Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip >> RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 10:11:50 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
dood.. did you not read this WHOLE post?? This has been covered. I never thought of you as thick headed before so please read the entire post as to the definition of "cam only" that I had with that other tool on here. Please.

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to jdaniel)
Post #: 101
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 10:17:22 AM   
JD1969




Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8564
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
JD1969's photo gallery
how come nobody knows what a cam only car is? It means the heads have never been of the car and the only internal mod is the cam, you can have bolt ons, headers, gears whatever as long as the internals of the motor remain untouched.

_____________________________

GET IN THE RING!

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 102
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 10:22:51 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
EXACTLY.. maybe there is some kind of ford learning curve about the term cam only that they have yet to hit the apex of... but it's really, REALLY simple

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to JD1969)
Post #: 103
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 10:44:33 AM   
jdaniel


Posts: 9173
Joined: 4/3/2004
Status: offline
jdaniel's photo gallery
LOL You guys beat all ive ever seen. LOL You said what you said and I did read the entire thread. You did say "cam only" did you not or do I need to quote you again. I guess thats the GM rememberance curve or something.

_____________________________


Dyno video

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 104
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 10:59:17 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
no. now your just being thick.. Look at my origonal post..



quote:

how about a cam only LS1 (stock heads and displacment) running 10.4.. would that be enough to convince you doubters what a bolt on LS1 can do?




Come on man. it's VERY simple. the ONLY limitation is stock internals other then the cam. Everyone knows this. Atleast everyone that I have any respect for as a car person. There is also no power addder in a cam only aplication. Come on people. This isn't hard at all


_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to jdaniel)
Post #: 105
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 11:11:23 AM   
01GT


Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
so in that aspect with a full bolt on gt and the biggest cam i could find witgh 410 gears and slicks with skinnies up front you don't think a gt could do it. i think it could because a good strong cam and some headers will give me 110+hp with 410 and some slicks i think i could get into the 10's

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 106
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 11:15:00 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
ok lets compare.. I give you 2 LS1's that DID it and you give me some hogwash about a mustang that"might" could do it? Lets see who I belive....



oh yeah, I belive me considering it's been done. Show me one that did it or do it yourself going by the same guidlines. M6, cam only, no head work or internal work. Then we will see.


BTW. Punctuation is a good thing

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 107
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 11:20:12 AM   
01GT


Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
its the internet dick not a college paper if i knew your were going to be grading the post i still wouldn't have tried to make it right. BTW that was a gay remark about the punctuation. If i had the money to do it i would try it and i never said that the ls1 didn't do i just asked if you think a gt could do it. a question i didn't put down your little car so take the panties out of your crack and calm down.

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 108
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 11:24:11 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
my best guess? Deep-mid 11's under the same rules for a GT. but thats only a guess since it hasn't been done. A lot of work went into both the thunder racing car and the futral motorsports car. The same caliber of work would have to go into the mustang. Who knows. After i finish my car maybe I will buy a mustang and try it. since that would take a good 5 years or so anyone else is welcome to try. I just personaly don't see it happening, but you never know.

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 109
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 11:25:20 AM   
jdaniel


Posts: 9173
Joined: 4/3/2004
Status: offline
jdaniel's photo gallery
Also... with a "big" cam, wouldnt you need a new set of valve springs and a few other things?

_____________________________


Dyno video

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 110
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 11:34:16 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
sure. thats exactly why it's listed on the mod sheet... no interal work other then cam. no aftermarket or ported/worked heads, no power adders. his whole mod list is already posted but if you want the full page just go here. http://www.thunderracing.com/customerscars/?action=view&ccid=36&x=8&y=8

Like I said, all you have to do is think about it for a sec and it's very easy to wrap your brain around. Whats the best way to add power without internals? head and cam work. take out the head work and you have a cam only set up. Just because someone says that they have heads and cam doesn't mean that the rets of the car is untouched.

I have a totaly stock motor. No cam, no heads, no nothing. Hell I still have the factory tune up. But I do have about 4 grand in suspention and driveline. But that doesn't mean that my motor isn't still stock.

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to jdaniel)
Post #: 111
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 2:02:47 PM   
JD1969




Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8564
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
JD1969's photo gallery
In the drag race world cam only means just 96Silverlt1 said. Its not our fault if you did not know that, our fault for assuming. However now you know what it means, ask anbody who serious about drag racing and they will tell you same thing. For most of us things like headers/tires/intakes/exhuast are a givin, it is easy and (realtivly) cheap to do, and most people who race will have these mods done.To me it's pointless to try and drag race with a street tire, yes it takes a skillfull driver to cut good times on a true street tire, but there is no consistancy, and consistancy is what drag racing is all about.

_____________________________

GET IN THE RING!

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 112
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 2:31:01 PM   
mrsneakyz28

 

Posts: 133
Joined: 2/10/2005
Status: offline
check these out

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=323279

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=326765



< Message edited by mrsneakyz28 -- 3/2/2005 2:45:14 PM >


_____________________________

99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back, slp lid, granitelli MAF
13.0 @ 108.5

90 5.0 Lx vert, flowmaster cat-back,MAC EL headers, h-pipe, 4.10's, E303 cam, bbk cai, trick flow intake manifold, centerforce clutch, pro 5.0, bbk subframes

(in reply to JD1969)
Post #: 113
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 3:02:41 PM   
JD1969




Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8564
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
JD1969's photo gallery
HA good ol US41, I race at that track alot. That wheels up pic looks great.

_____________________________

GET IN THE RING!

(in reply to mrsneakyz28)
Post #: 114
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 10:42:10 PM   
Chris98Formula

 

Posts: 265
Joined: 2/16/2005
From: Yukon, Oklahoma
Status: offline
This is way off topic here but just look at some off those guys sigs, it will just show you what 4th gens can do.

(in reply to JD1969)
Post #: 115
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 11:38:21 PM   
Dan89lx


Posts: 947
Joined: 8/25/2004
Status: offline
Dan89lx's photo gallery
someone please tell me what M6 means, i know this sounds stupid, please humor me

_____________________________


1989 lx Hatch. 306
lots of mods

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 116
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/3/2005 12:11:31 AM   
01GT


Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
Here is one of your 4th gens


sold: 99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back,slp lid, ls6 intake manifold, granitelli MAF, free mods
Best 1/4: 13.0 @ 108.5 on a 2.0 60"


M6 stands for a manual 6 spd i had to ask to don't feel bad

(in reply to Dan89lx)
Post #: 117
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/3/2005 12:30:03 AM   
5.0PonyDriver


Posts: 15
Joined: 2/13/2005
Status: offline
Bottom line of my original post wasn't to boast about my car or trash chevy... I've seen good chevy's and bad chevy's my personal opinion of the company is that they are generally not up to standards to Ford and I'am notjust talking about mustang vs maro. but the companies in generall...trucks,sedans,e.t.c

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 118
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/3/2005 9:59:28 AM   
JD1969




Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8564
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
JD1969's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 5.0PonyDriver

Bottom line of my original post wasn't to boast about my car or trash chevy... I've seen good chevy's and bad chevy's my personal opinion of the company is that they are generally not up to standards to Ford and I'am notjust talking about mustang vs maro. but the companies in generall...trucks,sedans,e.t.c

well you are still a tool who posted a time slip you pulled off the net from somplace

_____________________________

GET IN THE RING!

(in reply to 5.0PonyDriver)
Post #: 119
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/3/2005 10:20:48 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
exactly..


And untill your work on cars for a living for 5 years you have no place talking about build quality.

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to JD1969)
Post #: 120
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17922
nanaki14688
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14532
addermk214002
ride of the 13716
hotrods_n_bo13329
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211994
1slo8511751

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.