98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur
Login  | |
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/30/2003 9:28:46 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Dan02GT] Oh yea, that's with "light' mods also.
My 5 speed GT is no slouch for being near stock. Thanks to my heavy feet & right hand. [/QUOTE]
to solve the foot problem, less bigmacs
to solve the hand problem, less porno
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/30/2003 9:30:06 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=Dan02GT] Doh! And I'm not stock! Look's like I have you beat dumbass! Can't run your mouth to me anymore.
13.8 with a 2.2 60 foot time is a STATEMENT TO SHOW THAT I LEFT .2-3 tenths behind on off the line, you jack. Not to mention, your slushbox auto is much easier to get off the line than my 5 speed, oooh yeah, not to mention I have near bald stock Goodyears.
Point being = your an asshole, you are wasting your time here being a troll. It's sad you don't have better things to do... [/QUOTE]
i have an m6, let me explain, manual 6 speed. Congrats on your 5 speed though, you're getting there petey
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/30/2003 9:32:34 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
Well time for me to go do something none of you can, I'm going to have sex with my gf, so ha.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/30/2003 9:35:12 PM
|
|
|
blueovalkiller
Posts: 24
Joined: 10/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
|
DAMN! You want some cream Dan?! Because I know that musta burnt!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 11:20:09 AM
|
|
|
Davidj
Posts: 48
Joined: 10/28/2003
Status: offline
|
95LT1,
Your so hung up on stock vs stock, your missing a big point. With 350ci It better put out more h.p.!! But thats the only way chevy can compete.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 8:51:42 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
The 350 is a GM motor douchebag.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 9:18:09 PM
|
|
|
nostang
Posts: 173
Joined: 6/6/2003
Status: offline
|
Hey blueovalkiller,whats that Olds run??? And 95LT1,do ya think there was a reason GM didn't put a 305 in the F-body,it would have been slow as a Honda.You keep saying stock to stock,but you have 69 more cubic inches than a late model Mustang,do you really think it's a fair race,would you like to race my car,it's engine is only a little bigger than your engine? nostang37925.9115046296
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 9:36:10 PM
|
|
|
BCisme
Posts: 2045
Joined: 5/22/2003
From: Newport News, Va
Status: offline
|
nostang owns joo.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 10:00:44 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
M-kay, that was clever. So after arguing about your Buttstangs being faster than my GM, you're now settling on the fact that I am faster than you and now it's because my engine is bigger. Somehow stock isn't in any of your vocabulary's. Now I'm getting called out by some numbnut with a 503. Like I said, if any of you are near NC and need someone to race, let me know. I will not, repeat, will not have any problem finding someone who will hand you your ass. Thank you kindly.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 10:09:13 PM
|
|
|
BCisme
Posts: 2045
Joined: 5/22/2003
From: Newport News, Va
Status: offline
|
there's lots of people around here in VA that will hand you your ass. why don't you make the drive up to VMP next month? oh and as far as the stock thing, your car is stock you say. most of us who own mustangs don't leave them stock. so your arguement of stock vs stock is pointless cuz there's hardly a stock mustang on this board.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 10:13:34 PM
|
|
|
nostang
Posts: 173
Joined: 6/6/2003
Status: offline
|
Well if you want to run strictly stock to stock,and you have the fastest F-body,then you should run the fastest stock Mustang,can you run with a stock 03 Cobra?or a Cobra R?Well maybe you can go and buy a brand new F-body,oh,wait,they quit making them because they were/are pieces of crap and smart people know it.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 10:21:13 PM
|
|
|
BCisme
Posts: 2045
Joined: 5/22/2003
From: Newport News, Va
Status: offline
|
ever wonder why mustangs have been outselling camaros 6 to 1 for years? look at F body production numbers over the last 10 years.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 10:23:57 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=nostang] Well if you want to run strictly stock to stock,and you have the fastest F-body,then you should run the fastest stock Mustang,can you run with a stock 03 Cobra?or a Cobra R?Well maybe you can go and buy a brand new F-body,oh,wait,they quit making them because they were/are pieces of crap and smart people know it.[/QUOTE]
Alright, the fastest stock GM is the ZO6 dips**t, if I had one I would gladly kill any stock cobra. So lets put Ford's fastest Cobra vs fastest GM. You lose. And for the other guy about me going to VA, I'm not gonna race dips**t b/c unlike Mustang owners I know what I've got and I know who can beat me. My car isn't stock BTW, I said stock vs stock b/c you can make any s**t can fast, case in point, few of the Mustangs on this site. I have friends that race and will race anyone that you know and/or have contact with.
|
|
|
|
|
98 gt vs. C5 vette and 944 tur - 10/31/2003 10:25:21 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7043
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
|
Guys, just face it, a stock GT is slower than a stock LT1. There's only around .5 second difference, but you're slower. Now thats for the new GT's vs the outdated LT1. Venture to the LS1 and you all shall perish.
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
