New Features: Ford Mustang Knowledge Base - check it out & suggest new topics here.
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News

Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > General Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-08-2004, 07:58 AM   #1
normanbaites
1st Gear Member
My Garage
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 126
Default Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

ive been looking to get a cold air intake, are they really all pretty much the same, i keep hearing about densecharger, wheres the best place to buy from? i have a 99 gt
__________________
3.73 gears
Flowmasters
Diablo predator
steeda Tri ax short shifter
what should i get next? let me know what you think...
normanbaites is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Old 12-08-2004, 11:43 AM   #2
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
My Garage
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

densecharger is really similar to K&N, although I'd rather have the densecharger. Both are above and beyond a cheap eBay CAI by leaps and bounds (performance wise). Neither will give you neck snapping accelleration, but 4 or 5 hp from a Densecharger would be expected
mdvaldosta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004, 07:17 PM   #3
AtlanticBlue99
I ♥ Acer
My Garage
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,369
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

i got ebay cai for 43 bucks. i dont see why i need to spend an extra 100 bucks for a couple horsepower. (3-4hp, 4-5ft./lbs. torque to be expected) you may get a couple more here or there for different brands, but not to be expected, just better response throughout the rpm range.
AtlanticBlue99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004, 07:27 PM   #4
Fallstar01
4th Gear Member
My Garage
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,655
Send a message via AIM to Fallstar01
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

Densecharger made a significant difference for me. I wouldn't go any other way. Even if you get the ebay one, you'll probably kick yourself for not going with the densecharger. It's worth saving up for if money is an issue. I got my densecharger with filter, full pipe, connectors, (and carbon fiber appearence package) all the way up to the throttle body including an 85mm Pro M Racing MAM all for $200 on Ebay.
__________________
'02 GT vert - white/tan - Supercharged.
Up Coming Mustang Parts: extra idler pulley around SC, front heat exchanger
Fallstar01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004, 10:31 PM   #5
2k1gt
5th Gear Member
My Garage
 
2k1gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ole Miss
Posts: 3,337
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

Do with the densecharger. Its a much better buy than a ebay CAI. You can find them at www.tunableinduction.com
__________________

Magnaflows, Mac H-pipe, Densecharger, C&L Plenum, 75mm TB, Steeda Underdrive Pulleys
2k1gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004, 11:52 PM   #6
83GT306
1st Gear Member
My Garage
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 90
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

Not trying to rain on anyone's parade, but, they really should referr to the CAIs as Hot Air Intakes, unless it's a completely enclosed unit made of some kind of thermoplastic.
A more suitable set-up would be a ram-air type system with outside air entering through the cowl (by the windshield), or the air entering from the lower front spoiler area.
I don't have any data to support my theory, but it just seems like more underhood heat would enter through that open conical filter than any "cooler air", which can't be good for performance.
But even in a fully enclosed ram-air system, the air entering is only as cool as the outside air temperature, and whether or not how fast you're rolling.
So, if you're going for a CAI anyway, might as well buy the cheapest one.[sm=goodidea.gif]

Don't forget to create a path for the outside air to enter the CAI also...like removing any silencer from inside the fenderwell etc...hell, get creative, fab up a home-made air entry, and make sure all underhood air is completely closed off, it couldn't hurt.[sm=smiley20.gif]

[IMG]local://upfiles/10806/5017D58B907E4C3982A2D004971BFEC8.jpg[/IMG]
__________________
'83 Mustang GT, T-tops, 306, tweaked factory heads with 1.90/1.60 valves, RPM intake, 650 dbl. pmpr., Lunati cam, long headers, 2 chamber Flowmasters, T-5, 3.45 Tracloc...
'88 Lincoln Mark VII LSC, 5.0HO, AOD, loaded, leather, 3.27 Tracloc, no mods yet
83GT306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2004, 01:29 AM   #7
2k1gt
5th Gear Member
My Garage
 
2k1gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ole Miss
Posts: 3,337
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

A densecharger is fully seperated from the engine bay and is in the bumper/fender well which is open to the outside air at all times. And by the way, its made of plastic so by your description, it is a cold air intake.
__________________

Magnaflows, Mac H-pipe, Densecharger, C&L Plenum, 75mm TB, Steeda Underdrive Pulleys
2k1gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2004, 01:48 AM   #8
83GT306
1st Gear Member
My Garage
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 90
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname


Quote:
ORIGINAL: 2k1gt

A densecharger is fully seperated from the engine bay and is in the bumper/fender well which is open to the outside air at all times. And by the way, its made of plastic so by your description, it is a cold air intake.
Cool![sm=smiley20.gif]


[IMG]local://upfiles/10806/A44EA7DDA0594402BF5830F14D37A9C9.jpg[/IMG]
__________________
'83 Mustang GT, T-tops, 306, tweaked factory heads with 1.90/1.60 valves, RPM intake, 650 dbl. pmpr., Lunati cam, long headers, 2 chamber Flowmasters, T-5, 3.45 Tracloc...
'88 Lincoln Mark VII LSC, 5.0HO, AOD, loaded, leather, 3.27 Tracloc, no mods yet
83GT306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2004, 02:00 AM   #9
black00gt
1st Gear Member
My Garage
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 91
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

I got a k&n but i should have gone with the densecharger
__________________
Black 2000 mustang GT 5-speed convertible
Steeda CAI
SLP loudmouth exhaust
Richmond 4.10 gear
SPEC Stage 1 Clutch
Rims/lowering springs coming soon!
[IMG]http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/2/web/2222000-2222999/2222768_3_full.jpg[/
black00gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2004, 08:31 AM   #10
normanbaites
1st Gear Member
My Garage
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 126
Default RE: Densecharger vs. K&n vs. ebay noname

i went to tht tunable website, is this the one i should get, seems damn expensive for a intake, i

System # 5: Stage 2
96-04 4.6 GT System fender to throttle body system

[3] Piece CNC'd flanged & gasketed ABS intake pipes w/4 bolts and nylocknuts (3-position adjustable filter location)
[1] Polycarbonate high gloss black unbreakable cover plates
[1] Raven Black/Chrome Decal
[1] Green Filter #2074 ($75. retail price, lifetime warranty, stainless steel end cap)
Instructions and Bulletins (Revised TB pipe now fits with strut tower braces)
e-mail notify for '02up GT's please

Price: $339.00 Delivered
__________________
3.73 gears
Flowmasters
Diablo predator
steeda Tri ax short shifter
what should i get next? let me know what you think...
normanbaites is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors









New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

MustangForums.com and InternetBrands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company