Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News
Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4.6 (Modular) Mustang > Mach 1 Section

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-01-2008, 10:14 PM   #1
Stone629
5th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2004, Ford, Mach 1
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,568
Default How underated are..

the Machs? I've been seeing and hearing of several Machs getting anywhere from 275-290+rwhp.Ford's claim of 310hp definetly doesn't add up, but nobody has ever really stated how off Ford's numbers are.
For comparison's sake, lots of Machs are running 13.3 or quicker bone stock. 2003-04 Cobras are good for a steady 12.8, so if Machs are 3-4 tenths slower, that would translate roughly into a 30-40hp difference. Cobras are also under-rated at 390 hp, so would'nt that put us at 350+ hp or so? Any one have any idea....
__________________
Black 2004 Mach, Auto, SLP Catted X-Pipe
8.6 sec 1/8th, 86 mph, 1.97 60'

Traded...
2004 Mach 1 (13.03 @108.38mph) 2.0 60'
UPR O/R/X, FM Weld-Ins
4.10 gears, Mgw STS
KN Filter
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Old 01-01-2008, 10:49 PM   #2
USMCrebel
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 5,185
Default RE: How underated are..

yeah.
cobras are rated 390hp but actually put down anwhere from 380-425hp and putting from 360rwhp- 380rwhp (on a freak one)
the machs are rated at 305hp but probably is closer to 310-315hp and puts us at 275-290rwhp....im pretty sure thats about right.
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:56 PM   #3
01snake
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2001 ford cobra
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,309
Default RE: How underated are..

no 290rwhp is kinda high

mine dyno'd 277 stock. usually i think you take off around 40 hp and that give's you your rwhp. or fly hp x .85 = rwhp

for 290 you would have to put around 340hp to the crank
__________________

2001 True Blue Cobra.............average stock 01


HEAR ME
01snake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:59 PM   #4
01snake
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2001 ford cobra
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,309
Default RE: How underated are..

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Stone629

the Machs? I've been seeing and hearing of several Machs getting anywhere from 275-290+rwhp.Ford's claim of 310hp definetly doesn't add up, but nobody has ever really stated how off Ford's numbers are.
For comparison's sake, lots of Machs are running 13.3 or quicker bone stock. 2003-04 Cobras are good for a steady 12.8, so if Machs are 3-4 tenths slower, that would translate roughly into a 30-40hp difference. Cobras are also under-rated at 390 hp, so would'nt that put us at 350+ hp or so? Any one have any idea....
your also forgetting that the cobra's have irs

you can slap slick's on a mach and drop at 5k. (yes you are at very high risk of failure)

but if you did the same to a cobra, the irs may go farther then the car down the track
__________________

2001 True Blue Cobra.............average stock 01


HEAR ME
01snake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 07:26 AM   #5
jrherald420
5th Gear Member
 
jrherald420's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT
Location: Shepherdsville,Ky
Posts: 3,243
Default RE: How underated are..

i think the parisatic loss is 15%
__________________

02 Mustang GT
K&N CAI,PP PLENUM,FLOW 40s,EIBACH PROs,UPR UPPER/LOWER CONTROL ARMS,STEEDA ADJ CLUTCH KIT,SPEC STAGE 1 CLUTCH+FLYWHEEL,BRIDGESTONE POTENZAS,HAWK HPS PADS
jrherald420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 08:41 AM   #6
USMCrebel
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 5,185
Default RE: How underated are..

Quote:
ORIGINAL: jrherald420

i think the parisatic loss is 15%
12-15%
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 09:31 AM   #7
DaMach04
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vinton, Va. "Land-o-Cops"
Posts: 1,672
Default RE: How underated are..

on a dyno, i put down 291rwhp/311rwtq

with full exhaust, headers back...and CAI.



granted, i didnt get a base run before the bolt ons, but i dont know of many exhausts that add 30-40 bhp
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanMuscle4.6GT View Post
4 hot drunk freshman girls coming to my townhouse...
and its a girl to guy ratio of 3 to 1. they should be here any minute.
wish me luck fellas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostin95cobra View Post
and here you sit telling a bunch of guys on the internet...wonder why you are still a virgin...
DaMach04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 09:43 AM   #8
Stone629
5th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2004, Ford, Mach 1
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,568
Default RE: How underated are..

Quote:
ORIGINAL: 01snake

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Stone629

the Machs? I've been seeing and hearing of several Machs getting anywhere from 275-290+rwhp.Ford's claim of 310hp definetly doesn't add up, but nobody has ever really stated how off Ford's numbers are.
For comparison's sake, lots of Machs are running 13.3 or quicker bone stock. 2003-04 Cobras are good for a steady 12.8, so if Machs are 3-4 tenths slower, that would translate roughly into a 30-40hp difference. Cobras are also under-rated at 390 hp, so would'nt that put us at 350+ hp or so? Any one have any idea....
your also forgetting that the cobra's have irs

you can slap slick's on a mach and drop at 5k. (yes you are at very high risk of failure)

but if you did the same to a cobra, the irs may go farther then the car down the track
That's true, but both cars can pulla2.0-2.160' in stock form pretty easily and run 12.8(SVT) and 13.1-13.3(Mach) with the same60'. The IRS doesn't become a problem for Cobras until they really want to launch it hard. The two cars are still within .4 tenths of one another. We know that the 310 hp rating is wrong. If we take the lower % of parasitic loss and said it was about 12%, that's a 37 hp loss to the wheels. The one Mach I saw dyno at 285rwhp would be a 322 crank HP car, according to a 12% loss and the 310hp factory rating.
__________________
Black 2004 Mach, Auto, SLP Catted X-Pipe
8.6 sec 1/8th, 86 mph, 1.97 60'

Traded...
2004 Mach 1 (13.03 @108.38mph) 2.0 60'
UPR O/R/X, FM Weld-Ins
4.10 gears, Mgw STS
KN Filter
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 10:04 AM   #9
USMCrebel
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 5,185
Default RE: How underated are..

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Stone629

Quote:
ORIGINAL: 01snake

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Stone629

the Machs? I've been seeing and hearing of several Machs getting anywhere from 275-290+rwhp.Ford's claim of 310hp definetly doesn't add up, but nobody has ever really stated how off Ford's numbers are.
For comparison's sake, lots of Machs are running 13.3 or quicker bone stock. 2003-04 Cobras are good for a steady 12.8, so if Machs are 3-4 tenths slower, that would translate roughly into a 30-40hp difference. Cobras are also under-rated at 390 hp, so would'nt that put us at 350+ hp or so? Any one have any idea....
your also forgetting that the cobra's have irs

you can slap slick's on a mach and drop at 5k. (yes you are at very high risk of failure)

but if you did the same to a cobra, the irs may go farther then the car down the track
That's true, but both cars can pulla2.0-2.160' in stock form pretty easily and run 12.8(SVT) and 13.1-13.3(Mach) with the same60'. The IRS doesn't become a problem for Cobras until they really want to launch it hard. The two cars are still within .4 tenths of one another. We know that the 310 hp rating is wrong. If we take the lower % of parasitic loss and said it was about 12%, that's a 37 hp loss to the wheels. The one Mach I saw dyno at 285rwhp would be a 322 crank HP car, according to a 12% loss and the 310hp factory rating.
I would think that would be closer to the actual HP rating. i would put money on it. now i just to find a bone stock mach and test it! my personal guess is that the mach actually put down 320-330hp. everyone know theres gonna be that one freak that dyno's ungodly high so that one doesnt count nor should the one that dynos like a 4 cyl.
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 12:48 PM   #10
01snake
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2001 ford cobra
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,309
Default RE: How underated are..

Quote:
ORIGINAL: USMCrebel

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Stone629

Quote:
ORIGINAL: 01snake

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Stone629

the Machs? I've been seeing and hearing of several Machs getting anywhere from 275-290+rwhp.Ford's claim of 310hp definetly doesn't add up, but nobody has ever really stated how off Ford's numbers are.
For comparison's sake, lots of Machs are running 13.3 or quicker bone stock. 2003-04 Cobras are good for a steady 12.8, so if Machs are 3-4 tenths slower, that would translate roughly into a 30-40hp difference. Cobras are also under-rated at 390 hp, so would'nt that put us at 350+ hp or so? Any one have any idea....
your also forgetting that the cobra's have irs

you can slap slick's on a mach and drop at 5k. (yes you are at very high risk of failure)

but if you did the same to a cobra, the irs may go farther then the car down the track
That's true, but both cars can pulla2.0-2.160' in stock form pretty easily and run 12.8(SVT) and 13.1-13.3(Mach) with the same60'. The IRS doesn't become a problem for Cobras until they really want to launch it hard. The two cars are still within .4 tenths of one another. We know that the 310 hp rating is wrong. If we take the lower % of parasitic loss and said it was about 12%, that's a 37 hp loss to the wheels. The one Mach I saw dyno at 285rwhp would be a 322 crank HP car, according to a 12% loss and the 310hp factory rating.
I would think that would be closer to the actual HP rating. i would put money on it. now i just to find a bone stock mach and test it! my personal guess is that the mach actually put down 320-330hp. everyone know theres gonna be that one freak that dyno's ungodly high so that one doesnt count nor should the one that dynos like a 4 cyl.
people will argue that which you can, make a dyno read w/e you want.

and there was a big battle royal with the bullit v. gt. where some guy claimed he had a factory freak. and i believe it was 2000gt that said there are no such thing's due to the tolerance being so strict now a day's
__________________

2001 True Blue Cobra.............average stock 01


HEAR ME
01snake is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors









New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.