mustangs are in fact...slow
Login  | |
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/7/2003 8:49:51 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
Surely that 13.2 is on slicks though?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/7/2003 9:40:06 PM
|
|
|
Spinnerbate
Posts: 92
Joined: 10/7/2003
Status: offline
|
You are silly if you think a mach 1 will run a 13.2 stock. I can't believe you people think they are that much faster than a gt. They are fast, but not a low 13. A new cobra is only running a 12.8-12.9 at the local track here... Get real
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/7/2003 9:48:25 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
That's what I was thinking from what I've seen and read. I thought stock for stock they were slightly slower than the new TA's and Z's.95LT137932.9101851852
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/7/2003 9:58:51 PM
|
|
|
Spinnerbate
Posts: 92
Joined: 10/7/2003
Status: offline
|
They are rated at 13.9, so figure that they will probably run 13.7-13.8 with a perfect driver and a bit of tail-wind on a perfect day.
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 12:06:22 AM
|
|
|
Redline5th
Posts: 802
Joined: 7/17/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
low 13's nah, with a few things done to it I'm sure it could hit that, and a nice driver and some good tires...few bolt ons...
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 2:41:54 AM
|
|
|
GSRGuy18
Posts: 438
Joined: 9/7/2003
From: Dallas, TX
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Spinnerbate]They are rated at 13.9, so figure that they will probably run 13.7-13.8 with a perfect driver and a bit of tail-wind on a perfect day.[/QUOTE]
No. A Mach 1 has significantly more power than a GT. And it breathes better. I believe 13.4 is fully achievable by anyone that can drive worth a damn, while 13.2 is "perfect." And btw... I have a friend with an '02 WS6 6-speed that ran a 12.99 @ 110mph+ in 40 degree weather, with a horrible 2.15 60' time.
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 4:25:11 AM
|
|
|
randylamarr
Posts: 48
Joined: 11/2/2003
From: Belgium
Status: offline
|
Hey there buddy all I got is a 90GT where are you from cause I race you for pink slips right now if you want. And I dont care what mods you have done. I will show you that mustangs are not slow. And just to be a sport about it I will come to you and race on your turf. So are you down or what.
PS when you lose you can buy your car back for the price of the gas its took me to woop your AS*. Just Remember "ONLY LITTLE BOY WITH GIRLY TOYS WEAR BOWTIES"
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 9:04:16 AM
|
|
|
mdvaldosta
Posts: 8826
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
This thread is yet another reason why we laugh at mullet heads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 10:57:48 AM
|
|
|
Redline5th
Posts: 802
Joined: 7/17/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=GSRGuy18]
[QUOTE=Spinnerbate]They are rated at 13.9, so figure that they will probably run 13.7-13.8 with a perfect driver and a bit of tail-wind on a perfect day.[/QUOTE]
No. A Mach 1 has significantly more power than a GT. And it breathes better. I believe 13.4 is fully achievable by anyone that can drive worth a damn, while 13.2 is "perfect." And btw... I have a friend with an '02 WS6 6-speed that ran a 12.99 @ 110mph+ in 40 degree weather, with a horrible 2.15 60' time.
[/QUOTE]
really cool...
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 11:56:58 AM
|
|
|
Black03GT
Posts: 25
Joined: 10/17/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
only reason he needs nawwwwwwwws is cuz he know that his camaro aint s**t that any one of us here could spank his azz in reverse
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 12:26:42 PM
|
|
|
Spinnerbate
Posts: 92
Joined: 10/7/2003
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=GSRGuy18]
[QUOTE=Spinnerbate]They are rated at 13.9, so figure that they will probably run 13.7-13.8 with a perfect driver and a bit of tail-wind on a perfect day.[/QUOTE]
No. A Mach 1 has significantly more power than a GT. And it breathes better. I believe 13.4 is fully achievable by anyone that can drive worth a damn, while 13.2 is "perfect." And btw... I have a friend with an '02 WS6 6-speed that ran a 12.99 @ 110mph+ in 40 degree weather, with a horrible 2.15 60' time. [/QUOTE] When you decide to trade in that tuner and get a Mach 1, post a slip that shows you in the low 13's. If you do a few cheap mods with some good rubber, then yes it will, but not off of the showroom floor. I have played around with one on the street and it damned sure ain't a full second quicker than a stock gt. We are not talking a difference of 100 hp. 
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 12:38:07 PM
|
|
|
GSRGuy18
Posts: 438
Joined: 9/7/2003
From: Dallas, TX
Status: offline
|
stock GTs can do 13.8-13.9
|
|
|
|
|
mustangs are in fact...slow - 11/8/2003 12:52:59 PM
|
|
|
Spinnerbate
Posts: 92
Joined: 10/7/2003
Status: offline
|
Yeah, with slicks maybe. I am not sure where you get your stats, but c'mon. Be real, I have one and I would damned sure love to say it will run 13's, but it won't.(probably will now with mods) Don't you ever go to the track to watch cars?? I go just about every Saturday including tonight and all Stock 99 and up Gt coupes run a consistent 14-14.2, depending on weather and track. The best I have seen is like a 14.06 or something very low, but he had a mere perfect 60'...
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
