View Full Version : bye,bye camaro


whiteyford0212
03-24-2005, 01:52 PM
http://www.godfatheracing.com/tmvids/incontt370vsturbomustang.wmv

LINK FIXED AT BOTTOM

94BOOSTDCobra
03-24-2005, 01:56 PM
Very nice :)

98LS1
03-24-2005, 02:01 PM
What does that SS have done to it? That bike looked slow to run even with the Camaro considering it looked and sounded bone stock.

I think I'm gonna find someone with a stock GT to race...I might even spray em. Wonder how far my zoom feature works on my camera? [8D]

EDIT: I love the way that Mustang sounds....I want a turbo some kind of bad.

whiteyford0212
03-24-2005, 02:15 PM
whaaaaaaaaaa...heres another one

http://www.godfatheracing.com/tmvids/ghostvsturbomustang.wmv

94BOOSTDCobra
03-24-2005, 02:23 PM
damn he just walks on ppl. any numbers on that FOX?

98LS1
03-24-2005, 02:28 PM
Oh, that's the guy. There's TONS of vids of his car. Running off and leaving everything. Bikes, Cobra's, F-bods, etc...

Derf00
03-24-2005, 02:40 PM
Hey that's a freeway here in AZ.... Looks a lot like it anyway.... 101 to be more precise.

badtzmaru
03-24-2005, 02:47 PM
beautiful video! :D

whiteyford0212
03-24-2005, 03:10 PM
its more than just that car..theres a white turbo notch too (not on that video)
and like 5 other turbo mustangs

mikev08826
03-24-2005, 06:14 PM
bad link or something...not working

MooseStang88
03-24-2005, 07:22 PM
I could not get the site to come up........

whiteyford0212
03-24-2005, 07:40 PM
http://www.godfatheracing.com/tmvids/incontt370vsturbomustangs.wmv


LINK FIXED

jamz
03-24-2005, 08:00 PM
While i'm a fan of both TA's, Camaros & Stangs ( i've had 3 camaros/ 2 stangs & 1 transam) lets do recall just how well those GM 305's compared to Ford's 302's. Not all to well. It took GM moving up to the 350 before they could get back the bragging rights.

Yeah everyone know's the 350 takes the 302's & 281's, but am i wrong or is that like comparing a 350 to a 400 or 427?

blank
03-24-2005, 09:17 PM
nice stang i want a turbo stang so bad

I G Joe
03-24-2005, 09:43 PM
wow... thats a slow mustang.

01GTvertible
03-24-2005, 10:47 PM
ORIGINAL: jamz

While i'm a fan of both TA's, Camaros & Stangs ( i've had 3 camaros/ 2 stangs & 1 transam) lets do recall just how well those GM 305's compared to Ford's 302's. Not all to well. It took GM moving up to the 350 before they could get back the bragging rights.

Yeah everyone know's the 350 takes the 302's & 281's, but am i wrong or is that like comparing a 350 to a 400 or 427?


man are you gonna hear it now from some people on here......but i agree

that stang is a freak. you guys did see the maro hang w/ the bike right? some in here didnt believe that i beat a 600 w/ my car. that sticker is pretty funny on the maro.

STA
03-24-2005, 11:30 PM
what in that mustang besides a turbo??? with speed like that looks like that stang is running [sm=nxsmile.gif]

OICW
03-25-2005, 04:18 AM
ORIGINAL: 01GTvertible

some in here didnt believe that i beat a 600 w/ my car. that sticker is pretty funny on the maro.



Pretty sure that turbo 5.0 had more top end than your Eaton. I'm guessing you're around 450 rwhp? Most people that build a turbo stang will have 500 + hp. Don't forget a 5.0 is like 600 lbs lighter.

Turbos are a lot faster than blowers at the same boost. A twin turbo 03 Cobra makes 670 (or something close) hp at only 11 psi of boost.

Driver_Kiddo
03-25-2005, 08:02 AM
ORIGINAL: OICW


ORIGINAL: 01GTvertible

some in here didnt believe that i beat a 600 w/ my car. that sticker is pretty funny on the maro.



Pretty sure that turbo 5.0 had more top end than your Eaton. I'm guessing you're around 450 rwhp? Most people that build a turbo stang will have 500 + hp. Don't forget a 5.0 is like 600 lbs lighter.

Turbos are a lot faster than blowers at the same boost. A twin turbo 03 Cobra makes 670 (or something close) hp at only 11 psi of boost.


that sounds so delicious....

I G Joe
03-25-2005, 08:08 AM
lol you guys dont know what real engines are unless you've felt the pull of an N/A Olds 455 =P

also you have to give it up to chevrolet for putting out so much power out of their cam in block engines.
dunno about you but ford needs to step it up a bit when it comes to performance =P

whiteyford0212
03-25-2005, 11:24 AM
word is its like 600 hp or some ****..heres a pic of the motor:



local://upfiles/5364/DABE251998294E68B3C3565A03F81BF5.jpg

01GTvertible
03-25-2005, 12:10 PM
ORIGINAL: OICW


ORIGINAL: 01GTvertible

some in here didnt believe that i beat a 600 w/ my car. that sticker is pretty funny on the maro.



Pretty sure that turbo 5.0 had more top end than your Eaton. I'm guessing you're around 450 rwhp? Most people that build a turbo stang will have 500 + hp. Don't forget a 5.0 is like 600 lbs lighter.

Turbos are a lot faster than blowers at the same boost. A twin turbo 03 Cobra makes 670 (or something close) hp at only 11 psi of boost.


i wasnt talking about the mustang, i was talking about how the SS kept up w/ the bike, and if it can do it, then my cobra could beat it. i have nothing for that fox in the vid.
turbochargedpower.com has a sweet twin turbo set up for my cobra. but its like 7500 bucks.

bobby
03-25-2005, 02:19 PM
[sm=jawdrop.gif][sm=jawdrop.gif][sm=jawdrop.gif][sm=jawdrop.gif][sm=jawdrop.gif][sm=jawdrop.gif][sm=jawdrop.gif]

2000GT4.6
03-25-2005, 03:43 PM
ORIGINAL: 01GTvertible


ORIGINAL: OICW


ORIGINAL: 01GTvertible

some in here didnt believe that i beat a 600 w/ my car. that sticker is pretty funny on the maro.



Pretty sure that turbo 5.0 had more top end than your Eaton. I'm guessing you're around 450 rwhp? Most people that build a turbo stang will have 500 + hp. Don't forget a 5.0 is like 600 lbs lighter.

Turbos are a lot faster than blowers at the same boost. A twin turbo 03 Cobra makes 670 (or something close) hp at only 11 psi of boost.


i wasnt talking about the mustang, i was talking about how the SS kept up w/ the bike, and if it can do it, then my cobra could beat it. i have nothing for that fox in the vid.
turbochargedpower.com has a sweet twin turbo set up for my cobra. but its like 7500 bucks.


To me it looks like the bike let off or somethin, but I am not saying that a modified cobra cannot beat a 600. Hell, blades (I think?) had a video out of his eaton equipped 03 running right with a 600 all the way to 130+ MPH.

Kooldac
03-25-2005, 08:59 PM
ORIGINAL: Derf00

Hey that's a freeway here in AZ.... Looks a lot like it anyway.... 101 to be more precise.


I have no clue how you could tell that...

I live in South Chandler. Where you at?

03-25-2005, 09:38 PM
I like that site. 500kb/sec transfers.

He left that SS like he wasn't trying.

The intake path on that SS, is that **** all stock with the twin tubes coming from the scoop exit???

98LS1
03-25-2005, 11:01 PM
ORIGINAL: jamz

While i'm a fan of both TA's, Camaros & Stangs ( i've had 3 camaros/ 2 stangs & 1 transam) lets do recall just how well those GM 305's compared to Ford's 302's. Not all to well. It took GM moving up to the 350 before they could get back the bragging rights.

Yeah everyone know's the 350 takes the 302's & 281's, but am i wrong or is that like comparing a 350 to a 400 or 427?


What you guys don't understand is that the 305 put out just as much power as the great 302....it was just in a heavy chasis.

IDK whether most of you guys will admit it or not, but go to your local dragstrip. ALL your fast cars are either SBC's or BBC's. GM has ALWAYS made more hp/dollar than anyone else. Ask the guys that run 9's and 10's and see what they run. I'll bet money it's either a GM or Mopar. Like it or not, it's the truth.

The quote is "Ford tough with Chevy stuff" for a reason. Cheap power comes from a GM.

grimwolf
03-26-2005, 05:26 AM
yep their all in bed together its all about palm greasing
ORIGINAL: 98LS1


ORIGINAL: jamz

While i'm a fan of both TA's, Camaros & Stangs ( i've had 3 camaros/ 2 stangs & 1 transam) lets do recall just how well those GM 305's compared to Ford's 302's. Not all to well. It took GM moving up to the 350 before they could get back the bragging rights.

Yeah everyone know's the 350 takes the 302's & 281's, but am i wrong or is that like comparing a 350 to a 400 or 427?


What you guys don't understand is that the 305 put out just as much power as the great 302....it was just in a heavy chasis.

IDK whether most of you guys will admit it or not, but go to your local dragstrip. ALL your fast cars are either SBC's or BBC's. GM has ALWAYS made more hp/dollar than anyone else. Ask the guys that run 9's and 10's and see what they run. I'll bet money it's either a GM or Mopar. Like it or not, it's the truth.

The quote is "Ford tough with Chevy stuff" for a reason. Cheap power comes from a GM.

dc_mann8
03-26-2005, 02:59 PM
even a 350 80s camaro cant take a stock 5.0 from that decade. chev were pussies until the lt1 then ls1

JCstang01
03-26-2005, 04:24 PM
Nice Videos!:D

FoxGT
03-26-2005, 05:13 PM
Nice find.

98LS1
03-27-2005, 04:06 PM
ORIGINAL: dc_mann8

even a 350 80s camaro cant take a stock 5.0 from that decade. chev were pussies until the lt1 then ls1


Again...the 350 made more power, it was just in a heavy car.

Allstar
05-20-2005, 08:39 PM
ORIGINAL: I G Joe

lol you guys dont know what real engines are unless you've felt the pull of an N/A Olds 455 =P

also you have to give it up to chevrolet for putting out so much power out of their cam in block engines.
dunno about you but ford needs to step it up a bit when it comes to performance =P


AHAHA!!! april fools ended a month ago..

05-20-2005, 08:44 PM
Yes it did, and this thread ended two months ago... ;)

91hatchgt
05-22-2005, 09:27 PM
The 350 may have made more power, but then again it's a 350 to a 302.. duh.. The camaro in the 80's and early 90's were ugly as sin, wheras the 5.0 IMO is a great looking car.. The camaro's interior was very plain, and a LOT of wasted space, plus you are laying down while you drive it, it is very awkward... The Camaro looks to be a foot wider, yet the cornering performance sucks compared to my 5.0, they had 7.5 rear ends with open differentials whereas an 8.8 and a Limited slip was standard in the Mustang..

If you want to talk performance, the engine may have made more power, but the rest of the drive train SUCKED! wheras the 302 made less power (a tiny bit) but had a better suspension, tranny, rear end, etc... And isn't the Ford 9" found in just about EVERY race application whether it be Chevy, Mopar, etc? So in stock form, they may be a little behind in power, but our aftermarket is 10X the size than the one for the camaro, which more than makes up for it ;)

idriveamustang
05-22-2005, 11:28 PM
wow.. it looks like that bike was putting up more of a fight then that camaro

01BlackGT
05-23-2005, 05:20 AM
Twin Turbo's own you!!! I feel sorry for whoever races that fox

I G Joe
05-23-2005, 05:53 AM
ORIGINAL: Allstar

ORIGINAL: I G Joe

lol you guys dont know what real engines are unless you've felt the pull of an N/A Olds 455 =P

also you have to give it up to chevrolet for putting out so much power out of their cam in block engines.
dunno about you but ford needs to step it up a bit when it comes to performance =P


AHAHA!!! april fools ended a month ago..



lol oh man dont be in such denial it'll only hurt you in the end there allstar. its ok im sure you wouldnt mind getting beat by my dads W~30 =P

MooseStang88
05-26-2005, 12:50 AM
WOW, don't really think i can say anymore.........