145 mph vs, ws6
Login  | |
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:30:11 PM
|
|
|
Jugador1
Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
so i should shoot for a formula if i can...i bet they are worth less which means they cost less right?
I gotta add...plain ass firebirds look better until post 98...cause i hate those fog lights on the TA's until they were better concealed in 98 Jugador37927.7717592593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:33:30 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Jugador] HEY! new idea! formula firebird...econo TA basically right?[/QUOTE]
I don't think there is such a thing as an econo musclecar. Now you can get a VW 1.8TT or a Subaru or something, but then you'll be one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:37:04 PM
|
|
|
GSRGuy18
Posts: 438
Joined: 9/7/2003
From: Dallas, TX
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=95LT1]not according to musclecarclub.com, but they may be wrong  [/QUOTE]
93-96 I believe had 275hp, and in 97-98 they switched to 285hp
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:38:37 PM
|
|
|
Jugador1
Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=95LT1][QUOTE=Jugador]
so i should shoot for a formula if i can...i bet they are worth less which means they cost less right?
I gotta add...plain ass firebirds look better until post 98...cause i hate those fog lights on the TA's until they were better concealed in 98
[/QUOTE]
These you don't like?
[/QUOTE]
nah, but that wouldnt stop me from getting one for the right price
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:39:32 PM
|
|
|
Guest
|
[QUOTE=GSRGuy18]
[QUOTE=95LT1]not according to musclecarclub.com, but they may be wrong [/QUOTE]
93-96 I believe had 275hp, and in 97-98 they switched to 285hp
[/QUOTE]
93-95 had 275 hp. 96 and 97 they put in hotter cams and had 285. 98 they switched to LS1s and gave it 310 hp.
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:40:15 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
We got mine from a guy that lived far away and wasn't getting to drive it, he owed more than what I payed 
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:43:42 PM
|
|
|
Jugador1
Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
damn...i want a formula cause they look sicker than TA's...i like the sleeper-type look. no offense, id still take a ride like urs...but the formula is my goal now.
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:46:51 PM
|
|
|
GSRGuy18
Posts: 438
Joined: 9/7/2003
From: Dallas, TX
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=own3dbyyou][QUOTE=GSRGuy18]
[QUOTE=95LT1]not according to musclecarclub.com, but they may be wrong [/QUOTE]
93-96 I believe had 275hp, and in 97-98 they switched to 285hp
[/QUOTE]
93-95 had 275 hp. 96 and 97 they put in hotter cams and had 285. 98 they switched to LS1s and gave it 310 hp.
[/QUOTE]
That's what I meant... that's what I said in my previous post
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:48:44 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
Thats pretty quick for a stock Integra, I had no idea they run that quick.
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:48:49 PM
|
|
|
Guest
|
[QUOTE=Jugador]damn...i want a formula cause they look sicker than TA's...i like the sleeper-type look. no offense, id still take a ride like urs...but the formula is my goal now.[/QUOTE]
Sleepers do rule. I wanted to make my old Escort a sleeper. had another block I commenced building and even had a T3 turbo set up ready to go. I gave up on it though.
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:50:43 PM
|
|
|
GSRGuy18
Posts: 438
Joined: 9/7/2003
From: Dallas, TX
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=95LT1]Thats pretty quick for a stock Integra, I had no idea they run that quick.[/QUOTE]
They don't... most OBD-1 GSRs (94-95) did 15.2-15.4, OBD-2 were a tenth or two slower. I got lucky, and I'm a good driver, AND it was perfect conditions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:53:54 PM
|
|
|
Guest
|
[QUOTE=GSRGuy18]
[QUOTE=95LT1]Thats pretty quick for a stock Integra, I had no idea they run that quick.[/QUOTE]
They don't... most OBD-1 GSRs (94-95) did 15.2-15.4, OBD-2 were a tenth or two slower. I got lucky, and I'm a good driver, AND it was perfect conditions
[/QUOTE]
Those times are pretty good, unlike my 2000 Civic Si coupe, which runs 15.9. The hatchbacks are quicker.
SAS....slow as s**t
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:55:40 PM
|
|
|
GSRGuy18
Posts: 438
Joined: 9/7/2003
From: Dallas, TX
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=95LT1][QUOTE=GSRGuy18]
[QUOTE=95LT1]Thats pretty quick for a stock Integra, I had no idea they run that quick.[/QUOTE]
They don't... most OBD-1 GSRs (94-95) did 15.2-15.4, OBD-2 were a tenth or two slower. I got lucky, and I'm a good driver, AND it was perfect conditions
[/QUOTE]
and you have a fart cannon, missed that mod[/QUOTE]
meh... doesn't do anything
|
|
|
|
|
145 mph vs, ws6 - 11/2/2003 6:57:39 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=GSRGuy18] [QUOTE=95LT1][QUOTE=GSRGuy18]
[QUOTE=95LT1]Thats pretty quick for a stock Integra, I had no idea they run that quick.[/QUOTE]
They don't... most OBD-1 GSRs (94-95) did 15.2-15.4, OBD-2 were a tenth or two slower. I got lucky, and I'm a good driver, AND it was perfect conditions
[/QUOTE]
and you have a fart cannon, missed that mod[/QUOTE]
meh... doesn't do anything [/QUOTE]
Yea, im just fudging with ya, but you have to love the sound. Maybe since it doesn't do anything you should make it into a spud gun? 
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
