my point is 1 with our cars wieght and 270 rwhp at best cant and will not and will never in the history of racing run 13.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8. He MIGHT be lucky enough to grab 13.9 if and only if he grabs traction. But since he is stock he doesnt have drag radials and herefore he wont grab traction and therefor he will most likely run in the 14s. But anyways I am willing to race u in ur bone stock mach. But we probably dont live anywhere close to eachother to ever see so oh well. Enough about who car is better.... And for my kill list* 99 Firebird LS1 with lid Modded STI Modded WRX 04 Mach catback and intake Evo stock---- driver mod
dude now i have enough info to raise the bullsh!t flag, you aint killing none of those cars with your mods. Maybe the modded wrx but LS1, machs 1 and evos would anhilate you bad
< Message edited by cacimar -- 3/10/2008 1:46:50 PM >
_____________________________
04 SRT: 50 trim + supporting mods running only 11lbs.
Posts: 4124
Joined: 3/13/2007 From: Huntsville, AL Status: offline
quote:
LMAO dude your ignorant liitle prick aint you i ran a 14.0 with T/C ON, and pulled a 2.1 with it on as well. ill even go to the track on sunday and turn it off for you, and when i run a 13.5 or better i want you to suck my balls....btw check your info before you post----> , M1R
click the damn link thats why i put it in my origional post
_____________________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814 bone stock Her name is Melanie
my point is 1 with our cars wieght and 270 rwhp at best cant and will not and will never in the history of racing run 13.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8. He MIGHT be lucky enough to grab 13.9 if and only if he grabs traction. But since he is stock he doesnt have drag radials and herefore he wont grab traction and therefor he will most likely run in the 14s. But anyways I am willing to race u in ur bone stock mach. But we probably dont live anywhere close to eachother to ever see so oh well. Enough about who car is better.... And for my kill list* 99 Firebird LS1 with lid Modded STI Modded WRX 04 Mach catback and intake Evo stock---- driver mod
dude now i have enough info to raise the bullsh!t flag, you aint killing none of those cars with your mods. Maybe the modded wrx but LS1, machs 1 and evos would anhilate you bad
LOL.. maybe I should convince him to put his beast against my mach on pinks if he thinks USMC's is too slow.. (Which it isn't..) Then at least I'd have a new DD.. What do you think Caci? lol
Better yet, is the OP actually brain-dead enough to think he can take me? lol At least now we know where that weird smell's been coming from.. The OP is spewing sh1t all over the place..
damn only 230 at the wheels, i still got you by 70whp and 500 pounds. but you have a bigger cock right.... loser
lol when did i say i have only 230 to the wheels? And for u Mach ppl. A 2003 mach comes 305 hp to the crank. Now if you have an auto u lose 18% of that to the wheels. And for u manuals u lose 12%. So lets do some math: 305 * .18= 54.9 so 305-54.9= 250.1 rwhp/ auto 305 * .12= 36.6 so 305-36.6= 268.4 rwhp/ manual.
so ur stock car which weighs 3300 lbs with 268 rwhp at best runs 13.1s? lol. and for the cobalt ss ur car runs mid 14s best if its stock. With boltons ill give u high 13s then we can run and ill put u to shme as for the mach.
_____________________________
BBK CAI SLP Loudmouth II Catback O/R X MAC LT headers SCT Chip Dyno Tune Accufab 70mm T/B & Plenum Ford Racing 4.10s BFG G-Force DRs
damn only 230 at the wheels, i still got you by 70whp and 500 pounds. but you have a bigger cock right.... loser
lol when did i say i have only 230 to the wheels? And for u Mach ppl. A 2003 mach comes 305 hp to the crank. Now if you have an auto u lose 18% of that to the wheels. And for u manuals u lose 12%. So lets do some math: 305 * .18= 54.9 so 305-54.9= 250.1 rwhp/ auto 305 * .12= 36.6 so 305-36.6= 268.4 rwhp/ manual.
so ur stock car which weighs 3300 lbs with 268 rwhp at best runs 13.1s? lol. and for the cobalt ss ur car runs mid 14s best if its stock. With boltons ill give u high 13s then we can run and ill put u to shme as for the mach.
The factory ford rating is at 305CHP, though the numbers can vary as much as 5-10CHP (probably more) in either direction from car to car, as no one car is the same. Which potentially gets you anywhere from 259-277 RWHP on any given day considering conditions.. And that's IF they weren't under-rated, which they were in many cases..
By the way, I highly doubt you'd put me to shame.. you sound like a 10yr old a$$hat trying to defend why he wants to stay outside later when mommy says to go eat dinner.. Perhaps I'm just daft but I don't recall you ever saying what you were putting on the ground for numbers? I'm at 448.6 RWHP / 428.2 RWTQ.. If you think you can beat those numbers I'm all ears..
And by the way, edmunds isn't exactly the most reliable of sources, so again, nice try...
< Message edited by Subotai_95 -- 3/10/2008 5:19:55 PM >
put in ur weight and rwhp and see what u get. I know this isnt completley accurate but its not completley wrong either. And this is assuming u grab traction. But since u dont have Drag Radials and ur car is stock i would laugh and still am laughing at ur 13.1.
_____________________________
BBK CAI SLP Loudmouth II Catback O/R X MAC LT headers SCT Chip Dyno Tune Accufab 70mm T/B & Plenum Ford Racing 4.10s BFG G-Force DRs
damn only 230 at the wheels, i still got you by 70whp and 500 pounds. but you have a bigger cock right.... loser
lol when did i say i have only 230 to the wheels? And for u Mach ppl. A 2003 mach comes 305 hp to the crank. Now if you have an auto u lose 18% of that to the wheels. And for u manuals u lose 12%. So lets do some math: 305 * .18= 54.9 so 305-54.9= 250.1 rwhp/ auto 305 * .12= 36.6 so 305-36.6= 268.4 rwhp/ manual.
so ur stock car which weighs 3300 lbs with 268 rwhp at best runs 13.1s? lol. and for the cobalt ss ur car runs mid 14s best if its stock. With boltons ill give u high 13s then we can run and ill put u to shme as for the mach.
The factory ford rating is at 305CHP, though the numbers can vary as much as 5-10CHP (probably more) in either direction from car to car, as no one car is the same. Which potentially gets you anywhere from 259-277 RWHP on any given day considering conditions.. And that's IF they weren't under-rated, which they were in many cases..
By the way, I highly doubt you'd put me to shame.. you sound like a 10yr old a$$hat trying to defend why he wants to stay outside later when mommy says to go eat dinner.. Perhaps I'm just daft but I don't recall you ever saying what you were putting on the ground for numbers? I'm at 448.6 RWHP / 428.2 RWTQ.. If you think you can beat those numbers I'm all ears..
And by the way, edmunds isn't exactly the most reliable of sources, so again, nice try...
one im not trying to call anyone slow. I just pulled the BS flag when he told me his stock Mach went 13.1 in the 1/4. And we arent all lil rich kids like u to put that money into our cars to get that much pwer. My car is not faster than urs. However my car puts down 252rwhp with drag radials. And for the Cobalt ss who runs close to 15s shouldn even open his mouth about beating me.
_____________________________
BBK CAI SLP Loudmouth II Catback O/R X MAC LT headers SCT Chip Dyno Tune Accufab 70mm T/B & Plenum Ford Racing 4.10s BFG G-Force DRs
put in ur weight and rwhp and see what u get. I know this isnt completley accurate but its not completley wrong either. And this is assuming u grab traction. But since u dont have Drag Radials and ur car is stock i would laugh and still am laughing at ur 13.1.
LOL.. you obviously didn't read my sig did you? That stock run was before my mods, and was the last time I was at a track.. The 13.166 I ran was a fluke best run that I haven't been able to duplicate since. I usually average between 13.2 and 13.25.. And if you're laughing at that, you obviously do more BENCH racing than you do track racing.. I've seen pro-mod drivers in specialty events at Norwalk take stock mach's to high 12.9's before.. And yes, I do actually have drag radials.. Your little calculator gave me an 11.39.. What pray tell did it give you? IF you can give an honest answer that is..
Oh, and as if it wasn't obvious, check out the photo in my avatar and you'll see I"m not exactly "stock", a$$bag..
Well, then my apologies if you weren't speaking to me, I still think USMC's mach would hand you your ass.. Unless you've got something under the hood like H/C/I, or headers/exhaust that's going to improve your top end, a stock mach's 3rd gear is going to rape you if the driver knows what he's doing..
One more thing.. IWHINE's Cobalt isn't exactly THAT slow pally.. You might want to go read some of his other posts before you go spouting off your mouth regarding people you know jack about..
< Message edited by Subotai_95 -- 3/10/2008 5:36:03 PM >
Team MF Member #069 Posts: 8571
Joined: 5/21/2004 Status: offline
You do realize that the Cobalt is not stock right? In fact the only stock car that has posted (that I know of) is USMC's and I would still bet that he would win. One more time, what did you run in the 1/4??????? Oh that's right. BTW I am no rich "kid", I am over 30, have a job, house, kids etc. In other words I pay for everything. Come back when you get out high school and car runs better than 13.0
Printable Version
RE: Me and 00cls1camaross doing damage! VID! - 
