Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

Rant on slow sixxer

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 6 Cyl (V6) Applications >> V6 General Discussion >> Rant on slow sixxer Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Rant on slow sixxer - 6/7/2007 11:56:53 PM   
eaglecatcher


Posts: 719
Joined: 12/4/2006
Status: offline
I still can't for the life of me figure out why these mustangs are so damn slow.  Mine is a 98, and its got a 3.8L v6, thats a monster engine by normal standards, yet its slower than a ****ing accord.  I mean, why did ford not charge people a little more on the base price, and make use of the massive amount of displacement they have, instead of slacking off and making a ridiculously slow car.  I mean, a 9 second 0-60 time is pathetic.  You've got Nissans with much smaller engines, like the 300ZX has a 3.0L V6, and its got 222hp, the Maxima has 3.5L V6 making 255hp, and the 350Z has a 3.5L v6, and it makes over 300hp.  Hondas Accord 3L V6 makes 244hp.  That car is an econo sedan, that is faster than my car, and gets better gas mileage.  I don't see why someone would buy a mustang over the rest of the cars out there.  Well, you ask why did i buy one then? I'll tell you.  I turned 16, and my parents offered to buy me a car.  I just took whatever car they would get me, and a mustang was the only car oferred that I really liked (I didn't know anything about how terrible they were), so I took it.  Far be it from me to turn down a free car.

I was called unpatriotic in another thread for saying I'd rather buy a 15 year old 300ZX than a Mustang, and that I'd rather pay the repairs on such an old car than drive a new car that is horribly designed.  Ford made one of the crappiest cars (excluding the pinto, yugo, etc).  The engine is extrmeely underpowered, I coudl get better fuel efficiency driving a V8 Corvette, and the solid rear axle is the worst idea since fart cans on civics.  I'm sorry, but these cars are just terribly engineered, and are the least bang for the buck out there.  Feel free to complain all you want, but in the end, the only reason the mustang sells is because people know its name.  There is no car behind the name anymore, all you buy is the name when you buy a mustang.


_____________________________

Black 98 Mustang V6 5MT

Throttle Cable Tightened
Lowered Wiper Arms
Intake Silencer Removed
Bumper Cutouts Removed
Smoked Headlights and Corners
K&N Air Filter
Black Front Pony
Post #: 1
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 12:10:54 AM   
wmrcer

 

Posts: 254
Joined: 8/29/2006
Status: offline
i totally agree....i almost got one for 3000......had the cobra rims,exhaust already and thought it was a great deal.....but THANK GOD I DIDNT...

_____________________________

2000 3.8 5spd
Option Racing Cold air
BBK 70mm throttle body and spacer
9mm Stangwires
True Dual flowmaster 40's
4.10s and T-lok
DynoTune 50 shot nitrous

(in reply to eaglecatcher)
Post #: 2
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 12:15:12 AM   
02MustangV6DD



Posts: 1365
Joined: 4/12/2006
Status: offline
Ford really made the Yugo? That was the first car i ever drove, and it was a small peice but it still runs to today and we treat it like ****. Thats not unpatriotic at all, i belive if you dont buy American youare not helping your own country. But what in 98 Would you rather have? Whats the price differences? The V6 isnt made to go fast, its made to sell

_____________________________


"Its Dave!!"

(in reply to wmrcer)
Post #: 3
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 12:18:11 AM   
amrcnidyot



Posts: 5206
Joined: 3/7/2006
From: Wichita, Ks
Status: offline
amrcnidyot's photo gallery
wtf, they may not be the best cars ever but your comparing cars made today to a car made over 10 years ago....uhhh BIG difference

_____________________________


(in reply to wmrcer)
Post #: 4
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 12:18:37 AM   
Chr1s46536

 

Posts: 316
Joined: 12/12/2006
Status: offline
Yea and all those cars you mentioned cost more tard.........  These cars arent slow for how inexpensive they are.  If you look at how much the cars cost new, the more expensive the car, the faster it probably is.  Just like some ferraris may have a much smaller displacement that a 350 chevy but which is faster? Its not about size of the engine, you get what you pay for.  Dont expect a cheap car to be fast no matter how big the engine is........


_____________________________


www.Phillystangs.com

(in reply to wmrcer)
Post #: 5
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 12:24:13 AM   
85GTsleeper


Posts: 1291
Joined: 8/25/2006
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Status: offline
first of all the pinto was a badass car. second the 6 isnt made to go fast stock its there for price and better economy then the v8. and no they dont buy them for the name. thats why people buy camaros

_____________________________


Poopar © Mustangforums.com

(in reply to Chr1s46536)
Post #: 6
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 1:54:25 AM   
eaglecatcher


Posts: 719
Joined: 12/4/2006
Status: offline
ok I may be comparing it to newer cars, but the maximas made at the same time are still a ****load faster than my car.  NO ford didn't make the yugo, but thats a pretty sad car nonetheless.  I was just using the new cars for comparison, but I'll fidn the numbers for the old cars.  Regardless, just about any V6 ever made is more powerful than the ford 3.8 in the mustang.  It handles like crap, and its slow as a mofo.   I know guys with V8's that get about the same, just a tad worse mileage than my V6.  Why would you buy a car thats slow, and gets bad gas mileage?  Pick one or the other.  If your car gets bad mileage, at least have it be fast.  I could drive a slow car, if it got good gas mileage no problem, but I can't deal with having bad mileage and bad performance.  Ok, the 98 Maxima made 190hp, adn 205 torque.  Better numbers froma  smaller engine.  The 98 camaro makes 200hp and 220 torque with the same size engine.  Theres something wrong here.  If you've got two engines the same size, and both cars cost about the asme, why is one a hell of a lot faster than the other?  Bad engineering.  the Z31 300ZX (older version), made in the 80's, made 160hp.  thats 10 years earlier, and it makes more horespower, from a smaller engine, and gets better mileage.  The Z32 3.0L V6 made 222hp.  It made more power, yet came out 8 years earlier than my car.  yes it cost more, but due to depreciation, I can buy one of those for the same price as a 98 V6, so they are equal comparisons.

The least ford could have done was used a smaller engine and gotten better fuel economy and the same power.  They just continue to sell cars because people don't know any better.  Out of all the cars made in 98, I"d rather have just about anything besides a mustang.  Heck, I would honestly rather drive a Civic than this.  I could save so much more money on gas, get similar performance, and save more money so I can sell this POS and buy a 300ZX in a couple years.



_____________________________

Black 98 Mustang V6 5MT

Throttle Cable Tightened
Lowered Wiper Arms
Intake Silencer Removed
Bumper Cutouts Removed
Smoked Headlights and Corners
K&N Air Filter
Black Front Pony

(in reply to 85GTsleeper)
Post #: 7
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 1:54:26 AM   
Tiny1987

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 6/6/2007
Status: offline
plus import cars are smaller and lighter than domestic look at the weight of your car on the door sill tag, its pretty high and look at the size difference mustangs are long cars with a lot of heavy parts, an import is small and made light so that it is more fuel efficient and i think that if you have two cars with the exact same displacement but ones smaller and lighter which do you think will be faster?

(in reply to 85GTsleeper)
Post #: 8
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 1:57:50 AM   
eaglecatcher


Posts: 719
Joined: 12/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tiny1987

plus import cars are smaller and lighter than domestic look at the weight of your car on the door sill tag, its pretty high and look at the size difference mustangs are long cars with a lot of heavy parts, an import is small and made light so that it is more fuel efficient and i think that if you have two cars with the exact same displacement but ones smaller and lighter which do you think will be faster?


true as well.  imports are smaller, lighter, TURN BETTER (even my dad's Yukon has a tighter turn radius than my mustang), and are faster and get better mileage.  There are damn Jap/Korean SUVS that get better gas mileage than my mustang.


_____________________________

Black 98 Mustang V6 5MT

Throttle Cable Tightened
Lowered Wiper Arms
Intake Silencer Removed
Bumper Cutouts Removed
Smoked Headlights and Corners
K&N Air Filter
Black Front Pony

(in reply to Tiny1987)
Post #: 9
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:00:47 AM   
cobra232

 

Posts: 3332
Joined: 3/11/2004
Status: offline
cobra232's photo gallery
OK here is a good comparasion. take an 88 305 IROC and race it with the 98 3.8. they will run pretty much the same. i outran an 87 350 TA by about 1 car when my 98 was stock.

yeah the singleports were slow but for a reason. the V8's were not that fast and if they made the V6's faster then who would buy the V8???

all the cars you mention cannot even come close to the power potential of the 98 3.8L ford engine.

get over the fact that you bought a base model that doesn't run 13.5

< Message edited by cobra232 -- 6/8/2007 2:01:31 AM >


_____________________________

98 3.8L 11psi Procharger 1.8's,3.73`s,7.5 Detroit Truetrac,TA rear girdle,B&M shift kit,2500 stall,8.5:1 ross .030" pistons,Eagle H-Beam 351W rods,RPM 215/230 cam,SCT chip from VMP,Pro-M Univer MAF,ford 42lb injectors

(in reply to Tiny1987)
Post #: 10
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:02:35 AM   
Tiny1987

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 6/6/2007
Status: offline
look i work at a toyota dealership (don't ask why) and i know all about the jap cars getting great fuel milage but try and find add ons for them, the mustang was designed for a person to tune it how they please with thousands of parts stores carrying parts for them in stock, but if you go up to the counter asking for a water pump for a 300zx they'll tel you to come back in a week or 2 when it comes in. plus i've raced a '90s era civec in my mustang which is bare bones stock and blew his doors off...it cost me a $402 ticket but i beat him lol

(in reply to eaglecatcher)
Post #: 11
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:04:50 AM   
simpsonfan13


Posts: 705
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline
yea but the op does have a point the six is WAY underpowered
personally i think that the setup should be as follows
sixer~250hp
GT~300BHP
mach, boss, bulit?~400hp
GT500~500 DUH

_____________________________

VOTE NYSTANG FOR OT PRESIDENT!
HE DIDN'T TAKE A SHOT OF
HIS OWN
MAN JUICE TO THE FACE!

(in reply to Tiny1987)
Post #: 12
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:13:41 AM   
eaglecatcher


Posts: 719
Joined: 12/4/2006
Status: offline
ok, take the mustang I have, and put the 300ZX I want up against it.  You race them both stock, and the Z will kill the mustang.  Put 10 grand into both, and the Z will still kill the mustang.  Even though the NA 300ZXs respond very lackluster to mods, it would still kill a mustang.  to get any decent power out of the 3.8 for a decent price, you've got to go F/I, and if you go F/I with the mustang, that makes it fair to go F/I with the Z, and a 300ZXTT will kill pretty much any mustang ever made (stock ones).  No it wont take two weeks to get a water pump in for the Z, here in Dallas, there is a Nissan Dealer that specializes in 300ZX parts.  They are pretty much the largest 300ZX parts dealer in the US, and they have everything, so no it wouldn't take 2 weeks to get a water pump.  I had to get my ujoint on my driveshaft replaced, and it took about 3 days to get one, and thats how long it would take to get something fromthe Nissan dealer.  Dont getmad at me just because ford doesn't put any R&D into their cars like japanese manufs do.  They actually care about earning our business.  Ford just thinks they can sit on their haunches and use the "support your country and buy domestic" crap to keep them afloat.

_____________________________

Black 98 Mustang V6 5MT

Throttle Cable Tightened
Lowered Wiper Arms
Intake Silencer Removed
Bumper Cutouts Removed
Smoked Headlights and Corners
K&N Air Filter
Black Front Pony

(in reply to simpsonfan13)
Post #: 13
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:17:05 AM   
02 Stang


Posts: 2036
Joined: 12/6/2005
From: New Orleans, La
Status: offline
02 Stang's photo gallery
Lets compare my year Mustang.

2002 V6 Mustang - $17,475 (I'm using all base packages)
-Curb Weight: 3066 lbs
-3.8L OHV 232 V6
-193 HP
-225 TQ
-EPA: 20 City, 29 Highway

2002 Honda Civic SOHC I4 - $12,810
-Curb Weight: 2744 lbs
-1.7L 102 I4
-127 HP
-114 TQ
-EPA: 32/37

2002 Honda Civic DOHC I4 - $19,000
-Curb Weight: 2744 lbs
-2.0L 122 I4
-160 HP
-132 TQ
-26/30

2002 Acura Integra - $21,050
-Curb Weight: 2703 lbs
-1.8L DOHC I4 110ci
-195 HP
-130 TQ
-25/31

2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse - $21,147
-Curb Weight: 3042
-2.4L OHC I4 149ci
-145 HP
-163 TQ
-20/28

You get what you paid for. I have the largest engine, the most power (close to Integra), and the most torque by a LOT. Throw in the fact that I would MUCH rather be seen in a Mustang than any of those 4 bangers or 6cyls and you have the reason that I own a V6 Mustang. Don't compare it to cars of greater value, compare it to cars of equal value, then you start getting places.


_____________________________


(in reply to Tiny1987)
Post #: 14
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:20:11 AM   
simpsonfan13


Posts: 705
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eaglecatcher

Ford just thinks they can sit on their haunches and use the "support your country and buy domestic" crap to keep them afloat.


trye unfourtunately, and not to hijack but the interior build quality = crap

_____________________________

VOTE NYSTANG FOR OT PRESIDENT!
HE DIDN'T TAKE A SHOT OF
HIS OWN
MAN JUICE TO THE FACE!

(in reply to eaglecatcher)
Post #: 15
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:23:15 AM   
laserred02


Posts: 1061
Joined: 7/18/2006
From: Champaign, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eaglecatcher

ok, take the mustang I have, and put the 300ZX I want up against it.  You race them both stock, and the Z will kill the mustang.  Put 10 grand into both, and the Z will still kill the mustang.  Even though the NA 300ZXs respond very lackluster to mods, it would still kill a mustang.  to get any decent power out of the 3.8 for a decent price, you've got to go F/I, and if you go F/I with the mustang, that makes it fair to go F/I with the Z, and a 300ZXTT will kill pretty much any mustang ever made (stock ones).  No it wont take two weeks to get a water pump in for the Z, here in Dallas, there is a Nissan Dealer that specializes in 300ZX parts.  They are pretty much the largest 300ZX parts dealer in the US, and they have everything, so no it wouldn't take 2 weeks to get a water pump.  I had to get my ujoint on my driveshaft replaced, and it took about 3 days to get one, and thats how long it would take to get something fromthe Nissan dealer.  Dont getmad at me just because ford doesn't put any R&D into their cars like japanese manufs do.  They actually care about earning our business.  Ford just thinks they can sit on their haunches and use the "support your country and buy domestic" crap to keep them afloat.


ok the 99-04 3.8l puts out 190 bhp and 220 ft/lbs of tq. it is the base model, and i bought mine new for 15,500. tell me what the japanese offered 5 years ago when i bought my car for that price, power, style. ford's 3.5liter ohc v-6 puts out 265-285 hp, and will be in the fusion and five hundred, with that engine you will be approaching 25-30k dollars, which is what a comparable accord/maxima/camry will cost. that is also what a 300 hp 4.6l ohc mustang will cost. you are comparing cars that aren't in the same price range, the range the cars you are bithcing about are in is mustang GT price range. you say ford doesn't put R&D into their cars and manufacturing but how come the mustang and mercury milan (i.e. fusion) won best in class for initial quality and value by JD Power and Associates?

also hte largest 300zx dealer in the country takes 3 days to get a part, can you imagine if you didn't live by the "largest" dealer how easy it would be to get parts. think about it.


_____________________________

2007 5-speed V6 Grabber Orange PP Mustang
VMP 93 Octane Performance Tune
GT-Takeoff Muffler
MGW Short throw shifter

(in reply to eaglecatcher)
Post #: 16
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:24:19 AM   
cobra232

 

Posts: 3332
Joined: 3/11/2004
Status: offline
cobra232's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: eaglecatcher

ok, take the mustang I have, and put the 300ZX I want up against it.  You race them both stock, and the Z will kill the mustang.  Put 10 grand into both, and the Z will still kill the mustang.  Even though the NA 300ZXs respond very lackluster to mods, it would still kill a mustang.  to get any decent power out of the 3.8 for a decent price, you've got to go F/I, and if you go F/I with the mustang, that makes it fair to go F/I with the Z, and a 300ZXTT will kill pretty much any mustang ever made (stock ones).  No it wont take two weeks to get a water pump in for the Z, here in Dallas, there is a Nissan Dealer that specializes in 300ZX parts.  They are pretty much the largest 300ZX parts dealer in the US, and they have everything, so no it wouldn't take 2 weeks to get a water pump.  I had to get my ujoint on my driveshaft replaced, and it took about 3 days to get one, and thats how long it would take to get something fromthe Nissan dealer.  Dont getmad at me just because ford doesn't put any R&D into their cars like japanese manufs do.  They actually care about earning our business.  Ford just thinks they can sit on their haunches and use the "support your country and buy domestic" crap to keep them afloat.


dude have you ever built an engine in you entire life?????????

i think not.

1. the 300ZX TT is a top of the line model not a base model. take a NA 300 ZX and it will not outrun the stang by more than 1 car.

if it took you that long to find a U-joint for your stang then it's your fault cause everybody carries them.

R&D for Jap cars is no different than american cars. take a base model Nissan Sentra and compare it with a base model stang. same slow ass soft riding fuel efficient type of a car.


$10,000 into a 3.8 will get you into the mid to low 10's with a 3.8. it will barely get the 300 ZX rebuilt to handle the boost to get into the 11's on the 300ZXTT.


please quit making incredibly uneducated rants based on paper stats on a top of the line model VS a base model. your really making yourself look really dumb and it's really sad

_____________________________

98 3.8L 11psi Procharger 1.8's,3.73`s,7.5 Detroit Truetrac,TA rear girdle,B&M shift kit,2500 stall,8.5:1 ross .030" pistons,Eagle H-Beam 351W rods,RPM 215/230 cam,SCT chip from VMP,Pro-M Univer MAF,ford 42lb injectors

(in reply to eaglecatcher)
Post #: 17
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:24:32 AM   
02 Stang


Posts: 2036
Joined: 12/6/2005
From: New Orleans, La
Status: offline
02 Stang's photo gallery
@ Laserred, look a few posts up. 

_____________________________


(in reply to laserred02)
Post #: 18
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:26:15 AM   
laserred02


Posts: 1061
Joined: 7/18/2006
From: Champaign, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 02 Stang

@ Laserred, look a few posts up. 


yeah i must have been typing as you posted, thanks for taking the time to put numbers down


_____________________________

2007 5-speed V6 Grabber Orange PP Mustang
VMP 93 Octane Performance Tune
GT-Takeoff Muffler
MGW Short throw shifter

(in reply to 02 Stang)
Post #: 19
RE: Rant on slow sixxer - 6/8/2007 2:32:42 AM   
Tiny1987

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 6/6/2007
Status: offline
look if you hate your stang then sell it to someone who will apreciate it and quit your bitching and go buy your 300zx

(in reply to laserred02)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 6 Cyl (V6) Applications >> V6 General Discussion
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Ride of the Month
May 2008
1989 351W Hatch

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17404
nanaki14547
dan04cobra14383
88bluegt14311
ride of the 13292
addermk213280
hotrods_n_bo13191
2000gt4.612442
mustangman0211597
1slo8511496

New Vendors
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls
BrandMotion
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
Brenspeed's Saleen Superchargers

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or