Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

Cutting the rear springs

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 2005 - 2008 Mustangs >> 4.0L V6 Specific >> Handling Performance >> Cutting the rear springs Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Cutting the rear springs - 9/30/2007 8:49:11 AM   
Stangrunner06


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline
Many years ago when I was a kid, ( still am but the body doesn't know it) we used to cut the springs a coil at a time to lower front or rear, some guys even torched them to collapes them under weight but they found out later the temper was compromized on the spring and they would break/crack, so by using a cutoff wheel and die grinder they would cut a section of coil without compromize to the spring and got the lowering done. Anyone out there ever try on these cars? I want to swap out the stock ones on the rear to lower  the point of gravity of my car to stop it from hopping on bumps in tight turns, every time I make an agressive hi speed turn on bumpy curve, the ass end kicks out. I want the ROUSH rear springs to lower the car, so if anyone can respond on handling after an ass drop or if anyone has CUT  springs I would appreciate some feed back.  Body roll is not an issue, I got Hellwig Rear sway bar and GT front sway bar not to mention the shi--y stock tires but money is an issue and the cheapest out is springs depending on feed back.

_____________________________

K&N CAI
MAC axle back Single
Strut tower brace
Billet shifter bezel, leather boot, HURST SHIFTER!! tints,GT f swaybar, poly bushings, Hellwig RSway bar, Black stripes, Oil Scavanger Sys.
More to come...
Post #: 1
RE: Cutting the rear springs - 10/1/2007 7:01:29 PM   
dmhines


Posts: 1342
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline
I was considering cutting the springs also .. but the last loop on the spring is a smaller diameter than the rest of the spring so I don't think it could be installed properly ..

_____________________________



2006 X-Charged 4.0 Manual Transmission

(in reply to Stangrunner06)
Post #: 2
RE: Cutting the rear springs - 11/8/2007 5:25:02 PM   
oi8achevy


Posts: 309
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: NY
Status: offline
oi8achevy's photo gallery
ive cut a lot of springs in my day and it usually ends up being a bigger hassle than its worth on a tapered spring. save some headache and get a set of aftermarkets.

_____________________________


(in reply to dmhines)
Post #: 3
RE: Cutting the rear springs - 11/8/2007 5:28:28 PM   
dmhines


Posts: 1342
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline
I hear yah ... I picked up a set of Roush Rears ... being installed soon to level off the stance ...

_____________________________



2006 X-Charged 4.0 Manual Transmission

(in reply to oi8achevy)
Post #: 4
RE: Cutting the rear springs - 11/16/2007 8:43:17 AM   
Norm Peterson


Posts: 1386
Joined: 2/26/2007
From: Delaware Twp, NJ
Status: offline
My guess is that Stangrunner06 doesn't have enough shock damping back there, especially with that Hellwig sta-bar.  Stick axles are going to hop around a bit on bumpy turns anyway, and stiffening either the springs or the bar usually just makes things worse.  Shock damping, particularly rebound damping, tends to quiet what is essentially a low-frequency vibration.  I'm also guessing that the now-flatter cornering has encouraged harder driving in order to enjoy it.

Best advice I can offer is to give Sam Strano at stranoparts a call (he's a fairly new member here, but he knows a lot about making shocks work for you).


Norm
still a kid, too  

< Message edited by Norm Peterson -- 11/16/2007 8:49:14 AM >

(in reply to dmhines)
Post #: 5
RE: Cutting the rear springs - 11/21/2007 4:45:36 PM   
Stangrunner06


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/21/2006
Status: offline
Hey Norm,
Thank  God!! Another kid!  So  you think if I drop the ass end about  1"  and soften the shocks with wider tires might work?  The tires are gonna have to wait,( Might loose job, Plant closure) and If I don't have to get rid of car because of it, I will try the shocks. Im trying to get info so I can continue pulling 3 g's on highway entrance ramps without rear end kickout. And yea , my turning is a little more agressive than my Camry beater, but who could resist?? My wife is still recovering from the last one!!!


_____________________________

K&N CAI
MAC axle back Single
Strut tower brace
Billet shifter bezel, leather boot, HURST SHIFTER!! tints,GT f swaybar, poly bushings, Hellwig RSway bar, Black stripes, Oil Scavanger Sys.
More to come...

(in reply to Norm Peterson)
Post #: 6
RE: Cutting the rear springs - 11/22/2007 5:33:16 AM   
Norm Peterson


Posts: 1386
Joined: 2/26/2007
From: Delaware Twp, NJ
Status: offline
Ride height by itself won't affect axle hop much - the CG height of the sprung weight doesn't affect that weight itself, which is what the axle "pushes off of" during rebound (wheel moving down relative to the chassis). 

But there will be some effects that are less obvious.  Axle roll steer and anti-squat will change as ride height changes.  Unfortunately, anticipating what those effects might do requires knowing where all of the rear suspension pivot points are located and (for me at least) inputting them into a spreadsheet.  The short story is that the lower rear ride height will add a little understeer, or at least quicken the rate at which it builds.  Anti-squat effects are less clear (plotted against ride height you can get a straight line correlation, a curve, or even an "S"-shape), and this would primarily affect the "accelerating out of the turn" phase.  And because anti-lift is tied to anti-squat, braking or sharp engine deceleration on turn entry would also be affected.

I wouldn't add any more rear spring stiffness without adding more spring and/or bar up front.  I don't have enough information to figure out how your total lateral load transfer is distributed, but it already sounds like there's too much going to the rear as it is.  And a more rearward lateral load transfer distribution (LLTD) is in the "loose" direction.

I really think the solution - if there is one - involves shock damping.  I'm guessing less bump damping combined with more rebound damping. 


Norm

(in reply to Stangrunner06)
Post #: 7
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 2005 - 2008 Mustangs >> 4.0L V6 Specific >> Handling Performance
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17752
nanaki14679
88bluegt14517
dan04cobra14505
addermk213835
ride of the 13601
hotrods_n_bo13286
2000gt4.612490
mustangman0211872
1slo8511641

New Vendors
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.