Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

casting numbers

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs >> casting numbers Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
casting numbers - 4/21/2005 8:43:52 PM   
rattlehead_74

 

Posts: 26
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
hi, hows everyone doing today! ive got a simple question to ask and hopefully someone can help me out,,ive retrieved the casting numbers off my block (under the starter) now all i have to do is find a place where i can get info on these #s (c90e-6015-c) anyone know of a website to go too? thanks in advance!
Post #: 1
RE: casting numbers - 4/22/2005 4:19:40 AM   
onemean66stang

 

Posts: 61
Joined: 3/15/2005
Status: offline
i though the c9 in the beginning of the casting numbers ment 69, because C was for the 60's, and 9 was the ninth year, which means it a 69 block which would be a 302 wouldn't it?

(in reply to rattlehead_74)
Post #: 2
RE: casting numbers - 4/22/2005 6:56:00 AM   
69FECoupe

 

Posts: 683
Joined: 4/15/2004
Status: offline
You are correct, it's a 69 block. I'm not sure what size though. The only cross reff. I can find says it's a 351w.

< Message edited by 69FECoupe -- 4/22/2005 7:03:23 AM >

(in reply to onemean66stang)
Post #: 3
RE: casting numbers - 4/22/2005 7:31:00 AM   
rattlehead_74

 

Posts: 26
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
ok so its a 69 ,how can i tell if its a 351/302/289? wow the guy i got it from was way off,,he thought the motor came out of a 90 mustang!!!,,number tell the thuth! thanks for the help! tom

(in reply to 69FECoupe)
Post #: 4
RE: casting numbers - 4/22/2005 3:59:48 PM   
Marty256


Posts: 51
Joined: 1/12/2005
Status: offline
Marty256's photo gallery
Rattlehead. Looks like you've got a 351 C from a 1969 Fairlane/Torino. Check out this web site
http://www.classicmustang.com/decoding_part_numbers.htm

(in reply to rattlehead_74)
Post #: 5
RE: casting numbers - 4/22/2005 5:01:06 PM   
rattlehead_74

 

Posts: 26
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
thanks alot marty,and all others! for the help,wow i didnt know the 289/302 were so similar to the 351 style engine,,now one thing has me baffled about this ,,i read somewhere about external signs of the two,and someone said the bottom thermostat bolt on the 302 you cant get a socket on as for the 351 you can because of the deck heights? mine you cant?????

(in reply to Marty256)
Post #: 6
RE: casting numbers - 4/22/2005 9:10:19 PM   
fats429

 

Posts: 381
Joined: 2/27/2005
From: Philly. PA.
Status: offline
If the theremostat houseing is on the intake it deafently ant a 351c . The 351c has it into the block

Hear is the fail safe way to tell the 302 from 351 . look at the joint whare the head meets the block on the front . on the 302 the timeing cover is almost touching joint . on the 351w it has about 1/2" gap betewwn them . and the intake is a lot bigger on a windsor

It can not be a 289 , they stoped makeing them in 1968 or C8OE

(in reply to rattlehead_74)
Post #: 7
RE: casting numbers - 4/25/2005 7:25:17 PM   
rattlehead_74

 

Posts: 26
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
ok heres the skinny,,,from what ive learned from others ,i have a 302 out of a 1969 fairlane or torino, whats wierd is that when i looked the code up from a link in a previous post these casting numbers pointed towards a cleveland? but the fail safe way proved that wrong! my thermostat housing bolts to the intake,and the timing cover almost touches the joint at the block and head,so with that out of the way lol how does 150 to 152 psi per cyl sound for a compression check?can i calculate comp ratio with these numbers?thanks for the exellent advise!tom

(in reply to fats429)
Post #: 8
RE: casting numbers - 4/26/2005 5:39:10 PM   
69mach1377


Posts: 1321
Joined: 8/17/2004
Status: offline
I don't think they made 351Cs in 69, even though many think so. I heard too many guys talk about a 69 mach1 with a 351C, but when I press them, it was a 351W afterall. This bugs me almost as bad as those who refer to a commom 302 as a Boss 302...

_____________________________

69Mach1-SteetBoss377,351W blk/stroker crank,10:1cr,351C-2V hds,2500 stall FMX,3.50:1 posi,rack&pinion/tilt,16"Centerlines w/Kumho Victoracers,all MSD,Holley 750,custom paint,Shelby drop,Cam Adv
http://photobucket.com/albums/v618/danaranda/69stang

(in reply to rattlehead_74)
Post #: 9
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17922
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14532
addermk214002
ride of the 13716
hotrods_n_bo13328
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211993
1slo8511751

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.