thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also
Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? Just wondering.
i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated
Notice the "" In his question?
Thank you sir. I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress.
i understood the smiley perfectly, i just think it was a dumb statement even with the because it doesnt make sense as a joke or otherwise....plus, half the LS1 nutswingers on this board would have read your statement and thought it was true because the LS1 is the best/fastest engine ever developed...EVER
His numbers really weren't too far off. I seen LS1s dyno close to what he stated. No one has ever said the LS1 was the greatest/fastest engine ever developed so perhaps its time for you to get over it.
thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also
Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? Just wondering.
i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated
Notice the "" In his question?
Thank you sir. I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress.
i understood the smiley perfectly, i just think it was a dumb statement even with the because it doesnt make sense as a joke or otherwise....plus, half the LS1 nutswingers on this board would have read your statement and thought it was true because the LS1 is the best/fastest engine ever developed...EVER
His numbers really weren't too far off. I seen LS1s dyno close to what he stated. No one has ever said the LS1 was the greatest/fastest engine ever developed so perhaps its time for you to get over it.
no **** they dyno that much, did i not clearly put that i was giving out numbers that gm rated them at? and that i clearly said they were under rated??? learn to ƒucking read
and you jumped my **** for not picking up his sarcasm, maybe you should take your own advice....its clear that the LS1 isnt the best engine ever, but peopel often say it is jokingly and say God created the LS1 and all kinds of ****, so how about you stop riding my ass and stfu...i was simply throwing out numbers that gm rated the two engines at, and i clearly said that they are under rated...what part of that can you not understand? where the ƒuck did i say that LS1s cant dyno 305rwhp stock?
thats the difference in a 97 and 98 camaro z28...the models that have ram air are rated at 320...yes LS1s are under rated, but im pretty sure the LT1 is also
Why'd you rate the LT1 at the crank, and the LS1 at the wheels? Just wondering.
i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated
Notice the "" In his question?
Thank you sir. I thought 99Pony was a tad quicker, but I digress.
i understood the smiley perfectly, i just think it was a dumb statement even with the because it doesnt make sense as a joke or otherwise....plus, half the LS1 nutswingers on this board would have read your statement and thought it was true because the LS1 is the best/fastest engine ever developed...EVER
His numbers really weren't too far off. I seen LS1s dyno close to what he stated. No one has ever said the LS1 was the greatest/fastest engine ever developed so perhaps its time for you to get over it.
no **** they dyno that much, did i not clearly put that i was giving out numbers that gm rated them at? and that i clearly said they were under rated??? learn to ƒucking read
and you jumped my **** for not picking up his sarcasm, maybe you should take your own advice....its clear that the LS1 isnt the best engine ever, but peopel often say it is jokingly and say God created the LS1 and all kinds of ****, so how about you stop riding my ass and stfu...i was simply throwing out numbers that gm rated the two engines at, and i clearly said that they are under rated...what part of that can you not understand? where the ƒuck did i say that LS1s cant dyno 305rwhp stock?
He was being sarcastic and you decided to be a dick.
The only people who say the LS1 is Gods engine are usually Stang owners who are being sarcastic, not the LS1 owners themselves.
Don't get your panties in a bunch kid....since everyone knows that GMs fbody LS1 numbers are BS, there's really no need to post them..
Kenne Bell, Ford Racing Suspension, 3.73 gears, Steeda shifter, Fidanza twin disc, BMR LCA, Panhard Bar, UCA, poly engine mounts, SS brake lines, SOS pods, Spyder drive shaft, Raptor shift light, CHE Brace/Torque limiter, Royal Purple oils. Yes it's fast
Printable Version
RE: ss camaro in my lot - 
Just wondering. 
i was listing what gm rated them at, and both of those are at the crank....maybe if you knew how to read you woulda caught were i said the numbers were underrated 
