RE: RX7 Vs. Stang
Login | |
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 1:30:10 PM
|
|
|
Stang393
Posts: 29
Joined: 2/23/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jdaniel What an embarrasment. 4cly's should not be raced. LOL And people who don't know **** about cars shouldn't speak :-P rx-7 is a ROTARY NOT 4 CYCL! and ya a BIG Ass 5.0L beat a tiny 1.3L by a whole 2 cars! woohoo!! Guess whos stopping at the gas station first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 1:56:56 PM
|
|
|
primetime5.0
Posts: 7387
Joined: 12/2/2003 From: United States Status: offline
|
that car sounds like my farts
_____________________________
R.I.P. Robert H. Western just your average primered mustang
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 2:33:50 PM
|
|
|
snlpa
Posts: 238
Joined: 1/13/2005 From: Cinci Status: offline
|
Could that be from the fart can they use? LoL>>>>>>>>>
_____________________________
2002 Mustang GT(Premium Package) Mineral Grey 5-Speed Manual Bullitt Accessories Bullitt Wheels Steeda Short Shifter FRPP Lowering Springs Twister Flow-Pro's FRPP 4:10's
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 2:46:43 PM
|
|
|
badtzmaru
Posts: 1653
Joined: 11/28/2004 Status: online
|
I do not know for sure if Mitsu is closing doors but they are in hot water, since Chrysler is pulling out financially. Mitsu has been aroung for a long time, I do not think they will ever close doors, maybe a fall like this it will take for them to make a big come back. I am not a fan of Japanese automakers and I lived in Japan for six years! Ford all the way baby! American Muscle all the way! Thumbnail Image
Attachment (1)
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 4:38:21 PM
|
|
|
langod
Posts: 216
Joined: 12/29/2004 From: New Hampshire Status: offline
|
quote:
And people who don't know **** about cars shouldn't speak :-P rx-7 is a ROTARY NOT 4 CYCL! and ya a BIG Ass 5.0L beat a tiny 1.3L by a whole 2 cars! woohoo!! Guess whos stopping at the gas station first? For someone criticizing others about car knowledge you seem to be under some strange delusion that the "tiny" 1.3L rotary gets better gas mileage than a Mustang GT. From Edmunds.com 1995 Mazda Rx-7 (last year of the Rx-7's) Manual: 17 mpg / 25 mpg 1995 Mustang GT (last year of the 5.0 GT's) Manual: 17 mpg / 25 mpg Hey look at that! Perhaps you should check your facts before you mouth off. Rotary engines get notoriously bad gas mileage for their size.
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 4:43:10 PM
|
|
|
bobby
Posts: 3742
Joined: 10/27/2003 From: Mishawaka,Indiana Status: offline
|
did it beat that supra?
_____________________________
My NEW SITE!!! '93 Mustang 5.0 Coupe. Auto. with bolt ons
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 7:00:25 PM
|
|
|
CIZ58
Posts: 87
Joined: 11/22/2004 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
i thought it looked a few feet ahead at the end
_____________________________
94 Mustang GT Conv. - 5sp
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/23/2005 11:56:38 PM
|
|
|
Gaspi101
Posts: 630
Joined: 2/2/2005 Status: offline
|
Hahahahaha, Stang393 just got bitchslapped by a newbie, langod. Way to go mate! And you're right. RX-7s were my dream cars, but for the price of parts for a rotary engine, and it pissing away gas like light beer, I decided against it. But you can get a lot of power of out of those little engines, and the near 50/50 weight balance makes it corner like a freakin' rollercoaster cart. But I'm so glad to see the 'stang kicked ass. Thanks for posting the video, man!
_____________________________
"We can't afford to do anyone harm. We owe them our lives. Each breath is recycled by someone else's lungs. Our enemies are the very air in disguise." - Ani DiFranco 2005 Premium GT, bought 8.11.07, so completely stock for now.
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/24/2005 4:00:00 AM
|
|
|
IntruderLS1
Posts: 185
Joined: 5/22/2004 Status: offline
|
It's true. The poor fuel economy was the main reason Mazda pulled the line. Now that everybody is into SUV's, and gas prices are so low (I know they seem high as hell, but in reality, we still buy a Shiz load of it), the re-introduced it.
_____________________________
2002 SS TR224 Cam, Mac headers, Intake, American Thunder, Koni shocks, sub-frame connectors, drilled/slotted rotors, 18" Z06 wheels wrapped in Nitto555 373rwhp
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/25/2005 8:35:05 PM
|
|
|
Stang393
Posts: 29
Joined: 2/23/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: langod quote:
And people who don't know **** about cars shouldn't speak :-P rx-7 is a ROTARY NOT 4 CYCL! and ya a BIG Ass 5.0L beat a tiny 1.3L by a whole 2 cars! woohoo!! Guess whos stopping at the gas station first? For someone criticizing others about car knowledge you seem to be under some strange delusion that the "tiny" 1.3L rotary gets better gas mileage than a Mustang GT. From Edmunds.com 1995 Mazda Rx-7 (last year of the Rx-7's) Manual: 17 mpg / 25 mpg 1995 Mustang GT (last year of the 5.0 GT's) Manual: 17 mpg / 25 mpg Hey look at that! Perhaps you should check your facts before you mouth off. Rotary engines get notoriously bad gas mileage for their size. Ya u tell me who's stang gets 25mpg!
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/25/2005 8:36:05 PM
|
|
|
Stang393
Posts: 29
Joined: 2/23/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Gaspi101 Hahahahaha, Stang393 just got bitchslapped by a newbie, langod. Way to go mate! And you're right. RX-7s were my dream cars, but for the price of parts for a rotary engine, and it pissing away gas like light beer, I decided against it. But you can get a lot of power of out of those little engines, and the near 50/50 weight balance makes it corner like a freakin' rollercoaster cart. But I'm so glad to see the 'stang kicked ass. Thanks for posting the video, man! i'm 1 for 1, I owned the guy who said it was a 4cycl!
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/26/2005 12:31:36 AM
|
|
|
krafty02
Posts: 166
Joined: 1/15/2005 Status: offline
|
Nice car(s).
_____________________________
02 GT - Steeda Tri-Axe - Full length CAI - Eibach Sportlines, CC plates, poly kit, steeda bumpsteer kit, Tokico Struts/Shocks, tint
|
|
|
|
RE: RX7 Vs. Stang - 2/28/2005 2:05:02 AM
|
|
|
91hatchgt
Posts: 3131
Joined: 9/3/2004 Status: offline
|
I get about 27MPG in my 5.0 and I have 4.10's!
_____________________________
94'''' GT - 331, TW Stg. 2 heads, C.I. cam, 1.6rr, Tubular GT40, 24#, 75mm PMAS, 70mm TB, BBK Shorties, O/R X-pipe, Flowmasters, MSD TFI, Pro-kit, Spec Stg. II, B&M Ripper
|
|
|
|
|