waaaaait a minute here, so youre telling me that regardless of the reasons he had to be standing there, the simple fact that he was doing such makes the years of doctors documentaion of his condition invalid¿
_____________________________
it's psychosomatic. you need a lobotomy. ill get a saw. -calvin
waaaaait a minute here, so youre telling me that regardless of the reasons he had to be standing there, the simple fact that he was doing such makes the years of doctors documentaion of his condition invalid¿
waaaaait a minute here, so youre telling me that regardless of the reasons he had to be standing there, the simple fact that he was doing such makes the years of doctors documentaion of his condition invalid¿
yes
duly noted.
_____________________________
it's psychosomatic. you need a lobotomy. ill get a saw. -calvin
In addition, state and local LEOs cannot pick and choose which federal laws to enforce.
uhhh, actually most LEO's have a lot of discretionary power on when and what laws they enforce and with whom. I've walked away more than once after being caught with something I shouldn't have had.
uhhhh no they don't. not legally. But the reality of it is, cops can do whatever they want at that time, because they are the law, until they're not (court, higher ranking officer etc.)
but technically, legally, no, if an officer finds weed on you, he is supposed to charge you with possession. but if he doesn't whos going to argue?
waaaaait a minute here, so youre telling me that regardless of the reasons he had to be standing there, the simple fact that he was doing such makes the years of doctors documentaion of his condition invalid¿
yes
duly noted.
Below I have put in bold the sentence that questions what your real motives are. I honestly don't want to start anything I'm just pointing out where my stance on this issue is coming from
quote:
ORIGINAL: tokinGLX
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ultrashock
Ok so, they take his weed convict him of a felony and give it back? Wtf? Is this the clashing of the state and federal gov?
no, by the way. this was strictly a state case. a little more on what happened, when we went to pick up his stuff, we showed them(at the police station) the court order that said he was entitled to his belongings. they played hardball, said that they needed a faxed official court order from the courthouse. we went to the courthouse and the clerk said the paper my friend had in his hands was the official cort order, signed by the judge and all. return to cops and now they are MUCH more willing to comply with us. 45 minutes of waiting later they come out and say that the da is not willing to consent to the court order, they say that they will allow everything BUT the marijuana and the plants. because the schedule of my friends lawyer was so busy, he was unable to attend this property transfer and had been in court on the other side of the state all morning. when he got word of what was happening, he was fumed and awhile later the cops come out with a revised order saying that my friend can get some of the marijuana back, but they(the cops) had ABSOLUTELY no idea how much my friend was entitled to legally have under state law. we explained the law to them, they said it doesnt matter what we tell them, we had to give them printed proof of the law in order to release his medicine. (how often do you hear law enforcement tell you 'ignorance is no excuse'......) we told them that we could show them in under 2 minutes if they would let us show them on a computer with internet access, that was met with some **** excuse. we told them the number to call and who to ask at the state health department, that was met with some **** excuse. so we went home, got high, called the lady at the state health department and had her fax the documents to the cops. went back and now they were very, very eager to complete the transfer and get it over with. but of course, that went about as well as one would expect it would....cops with pot, and every little thing with thc(vaporized remains of pot) choosing what to give back to the patient. the law states that a patient can have 2 ounces of dried marijuana, so they gave hi'm one ounce of good usable medicine, and one ounce of the spent vapeash. my friend was very busy that day(he was planning on surrendering himself to start the sentence later that day) so he didnt want to sit around and argue with them about how worthless the vapeash was, so he just smiled and left. i got all of this on video, by the way (':
just gotta try to make it back home today, lots of snow got dumped on the mountains the night i came out here, there was a pretty massive type accident on the freeway going back, so i was stuck here one night, hopefully things will be smooth driving for me on the way back. no worries tho, it aint an adventure if youre not truely scared for your life at least once along the journey
waaaaait a minute here, so youre telling me that regardless of the reasons he had to be standing there, the simple fact that he was doing such makes the years of doctors documentaion of his condition invalid¿
yes
duly noted.
Below I have put in bold the sentence that questions what your real motives are. I honestly don't want to start anything I'm just pointing out where my stance on this issue is coming from
quote:
so we went home, got high, called the lady at the state health department and had her fax the documents to the cops.
if you were going to jail for 2 weeks, wouldnt you want to go in as high as possible¿ and guess what...just because somebody primarily uses marijuana for medicinal reasons doesnt mean they cant use it for recreational purposes as well. its just that most of the time, theyre too concerned with the neverending pain to care about recreational tokage.
_____________________________
it's psychosomatic. you need a lobotomy. ill get a saw. -calvin
well for one thing I never liked being high so I guess you're asking the wrong person. But why would you want to be high going to jail?
what effects of being high did you not like¿ i dont often enjoy being drunk, but if i was facing jailtime(and i had no weed handy) i would go in drunk as a skunk. i would choose an intoxicated state over sobriety because i would be facing plenty of mandatory sober days ahead. also, obviously, it makes the tedium much more bearable
< Message edited by tokinGLX -- 5/5/2008 12:47:08 AM >
_____________________________
it's psychosomatic. you need a lobotomy. ill get a saw. -calvin