New Member, which is best?

Signal TSi · 10-12-2003, 02:13 AM

Hey everyone, new member here, I currently own a lightly modified 1993 Eagle Talon TSi AWD, it's a great car, but I plan on getting something different for college, what is the best year(years) for the GT 94-98. Such as best motor, tranny differences, computer programming differences, etc, thanks for any help!</P>

Also, which is faster the 94-95 5.0 or the 96+ 4.6, also which is more reliable and easier to get power out of? thanks!</P>

Jugador1 · 10-12-2003, 05:43 AM

94-95 mods should be a dime a dozen cause its a 5.0, but it has less power to start so be prepared to be beat a lot until you do some work. but if it were me i would either go for an older 5.0 like a fox body or a newer 4.6 (current style). SN95 was like puberty...kinda awkward clumsy stage of the mustang...

crimson tide · 10-12-2003, 06:46 AM

i agree with juga however, it depends i prefer the 94-98 body style over the newer, and the only difference in performance is the heads which are somewhat inexpensive and easy to install. if you want a better more reliable engine go with the 4.6 modular the torque difference is obvious and it remains strong at higher miles.

Jugador1 · 10-12-2003, 06:51 AM

i think theyre ugly as crap

crimson tide · 10-12-2003, 07:33 AM

well to each his own juga<IMG src=smileys/smiley1.gif border="0">i thought the 99+ concept was hideous when i first saw but then as time progressed it grew on me. but whatever you are entitled to your opinion lol. a 96-98 stage I roush??? are you kidding me you think that to be ugly??wow i have never had anyone tell me mine was ug even chevy people. actually better comments from them.<edited><editID>crimson tide</editID><editDate>37906.2344675926</editDate></edited>

Jugador1 · 10-12-2003, 01:08 PM

post a pic...never seen anything but current generation roush's which by the way look AMAZING!

mdvaldosta · 10-12-2003, 01:16 PM

Either choice of mustangs will be the slowest mustangs (stock) around, especially the 96-98's. Seems how performance suks with both, just go with whichever you prefer the looks of better. Me, I would go with the 94-95 because of the 5.0, its cheaper and easier to modify.</P>

Deleted User · 10-13-2003, 03:35 AM

[Deleted by Admins]

tyybo · 10-16-2003, 02:31 AM

Yeah I just bought a 5 lieter (1995) and i love it id highly reccommend it to anyone</P>

piston · 10-16-2003, 12:03 PM

I agree with MD. The 4.6 was not very good (powerwise)in its early development in the mustangs, 96-97. I think the '98 was a stonger car though not 100% sure. The early SN95's are slower due to the extra 500-600 pounds or so over thefox cars but the chassis isexponentially better. They are a more well rounded carrather thana straight line car.