I forgot because it was sarcastic, and becuase there is no need to argue. We are a good match for SRT-8's. "WE" being S197 with full bolt-on's and your Camaro.
First off, good kill. Forced induction is a hell of alot of fun huh? Secondly I don't think the SRT-8 is over rated at all. It might be pricy but not over rated. It's probably one of the best looking cars on the street right now along with the mustang. Think about it, a family car that can fit 5 adults and still run very low 13's from the factory is a Bad mother f*cker! And in 20 years it'll be selling on Barret Jackson for 75 grand because of it's low production and street rep.
_____________________________
Roll racing isn't racing. Its just 2 retards speeding together!
First off, good kill. Forced induction is a hell of alot of fun huh? Secondly I don't think the SRT-8 is over rated at all. It might be pricy but not over rated. It's probably one of the best looking cars on the street right now along with the mustang. Think about it, a family car that can fit 5 adults and still run very low 13's from the factory is a Bad mother f*cker! And in 20 years it'll be selling on Barret Jackson for 75 grand because of it's low production and street rep.
I agree with all but the value down the line, it would be cool if it did go that way but I'm kinda doubting it, time will tell! If I had kids it would have been in my radar for sure.
_____________________________
Vortech V2-SQ Supercharger 60' 1.769 1/8 7.901@90.15 1/4 12.20@113.50 - new best! 10/13/07 Best 1/4 on stock KDWS tires = 12.56@113.3 My 2006 Mustang GT Web Page
im tired of rehashing this subject-so this wont be nice---
lets compair these cars side by side mustang charger weight 3500 vs 4200 force in yes vs no cams 2 vs 1
its all about the cubic inches, maybe one of these day for dwill at least put a 5.4 in the mustang, if you look at every performance mustang ford has built, they either had to supercharge it, or put on some huge cylender heads, start with the big engine then you can add those later for godly hp
and btw 3 lengths is only ABOUT a tenth and a 1/2
imo the chargers are amazing looking, they look like they just want to kick your ass, the mustang on the other hand, which i do think they look pretty decent, seem to be mostly liked girls in thier 20s, thats all i see is them driving around 6 cyl all cutsied up, they really had somthing with the 04 cobra front bumper and imo ruined it when they went to the "retro body style", which is a digrace to the true 67-68 mustangs, take a look at the new challenger, thats how you redo a classic - which look would you rather have, cutsy car or mean looking
chargers were runnner up for 06 motor trend car off the year the first year in its production, how many cars can claim that huh? plus the 300 was #1 in 05,
not to mention that you can actually fit 5 people in it comfortably, and its a 4 door, so what does that make it slow? its targeted at guys in thier 40s with kids,
First off, good kill. Forced induction is a hell of alot of fun huh? Secondly I don't think the SRT-8 is over rated at all. It might be pricy but not over rated. It's probably one of the best looking cars on the street right now along with the mustang. Think about it, a family car that can fit 5 adults and still run very low 13's from the factory is a Bad mother f*cker! And in 20 years it'll be selling on Barret Jackson for 75 grand because of it's low production and street rep.
I agree with all but the value down the line, it would be cool if it did go that way but I'm kinda doubting it, time will tell! If I had kids it would have been in my radar for sure.
Speculating on what will be valueble in the future is always fun. If you look at the 60's muscle cars it's the super low production dodges that get the most attention now(Hemi Cudas & chargers). I'm hoping the same will happen in the future sinse my car was only made for 3 years. I think the special edition mustangs will easily demand collector attention. like the GT500 or the Cobra. It's also just my opinion but cars with serious street cred. will be hot with collectors like the WS6 or the LS1 camaros. We're in a second muscle car era. right now.
_____________________________
Roll racing isn't racing. Its just 2 retards speeding together!
im tired of rehashing this subject-so this wont be nice---
lets compair these cars side by side mustang charger weight 3500 vs 4200 force in yes vs no cams 2 vs 1
its all about the cubic inches, maybe one of these day for dwill at least put a 5.4 in the mustang, if you look at every performance mustang ford has built, they either had to supercharge it, or put on some huge cylender heads, start with the big engine then you can add those later for godly hp
and btw 3 lengths is only ABOUT a tenth and a 1/2
imo the chargers are amazing looking, they look like they just want to kick your ass, the mustang on the other hand, which i do think they look pretty decent, seem to be mostly liked girls in thier 20s, thats all i see is them driving around 6 cyl all cutsied up, they really had somthing with the 04 cobra front bumper and imo ruined it when they went to the "retro body style", which is a digrace to the true 67-68 mustangs, take a look at the new challenger, thats how you redo a classic - which look would you rather have, cutsy car or mean looking
chargers were runnner up for 06 motor trend car off the year the first year in its production, how many cars can claim that huh? plus the 300 was #1 in 05,
not to mention that you can actually fit 5 people in it comfortably, and its a 4 door, so what does that make it slow? its targeted at guys in thier 40s with kids,
uuhhh that statment about mustang being driven mostly by girsl is gonna bring a big tail, u better have ur flame suit on
_____________________________
04 SRT: 50 trim + supporting mods running only 11lbs.
im tired of rehashing this subject-so this wont be nice---
lets compair these cars side by side mustang charger weight 3500 vs 4200 force in yes vs no cams 2 vs 1
its all about the cubic inches, maybe one of these day for dwill at least put a 5.4 in the mustang, if you look at every performance mustang ford has built, they either had to supercharge it, or put on some huge cylender heads, start with the big engine then you can add those later for godly hp
and btw 3 lengths is only ABOUT a tenth and a 1/2
imo the chargers are amazing looking, they look like they just want to kick your ass, the mustang on the other hand, which i do think they look pretty decent, seem to be mostly liked girls in thier 20s, thats all i see is them driving around 6 cyl all cutsied up, they really had somthing with the 04 cobra front bumper and imo ruined it when they went to the "retro body style", which is a digrace to the true 67-68 mustangs, take a look at the new challenger, thats how you redo a classic - which look would you rather have, cutsy car or mean looking
chargers were runnner up for 06 motor trend car off the year the first year in its production, how many cars can claim that huh? plus the 300 was #1 in 05,
not to mention that you can actually fit 5 people in it comfortably, and its a 4 door, so what does that make it slow? its targeted at guys in thier 40s with kids,
I'm a Mopar guy right now to but the Mustang is the best selling performance car in america for a reason. It's an awesome looking car at a very good price with solid performance. I mean good god a charger is 40 grand. A Mustang is what 25 or 30 grand?
_____________________________
Roll racing isn't racing. Its just 2 retards speeding together!
Dont be a thief! Pay back what you owe! Posts: 228
Joined: 5/12/2007 Status: offline
the definition of murder was NOT EVEN CLOSE stock for stock stang DO NOT STAND A CHANCE AGAINST ANY SRT8 now mod a stang and mod an srt8 it will depend on the drivers and the type of mods in each car. i will definately consider another srt8 in the future.
_____________________________
2003 gt s/c 4.10 bbk shorties headers, intercooler, power pipe 42lb inj, cobra fuel pump, trick flow manifold, maf, sub-frames connectors, lower control arms, eibach springs,magnaflow catback -x pipe and a custom tune.
ORIGINAL: cacimar uuhhh that statment about mustang being driven mostly by girsl is gonna bring a big tail, u better have ur flame suit on
everyone knows thats ford 90% of the reason mustangs exsist is because of the 6 cylinder, heck back in 64 all you could get was a 6 cyl and guess what, it was marketed to women in their 30s,
this is about the % for people i see in mustangs
40% women in 6ers because there cute 30% men in 6ers because the buy it cause it says mustang on the side, nothing more 10% men in v8s who are pricks and leave them mostly stock and think they are "fast" stock (60% of the people on here) 9% men in v8s that actually mod their cars and know what they are doing (sad its only 9%) (40% of the people on here) 1% other
btw i consider the fast breaking point average for every car out there compaired to each other is 14.0 or faster, quicker then you can call yourself fast, slower then spend some more money
base on the srt8 charger is 36, and that extra 15 grand you would pay for the cahrger over the mustang is totally worth it, the new mustangs are so striped down and basic
and i wouldnt say the mustang is the best selling PERFORMANCE car, seeing how less than 0% produced were "performance"
< Message edited by moparrr07 -- 10/16/2007 4:39:06 PM >
you really cannot determine how many tenths of a second a length is. Think about it. A Car that comes with a 6.1 Liter Engine, has 420 Flywheel Hp, and runs low 13's stock. If you do not think 3 lengths on a street, with no traction, is ONLY 1.5 tenths of a second, fast, then I have no idea what to say. what do you drive? you live in belvidere. I will come to you. Viking396 has the exact same setup as me, except he has 5M and DR's, yet he runs 12.2's pretty consistently, which, I am sure that I could come close to that time. so, if that is the case, that is almost a second faster then your average SRT-8, so that means, by your formula there mr. moparrr, that would be like 20+ car lengths? guys, does this make sense. that 3 full car lengths, is only 1.5 tenths of a second? So that means, if a car is 1 tenth faster, and if driven the same on the streets, the person would be about 3 car lengths on me. Hmmmm. Whatever you say man. Whatever you say.
ORIGINAL: cacimar uuhhh that statment about mustang being driven mostly by girsl is gonna bring a big tail, u better have ur flame suit on
everyone knows thats ford 90% of the reason mustangs exsist is because of the 6 cylinder, heck back in 64 all you could get was a 6 cyl and guess what, it was marketed to women in their 30s,
this is about the % for people i see in mustangs
40% women in 6ers because there cute 30% men in 6ers because the buy it cause it says mustang on the side, nothing more 10% men in v8s who are pricks and leave them mostly stock and think they are "fast" stock (60% of the people on here) 9% men in v8s that actually mod their cars and know what they are doing (sad its only 9%) (40% of the people on here) 1% other
btw i consider the fast breaking point average for every car out there compaired to each other is 14.0 or faster, quicker then you can call yourself fast, slower then spend some more money
the more you write the more pissed off i get with your statements, all your percentage bs are only assumptions that u have pulled out of your ass, i used to have a mustang 4.0 cuz i liked it a lot. It was not fast by any means but sure it was a really nice car. You are just hurt because the new S197 have stolen the thunder from the charger in performance wise and in looks. (Not including the srt8 though )
_____________________________
04 SRT: 50 trim + supporting mods running only 11lbs.
Printable Version
RE: Charger SRT-8 Kill - 
