Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28

  Printable Version
Mustang Forum >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip >> RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:22:36 PM   
01GT


Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 96SilverLT1

ok.. I am just going to take this right from something I just posted..





how about a cam only LS1 (stock heads and displacment) running 10.4.. would that be enough to convince you doubters what a bolt on LS1 can do?

Umm looks like you did say that a cam only ls1 you say nothing about othwer mods. you also didn't say cam only bolt on it is a fast car for what he has done to it but you do have to say that a set of slicks is a performance bolt on because it shaves time off of your car.
running that much power to the ground if he had street tires on that car he would be mid 11's at best.

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 81
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:31:58 PM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
God you are dense... do you see the ( ) right next to that?? good lord you need to get out of the world of literaly statments and do some reading on drag racing terms.

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 82
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:37:09 PM   
98LS1


Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 01GT

quote:

ORIGINAL: 96SilverLT1

ok.. I am just going to take this right from something I just posted..





how about a cam only LS1 (stock heads and displacment) running 10.4.. would that be enough to convince you doubters what a bolt on LS1 can do?


Umm looks like you did say that a cam only ls1 you say nothing about othwer mods. you also didn't say cam only bolt on it is a fast car for what he has done to it but you do have to say that a set of slicks is a performance bolt on because it shaves time off of your car.
running that much power to the ground if he had street tires on that car he would be mid 11's at best.


There, I fixed it for the moron.

'01GT, you have a slow car, get over it. My car with exhaust, gear, and a stall will run all over any bolt-on GT's here with stock weight. With all your bolt ons and a 5-speed you're probably making 50 less rwhp than me with my auto. If I had a manual you'd be making 75 less rwhp than me. You'd need a set of heads and cams to make comparible power to my exhaust only vehicle.

You guys are in denial. Oh ya, I get better gas mileage too.

_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 83
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:39:39 PM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
Thank you. at least someone else understands the concept of cam only.

But give it a min and he will be back making some other misconstrud (sp) claim of why it's not fair

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 84
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:55:08 PM   
01GTvertible


Posts: 740
Joined: 6/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 98LS1




There, I fixed it for the moron.

'01GT, you have a slow car, get over it. My car with exhaust, gear, and a stall will run all over any bolt-on GT's here with stock weight. With all your bolt ons and a 5-speed you're probably making 50 less rwhp than me with my auto. If I had a manual you'd be making 75 less rwhp than me. You'd need a set of heads and cams to make comparible power to my exhaust only vehicle.

You guys are in denial. Oh ya, I get better gas mileage too.


what kind of times do you get at the track?


_____________________________

04 Mystic Chrome Cobra

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 85
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:57:37 PM   
mrsneakyz28

 

Posts: 133
Joined: 2/10/2005
Status: offline


Hey man. just because you have horrible reading comprehention doesn't mean that I'm a liar. If you think any car with literaly JUST a cam can run 10's then you need an ass whoopin. cam only as stated in my first post means Stock heads and internals...


learn to read and try again
[/quote]

I think he need an ass whoopin anyway lol

_____________________________

99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back, slp lid, granitelli MAF
13.0 @ 108.5

90 5.0 Lx vert, flowmaster cat-back,MAC EL headers, h-pipe, 4.10's, E303 cam, bbk cai, trick flow intake manifold, centerforce clutch, pro 5.0, bbk subframes

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 86
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:57:45 PM   
98LS1


Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery
No 1/4 tracks here. I could say what it should run, but that's just speculation. On the gas, it should run what you would run with some DR's.

< Message edited by 98LS1 -- 3/1/2005 3:58:57 PM >


_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to 01GTvertible)
Post #: 87
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 4:09:02 PM   
01GTvertible


Posts: 740
Joined: 6/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 98LS1

No 1/4 tracks here. I could say what it should run, but that's just speculation. On the gas, it should run what you would run with some DR's.


im not understanding you here. you saying that your 325hp car will run 11's?

_____________________________

04 Mystic Chrome Cobra

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 88
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 4:17:24 PM   
98LS1


Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003
Status: offline
98LS1's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 01GTvertible


quote:

ORIGINAL: 98LS1

No 1/4 tracks here. I could say what it should run, but that's just speculation. On the gas, it should run what you would run with some DR's.


im not understanding you here. you saying that your 325hp car will run 11's?


With my nitrous, yes...

Car should run low to mid 12's on motor. I'm expecting middle 11's on a 75-100 shot.


_____________________________

1998 TransAm

Idle/Walkaround

(in reply to 01GTvertible)
Post #: 89
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 5:05:29 PM   
01GT


Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
i did not understand how he worded it but i do i was wrong in that aspect of it but if you look back i said a ls1 with justa cam ran a 10.4 i don't think so that would have been the time to correct me not later. Sense you are talking about ass whoopins why don't you come to florida and give me one i DARE YOU to. you will not get close to mid 12's with your mods how can you even talk **** if you have never been to a track. you can't guess what you will run if you have never went. go to a track produce a slip or video then start talking again. oh yeah don't blow that motor up when you spray it.

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 90
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 5:13:54 PM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
wait.. who are you talking to now? Where did I say that I never went to a track? or are you just liping off at both me and 98 in the same paragraph. Like I said. Reading comprehention, it will make you a more gooder reader... I corrected you the very post after you missed the point of cam only



quote:


If you think any car with literaly JUST a cam can run 10's then you need an ass whoopin. cam only as stated in my first post means Stock heads and internals...




I explained it many many times. The fact that your not comprehending what people are typing is your downfall. But I love how defensive your getting about it and trying to come off as a big shot.


_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 91
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 5:18:38 PM   
01GT


Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
i was talking to 98 he said that i could tell you what i should run. i just said i was wrong so get off it i misunderstood how you worded it and said i was wrong. shut your mouth

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 92
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 5:24:10 PM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline
well... since you asked nice and all..




now how about a hug??

_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 93
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 6:27:17 PM   
01GT


Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
thanks for the pissing match i enjoyed it while it lasted but we need a new topic to argue about this one is old.

(in reply to 96SilverLT1)
Post #: 94
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 8:49:38 AM   
TommyV8

 

Posts: 4019
Joined: 7/26/2004
From: St. Louis, MO
Status: offline
01GT, what did your car run stock? I'm guessing not anywhere near what a bone stock auto LS1 Camaro with 2.73 gears will do (13.36 @ 105).

_____________________________

2002 Camaro Z28
Automatic, stock converter, 2.73 gears
Airbox lid, longtube headers, catless Y-pipe, cutout, Nitto drag radials
12.72 @ 108.62 1.93 60 ft


(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 95
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 9:45:15 AM   
jdaniel


Posts: 9173
Joined: 4/3/2004
Status: offline
jdaniel's photo gallery


quote:

ORIGINAL: 96SilverLT1

how about a cam only LS1 (stock heads and displacment) running 10.4.. would that be enough to convince you doubters what a bolt on LS1 can do?




ummm... NO!

There is a Vette at my track with a license plate "Kwik 99" that ran a 10.95 on all motor. He has every possible thing ported and polished that can be P&P'd and full exhaust, BIG ass tires and a lot of rear end work. He launches off the rev limiter and hauls ass. Under the spray I think Rich said he runs a low 10 or a high 9. He runs race fuel also.

I dont think a cammed LS1 only will run low 10's without spray.


_____________________________


Dyno video

(in reply to 98LS1)
Post #: 96
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 9:47:23 AM   
JD1969




Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8459
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
JD1969's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 01GT

i did not understand how he worded it but i do i was wrong in that aspect of it but if you look back i said a ls1 with justa cam ran a 10.4 i don't think so that would have been the time to correct me not later. Sense you are talking about ass whoopins why don't you come to florida and give me one i DARE YOU to. you will not get close to mid 12's with your mods how can you even talk **** if you have never been to a track. you can't guess what you will run if you have never went. go to a track produce a slip or video then start talking again. oh yeah don't blow that motor up when you spray it.

How could he not be mid 12's with his mods? my car does not have gears or headers or tires and I ran a 12.92 @107. All I had was a lid, maf, bellows, cat back and free mods. I agree that guessing a time does not mean jack but if the his did'nt go mid 12's I would be shocked.

_____________________________

GET IN THE RING!

(in reply to 01GT)
Post #: 97
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 9:54:15 AM   
JD1969




Team MF Member #069
Posts: 8459
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
JD1969's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: jdaniel



quote:

ORIGINAL: 96SilverLT1

how about a cam only LS1 (stock heads and displacment) running 10.4.. would that be enough to convince you doubters what a bolt on LS1 can do?




ummm... NO!

There is a Vette at my track with a license plate "Kwik 99" that ran a 10.95 on all motor. He has every possible thing ported and polished that can be P&P'd and full exhaust, BIG ass tires and a lot of rear end work. He launches off the rev limiter and hauls ass. Under the spray I think Rich said he runs a low 10 or a high 9. He runs race fuel also.

I dont think a cammed LS1 only will run low 10's without spray.


Yes they will, Car Craft did a write up on bunch of quick LS1's last year. A buddy of mine had his car in the issue, he was cam and full bolt-ons at the time, plus a ton of weight reduction (this is the key part) his car was 3000# race weight. He went 10.8'2 which is not low 10 but this was a 6spd car, if it was an auto I bet he would have gone quicker, but its all speculation. BTW he now has heads and TH400 and a 100 shot and is now running low 9's

_____________________________

GET IN THE RING!

(in reply to jdaniel)
Post #: 98
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 9:55:38 AM   
96SilverLT1

 

Posts: 947
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jdaniel



ummm... NO!

There is a Vette at my track with a license plate "Kwik 99" that ran a 10.95 on all motor. He has every possible thing ported and polished that can be P&P'd and full exhaust, BIG ass tires and a lot of rear end work. He launches off the rev limiter and hauls ass. Under the spray I think Rich said he runs a low 10 or a high 9. He runs race fuel also.

I dont think a cammed LS1 only will run low 10's without spray.




The vid and all the info on the car was already posted in this thread. look it up. It's legit.


_____________________________

Owner of HBHRacing.com Xtreme performance products

(in reply to jdaniel)
Post #: 99
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/2/2005 10:03:27 AM   
jdaniel


Posts: 9173
Joined: 4/3/2004
Status: offline
jdaniel's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: JD1969


quote:

ORIGINAL: jdaniel



quote:

ORIGINAL: 96SilverLT1

how about a cam only LS1 (stock heads and displacment) running 10.4.. would that be enough to convince you doubters what a bolt on LS1 can do?




ummm... NO!

There is a Vette at my track with a license plate "Kwik 99" that ran a 10.95 on all motor. He has every possible thing ported and polished that can be P&P'd and full exhaust, BIG ass tires and a lot of rear end work. He launches off the rev limiter and hauls ass. Under the spray I think Rich said he runs a low 10 or a high 9. He runs race fuel also.

I dont think a cammed LS1 only will run low 10's without spray.


Yes they will, Car Craft did a write up on bunch of quick LS1's last year. A buddy of mine had his car in the issue, he was cam and full bolt-ons at the time, plus a ton of weight reduction (this is the key part) his car was 3000# race weight. He went 10.8'2 which is not low 10 but this was a 6spd car, if it was an auto I bet he would have gone quicker, but its all speculation. BTW he now has heads and TH400 and a 100 shot and is now running low 9's



But of course. I can see it happening with a tom of weight reduction, full exhaust and full bolt-on's with slicks... But he said LS1 with cam only. There is no way in hell it will come out factory and only mod was a cam and it runs 10's. Ford would have been out of business in 1998! LOL

< Message edited by jdaniel -- 3/2/2005 10:04:05 AM >


_____________________________


Dyno video

(in reply to JD1969)
Post #: 100
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17788
nanaki14679
88bluegt14533
dan04cobra14505
addermk213855
ride of the 13610
hotrods_n_bo13287
2000gt4.612490
mustangman0211885
1slo8511661

New Vendors
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.