Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

Shorties VS Long Tubes, s

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Detailing >> Shorties VS Long Tubes, s Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/19/2003 11:19:00 PM   
QWK90GT

 

Posts: 39
Joined: 11/12/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
I put longtubes on a 98GT that already had an o/r pipe and flowmasters couldn't even tell a difference.

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 21
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/20/2003 9:10:45 AM   
jeep45238

 

Posts: 2199
Joined: 3/31/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
Something wrong with installation (like a leak somehwere) or the car having some problems?

In most cars when you install something like this and you don't get gains it's because the computer detects something wrong and puts it in "limp" mode.....really rich with hardly any ignition lead. This helps prevent more damage if the driver continues to abuse the car, which we all know happens.

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 22
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/20/2003 10:19:42 AM   
Dan04COBRA



Team MF Member #420
Posts: 14534
Joined: 7/24/2003
Status: offline
Dan04COBRA's photo gallery

Like jeep said, sometimes a car is just randomly sensitive to minor mods, and like he said the computer goes into 'limp home mode' pulls the timing and adds gobs of fuel. But, I don't suggest running the car around like this very long.


You could try a performance chip or a custom tuned chip, then throw those flowmasters in the garbage.


(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 23
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/20/2003 7:30:49 PM   
GSXRIntensity

 

Posts: 1194
Joined: 5/29/2003
From: Chi-town!!!
Status: offline
[QUOTE=Dan02GT]

You could try a performance chip or a custom tuned chip, then throw those flowmasters in the garbage.


[/QUOTE]


...someone had to tell him about those Flows lol.


(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 24
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 11/20/2003 7:51:40 PM   
Dan04COBRA



Team MF Member #420
Posts: 14534
Joined: 7/24/2003
Status: offline
Dan04COBRA's photo gallery
Hahah

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 25
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 2:18:39 AM   
FiveOhNo


Posts: 613
Joined: 11/18/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
FiveOhNo's photo gallery
[QUOTE=Dan02GT]

Shorties are a 5-6 hour job for a shop. They are rather easy to install, just a tight space to work in makes for slow progress..


Majority of shops charge 60 and hour...I'd say anywhere from 400-600.


[/QUOTE]


i got my long tubes installed for just under $200 on my 5.0.  the mechanic said they slid right into place...?  personally, i like the look of the long tubes better, especially when you take a look under the car and see the giant collector .  about this whole issue of "well, you save some money getting the shorties, so you can get something else that will balance out gains of the long tubes."  i'd rather spend the money on the best performing parts so that when i get that "something else" it will be that much faster.  long tubes seem to be more of a 'looking ahead' type of exhaust.  i got them now so that when i have many more mods (when i'm 60 ) i won't have to come back and redo the exhaust.

FiveOhNo37962.0967592593

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 26
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 2:33:08 AM   
Jugador1

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003
From: United States
Status: offline

you'll never be the fastest so you might as well go for affordability.  and as i see it screamin' ass high end really isnt necessary on a street car so shorties to me seem ideal...low cost and low end, dont get much better IMO


(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 27
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 5:40:21 AM   
Dan04COBRA



Team MF Member #420
Posts: 14534
Joined: 7/24/2003
Status: offline
Dan04COBRA's photo gallery

You have valid points, and so does Jugador.


You happened to be very lucky with your install price. Those long tubes are nice to have, but doesn't make very much sense with those Flowmasters choking that exhaust system.


(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 28
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 4:26:45 PM   
FiveOhNo


Posts: 613
Joined: 11/18/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
FiveOhNo's photo gallery
[QUOTE=Dan02GT]

You have valid points, and so does Jugador.


You happened to be very lucky with your install price. Those long tubes are nice to have, but doesn't make very much sense with those Flowmasters choking that exhaust system.


[/QUOTE]


what would be a good muffler?  the flows were on there when i bought the car.  so, jug, you're saying you don't use the high end power (upper rpm)?  because i know i don't race to only 35-45mph...top end is very helpful.


(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 29
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 4:38:34 PM   
Jugador1

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003
From: United States
Status: offline

i don't use any power (lol), but i personally think low end is mo bettah than high end cause when do you really race to ungodly speeds?  less often than a little "up to speed" race i would imagine, making shorties the better choice in my mind.  more efficiency on low end makes better city mileage too i would think.


(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 30
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 4:54:29 PM   
FiveOhNo


Posts: 613
Joined: 11/18/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
FiveOhNo's photo gallery
[QUOTE=Jugador]

i don't use any power (lol), but i personally think low end is mo bettah than high end cause when do you really race to ungodly speeds?  less often than a little "up to speed" race i would imagine, making shorties the better choice in my mind.  more efficiency on low end makes better city mileage too i would think.


[/QUOTE]


yeah, but top end in terms of exhaust flow is upper rpm...and me, i use the more than the lower rpm when i race...but that's just me...maybe other people only run it up to...3k rpm?  haha...not much of a race though

FiveOhNo37962.7056597222

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 31
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/7/2003 5:12:07 PM   
Jugador1

 

Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
i'm just saying low end makes for good launches and on races up to speed that low end grunt makes the difference.

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 32
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/8/2003 10:22:43 AM   
Dilostangtr01

 

Posts: 35
Joined: 12/7/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
Long tube headers you have to change your exhaust system a little and wiast alot more money.  Shorty headers you can just place in as it is to your system.  Plus they cost less and produce just as much power unless your producing about 600 HP with other mods.              Go with the shorties unless money isn't an issue then might as well get long tubes to say you have them but performance wise and exhaust tone, theres no BIG difference.              -DILO

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 33
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/8/2003 10:52:24 AM   
Dilostangtr01

 

Posts: 35
Joined: 12/7/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
Dynomax is the #1 ranked performance exhaust you can buy.  Flowmasters just said like rumbling.  Dynomax provides the muscle car enthusiast with a race car sound.  Performance and sound are both a #1 for your exhaust.  Flowmaster is just been around a while and thats why everyone is used to them because they were around before eveyone else.  New era, go with Dynomax.  Magnaflows are pretty good too.              -DILO

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 34
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/9/2003 12:51:43 PM   
FiveOhNo


Posts: 613
Joined: 11/18/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
FiveOhNo's photo gallery

[QUOTE=Dilostangtr01]Dynomax is the #1 ranked performance exhaust you can buy.  Flowmasters just said like rumbling.  Dynomax provides the muscle car enthusiast with a race car sound.  Performance and sound are both a #1 for your exhaust.  Flowmaster is just been around a while and thats why everyone is used to them because they were around before eveyone else.  New era, go with Dynomax.  Magnaflows are pretty good too.              -DILO[/QUOTE]


i replaced my whole exhaust at one time...it's not like i had an h-pipe then had to buy a short h-pipe...so it really wasn't that much more expensive ($370 for everything).  about the mufflers...how does the dynomax sound compared to the flowmasters?  what about the spintech mufflers?


(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 35
Shorties VS Long Tubes, s - 12/10/2003 1:22:19 AM   
jeep45238

 

Posts: 2199
Joined: 3/31/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
The don't have the classic lop dub sound to 'em, but they're still deep and you can definately tell it's a V8.

Just a MASSIVE amount more flow. Here's a nice bit of info....keep in mind that it's a 1 chamber Flow....not a 2 or 3....

http://home.earthlink.net/~tmahon281/image.html

(in reply to Dan04COBRA)
Post #: 36
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Detailing
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14534
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511767

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.