RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28
Login  | |
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 2/28/2005 6:58:30 PM
|
|
|
01GTvertible
Posts: 740
Joined: 6/13/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
Ok I just need to reply to alot of posts on here because I read alot of dumb ****. First of all the kid that started this post you are ****ing retarded. Second of all blown 5.0 under 10 lbs of boost not a chance vs. bonestock ls1 unles heads,cam,etc. Third blown 5.0 no matter what pounds of boost, not a chance against a blown ls1. Fourth no 95 cobra or even 01 cobra will beat a bonestock ls1 in the quarter. Only cobra that will is the 03 cobra which I respect. But it doesnt take much mods for ls1's to run 11's I just don't understand y someone would say the sucks? Lid/cat-back,headers,ls6 manifold, 4.10 gears, a cam and some tires and ur running high 11's, how does that suck!
_____________________________
sold: 99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back,slp lid, ls6 intake manifold, granitelli MAF, free mods
Best 1/4: 13.0 @ 108.5 on a 2.0 60"
what happen, you had a lot of bolt ons on your 99 maro, and you only got 13.0? i thought that it was easy to put them into 11's? HAHAHAHAHAHA maGOO
_____________________________
04 Mystic Chrome Cobra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 2/28/2005 8:35:01 PM
|
|
|
01GT
Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
|
MrSneakyZ28 you are an ass you just got done saying how easy it is to run in the elevens with that LS1 and countless morons here say that they run in the 12's stock so why did you run a 13.0 with all those mods you should be a low 12 easy unless eveything that comes out of your mouth is BS. Why are you buying a 5.0 if your LS1 is so much better you make no sense you chevy guys are so full of sh1t that i think you are starting to believe your own lies. if that is the case you need help check yourself in do what you got to do but MRSneaky just spilled the beans on your whole operation with his dumb ass remarks. go back to a chevy forum back where you belong.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 2/28/2005 9:17:17 PM
|
|
|
Dan89lx
Posts: 947
Joined: 8/25/2004
Status: offline
|
I like LS1's and all, but my I have outrun a couple of them on the street and I have way less money in my car than any LS1 on these forums.I know an LS1 will eventually catch me on top end now but thats why I got me some heads. Hell you better be able to outrun a mustang when you have a 200cc aluminum head stock,and the bigger engine; and for what it costs to put a few bolt ons on a LS1, you could buy a nice 5.0 mustang. Just my 2 cents.
_____________________________
1989 lx Hatch. 306
lots of mods
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 2/28/2005 11:20:42 PM
|
|
|
Mach1
Posts: 1176
Joined: 10/19/2003
From: martinez, ca
Status: offline
|
Ya but finding a nice 5.0 nowadays is almost inpossible. That and they dont put 300rwhp stock. Mod for mod it isnt even close. Not trynig to dis 5.0s but thats the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 2/28/2005 11:24:01 PM
|
|
|
mrsneakyz28
Posts: 133
Joined: 2/10/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 01GT
MrSneakyZ28 you are an ass you just got done saying how easy it is to run in the elevens with that LS1 and countless morons here say that they run in the 12's stock so why did you run a 13.0 with all those mods you should be a low 12 easy unless eveything that comes out of your mouth is BS. Why are you buying a 5.0 if your LS1 is so much better you make no sense you chevy guys are so full of sh1t that i think you are starting to believe your own lies. if that is the case you need help check yourself in do what you got to do but MRSneaky just spilled the beans on your whole operation with his dumb ass remarks. go back to a chevy forum back where you belong.
ok shows how much you assholes know. THat is not a lot of mods, catback exhaust about 2tenths cost me $350, lid about 1 tenth cost me $90, the manifold came on the car about 1 tenth, the MAF doesnt really do anything it came on the car also, and thats it lol. So basically lid,catback,and some other bolt-on that gives u about 10rwhp and u are very close to 12's, that was my only run that day so was very possible. Besides I NEVER said that ls1's run 12's bonestock that is only a few freaks on very favorable conditions, i said they run 13.5-13.6 with a halfway decent driver. Now a set of 4.10's on an m6 will give u around 3-4 tenths improvement for about 200 bucks. Um...full bolt-on gt with gears mid-high13's? So you see think aobut what u are saying before u open ur ass.
An intake and an exhaust oh my god soo many mods!
_____________________________
99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back, slp lid, granitelli MAF
13.0 @ 108.5
90 5.0 Lx vert, flowmaster cat-back,MAC EL headers, h-pipe, 4.10's, E303 cam, bbk cai, trick flow intake manifold, centerforce clutch, pro 5.0, bbk subframes
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 2/28/2005 11:50:03 PM
|
|
|
01GTvertible
Posts: 740
Joined: 6/13/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mrsneakyz28
But it doesnt take much mods for ls1's to run 11's I just don't understand y someone would say the sucks? Lid/cat-back,headers,ls6 manifold, 4.10 gears, a cam and some tires and ur running high 11's, how does that suck!
thats not much?? seems like a lot to me. i met a maro guy through a mutual friend, very nice guy. he has a 99 maro z-28. its an automatic, but has all the mods you have listed, except for gears, he has 3.73's, and he's not running drag radials, his best time is 12.8. is the auto that much slower? he also has a 98 that he has completely built, top to bottom, roll cage and all, and his best is 11.78 all motor. i know he has more mods then you have listed. i was still impressed, but he was more impressed w/ my 4.6 supercharged cobra, because w/ running kumho allseasons, he beat me by .2 sec. and i didnt trailor my car to the track.
_____________________________
04 Mystic Chrome Cobra
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 1:16:23 AM
|
|
|
Dan89lx
Posts: 947
Joined: 8/25/2004
Status: offline
|
I wasnt trying to start a fight, but since you are name calling: im not scared mrsneakyZ28, bring that trap to VA and I'll embarras you with a $6000 89lx
_____________________________
1989 lx Hatch. 306
lots of mods
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:28:37 AM
|
|
|
mrsneakyz28
Posts: 133
Joined: 2/10/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dan89lx
I wasnt trying to start a fight, but since you are name calling: im not scared mrsneakyZ28, bring that trap to VA and I'll embarras you with a $6000 89lx
lol I sold it, but I will have a 90 lx soon as a project car, and I live in va so i'll bring it lol
_____________________________
99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back, slp lid, granitelli MAF
13.0 @ 108.5
90 5.0 Lx vert, flowmaster cat-back,MAC EL headers, h-pipe, 4.10's, E303 cam, bbk cai, trick flow intake manifold, centerforce clutch, pro 5.0, bbk subframes
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 3:30:43 AM
|
|
|
mrsneakyz28
Posts: 133
Joined: 2/10/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 01GTvertible
quote:
ORIGINAL: mrsneakyz28
But it doesnt take much mods for ls1's to run 11's I just don't understand y someone would say the sucks? Lid/cat-back,headers,ls6 manifold, 4.10 gears, a cam and some tires and ur running high 11's, how does that suck!
thats not much?? seems like a lot to me. i met a maro guy through a mutual friend, very nice guy. he has a 99 maro z-28. its an automatic, but has all the mods you have listed, except for gears, he has 3.73's, and he's not running drag radials, his best time is 12.8. is the auto that much slower? he also has a 98 that he has completely built, top to bottom, roll cage and all, and his best is 11.78 all motor. i know he has more mods then you have listed. i was still impressed, but he was more impressed w/ my 4.6 supercharged cobra, because w/ running kumho allseasons, he beat me by .2 sec. and i didnt trailor my car to the track.
the auto's are a good bit slower than the m6 even with gears until u add a stall, and get a programmer for the shift points. Then its all over. Most of the ls1's that you would see running 11's with very few mods are auto's with gears,high stall,programmer, and dr's. Not very likely to see an m6 running 11's without a cam.
_____________________________
99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back, slp lid, granitelli MAF
13.0 @ 108.5
90 5.0 Lx vert, flowmaster cat-back,MAC EL headers, h-pipe, 4.10's, E303 cam, bbk cai, trick flow intake manifold, centerforce clutch, pro 5.0, bbk subframes
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 7:19:13 AM
|
|
|
01GT
Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
|
Yeah i have exhaust and intake and i ran a 12.9 so a full bolt on gt with gears won't run lower than 13.5 shut your mouth you are the asshole. please go and buy a ls1 not a gt so you can get embarrassed again i think that is why you sold the car in the first place a gt put you to bed. lets all meet in atlanta at the track there so settle some things.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 1:05:11 PM
|
|
|
mrsneakyz28
Posts: 133
Joined: 2/10/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 01GT
Yeah i have exhaust and intake and i ran a 12.9 so a full bolt on gt with gears won't run lower than 13.5 shut your mouth you are the asshole. please go and buy a ls1 not a gt so you can get embarrassed again i think that is why you sold the car in the first place a gt put you to bed. lets all meet in atlanta at the track there so settle some things.
um...i had car payments of 330 a month and I have a 12 month old child and another on the way, thats y I sold thels1. The only reason I'm buying the stang is because it only costs 3k and it will NOT be my everyday driver like the camaro was, it's just a project car. Sorry never lost to a gt btw.
This arguement could go on forever so lets just set this straigh gt<ls1<03 cobra<etc.etc.
< Message edited by mrsneakyz28 -- 3/1/2005 1:10:09 PM >
_____________________________
99 camaro z28 M6 magnaflow cat-back, slp lid, granitelli MAF
13.0 @ 108.5
90 5.0 Lx vert, flowmaster cat-back,MAC EL headers, h-pipe, 4.10's, E303 cam, bbk cai, trick flow intake manifold, centerforce clutch, pro 5.0, bbk subframes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 1:42:43 PM
|
|
|
01GT
Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
|
so a ls1 with a cam only ran 10.4 yeah right and i guess they are not doing it at every track because i have never seen one so show me so video of one doing it until then as far as i'm concerened you are wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 1:57:19 PM
|
|
|
01GT
Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
|
please
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 91' 5.0 GT vs. 98' Z28 - 3/1/2005 2:01:59 PM
|
|
|
01GT
Posts: 774
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
|
Performance Modifications: Thunder Racing T-ReX camshaft, Crane dual springs with .030 shims, Thunder Racing hardened pushrods, Thunder Racing 1-3/4" race headers, F.A.S.T. 90mm intake manifold, F.A.S.T. 90 mm throttle body, Thunder Racing custom dyno tune, Moser 12-bolt rear end, 33 spline axles, 4.56 gears with spool, custom 3.5" aluminum driveshaft, Spec stage 4 clutch, Weld Prostar 15x10 wheels with Mickey Thompson 28x10.5x15 ET drags on the rear, Weld Prostar 15x3.5 front with metric radials.
Chassis & Suspension Modifications: BMR boxed subframe connectors, Wolfe Racecraft 6-point chromemoly roll cage, BMR tubular k-member, BMR tubular front a-arms, HAL "F" series drag shocks and springs, BMR adjustable torque arm, BMR Xtreme Duty drag race sway bar, BMR tubular lower control arms, BMR weld-on LCA relocation brackets, BMR tubular adjustable panhard rod
Rodney's car has been raced to a best of 10.433 @ 130.19 mph with a 1.401 sixty foot time. All of this was accomplished on the stock rods, pistons, crankshaft, and cylinder heads. He is the current "camshaft only" ET record holder for LS1 vehicles in the country.
Next time try harder dick why do you have to lie this does not say he ran that 10.4 with just cams it said his best time is that and he holds a record for best time with just cams
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
