View Full Version : '03 T-Bird V8 times Vs Stang V6
07 Stang 08-01-2007, 07:10 PM My neighbor down the street has a 2003 red convertible Thunderbird. He had garage built just for the car. Anyway, his car is a V8 which boast 280 hp.....ours are rated 210. The T-bird's 0-60 times is 6.70 ours 6.5.....T-bird 1/4 mile 15.10 ours 15.3. So why is the Thunderbird not any faster? It only has two seats? Could it be the hard top that's on the vert that weighs it down?
I was a little surprised when I saw those numbers. http://soundmachine.org/dci/forum/images/smiles/icon_jawdrop.gifLink provided below;
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/Spec_Glance.aspx?year=2003&make=Ford&model=Thunder bird&trimid=-1
cmschlatt 08-01-2007, 07:29 PM thats really wierd. youd think with that much more hp and torque, itd go faster... :eek:
tedBalog 08-01-2007, 07:45 PM Could be, gearing, could beweight.. I'd guess that its a combination of both...
07 Stang 08-01-2007, 08:06 PM I just looked....T-Bird weighs 3869 to our 3439.....a 430 lb difference.
68XR7 08-01-2007, 08:11 PM So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
birdoffire7 08-01-2007, 08:13 PM ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
We'd go looking for a replacement? ;)
07 Stang 08-01-2007, 08:17 PM ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
You mean like one of these calendar babes?
birdoffire7 08-01-2007, 08:19 PM ORIGINAL: 07 Stang
ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
You mean like one of these calendar babes?
Good lord!
MantaDreams 08-01-2007, 08:20 PM ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
I reckon you just found an inexpensive, flexible means of lowering your car. Just gotta feed her.
birdoffire7 08-01-2007, 08:22 PM ORIGINAL: MantaDreams
ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
I reckon you just found an inexpensive, flexible means of lowering your car. Just gotta feed her.
LOL. I guess instead of measuring your mileage in gallons, you'd have to measure it in fast food consumption???:D
beaustang 08-01-2007, 08:32 PM Why would you post something like that! Now I'm going to have to surf the porn sites to get that image out of my mind!
Black06stang 08-01-2007, 08:36 PM ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
Or we could have 3 skinny girls instead of one fat girl....
birdoffire7 08-01-2007, 10:34 PM ORIGINAL: Black06stang
ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
Or we could have 3 skinny girls instead of one fat girl....
This is a much better idea!
banka87 08-02-2007, 09:01 AM ORIGINAL: MantaDreams
ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
I reckon you just found an inexpensive, flexible means of lowering your car. Just gotta feed her.
Way cheaper then lowering springs. and its adjustable!
Erdrickk 08-02-2007, 09:40 AM ORIGINAL: banka87
ORIGINAL: MantaDreams
ORIGINAL: 68XR7
So If we had a big fat girl in our car with us, then what?
I reckon you just found an inexpensive, flexible means of lowering your car. Just gotta feed her.
Way cheaper then lowering springs. and its adjustable!
Cheaper???!?! are you mad? You would go broke trying to feed those behemoths :(:(:(:( :D:D:D
Erdrickk 08-02-2007, 09:40 AM o yes...guys I have a fat chick on my car....Check out that lowering action!:D:D:D:D
Tubra 08-02-2007, 10:10 AM omg that sig... LOL
:)
Erdrickk 08-02-2007, 10:17 AM ORIGINAL: Tubra
omg that sig... LOL
:)
lol yah my bud Adam02GT made it for me...haha
|