Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs >> RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
[Poll]

Restomod and Classic separate sections vote


Leave it alone
  77% (80)
Separate them
  22% (23)


Total Votes : 103


(last vote on : 6/5/2007 11:16:58 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:32:51 PM   
NorCalTroy



Posts: 542
Joined: 9/13/2006
From: Sacramento, CA
Status: offline
NorCalTroy's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tony R

I'm not saying name calling is fun and if glen is like that it still isnt going to change his personality by moving him to another section.


I'm not trying to change Glen, I have already been told several times that that is NOT going to happen.  Since that is not going to happen, I think an area where we, as modification friendly Mustang owners, can talk about our cars and the changes that we make to them without his interference.


_____________________________


(in reply to Tony R)
Post #: 21
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:32:55 PM   
JMD


Posts: 3147
Joined: 1/18/2007
From: Las Cruces, NM
Status: offline
I guess my son and I are doing a restomod to one extent or another,,, but I really enjoy this section, even with it's "issues"... Hell,,,  I have "issues" with my wife and kids,,,, but seperation aint always the best solution,,,  I think we should vocalize our opinions, even vigorously, and then agree to disagree when we can't find common ground.

As I have said many times, there has always been a rift between those who like "stock" and those who like "modified", this will not change,,, ever. We can make the most of this rift, and run the risk of learning somthing, or we can disregard the other point of view and remain ignorant to the fact that valid opinions can exist that differ from the opinions that we hold as our own.

I mean it's not like we are discussing religion or politics here,,,, it is not likely that someone will actually die because of the different positions that "stock people" and "modified people" hold. The most I have seen getting hurt here are feelings,, I am of the opinion that the feelings of grown men (and women) will grow back if allow them to.

I think that most of the disagreements here actually add flavor to the forum, especially when the discourse remains more or less "civil". Besides, each of us is going to do what we want with our cars, regardless of (and sometimes in spite of) what others think.

_____________________________

66 Coupe
I-6 Conversion, 408 Windsor, Tremec TKO 600
Wilwood fronts, SSBC Rears
9" Track Loc.

"All work and no play makes Jack a asshole!"

(in reply to Soaring)
Post #: 22
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:35:47 PM   
Celtic37


Posts: 403
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
Celtic37's photo gallery
OH MAN, I'm lost I'll just stop posting and be in the middle. "Are you my mommy?"

< Message edited by Celtic37 -- 6/4/2007 11:36:31 PM >


_____________________________


My car will go there once I get it.

(in reply to PReal)
Post #: 23
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:36:51 PM   
428coupe


Posts: 181
Joined: 6/15/2006
From: West Virginia
Status: offline
I think I may want to change my vote also.  I know that I dont "post" here often, but I can assure you that I frequent these boards daily, I just like to observe and I don't feel the need to comment on every thread.  I notice Glen hates the idea of talking about anything that is not "original", but the truth is, not very many of us have numbers matching cars, does that mean they are not classics?  The above referenced thread goes to show that our "moderator" is out of line.  Besides, a motorcraft carb is just a generic version of a Holley.

I vote, that we either get seperate sections, or a new moderator.

(in reply to Celtic37)
Post #: 24
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:41:27 PM   
deebo68


Posts: 110
Joined: 9/13/2006
Status: offline
deebo68's photo gallery
I definitely think it should remain one forum, like stated previously, you can modify your stang all you want but you still have a classic, and we can all learn from one another. 

Maybe in the post heading you could add "Resto" or "RM?" to designate restomod question, then those who don't prefer restomods could choose to not read and/or post in the forum. 
I think theres room for young and old.




(in reply to noroof66)
Post #: 25
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:48:14 PM   
mySAVIOReigns


Posts: 831
Joined: 2/18/2007
Status: offline
Isn't "restomod" defined as part restoration, part modification?  Seems silly to have it become solely "mod" and "resto."  If you seperate them, it's going to create 2 of the same forum.  

(in reply to PReal)
Post #: 26
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:52:01 PM   
JMD


Posts: 3147
Joined: 1/18/2007
From: Las Cruces, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 428coupe

I think I may want to change my vote also. 


I think that you should certainly vote the way you choose, but at the risk of offending, I don't think that you need to change any vote.

Taking the entirty of your post into consideration, I am going to need to beg your pardon for my thinking that you ever even considered voting for anything other than seperation.  

I can respect your opinion, but your presentation tends to make me think that you are atempting to insult my inteligence...  


_____________________________

66 Coupe
I-6 Conversion, 408 Windsor, Tremec TKO 600
Wilwood fronts, SSBC Rears
9" Track Loc.

"All work and no play makes Jack a asshole!"

(in reply to 428coupe)
Post #: 27
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/4/2007 11:57:19 PM   
EmperorOfChicken


Posts: 2091
Joined: 5/16/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
nah leave it alone.  hey im all for restomods, my car is more restomod than factory spec,  but its an internet forum and really we all love mustangs.  if someone says your digital gauges are gay and that offends you and makes you decide not to get them or something, youve got bigger problems then wether or not their should be a restomod vs classic section on a mustang forum.  

_____________________________



(in reply to JMD)
Post #: 28
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:06:53 AM   
NorCalTroy



Posts: 542
Joined: 9/13/2006
From: Sacramento, CA
Status: offline
NorCalTroy's photo gallery
Here are a couple more threads that show the moderator abuse:
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_3338196/tm.htm
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_2688738/tm.htm
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_3327402/tm.htm
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_3312215/tm.htm
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_3326960/tm.htm
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_3277806/tm.htm
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_3213213/tm.htm
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_3321809/tm.htm

That is just a quick search of his last posts.  Imagine out of the 15,700 posts that he has, how many of them are abusive.

There is no denying his knowledge, Glen is probably one of the most knowledgeable Mustang guys I have ever seen, however, the abuse makes his knowledge worthless!


_____________________________


(in reply to 428coupe)
Post #: 29
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:10:08 AM   
five pt oh


Posts: 336
Joined: 3/25/2007
Status: offline
this is total BS. 

The reality of this poll is:

choice 1=  create a 2nd section so that Glen doesn't have to grow up and start being polite to restomoders.  And as a result, everyone has to go search two places for help.
or
choice 2=  put up with Glen's inmature negativity towards restomods.

Is it really too much to ask for Glen to keep his restomod comments to himself or ask the restomoder's to ignore his efforts to get a rise out of them??? 

_____________________________


(in reply to mySAVIOReigns)
Post #: 30
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:20:35 AM   
NorCalTroy



Posts: 542
Joined: 9/13/2006
From: Sacramento, CA
Status: offline
NorCalTroy's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: five pt oh

this is total BS. 

The reality of this poll is:

choice 1=  create a 2nd section so that Glen doesn't have to grow up and start being polite to restomoders.  And as a result, everyone has to go search two places for help.
or
choice 2=  put up with Glen's inmature negativity towards restomods.

Is it really too much to ask for Glen to keep his restomod comments to himself or ask the restomoder's to ignore his efforts to get a rise out of them??? 



Glen has already been asked (several times) to modify his behavior, however as I have posted before he "doesn't answer to anyone".
I wish I could post some of the PM conversations that he and I have had, but it is against the forum rules to do so.

I also think that a better way to word the poll would be to have a Modified sub-section and a Stock sub-section of the classic section or leave as is.  That would be the proper unbiased way to word it.


_____________________________


(in reply to five pt oh)
Post #: 31
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:22:09 AM   
valley firearms


Posts: 1952
Joined: 9/4/2005
From: Wasilla, Alaska
Status: offline
valley firearms's photo gallery
I voted to leave it alone. But, reading all the posts has changed my mind. No offense to the classic guys, but I think theyd'e be searching the restomad section. I think a restomod section would draw a lot of people. Besides, several months ago this topic came up with my EFI post and I said that it would be pretty lonely over there Who will be the restomod administrator. I vote JamesW.


_____________________________

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2981459
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQtHM5ynRjQ






(in reply to five pt oh)
Post #: 32
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:26:44 AM   
andrewmp6

 

Posts: 4013
Joined: 10/2/2006
Status: offline
to me its just a mustang only ones like the twister mach1 or shelbys should be restored rest are up to you they are high production cars i know alot of people think there car is rare but face the facts its not to me rare is 6 or less made ever. look at the street rods anyone have a restored 32 ford with a flathead nothing changed it on it. its a car you should enjoy driving it not worried about if it will stop with the none power drums. alot of parts on the early mustang where changed by ford later on for reasons like the points. look at how much changed between 73 and 74

(in reply to NorCalTroy)
Post #: 33
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:31:46 AM   
rmodel65

 

Posts: 6858
Joined: 10/10/2005
From: brunstank ga
Status: online
rmodel65's photo gallery
i dont think we need a seperte section for restomods we need out own off topic

_____________________________

Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

(in reply to PReal)
Post #: 34
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:36:25 AM   
4reboy

 

Posts: 1420
Joined: 7/5/2006
From: Long Beach, CA
Status: offline
4reboy's photo gallery
I think its fine to be all in one section. the section is called CLASSIC MUSTANGS not CONCOURS CLASSIC MUSTANGS. This classic mustang section should be open to EVERYONE whether they restomod or keep it like it was. We are all mustang guys (and even gals) and shouldn't be split under two groups.

However, NorCalTroy and JamesW as well as other members raise very valid issues. I just think we should be left alone in one group, but indeed the chastising and name calling HAS to stop. It all comes down to all of us loving classic mustangs, this forum, and its members. We all just need to get along despite difference of opinion when it comes to how you chose to build your car.

_____________________________

First car and first mustang, 1969 Mach 1

(in reply to PReal)
Post #: 35
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:41:20 AM   
EmperorOfChicken


Posts: 2091
Joined: 5/16/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
SETTLE THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL, GANG WARS mustang forums edition, restomodders vs. conroursers.  i think teh restomoders will use advanced technology to kick ayus, but the concours guys will use tire irons and such to lay a smack down, TWO TEAMS ENTER, ONE TEAM LEAVES!! there can be ONLY ONE!!!!!! 

_____________________________



(in reply to 4reboy)
Post #: 36
Let's be honest... - 6/5/2007 12:45:35 AM   
Timelockmind

 

Posts: 534
Joined: 11/3/2006
Status: offline
Splitting the board makes no sense.  Once you've upgraded tires or brakes, or carb, or air conditioning or radio or headlights or shocks or exhasut, or wiring, or anyone of a hundred little things, you no longer have a "pure" Mustang.  Did we learn nothing from the Germans?  Do we relly want a "master race" of Mustang Nazis?   

Let's be honest here. The issue is Glenn.

He is an amazing resource for all of us.  I greatly respect his knowledge and appreciate his willingness to share.  I have learned more from him in the last 9 months than dozen Mustang books I have purchased.  Yet, he is also very moody.  One day he's tolerant of us ""freaks" the next day he hates us.  He makes me think, he makes me laugh, he makes me really pissed off.  And I suspect we do the same to him.

If I could send him a chill pill I would.

I say be kind to him.

We like you, Glen.  And I - for one - do not want to leave "home".

Thank you.



I say - chill Glen.  We all need your help

(in reply to PReal)
Post #: 37
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:49:42 AM   
five pt oh


Posts: 336
Joined: 3/25/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorCalTroy
Glen has already been asked (several times) to modify his behavior, however as I have posted before he "doesn't answer to anyone".
I wish I could post some of the PM conversations that he and I have had, but it is against the forum rules to do so.

I also think that a better way to word the poll would be to have a Modified sub-section and a Stock sub-section of the classic section or leave as is.  That would be the proper unbiased way to word it.

oh yeah, it's out of control all right.  We should get a new mod for this section and then let Glen mod a subsection.

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmperorOfChicken

SETTLE THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL, GANG WARS mustang forums edition, restomodders vs. conroursers.  i think teh restomoders will use advanced technology to kick ayus, but the concours guys will use tire irons and such to lay a smack down, TWO TEAMS ENTER, ONE TEAM LEAVES!! there can be ONLY ONE!!!!!! 

no reason to pick on all the concoursers when only one of them is causing significant problems. 

_____________________________


(in reply to NorCalTroy)
Post #: 38
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 12:52:54 AM   
EmperorOfChicken


Posts: 2091
Joined: 5/16/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
joke five point oh  <-- joke face 

_____________________________



(in reply to five pt oh)
Post #: 39
RE: Restomod and Classic separate sections vote - 6/5/2007 1:11:25 AM   
five pt oh


Posts: 336
Joined: 3/25/2007
Status: offline
Timelockmind- I fully agree with everything you wrote.  The only difference for me is that in the short time I've been here, I've already seen this come up over and over, and he's proved he's not going chill.  At least not for very long.  
quote:

ORIGINAL: EmperorOfChicken

joke five point oh  <-- joke face 
I know it was a joke...and it was rather funny.  At the same time, I don't want anyone to get the impression that there are teams here. 

As I see it, we have one guy being offensive, several guys being insulted, and then a whole mess of us that keep getting caught up in the middle.  If there were teams, I'd expect to see at least one other person attacking the restomoders the way Soaring does.  That just isn't the case.  Heck, my car might be even more stock than his, and I don't even agree with bias against the restomod guys.  At any rate, I don't want anyone to think that there is "anti restomod team".

anyway, I knew it was a joke.  I was just making a point.

_____________________________


(in reply to EmperorOfChicken)
Post #: 40
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17921
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14532
addermk213995
ride of the 13714
hotrods_n_bo13328
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211989
1slo8511744

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.