Shorties VS Long Tubes, s
Login | |
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/19/2003 11:19:00 PM
|
|
|
QWK90GT
Posts: 39
Joined: 11/12/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
I put longtubes on a 98GT that already had an o/r pipe and flowmasters couldn't even tell a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/20/2003 9:10:45 AM
|
|
|
jeep45238
Posts: 2199
Joined: 3/31/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
Something wrong with installation (like a leak somehwere) or the car having some problems?
In most cars when you install something like this and you don't get gains it's because the computer detects something wrong and puts it in "limp" mode.....really rich with hardly any ignition lead. This helps prevent more damage if the driver continues to abuse the car, which we all know happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/20/2003 7:30:49 PM
|
|
|
GSXRIntensity
Posts: 1194
Joined: 5/29/2003 From: Chi-town!!! Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Dan02GT] You could try a performance chip or a custom tuned chip, then throw those flowmasters in the garbage. [/QUOTE] ...someone had to tell him about those Flows lol.
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/20/2003 7:51:40 PM
|
|
|
Dan04COBRA
 Team MF Member #420 Posts: 14534
Joined: 7/24/2003 Status: offline
|
Hahah
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 2:18:39 AM
|
|
|
FiveOhNo
Posts: 613
Joined: 11/18/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Dan02GT] Shorties are a 5-6 hour job for a shop. They are rather easy to install, just a tight space to work in makes for slow progress.. Majority of shops charge 60 and hour...I'd say anywhere from 400-600. [/QUOTE] i got my long tubes installed for just under $200 on my 5.0. the mechanic said they slid right into place...? personally, i like the look of the long tubes better, especially when you take a look under the car and see the giant collector . about this whole issue of "well, you save some money getting the shorties, so you can get something else that will balance out gains of the long tubes." i'd rather spend the money on the best performing parts so that when i get that "something else" it will be that much faster. long tubes seem to be more of a 'looking ahead' type of exhaust. i got them now so that when i have many more mods (when i'm 60 ) i won't have to come back and redo the exhaust. FiveOhNo37962.0967592593
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 2:33:08 AM
|
|
|
Jugador1
Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
you'll never be the fastest so you might as well go for affordability. and as i see it screamin' ass high end really isnt necessary on a street car so shorties to me seem ideal...low cost and low end, dont get much better IMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 4:26:45 PM
|
|
|
FiveOhNo
Posts: 613
Joined: 11/18/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Dan02GT] You have valid points, and so does Jugador. You happened to be very lucky with your install price. Those long tubes are nice to have, but doesn't make very much sense with those Flowmasters choking that exhaust system.  [/QUOTE] what would be a good muffler? the flows were on there when i bought the car. so, jug, you're saying you don't use the high end power (upper rpm)? because i know i don't race to only 35-45mph...top end is very helpful.
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 4:38:34 PM
|
|
|
Jugador1
Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
i don't use any power (lol), but i personally think low end is mo bettah than high end cause when do you really race to ungodly speeds? less often than a little "up to speed" race i would imagine, making shorties the better choice in my mind. more efficiency on low end makes better city mileage too i would think.
|
|
|
|
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 4:54:29 PM
|
|
|
FiveOhNo
Posts: 613
Joined: 11/18/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Jugador] i don't use any power (lol), but i personally think low end is mo bettah than high end cause when do you really race to ungodly speeds? less often than a little "up to speed" race i would imagine, making shorties the better choice in my mind. more efficiency on low end makes better city mileage too i would think. [/QUOTE] yeah, but top end in terms of exhaust flow is upper rpm...and me, i use the more than the lower rpm when i race...but that's just me...maybe other people only run it up to...3k rpm? haha...not much of a race though  FiveOhNo37962.7056597222
|
|
|
|
|