so there's a kid with an SS camaro in my lot... it has the square headlights so I was thinking it was an LT1.... but after doing a little facebook stalking I found out it was a 1996 z28 SS built by SLP.... after some more research only 2140 were built...

http://www.bfranker.badz28.com/96ss/96ss.htm (http://www.bfranker.badz28.com/96ss/96ss.htm%C2%A0) then I stumbled apon that site on google (edit:was NOT made by him... but it's relavent)... and the guy said this "The Trans Am got 31-32 mpg and the 450 hp SS got 25 mpg... even with 4.10 gearing!!! I was impressed :)"


WTF?!?!?

so all in all... should I be worried of the camaro??? Prolly not because he drives slow as hell like the kid with the knock-off s197 saleen.

http://photos-492.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v168/67/48/33605492/n33605492_32020504_3943.jpg

mmm its a nice car. better get some mods there;)

no chance does that car put out 450 with out full bolt ons and cam....and with the lt1 thats even pushing it

steal it

its an LT1...theres no way in hell it makes 450hp unless its built...and built/stock, it doesnt get that much mpg, esp with 4.10s....that kid jsut doesnt know what he is talking about

friends is stock and gets 21 mixed...

no no... the kid didn't make that site... it was just one I stumbled upon while searching info on his car.

it was rated at 310 hp and the regular z28 was rated at 285...the only diffence in the z28ss was ram air and an slp catback

hey... it sounds good... but like...after riding in my sister's 87 camaro a few years ago (I learned how to do a burnout on it...) and then her ex's 2000 ss (learned stick on it)... they are terrible... uncomfortable, can't see over the hood and the interior is cheesy...

Its an lt1, its a dog more than likely
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q146/redfoxnick/funny%20pics/ls1.jpg

ORIGINAL: nmerrill

Its an lt1, its a dog more than likely
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q146/redfoxnick/funny%20pics/ls1.jpg


I hope your kidding...

Ehhh, even if it is an ls1 one at least the picture is still true! and swat, buy my fox!

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also

The LT1 is nowhere near as under-rated as the LS1 was. Plus you have to look at power under the curve, not just peak power. LS1 cars are about 3/4 of a second quicker (on average), that's a pretty big differance

the same difference as an 04gt and an 05gt....and it doesnt take much for an 04 to catch up....of course the ls1 is faster, im just stating that the LS1 is not TONS faster than the LT1 like that picture is trying to say

The Ls1 has hot girls on it


The Lt1 has richard simmons on it

Ls1>Lt1

Tits or GTFO

ORIGINAL: spoke2go1

The Ls1 has hot girls on it


The Lt1 has richard simmons on it

Ls1>Lt1

Tits or GTFO


damn s197 went straight to your head.

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :D Just wondering.

Thank god s197's resemble the 1st gen Mustang or god help me.

http://i31.tinypic.com/e9gdb7.jpg

4.6 3v
not the best but jesus f-ing christ do I love it

http://www.evoperform.com/shop/images/gt500-crate.jpg
http://medias.ados.fr/people/2/6/2602/Pamela-Anderson/photos/7696-pamela-anderson.jpg

Gross! Do cobras really have hepatitus?!

since when did the cobra have a TB on the right side?!?!? That's a lightning thing lol...


edit: o wait.. that must be a gt500...

http://image.sportcompactcarweb.com/f/car-news/chevrolets-supercharged-ls9-corvette-zr-1/8072016+w640+cr1+re0+ar1/chevrolet-corvette-zr1-ls9-engine.jpghttp://www.worldsgreatesttoys.com/images/blog/080807/equals.gifhttp://galleries.sterlingcash.com/gb/ibwa/ashley_ashleyfaith/02.jpg

http://i29.tinypic.com/o7kth3.jpg

^^yeck[:'(]



but I lol'd... taht pic... idk what those dudes were thinking.

lol..crazy asians..[&:][&:]
Whoever posted that picture of the chick in the pink...god.. she's smoking.

this thread is funny

ORIGINAL: 72MachOne99GT

lol..crazy asians..[&:][&:]
Whoever posted that picture of the chick in the pink...god.. she's smoking.



Sarah Chalke (Elliot on Scrubs)



and yes

ORIGINAL: Joolander

ORIGINAL: 72MachOne99GT

lol..crazy asians..[&:][&:]
Whoever posted that picture of the chick in the pink...god.. she's smoking.



Sarah Chalke (Elliot on Scrubs)



and yes



Shes going into my next sig, Im glad yall approve. I mean I didnt know how I was going to +1 Jessica Alba but I think I have.

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT
of course the ls1 is faster, im just stating that the LS1 is not TONS faster than the LT1 like that picture is trying to say


I totally agree.

There are threads all the time about LT1 vs LS1 on Camaro boards.
These threads got very long and very heated.
Most LT1 owners are very loyal and very happy with their cars (I'm one of them).

Yes, a stock LS1 is faster.....no doubt about it.
Many have commented on the slightly better exhaust note of the LT1
and the more noticeable torque thrust at lower speeds.
Yet, if 1/4 miles times are the bottom line....LS1 FTW.....
That doesn't mean that the LT1 is slow by any means
and that picture (though it stands out) is far from true.

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :D Just wondering.



:eek:i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated

ORIGINAL: dubarado

since when did the cobra have a TB on the right side?!?!? That's a lightning thing lol...


edit: o wait.. that must be a gt500...


I would venture that it's a lightning engine, because a GT500 engine would've had Shelby on the valve covers.. ;)Close though brudda..

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :DÂ* Just wondering.



:eek:Â*i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated



Notice the ":D" In his question?
:eek:

ORIGINAL: Subotai_95

ORIGINAL: dubarado

since when did the cobra have a TB on the right side?!?!? That's a lightning thing lol...


edit: o wait.. that must be a gt500...


I would venture that it's a lightning engine, because a GT500 engine would've had Shelby on the valve covers.. ;)Close though brudda..



negative... it's a GT500 motor.

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :D Just wondering.



:eek:i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated



Notice the ":D" In his question?
:eek:




Thank you sir. I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress. [&:]

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :DÂ* Just wondering.



:eek:Â*i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated



Notice the ":D" In his question?
:eek:




Thank you sir.Â* I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress. [&:]



Thats who I was replying to...

What are you talking about?[&:]

There's a guy around here with one of the SLP SS's... Red vert, automatic LT1.

From a roll (no spray) I walk him.He's stock, and I, apart from an O/R midpipe am stock as well. Stock for stock, you shouldn't have to worry. Mod-for-mod, I think he'll end up taking you though :D

he needs a driver mod...no way a stock 2v would "walk" an LT1

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :D Just wondering.



:eek:i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated



Notice the ":D" In his question?
:eek:




Thank you sir. I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress. [&:]

i understood the smiley perfectly, i just think it was a dumb statement even with the :Dbecause it doesnt make sense as a joke or otherwise....plus, half the LS1 nutswingers on this board would have read your statement and thought it was true because the LS1 is the best/fastest engine ever developed...EVER

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :DÂ* Just wondering.



:eek:Â*i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated



Notice the ":D" In his question?
:eek:




Thank you sir.Â* I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress. [&:]

i understood the smiley perfectly, i just think it was a dumb statement even with the :DÂ*because it doesnt make sense as a joke or otherwise....plus, half the LS1 nutswingers on this board would have read your statement and thought it was true because the LS1 is the best/fastest engine ever developed...EVER


His numbers really weren't too far off. I seen LS1s dyno close to what he stated. No one has ever said the LS1 was the greatest/fastest engine ever developed so perhaps its time for you to get over it.

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :D Just wondering.



:eek:i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated



Notice the ":D" In his question?
:eek:




Thank you sir. I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress. [&:]

i understood the smiley perfectly, i just think it was a dumb statement even with the :Dbecause it doesnt make sense as a joke or otherwise....plus, half the LS1 nutswingers on this board would have read your statement and thought it was true because the LS1 is the best/fastest engine ever developed...EVER


His numbers really weren't too far off. I seen LS1s dyno close to what he stated. No one has ever said the LS1 was the greatest/fastest engine ever developed so perhaps its time for you to get over it.


no **** they dyno that much, did i not clearly put that i was giving out numbers that gm rated them at? and that i clearly said they were under rated??? learn to Æ’ucking read

and you jumped my **** for not picking up his sarcasm, maybe you should take your own advice....its clear that the LS1 isnt the best engine ever, but peopel often say it is jokingly and say God created the LS1 and all kinds of ****, so how about you stop riding my ass and stfu...i was simply throwing out numbers that gm rated the two engines at, and i clearly said that they are under rated...what part of that can you not understand? where the Æ’uck did i say that LS1s cant dyno 305rwhp stock?

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: MrRogers


ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

ORIGINAL: KTownGT

ORIGINAL: 99BlackPonyGT

LT1's and LS1's arent that far off..

LT1 - 285/325
LS1 - 305/335

thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also



Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? :DÂ* Just wondering.



:eek:Â*i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated



Notice the ":D" In his question?
:eek:




Thank you sir.Â* I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress. [&:]

i understood the smiley perfectly, i just think it was a dumb statement even with the :DÂ*because it doesnt make sense as a joke or otherwise....plus, half the LS1 nutswingers on this board would have read your statement and thought it was true because the LS1 is the best/fastest engine ever developed...EVER


His numbers really weren't too far off. I seen LS1s dyno close to what he stated. No one has ever said the LS1 was the greatest/fastest engine ever developed so perhaps its time for you to get over it.


no **** they dyno that much, did i not clearly put that i was giving out numbers that gm rated them at? and that i clearly said they were under rated??? learn to Æ’ucking read

and you jumped my **** for not picking up his sarcasm, maybe you should take your own advice....its clear that the LS1 isnt the best engine ever, but peopel often say it is jokingly and say God created the LS1 and all kinds of ****, so how about you stop riding my ass and stfu...i was simply throwing out numbers that gm rated the two engines at, and i clearly said that they are under rated...what part of that can you not understand? where the Æ’uck did i say that LS1s cant dyno 305rwhp stock?


He was being sarcastic and you decided to be a dick.

The only people who say the LS1 is Gods engine are usually Stang owners who are being sarcastic, not the LS1 owners themselves.

Don't get your panties in a bunch kid....since everyone knows that GMs fbody LS1 numbers are BS, there's really no need to post them..

Is it the one in the pic?

ORIGINAL: RODRIGUEZ

Is it the one in the pic?


yea... shot the kid an email on facebook awhile back.. no answer... o well.


I wonder if him and the knock-off saleen kid are friends... can be cap'n slows together.:D

ORIGINAL: dubarado

ORIGINAL: RODRIGUEZ

Is it the one in the pic?


yea... shot the kid an email on facebook awhile back.. no answer... o well.


I wonder if him and the knock-off saleen kid are friends... can be cap'n slows together.:D



Do you go to atco raceway? Like in the past few weeks? I'm pretty sure I saw ur car w/ the same setup (intake/dr tires and something else).

There also a saleen that runs like 15's at atco:eek:

Idiot!