Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor.

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs >> Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 3:32:58 PM   
Bogalu

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 4/20/2007
Status: offline
My 69 mustang has a 351w in it now. I heard clevelends were much better. Would my existing motor mounts allow me to put a clevelend in there? Also I have power steering, power brakes, ac compressor, and heater in my car now. Will they just bolt onto a clevelend like they do my windsor? Also is it worth upgrading to a clevelend? Im going to by a crate motor so if a clevelend is better I thought why not? If it is worth the upgrade what would be involved in modifications to get the clevelend to drop in there?

_____________________________

"Signature? What kind of pen works on an LCD Screen?"
Post #: 1
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 3:42:16 PM   
dodgestang

 

Posts: 1478
Joined: 11/23/2004
Status: offline
dodgestang's photo gallery
quote:

My 69 mustang has a 351w in it now.


Build what you own, it is always cheaper

quote:

I heard clevelends were much better


This is a well debated issue.  Search will net you plenty of results.  I am sure plenty of others will also sound of again.  Have fun figuring out opinions and facts

quote:

Would my existing motor mounts allow me to put a clevelend in there?


Yes, 351c is a small black ford

quote:

I have power steering, power brakes, ac compressor, and heater in my car now. Will they just bolt onto a clevelend like they do my windsor?


Yes, 351c is a small block ford

quote:

Is it worth upgrading to a clevelend?


This is a well debated issue.  Search will net you plenty of results.  I am sure plenty of others will also sound of again.  Have fun figuring out opinions and facts.  On this specific issue my opinion based on research of costs to build 408 strokers tells me it is cheapest to build what you have.  When you switch from one to the other you have the added costs of sourcing the additional parts (like a block).

quote:

Im going to by a crate motor so if a clevelend is better I thought why not?


351w is your mule here, the reason being is you can't buy a cleveland crate motor that I am aware of.

quote:

If it is worth the upgrade what would be involved in modifications to get the clevelend to drop in there?


There are no changes needed to the car to remove one small block fold and install a difference small block ford.



ps I like 'em both but never through away something that is perfectly good IMO.


_____________________________

Nick
65FB 408c AOD D.T.


11.99 Goal achieved!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGc8Wr9HvfA

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 2
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 3:42:26 PM   
Deviousfred

 

Posts: 121
Joined: 7/12/2005
From: El Paso, TX
Status: offline
I would keep the Windsor.  If you plan on doing any kind of performance upgrades I think Windsors respond better and there is a lot more available.  I remember reading somewhere a while back that the ports on the Cleveland 4V heads were way too ridiculous for street.  If you're going with a crte motor I say definitely stick with a Windsor.  Just my opinion.

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 3
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 4:06:02 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5444
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
Yeah, it's always cheaper to build what you already have

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to Deviousfred)
Post #: 4
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 4:10:50 PM   
Bogalu

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 4/20/2007
Status: offline
I've heard that saying so many times like "it wouldn't be street car with that much power" or "it would be ridiculous on the street" but I don't quite understand those sayings. Would it be so fast that you couldn't even step on the pedel without peeling out, or would it be real squirly on the street? Please elaborate because I was hoping to get a 351w stroked out to a 427. I was gonna go for a 408 but a little extra money for a gain of 40 horses and some torque, you cant go wrong. But is 500 horsepower and a little over 500 torque gonna be too radical for street driving. Because its gonna be a daily driver for sure, but I wanna smoke any little rice burner on the street with a real car... the best classic muscle made. lol The only problem is that I don't want to take my car out of commission, thats why I was just gonna buy a new crate engine and just take the old 351w out of it and sell it to someone. Its not the original engine anyway. That way I don't have to stop driving it while its getting a new engine instead of modifying the current one and be out of commission for a while.

_____________________________

"Signature? What kind of pen works on an LCD Screen?"

(in reply to Deviousfred)
Post #: 5
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 4:17:55 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5444
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
It depends, some people think 300hp is a lot, others think 700hp is nothing. How much is too much depends on how the car is setup. If you have enough traction and driving skill for 700hp, then it's not "too much" provided it's something that can be driven practically(ie, doesn't need special fuel, meets legal requirements, isn't extremely difficult to drive - such as poor part throttle power when leaving stops etc). A lot of it comes down to suspension. 200hp could be too much with crappy suspension and tires, it won't hook and may handle like crap. Provided power doesn't exceed traction to the point where you can't control it or have to be ever so careful when you drive it, then I wouldn't consider it too much

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 6
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 4:39:15 PM   
Bogalu

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 4/20/2007
Status: offline
I understand. So if you have good suspension, traction, ect. Then 500 horses can handle just like a lexus with 250 horses, but of couse a lot faster. lol

_____________________________

"Signature? What kind of pen works on an LCD Screen?"

(in reply to 67mustang302)
Post #: 7
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 5:28:25 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5444
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
With the right setup, yes. There is a point where that no longer is true though. Trying to get 5,000hp to get traction with street tires won't happen obviously

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 8
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 5:29:54 PM   
dodgestang

 

Posts: 1478
Joined: 11/23/2004
Status: offline
dodgestang's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bogalu

I understand. So if you have good suspension, traction, ect. Then 500 horses can handle just like a lexus with 250 horses, but of couse a lot faster. lol


I consider this statement to be a fact, but I am sure it will be debated anyway ;) "Vintage mustang will never handle like a Lexus unless you do something drastic like take your vintage sheetmetal and graft it onto a late model mustang and then spend a pile of money on that late model upgrading it.  Regardless of suspension upgrades on an old mustang (which can be made to perform extremely well) the Lexus will have a few other things like anti lock brakes, traction control, depending on the model all wheel drive, etc... that unless you are planning HUGE changes to the car, you will never have."

A 500 HP 427 stroker powered vintage mustang will out accelerate many cars on the road however it is not an ideal setup for a daily driver for a couple of reasons. 
1. A 427 (strokers in general and the 427 inparticular) will not be a 100k mile motor and generally there is a direct coorelation to the amount of money you spend building it to how many miles it will last for you.
2. A N/A carbed 500 HP will get poor gas mileage making for a rather expensive daily driver
3. A N/A carbed 500 HP will have poor street manners

I have a 410 cleveland in my 65 and it puts out close to 400 at the back tire.  As soon as it rain (or snows) the car becomes more than a hand full to drive.  I am not saying you can't, but if you want to build something at this level and use it for a daily driver you need to remember to also sink not just 6k min into the motor but another 12-20k into the car.  Personally though if I had to have it as a daily drive I would do an EFI and forced induction on a standard stroke setup (or maybe a smaller 393 stroke).


_____________________________

Nick
65FB 408c AOD D.T.


11.99 Goal achieved!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGc8Wr9HvfA

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 9
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 5:39:12 PM   
Hawkins 812


Posts: 306
Joined: 10/13/2007
Status: offline
Interesting thread. I agree with dodgestang and 67mustang302. IMO- theres no since in spending money/time for such a small(if any) gain. Put that money into the windsor you currently own and afterwards there wont be any comparison between the two.

_____________________________


(in reply to dodgestang)
Post #: 10
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 6:16:32 PM   
Deviousfred

 

Posts: 121
Joined: 7/12/2005
From: El Paso, TX
Status: offline
I dunno if it was directed at what I said about the Cleveland 4V heads, but what I meant is that the ports are so big the streetability of the car would not be good.  The low end would really suffer from the oversized ports.

(in reply to Hawkins 812)
Post #: 11
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 6:25:52 PM   
Bogalu

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 4/20/2007
Status: offline
Well it sounds like everybody agrees on a windsor. I suspose a 408 would do. Really like to get the 427, most crate engines I found are only 7-8 hundred more for a gain of 40+ horsepower and of course a little more torque too. Would really regret not upgrading if I find out that I will still strive for more power after I get the engine. Then crates that I found are usually around 6-7 grand so it should be a fair amount of money to spend, couse you get what you pay for in engines, or thats what I've found out lately. I would upgrade suspension later so it will probably drive like **** when I first put it in but its one thing at a time. Traction will be something that I will do if not the same time as I get the engine then shortly after. The FMX tranny should be able to handle that power easy. I will also upgrade to posi right around the same time. But im gonna worry about the engine first because the engine in the car right now is starting to get a little sick. lol

_____________________________

"Signature? What kind of pen works on an LCD Screen?"

(in reply to Hawkins 812)
Post #: 12
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 7:29:59 PM   
67mustang302

 

Posts: 5444
Joined: 4/21/2007
Status: offline
If you put a lot of power in a car with bad suspension, you spend more in the long run when you replace crap that you keep breaking, such as u joints ans body panels(when you hit crap from losing control).

Good suspension on an old car can definately make it handle VERY well. Even a rear leaf spring type setup, if thought out well, can be made to handle nicely.

Also, consider a blower, since you can have a 351, or even a 302 and produce plenty of power, but have great drivability. A 302 built off the new Boss block for instance, with a nice blower setup and either EFI or a blow through carb could easily produce 500-600hp on pump fuel and drive every day with good reliability and manners, though would obviously be VERY expensive. Strokers can be a bear to drive with a lot of power, especially in bad weather, with all the bottom end torque. Simply looking hard at the gas pedal is enough to produce torque at the wheels. So yeah, like Dodgestang said, be ready to dump plenty of money into the rest of the car, and make sure everything is well thought out

_____________________________

Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

Best run 13.23 at 106.97mph with a 2.183 60'
Times from before tune and driver mod.

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 13
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/28/2007 8:04:38 PM   
JMD


Posts: 3147
Joined: 1/18/2007
From: Las Cruces, NM
Status: offline
Windsor.. just my opinion....

My son's 66 is a great driver, in spite of what I believe is a 500 HP 408 Windsor.....

But the gas mileage is not so great....

_____________________________

66 Coupe
I-6 Conversion, 408 Windsor, Tremec TKO 600
Wilwood fronts, SSBC Rears
9" Track Loc.

"All work and no play makes Jack a asshole!"

(in reply to 67mustang302)
Post #: 14
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/29/2007 12:49:33 AM   
Bogalu

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 4/20/2007
Status: offline
I definitley agree that I will get a windsor. Been happy with it. Plus its really hard to find a cleveland so definitely a windsor. Although I don't want to break **** in my car just couse I cant afford a good suspension right away. I will hopefully not hit any walls but about ripping u joints and stuff like that. Is it really easy to tear something up on stock suspension or is it ok to run on stock suspension for a couple of months before I can offord to modify it?

_____________________________

"Signature? What kind of pen works on an LCD Screen?"

(in reply to JMD)
Post #: 15
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/29/2007 1:11:27 AM   
andrewmp6

 

Posts: 4013
Joined: 10/2/2006
Status: offline
Id keep what you have it is cheaper and with most aftermarket heads you can build a monster of a small block.

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 16
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/29/2007 7:40:08 AM   
JMD


Posts: 3147
Joined: 1/18/2007
From: Las Cruces, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bogalu

I definitley agree that I will get a windsor. Been happy with it. Plus its really hard to find a cleveland so definitely a windsor. Although I don't want to break **** in my car just couse I cant afford a good suspension right away. I will hopefully not hit any walls but about ripping u joints and stuff like that. Is it really easy to tear something up on stock suspension or is it ok to run on stock suspension for a couple of months before I can offord to modify it?
Avoid dumping the clutch or doing neutral drops and the stock driveline and axle should live for a long time..... providing that the rear end is in respectable condition to begin with...

_____________________________

66 Coupe
I-6 Conversion, 408 Windsor, Tremec TKO 600
Wilwood fronts, SSBC Rears
9" Track Loc.

"All work and no play makes Jack a asshole!"

(in reply to Bogalu)
Post #: 17
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/29/2007 8:54:04 AM   
pushrodpower


Posts: 158
Joined: 10/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviousfred

I would keep the Windsor.  If you plan on doing any kind of performance upgrades I think Windsors respond better and there is a lot more available.  I remember reading somewhere a while back that the ports on the Cleveland 4V heads were way too ridiculous for street.  If you're going with a crte motor I say definitely stick with a Windsor.  Just my opinion.


If you are starting from scratch a cleveland is going to be little cheaper than a Windsor for the fact that the stock Cleveland heads (2V or 4V) will out flow any stock Windsor head. If you are comparing aftermarket, then the price is pretty much even. Their is almost as much aftermarket support for the Cleveland as there is for the Windsor.
Another fallacy is that the 4V heads are too big for the street, that is an old wives tale with no basis in reality.

_____________________________

1973 Mach 1 with many mods


(in reply to Deviousfred)
Post #: 18
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/29/2007 9:01:37 AM   
Deviousfred

 

Posts: 121
Joined: 7/12/2005
From: El Paso, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pushrodpower

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviousfred

I would keep the Windsor.  If you plan on doing any kind of performance upgrades I think Windsors respond better and there is a lot more available.  I remember reading somewhere a while back that the ports on the Cleveland 4V heads were way too ridiculous for street.  If you're going with a crte motor I say definitely stick with a Windsor.  Just my opinion.


If you are starting from scratch a cleveland is going to be little cheaper than a Windsor for the fact that the stock Cleveland heads (2V or 4V) will out flow any stock Windsor head. If you are comparing aftermarket, then the price is pretty much even. Their is almost as much aftermarket support for the Cleveland as there is for the Windsor.
Another fallacy is that the 4V heads are too big for the street, that is an old wives tale with no basis in reality.


Very true about the Cleveland heads outflowing the Windsor heads but there is also too much.

(in reply to pushrodpower)
Post #: 19
RE: Debating on whether to get a clevelend or windsor. - 10/29/2007 11:03:32 AM   
pushrodpower


Posts: 158
Joined: 10/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviousfred

quote:

ORIGINAL: pushrodpower

quote:

ORIGINAL: Deviousfred

I would keep the Windsor.  If you plan on doing any kind of performance upgrades I think Windsors respond better and there is a lot more available.  I remember reading somewhere a while back that the ports on the Cleveland 4V heads were way too ridiculous for street.  If you're going with a crte motor I say definitely stick with a Windsor.  Just my opinion.


If you are starting from scratch a cleveland is going to be little cheaper than a Windsor for the fact that the stock Cleveland heads (2V or 4V) will out flow any stock Windsor head. If you are comparing aftermarket, then the price is pretty much even. Their is almost as much aftermarket support for the Cleveland as there is for the Windsor.
Another fallacy is that the 4V heads are too big for the street, that is an old wives tale with no basis in reality.


Very true about the Cleveland heads outflowing the Windsor heads but there is also too much.


I disagree, and I think all head porters would as well.


< Message edited by pushrodpower -- 10/29/2007 11:29:11 AM >


_____________________________

1973 Mach 1 with many mods


(in reply to Deviousfred)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17921
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14532
addermk213997
ride of the 13714
hotrods_n_bo13328
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211993
1slo8511744

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.