HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (Full Version)

Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 6 Cyl (V6) Applications >> V6 General Discussion

HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS

  

2004 V6 3.9 -> HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 1:58:51 PM)

stupid kid with 97 civic thinks he can beat me  hahah lmao

all he says is mines lighter hahaha and 90 hp/tq less LMAO [8D]

  
tightdogal -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:06:35 PM)

if he has a turbo, you are indeed toast.  they don't make power but they are light

2004 V6 3.9 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:09:17 PM)

yeah... if he has a turbo... hahaha if he doesn't he'll be ****ing burnt toast hahah [:D]

laserred02 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:12:49 PM)

this is not tech, and frankly you have a basically unmodified high 15 to low 16 second car, you better not laugh your ass off to much because it might get handed to you. not necessarily by the civic, but there are a lot of foreign and domestic four bangers that will give you a run for your money.

Xemeth -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:14:49 PM)

This is a waste of webspace. Your car is slow, too. It's a stock automatic V6 Mustang. You don't really have bragging rights, either.

2004 V6 3.9 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:15:01 PM)

haha i know tht but this kid is talking s***. i just find it funny.. i mean i dont go talking **** to GT's...  same idea here       1.6 < 3.9

v6stang07 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:16:48 PM)

yea u have him but u dont have much more braggin rights

2004 V6 3.9 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:19:23 PM)

hahah all i said is i will beat some stupid civic bi***. im not saying there arent other cars tht will beat me hahahaha  calm down...

laserred02 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:22:05 PM)

1.6l honda motor = 79 hp per liter
3.9l ford motor = 49.5 hp per liter

you shouldn't talk **** unless you know what you are talking about, and posting in tech about how you can beat a civic means you do not know what you are talking about.

which motor is better depends on what you are looking for, so ignorant posts like 1.6 < 3.9 are useless

SRT lol -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:22:52 PM)

I noticed you put 1.6 for his engine size? If its a B16 then you will get your ass handed to you!! Sorry to say but all my friends are into honda's i know what they can do. Their power to weight ratio is way better than yours. If its a hatch with a B16 and a good driver, highly capable of high 13's. My friend has a gutted out hatch with a stock B16 and a 75 shot with some slicks and runs 12.3 in the 1/4.

tightdogal -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:25:40 PM)

I think the moral of the story is, don't laugh at him until you race him.  Granted, a mere 5% of Civic owners actually know what they are doing to make a fast civic.  But still, being cocky, esp with a V6 Mustang, isn't the way to go....

laserred02 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 2:26:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tightdogal

I think the moral of the story is, don't laugh at him until you race him.  Granted, a mere 5% of Civic owners actually know what they are doing to make a fast civic.  But still, being cocky, esp with a V6 Mustang, isn't the way to go....


+1000

dhuskers_11 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 3:01:19 PM)

yeah my friend has a civic hatch with a b16 with a turbo setup on it running low 12's

94Blk5.0 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 3:02:52 PM)

Orginal poster: Sure you will probably beat him, and he was talking smack, so I understand why you are a little hyped, but be careful with the generaliztions. And a question was your CAI worth it on your car as far as the seat of the pants dyno goes?

And Please do not start comparing motors based on output. You are comparing a DOHC, and aOHV motor, it is so useless when actually racing. I felt like I was reading Motor Trend, all this talk about output, and HP/Weight ratio. Just run them. You can "race" them on paper all day long, but it proves nothing.

Autobadges.com -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 3:52:15 PM)

I remember a civic actually pulled up next to me on the freeway and reved to go...I laughed so he kept reving.

Needless to say 15 cars later I slowed down as he zipped by with his ricer flyby as I laughed lol

v6stang07 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 4:03:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Autobadges.com

I remember a civic actually pulled up next to me on the freeway and reved to go...I laughed so he kept reving.

Needless to say 15 cars later I slowed down as he zipped by with his ricer flyby as I laughed lol



now thats a funny story

moontang -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 5:58:04 PM)

just out of curosity and im lazy and dont feel like looking it up how much hp do stock 3.9L v6's push? (at the wheels witha 5spd)

99RedStang -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 6:00:58 PM)

193 HP, I believe.

laserred02 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 6:02:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: 94Blk5.0

Orginal poster: Sure you will probably beat him, and he was talking smack, so I understand why you are a little hyped, but be careful with the generaliztions. And a question was your CAI worth it on your car as far as the seat of the pants dyno goes?

And Please do not start comparing motors based on output. You are comparing a DOHC, and aOHV motor, it is so useless when actually racing. I felt like I was reading Motor Trend, all this talk about output, and HP/Weight ratio. Just run them. You can "race" them on paper all day long, but it proves nothing.


my point was that he made a simple generalization about the 1.6l < 3.9l, but based on what? i know that the little engine is high technology and not comparable to the old school pushrod motors, he obviously doesn't know anything other than generalizations. each motor has its strengths, and racing is not the civic's strength, but then again without knowledge and work neither is racing a strentgh of a 3.8L mustang or 3.9L for that matter.

laserred02 -> RE: HAhahahahahaa STUPID CIVICS (7/11/2007 6:04:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: 99RedStang

193 HP, I believe.

193 at the crank it assume 15-20% drivetrain loss for whp. so like 155-165 whp.

  

Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Return to Mustang Forums home page or view the Full Version of this page.