RE: Bullitt vs. 99 ls1
Login | |
|
RE: Bullitt vs. 99 ls1 - 1/11/2005 3:17:38 PM
|
|
|
Sidewayz6.0
 Team MF Member #007 Posts: 9822
Joined: 1/5/2004 From: My moms uterus Status: offline
|
Alrighty then!
_____________________________
Happy now GM haters???
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Bullitt vs. 99 ls1 - 1/11/2005 5:24:57 PM
|
|
|
98LS1
Posts: 7034
Joined: 10/30/2003 Status: offline
|
I thought it was sig worthy....in case you guys missed it yesterdah!
_____________________________
1998 TransAm Idle/Walkaround
|
|
|
|
RE: Bullitt vs. 99 ls1 - 1/12/2005 11:55:29 AM
|
|
|
whiteyford0212
Posts: 272
Joined: 2/25/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
least i dont use company time check the forums. LOL J/K i do!
< Message edited by whiteyford0212 -- 1/12/2005 11:57:13 AM >
_____________________________
cobra intake, gt40 heads, e-cam w/ 1.7rr's, 3.73's, etc..
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Bullitt vs. 99 ls1 - 1/12/2005 7:26:04 PM
|
|
|
TommyV8
Posts: 4019
Joined: 7/26/2004 From: St. Louis, MO Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: whitesnake69 he didnt have a problem with camaros but t/a's are a different story No, they are not a different story. They are the exact same story. Camaro Z28=Camaro SS=Trans Am=Firebird. It's the same car, just different appearance packages. Big chrome wheels and spoilers and crazy-looking hoods do not make a car faster.
_____________________________
2002 Camaro Z28 Automatic, stock converter, 2.73 gears Airbox lid, longtube headers, catless Y-pipe, cutout, Nitto drag radials 12.72 @ 108.62 1.93 60 ft
|
|
|
|
|