Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

351W vs. 351C

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs >> 351W vs. 351C Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
351W vs. 351C - 2/20/2005 3:51:42 PM   
Shifty101Easy


Posts: 2707
Joined: 2/17/2005
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Shifty101Easy's photo gallery
which is better and why? ive heard the cleaveland was but i dont know why. also, i heard there were other rare enginesmade like the michigan or some other place. is this true?

_____________________________

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2453417/4

Post #: 1
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/20/2005 4:05:55 PM   
Soaring



Posts: 17565
Joined: 10/29/2004
Status: offline
Soaring's photo gallery
For rebuilding for power, there is no question that the Cleveland has more options available, but more expensive as compared to the windsor.

(in reply to Shifty101Easy)
Post #: 2
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/20/2005 4:17:19 PM   
Shifty101Easy


Posts: 2707
Joined: 2/17/2005
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Shifty101Easy's photo gallery
like its just more compatible with performance parts or what? how differnt, architechture-wise are the cleveland and the windsor that the cleveland is noticibly better?

_____________________________

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2453417/4


(in reply to Soaring)
Post #: 3
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/20/2005 7:06:02 PM   
69FECoupe

 

Posts: 683
Joined: 4/15/2004
Status: offline
These days, there are many more performance parts available for the Windsor vs the Cleveland. That, plus the fact that the Windsor was in production so much longer then the Cleveland make the Windsor a popular choice today. That said, the reason the Cleveland has so much performance potential is the head design. It breathes much better in stock form then the Windsor head. The 2bbl head is better for street performance as the 4bbl heads like high rpm's. They're both good motors but if I was going to build a 351, I'd do a Cleveland. JMO.

(in reply to Shifty101Easy)
Post #: 4
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/20/2005 7:12:21 PM   
Trannyman

 

Posts: 85
Joined: 7/18/2004
From: Newport News, VA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shifty101Easy

like its just more compatible with performance parts or what? how differnt, architechture-wise are the cleveland and the windsor that the cleveland is noticibly better?


Windsor is a small block. The Cleveland is an "intermediate" block. A tweener if you will. Not technically a small block, but not technically (but sometimes listed as) a big block. When Ford desinged the Cleveland (esp the 4bbl head version) they realized that you can make lotsa power if the heads breathe well. The 4bbl heads on a Cleveland were built to breathe.

The gas crunch and introduction of emissions laws killed development of the Cleveland. I think they were only made from like '71-'74. Then came the neutered 351M and 400M.

Be warned though. They can be hard to find parts for. And as was said, expensive.

_____________________________

My Ride
1990 HB LX 5.0 w/5sp tranny

351 Cleveland for Sale/Trade


(in reply to Shifty101Easy)
Post #: 5
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/20/2005 7:13:43 PM   
Trannyman

 

Posts: 85
Joined: 7/18/2004
From: Newport News, VA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 69FECoupe

These days, there are many more performance parts available for the Windsor vs the Cleveland. That, plus the fact that the Windsor was in production so much longer then the Cleveland make the Windsor a popular choice today. That said, the reason the Cleveland has so much performance potential is the head design. It breathes much better in stock form then the Windsor head. The 2bbl head is better for street performance as the 4bbl heads like high rpm's. They're both good motors but if I was going to build a 351, I'd do a Cleveland. JMO.


Cheese and Rice! You beat me to it.....LOL!


_____________________________

My Ride
1990 HB LX 5.0 w/5sp tranny

351 Cleveland for Sale/Trade


(in reply to 69FECoupe)
Post #: 6
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/20/2005 9:54:46 PM   
cobra427302

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
i can tell u that depending on what year you have its possible to fit both in just about every year. i have a cleveand, and my friend has a winsor both are 67 coupes and i know a few people who have put them in 65s where the engine compartment is smaller, but it was a squeeze.

(in reply to Shifty101Easy)
Post #: 7
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/21/2005 9:42:58 AM   
69mach1377


Posts: 1321
Joined: 8/17/2004
Status: offline
Good news for the C...edelbrock just announced it will be selling aluminum heads for it, a first.

_____________________________

69Mach1-SteetBoss377,351W blk/stroker crank,10:1cr,351C-2V hds,2500 stall FMX,3.50:1 posi,rack&pinion/tilt,16"Centerlines w/Kumho Victoracers,all MSD,Holley 750,custom paint,Shelby drop,Cam Adv
http://photobucket.com/albums/v618/danaranda/69stang

(in reply to cobra427302)
Post #: 8
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/21/2005 5:54:55 PM   
vfast

 

Posts: 11394
Joined: 7/16/2003
Status: offline
the old clev..revs like crazy and it good for on the avg 1000 more rpms

_____________________________

IF YOU CAN'T BEAT'EM WHOOP THEIR ASS!
'89 lx 5.0 5spd 4 sale 3800
'90 lx 306 s/c
'90 lx 5.0 auto
hockey sux
mopar..I like midgets they hang nice from my x-mas tree

WTB 62-67 NOVA

(in reply to 69mach1377)
Post #: 9
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/22/2005 6:00:20 AM   
65_2plus2


Posts: 392
Joined: 3/30/2004
From: Arizona Desert
Status: offline
For what you will pay for a hot Cleveland, you can get a stroker Windsor with more HP. I think the Windsor is the better bang for the buck. And it will fit into any year mustang whereas the Cleveland wont.


(in reply to vfast)
Post #: 10
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/22/2005 7:21:50 PM   
Shifty101Easy


Posts: 2707
Joined: 2/17/2005
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Shifty101Easy's photo gallery
ok, so both have some upside and downside it seems like. Cleveland seems like you have to be more committed and attentive while the windsor isnt as demanding but still has potential to be preatty good like the Cleveland.

ok for you computer guys out there...is "stroking" your engine sort of like "overclocking" your engine?

_____________________________

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2453417/4


(in reply to 65_2plus2)
Post #: 11
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/23/2005 4:57:08 AM   
Magiarn71


Posts: 645
Joined: 2/17/2005
Status: offline
It's not as easy as "overclocking". It's more involved than a dipswitch and a flex fan. What you're doing is changing the actual displacement. I would relate overclocking to running an engine at higher RPM then suggested...

As far as I can see, the Cleveland is like the Vortec stuff to the chevy guys. For stock parts, it's better. As someone already said, It's alot easier to find upgrades for a W than a C, so if you plan on alot of aftermarket stuff, the W will give you more options.

(in reply to Shifty101Easy)
Post #: 12
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/24/2005 1:53:15 AM   
65_2plus2


Posts: 392
Joined: 3/30/2004
From: Arizona Desert
Status: offline
When you stroke a motor, you are changing the crank profile to take longer piston rods, thereby increasing the cubic inch displacement of the engine.
I have seen kits that take a 351W block and increase it to a 427ci. And that one you can fit into a 65 of 66 body.

(in reply to Magiarn71)
Post #: 13
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/24/2005 2:15:21 AM   
Shifty101Easy


Posts: 2707
Joined: 2/17/2005
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Shifty101Easy's photo gallery
so essentially it packs a way bigger punch in a smaller package, increasing power, while decreasing weight. Sounds like a win-win to me!

is there more special care or anything needed for a stroked engine?

what would be the average you could stroke a 302 to? 351? (im assuming 427 isnt average?)

and it something the average car guy could do? or is its preatty invovled and complicated? (cutting metal, sanding, etc)

_____________________________

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2453417/4


(in reply to 65_2plus2)
Post #: 14
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/24/2005 10:13:57 AM   
69mach1377


Posts: 1321
Joined: 8/17/2004
Status: offline
Commonly a 302 is stroked to 347 and the 351 to a 393 or 408.
Best to buy a stroker kit or even short block from somebody like coasthigh performance.
Big inch small blocks are good bang for the buck and weight...

_____________________________

69Mach1-SteetBoss377,351W blk/stroker crank,10:1cr,351C-2V hds,2500 stall FMX,3.50:1 posi,rack&pinion/tilt,16"Centerlines w/Kumho Victoracers,all MSD,Holley 750,custom paint,Shelby drop,Cam Adv
http://photobucket.com/albums/v618/danaranda/69stang

(in reply to Shifty101Easy)
Post #: 15
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 2/25/2005 5:36:12 AM   
65_2plus2


Posts: 392
Joined: 3/30/2004
From: Arizona Desert
Status: offline
You can get complete kits that are just drop in parts from places like Performance Automotive Warehouse (PAW), I think JEGs and Summit racing also.
If you can turn a wrench, you can build a motor.

(in reply to 69mach1377)
Post #: 16
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 3/6/2005 2:27:33 AM   
aussie _351

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
I am from australia and own a 351 cleveland in a 1976 ford landau. the engine produces 350 flywheel hp with stock 2v closed chamber heads, stock inlet manifold, and stock HEI ignition. It does however have a holley 650dp and a stage 3 heetseeker cam with 500thou lift on both inlet and exhaust. clevelands were the only small block ford V8 built in australia so parts are plentyful. Ford australia built two versions of the cleveland, 351ci and 302ci. the 302 has been known to produce 450hp with ported 2v heads and the 351 can produce 550hp. there is a 3v aluminium head wich has produced 550hp on a 351 unported with 10.2-1comp. there are only a few windsors used for racing over here being the cleveland is easy to extract power from. clevelands can be stroked to 412ci using a 400M crank

(in reply to Shifty101Easy)
Post #: 17
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 3/6/2005 4:20:55 PM   
dodgestang

 

Posts: 1480
Joined: 11/23/2004
Status: offline
dodgestang's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: 65_2plus2

When you stroke a motor, you are changing the crank profile to take longer piston rods, thereby increasing the cubic inch displacement of the engine.
I have seen kits that take a 351W block and increase it to a 427ci. And that one you can fit into a 65 of 66 body.


Not sure what you are trying to say.

Here is my Stroked 351 cleveland....408 cubes with a modest cam and STOCK cast iron heads putting 396 RWHP to the ground through an AOD, Ford 9 inch, and all installed in my STOCK 65 engine compartment.



The no BS bottom line is: "It is cheaper to build what you own already"

The difference between building a c and a w for performance is easily marginalized to the cost of the core parts...meaning if own a w and want to build a c...the cost to source the parts you don't already have (block, heads) make it more expensive to build...and vise versa.

Where I can drop 2k on a stroker kit and go to town on the stock heads for 500-600 (valves, springs, etc), you can't with a w...you have to drop $1500 on a stroker kit and then 1200 on new aluminum heads.

_____________________________

Nick
65FB 408c AOD D.T.


11.99 Goal achieved!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGc8Wr9HvfA

(in reply to 65_2plus2)
Post #: 18
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 3/6/2005 8:10:11 PM   
onefast2002ss

 

Posts: 66
Joined: 3/2/2005
Status: offline
i have a 79 351w in my fox bodie and i couldnt ask for more the windsor has so much tourqe. the engine just about jumped in my lap i called a place and the guy had one i bought it rebuilt it put some heads on it the only part hard to find was the oil pan i needed an oil pan that had the dipstick in the pan not in the block after that i used my 302's roller rockers put the guide plates in for my 302's roller cam and i have a 79 351w roller motor parts were everywhere for it

(in reply to dodgestang)
Post #: 19
RE: 351W vs. 351C - 3/6/2005 8:12:56 PM   
onefast2002ss

 

Posts: 66
Joined: 3/2/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 69mach1377

Commonly a 302 is stroked to 347 and the 351 to a 393 or 408.
Best to buy a stroker kit or even short block from somebody like coasthigh performance.
Big inch small blocks are good bang for the buck and weight...

you could stroke a 302 but you get a oil burner form the piston pin being so far moved that the oil ring is under the piston boss causing oil to pass

(in reply to 69mach1377)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14534
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511762

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.