
Regan and Bush senior did nothing to help the economy, ever hear of Reganomics?
Largest economic expansion in U.S. history, lowest amount of people on welfare in 35 years, balanced budget and surplus of money and the world didnt hate us.

Bush got in office and pissed through the surplus, dropped the taxes and started a fight that is to this very day still unjustifiable.
And dont give me that 9/11 bs, that dumb b@stard said there were weapons of mass destruction that posed an imminent threat to the United States. He never said that we needed to free the iraqis, he never said we had to spread democracy and the iraqis had nothing to do with 9/11! Hell they even said that there were no WMD's in Iraq! So you were either lied to or you listened to a dumbass with a vendetta against saddam.


Long live slick willy!!! a.k.a Bill Clinton
And depending on the outcome of the DNC, Ill either be voting for a black man or a bitchy woman.

_____________________________


<- Doesnt like old cars but has a thing for VW

(in reply to Burnsy)
Post #: 9
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 6:47:20 AM   
fastbackford351


Posts: 978
Joined: 12/23/2006
Status: offline
Anybody who knew anything about national security or foreign policy was complaining during the Clinton years. He was content to let law enforcement try to handle the terrorism issue and you see what that got us. He and his foreign policy team were incompetent at their best and malfeasant at their worst.  He was responsible for passing the law that prohibited intelligence agencies from sharing information with each other.  That law was passed to cover his own interests.  As a result of that, it could be argued that led directly to 9/11.

He just kicked the serious problems down the road for 8 years and accomplished nothing of note.   His legacy is a blue stained dress. 

Ronald Reagans reduced the income tax rates DRAMATICALLY. Yes a lot of the deductions were taken away also and congress, during the Clinton years re-raised those tax rates without bringing the deductions back.

Tax cuts are a boon to the economy and work every time.  Lower the tax rates and the Federal coffers fill up. Were it not for the BushII taxcuts he introduced at the beginning of his 1st term I shudder to think what kind of economic mess we would be in. 





_____________________________

Government Warning:

Governments are extremely dangerous.
Death, imprisonment, theft of property
and loss of freedom will result from
giving them too much power.

(in reply to spoke2go1)
Post #: 10
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 7:27:45 AM   
nghtrnnr


Posts: 54
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fastbackford351

Anybody who knew anything about national security or foreign policy was complaining during the Clinton years. He was content to let law enforcement try to handle the terrorism issue and you see what that got us. He and his foreign policy team were incompetent at their best and malfeasant at their worst.  He was responsible for passing the law that prohibited intelligence agencies from sharing information with each other.  That law was passed to cover his own interests.  As a result of that, it could be argued that led directly to 9/11.





how can anyone possibly buy any of that complete bs?  until marshall law is declared and we have tanks rolling down our street law enforcement is still handling the terrorism issue and always has been...always will be...as for the rest, lest we forget that 9-11 happened well into bush's years....an argument can be made that they waited until clinton left....as for clinton letting embassies get blown up...i guess he was supposed to pick up his sidearm and go stand post himself? lol....last time i checked embassies were still gettin blown up nowadays...as for legacys...clinton, even after the monica lewinsky scandal, left office one of the most popular presidents ever....george bush is leaving the most unpopular president in history with lower approval rates than even richard nixon....if you think about it...i guess nearly all the people who like bush are right here in this thread...lol

_____________________________

F.E.A.R ..... ITS ALL WHAT YOU DO WITH IT:

forget everything and run
or
face everything and recover
"fight everything...conform to nothing"

(in reply to fastbackford351)
Post #: 11
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 9:34:09 AM   
00limited7


Posts: 420
Joined: 8/25/2005
From: Indy
Status: offline
Didn't Clinton pass NAFTA... This country was built on the backs of the maufacturing worker!!
I guess now we don't have a backbone and we are waiting on a backbone implant made in China!!!!



_____________________________


87 LX T-Top 5.0,5-speed,3.73,Cobra intake,GT-40P heads,cam,BBK 70mmTB,BBK CAI, FRPP Headers,Bassani X-pipe, Flowmasters American Thunder.

(in reply to nghtrnnr)
Post #: 12
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 10:03:36 AM   
okbfd


Posts: 993
Joined: 12/6/2006
Status: offline
BJ Bill......he also passed on whacking Ben Laden, let Tomahawks fly against BS targets to pull attention from the (I didn't have sex with that woman) scandal, committed perjury, gutted the military, rode the coatails of Reagen economics, and made the US presidency the laughingstock of the world. +1 Burnsy and Fastback    Oh yeah, he was a GREAT president.  

_____________________________



Steeda CAI/SCT + Tri-ax shifter
Konig Wheels/Eibach springs
http://www.classyauto.com/v/Ford+Mustang/GT/64335



(in reply to 00limited7)
Post #: 13
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 10:33:57 AM   
GStam66


Team MF Member #066
Posts: 1301
Joined: 6/19/2006
From: Buffalo, NY
Status: offline
GStam66's photo gallery
99% of politicians just plain suck at their job.

_____________________________


1999 Mustang GT Auto (Flowmasters, Pypes Catted X-pipe, 4r70w with shiftkit and 2500 stall, Diablo Tuner, 275/40/17 Nitto 555r''''s.)
Best time (1/8th): 9.07 @ 78mph

(in reply to okbfd)
Post #: 14
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 10:41:27 AM   
SXGT


Posts: 2254
Joined: 4/3/2004
From: Louisville, Ky
Status: offline
SXGT's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: spoke2go1

Regan and Bush senior did nothing to help the economy, ever hear of Reganomics?
Largest economic expansion in U.S. history, lowest amount of people on welfare in 35 years, balanced budget and surplus of money and the world didnt hate us.

Bush got in office and pissed through the surplus, dropped the taxes and started a fight that is to this very day still unjustifiable.
And dont give me that 9/11 bs, that dumb b@stard said there were weapons of mass destruction that posed an imminent threat to the United States. He never said that we needed to free the iraqis, he never said we had to spread democracy and the iraqis had nothing to do with 9/11! Hell they even said that there were no WMD's in Iraq! So you were either lied to or you listened to a dumbass with a vendetta against saddam.


Long live slick willy!!! a.k.a Bill Clinton
And depending on the outcome of the DNC, Ill either be voting for a black man or a bitchy woman.



no clinton did that

_____________________________



Don''''t be too proud of this technological terror you''''ve constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of Big Oil.

(in reply to spoke2go1)
Post #: 15
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 10:45:26 AM   
SXGT


Posts: 2254
Joined: 4/3/2004
From: Louisville, Ky
Status: offline
SXGT's photo gallery
ok another thing everyone says the military was gutted.


in 1993 our military was BIGGER then today....

Year - GDP on military
1993 4.4
1994 4.0
1995 3.7
1996 3.5
1997 3.3
1998 3.1
1999 3.0
2000 3.0
2001 3.0
2002 3.4
2003 3.7


_____________________________



Don''''t be too proud of this technological terror you''''ve constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of Big Oil.

(in reply to SXGT)
Post #: 16
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 10:50:00 AM   
boostin95cobra


Posts: 972
Joined: 1/11/2006
From: Botswana
Status: offline
boostin95cobra's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: spoke2go1

Regan and Bush senior did nothing to help the economy, ever hear of Reganomics?



....




Thanks for the laugh.


_____________________________


Team Wonderbike

(in reply to spoke2go1)
Post #: 17
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 10:56:43 AM   
03_gt_woowee


Posts: 214
Joined: 7/29/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SXGT

ok another thing everyone says the military was gutted.


in 1993 our military was BIGGER then today....

Year - GDP on military
1993 4.4
1994 4.0
1995 3.7
1996 3.5
1997 3.3
1998 3.1
1999 3.0
2000 3.0
2001 3.0
2002 3.4
2003 3.7



yes it was bigger then he gutted it and now its smaller what are you getting at?

_____________________________



screw global warming
http://mysite.verizon.net/mhieb/WVFossils/ice_ages.html

(in reply to SXGT)
Post #: 18
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 10:57:51 AM   
35thAnni99GT


Posts: 1522
Joined: 3/12/2007
From: Sick VTAK, Yo!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SXGT

ok another thing everyone says the military was gutted.


in 1993 our military was BIGGER then today....

Year - GDP on military
1993 4.4
1994 4.0
1995 3.7
1996 3.5
1997 3.3
1998 3.1
1999 3.0
2000 3.0
2001 3.0
2002 3.4
2003 3.7



I don't want to nit pick or anything, but it started out big from the last administration and it got smaller and smaller... what's your point?


_____________________________


(in reply to SXGT)
Post #: 19
RE: 1993 - 2000 - 5/5/2008 11:26:00 AM   
Morbid Intentions


Posts: 4171
Joined: 2/26/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 35thAnni99GT

quote:

ORIGINAL: SXGT

ok another thing everyone says the military was gutted.


in 1993 our military was BIGGER then today....

Year - GDP on military
1993 4.4
1994 4.0
1995 3.7
1996 3.5
1997 3.3
1998 3.1
1999 3.0
2000 3.0
2001 3.0
2002 3.4
2003 3.7



I don't want to nit pick or anything, but it started out big from the last administration and it got smaller and smaller... what's your point?



I'm going to have to agree with 03_wowee and 35th here.... all that chart shows is information that backs up the exact opposite of what you claim


fail?

< Message edited by Morbid Intentions -- 5/5/2008 11:30:43 AM >


_____________________________

creepy crawly sin


(in reply to 35thAnni99GT)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Other >> Off Topic
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17888
nanaki14679
88bluegt14535
dan04cobra14518
addermk213959
ride of the 13696
hotrods_n_bo13304
2000gt4.612513
mustangman0211949
1slo8511713

New Vendors
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.