Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003 From: United States Status: offline
[QUOTE=Hrtbr8kr66]
Hey Juagador.. BLAH BLAH BLah... did u guys hear something.. i just smell jealousy.. oh and my car.. IS BETTER THEN PROFESSIONAL
[/QUOTE]
you call it jealousy, i call it you thinking your car is a lot better than it is. sure, its cool you worked on it, you're a girl, but you keep expecting all this recognition.
and i believe ive stated reasons why i would not want your or a similar car to yours. 1. i dont think they look good. 2. value. 3. virtually no engine.
reads with an accent Posts: 4231
Joined: 7/4/2003 From: New Orleans La Status: offline
[QUOTE=Hrtbr8kr66]EXACTLY... NEW MUSTANGS are like tampons.. every p****'s got one I'll keep my classic that i took two and half years to build slow and all.. before u would EVER by one off the show room floor. [/QUOTE]
are you high.. the classics are great, and make excellent boat anchors too. j/j i have been through my gt time after time to get her just right, then she got stolen and placed into a pole,. and now she is getting 5 layers of clear and a few more goodies. the new mustangs outhandle, outperform, and will outlast the beasts of old. i could give you a 2 car lead and could probably snatch you up halfway down the track
Posts: 23
Joined: 10/23/2003 From: United States Status: offline
I dont give two s**ts about performance, i drive a show car and i drive it everyday. I didn't just go buy it off the show room floor somewhere. As for value, you can't tell me that a vintage mustang say oh a SHELBY GT 500 isn't worth more then some new mustang cause thats a major lie.
And hey jugador,,, what the hell do u drive that u think ur so hot?I want some pics.. Wait a minute, i just checked ur profile, YOUR NOT EVEN OLD ENOUGH TO DRIVE. WTF..
Posts: 2963
Joined: 6/8/2003 From: United States Status: offline
So what? Does that mean I know nothing? No. I'm not saying bow to me, but I'm not stupid. Age/Being able to drive does not make people smarter nor does it mean they have common sense, as proven in your case.
PS: is your car a Shelby GT-500? No. Is your car even close to one? No. Did I once say all new mustangs are a better value than old ones? No.
EVOs are fully capable of running low-mid 13s in the right conditions. So most bolt-on GTs aren't gonna beat them in the 1/4. When you add weight to a 4cyl car, it's like adding 1.5 times that weight in a bigger-engined car. So him with a passenger is like you with a passenger and a half. Had you both been alone, you wouldn't have been pulling. And they have a huge aftermarket, because the engine is essentially a better version of the 4G63t motor used in 1990-1999 turbo Eclipses/Lasers/Talons/Galant VR4s. There are companies out that already have 700hp+ on them. And btw... the WRX STi? Even quicker
What? Older mustangs look better? Hell NO.. That's my opinion!....
I didn't like the stangs until the 01's came out.. Dropped, with the right wheels and exhaust, its a keeper and a bad ass pony! Put a Kenny Belle root supercharger and..... well, you get where I'm going.
Newer Mustangs all the way baby....
But ladies and germs,
that's my (aaron's) opinion. Don't stop helping me cause I don't care for the fox bodies or classics please. They're all mustangs.
[/QUOTE]
With the exception of wheels... all 99+ Mustangs look pretty much the same
I like the current gen mustangs, and would love to either have a cobra or saleen, but the majority over here in texas are v6's and GT's. It would be cool to see something different for a change like a good ol classic. As much as i love mustangs, i would rather have my WS6 over one. But i am planning on getting a used '03 Cobra within the next year!
Older stangs are nice, well some. That girl on here has a nice one. My neighbor has a 67 6 banger and I believe a 69 or 67 Mach 1. The Mach 1 is niiiiiiiiice.
reads with an accent Posts: 4231
Joined: 7/4/2003 From: New Orleans La Status: offline
my boss had a 69 gt 500 with 30000 miles on it mint condition and sold it for 64k. and as i stated in my write up, there is virtually nothing stock on my car.esp now after the theft and the pole incident. classics are nice, hey my great aunt has a 65 and the performance is fitting.. if i go back in time on a car i think i would have to go with a 69 gt 500 or 69 ss camero, or a 455 shaker firebird
[QUOTE=GSRGuy18]And btw... the WRX STi? Even quicker[/QUOTE]
Not by a whole lot stock for stock. The EVO is slower straight line, but is quicker in the cornering than the STi. The EVO is the better deal IMO, but I love Subarus to death. Especially the "bugeyed" WRX.
Printable Version
2002 GT vs 2003 Lancer EVO - 
