Posts: 992
Joined: 9/9/2004 From: Amsterdam, New York Status: offline
ok i think i found my winter car for when i put my mustang away...i was afraid id have to go impot but this thing looks impressive. Do you guys have any performance specs on it? All i know is that it has 205 horsepower... and is a light car
sionix 2001 Crown Vic w/ P&H package marauder air box w/ 80mm mass air and k&n panel 70mm Tbody and ported plenum sway bars, plugs, tstat, and superchip and so many mods yet to go...
I work at a Chevy dealership, when I PDI one of them I will let you know what I think maybe take some pics. we should be getting one in soon sice we already have a cobalt 4 door in.
You bet'cha... Loser a$$ looking car. Another f'ing SRT wannabe.
quote:
Engine Type 2.2L ECOTEC DOHC 2.0L ECOTEC Supercharged DOHC RPO L61 LSJ Displacement (liters/cu. in.) 2.2/134 2.0/122.0 Bore & stroke (in.) 3.4 x 3.7 3.4x3.4 Bore & stroke (mm) 86.00 x 94.60 86.00 x 86.00 Compression ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1 Block material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Cylinder head material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Valves per cylinder 4 4 Recommended unleaded fuel 87 octane 91+ octane Redline (RPM) 6500 6500 Horsepower/kW @ engine RPM 145/108.17 @ 5600 RPM 205/152.93 @ 5600 RPM Torque (lb.-ft./N-m) @ engine RPM 155/210.15 @ 4000 RPM 200/271.16 @ 4400 RPM
WEAK!!!! Look ^^ its max'd out from the factory. 9.5:1 C/R, bad for more boost. Its aluminum, bad for more HP. Its a 4banger that redlines at 6500... WTF! A Built GT could rev way past that!!!!! LOL
better than a cavalier rs but that aint sayin much...
_____________________________
sionix 2001 Crown Vic w/ P&H package marauder air box w/ 80mm mass air and k&n panel 70mm Tbody and ported plenum sway bars, plugs, tstat, and superchip and so many mods yet to go...
i dunno personally, i think its pretty coool 12-14psi capabilities on the stock supercharger. i see where you are coming from with another SRT-4, so yes osme of the new drivers of these might be assholes, and on another note camaros arent bad cars, i love mustangs and camaros equally, its jsut somthing about 55mph in first gear and 300 hp stock that isnt ****ty. but yeah also they jsut tested teh Ecotech engine with some crazy work done to it in the salt flats and it set a record i belive somewhere around 300+ mph. so the car definetly has potential, but just like everything else it has its flaws.
RE: Chevy cobalt ss supercharged?? - 12/7/2004 9:34:04 PM
Guest
quote:
ORIGINAL: 00GT00
quote:
ORIGINAL: iwrxit
thats the new camaro. just wait, youll see.
You bet'cha... Loser a$$ looking car. Another f'ing SRT wannabe.
quote:
Engine Type 2.2L ECOTEC DOHC 2.0L ECOTEC Supercharged DOHC RPO L61 LSJ Displacement (liters/cu. in.) 2.2/134 2.0/122.0 Bore & stroke (in.) 3.4 x 3.7 3.4x3.4 Bore & stroke (mm) 86.00 x 94.60 86.00 x 86.00 Compression ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1 Block material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Cylinder head material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Valves per cylinder 4 4 Recommended unleaded fuel 87 octane 91+ octane Redline (RPM) 6500 6500 Horsepower/kW @ engine RPM 145/108.17 @ 5600 RPM 205/152.93 @ 5600 RPM Torque (lb.-ft./N-m) @ engine RPM 155/210.15 @ 4000 RPM 200/271.16 @ 4400 RPM
WEAK!!!! Look ^^ its max'd out from the factory. 9.5:1 C/R, bad for more boost. Its aluminum, bad for more HP. Its a 4banger that redlines at 6500... WTF! A Built GT could rev way past that!!!!! LOL
who cares what it revs to? It's not built to rev to skyhigh rpms. It's built for low end torque and tuned for driveability. I have an aluminum block and sleeved properly I could easily put down 550+ hp, Just because Ford likes to dump heavy iron blocks in it's SVTs doesn't mean that aluminum isn't good for taking boost. As long as the internals are forged and it has the proper sleeves in it, it'll be fine. But if a boosted car blows a rod, the aluminum block will give easier than an Iron block.
You bet'cha... Loser a$$ looking car. Another f'ing SRT wannabe.
quote:
Engine Type 2.2L ECOTEC DOHC 2.0L ECOTEC Supercharged DOHC RPO L61 LSJ Displacement (liters/cu. in.) 2.2/134 2.0/122.0 Bore & stroke (in.) 3.4 x 3.7 3.4x3.4 Bore & stroke (mm) 86.00 x 94.60 86.00 x 86.00 Compression ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1 Block material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Cylinder head material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Valves per cylinder 4 4 Recommended unleaded fuel 87 octane 91+ octane Redline (RPM) 6500 6500 Horsepower/kW @ engine RPM 145/108.17 @ 5600 RPM 205/152.93 @ 5600 RPM Torque (lb.-ft./N-m) @ engine RPM 155/210.15 @ 4000 RPM 200/271.16 @ 4400 RPM
WEAK!!!! Look ^^ its max'd out from the factory. 9.5:1 C/R, bad for more boost. Its aluminum, bad for more HP. Its a 4banger that redlines at 6500... WTF! A Built GT could rev way past that!!!!! LOL
who cares what it revs to? It's not built to rev to skyhigh rpms. It's built for low end torque and tuned for driveability. I have an aluminum block and sleeved properly I could easily put down 550+ hp, Just because Ford likes to dump heavy iron blocks in it's SVTs doesn't mean that aluminum isn't good for taking boost. As long as the internals are forged and it has the proper sleeves in it, it'll be fine. But if a boosted car blows a rod, the aluminum block will give easier than an Iron block.
Hey man take it easy with your blow-torch, AIGHT!! I know that you could build a high-po Civic, you could build a High-po V6'r or even a low 12 sec FORD RANGER! So riddle me this, riddle me that... I just dont care! Im not going to buy one. I got made R-E-S-P-E-C-T for anyone willing and able to put tons of money into something that they will never get a return on. IMO, we do not need another SRT. Chevy just wants to get a piece of that "uneducated" tuner market. Its A FRIGGIN GRAMMA CAR!!! Done!
i dunno, kinda reminds me of a neon in a way, but yeah, just definately a cavalier replacement, why i mentioned its better than one. and it is SO for uneducated tuners or whatever, yeah, but i guess for someone who just turned 16 and just wants something cutesy, well, its aiight. but i KNOW im gonna see them on the road trying to act hard and hang with much faster cars... ya know, cuz the commercials associate it with a corvette... hehe, and show it sportin about like its awesome. commercials wouldnt lie just to make money!!!
_____________________________
sionix 2001 Crown Vic w/ P&H package marauder air box w/ 80mm mass air and k&n panel 70mm Tbody and ported plenum sway bars, plugs, tstat, and superchip and so many mods yet to go...
RE: Chevy cobalt ss supercharged?? - 12/8/2004 1:35:37 AM
Guest
quote:
ORIGINAL: 00GT00
quote:
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
quote:
ORIGINAL: 00GT00
quote:
ORIGINAL: iwrxit
thats the new camaro. just wait, youll see.
You bet'cha... Loser a$$ looking car. Another f'ing SRT wannabe.
quote:
Engine Type 2.2L ECOTEC DOHC 2.0L ECOTEC Supercharged DOHC RPO L61 LSJ Displacement (liters/cu. in.) 2.2/134 2.0/122.0 Bore & stroke (in.) 3.4 x 3.7 3.4x3.4 Bore & stroke (mm) 86.00 x 94.60 86.00 x 86.00 Compression ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1 Block material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Cylinder head material cast-aluminum cast-aluminum Valves per cylinder 4 4 Recommended unleaded fuel 87 octane 91+ octane Redline (RPM) 6500 6500 Horsepower/kW @ engine RPM 145/108.17 @ 5600 RPM 205/152.93 @ 5600 RPM Torque (lb.-ft./N-m) @ engine RPM 155/210.15 @ 4000 RPM 200/271.16 @ 4400 RPM
WEAK!!!! Look ^^ its max'd out from the factory. 9.5:1 C/R, bad for more boost. Its aluminum, bad for more HP. Its a 4banger that redlines at 6500... WTF! A Built GT could rev way past that!!!!! LOL
who cares what it revs to? It's not built to rev to skyhigh rpms. It's built for low end torque and tuned for driveability. I have an aluminum block and sleeved properly I could easily put down 550+ hp, Just because Ford likes to dump heavy iron blocks in it's SVTs doesn't mean that aluminum isn't good for taking boost. As long as the internals are forged and it has the proper sleeves in it, it'll be fine. But if a boosted car blows a rod, the aluminum block will give easier than an Iron block.
Hey man take it easy with your blow-torch, AIGHT!! I know that you could build a high-po Civic, you could build a High-po V6'r or even a low 12 sec FORD RANGER! So riddle me this, riddle me that... I just dont care! Im not going to buy one. I got made R-E-S-P-E-C-T for anyone willing and able to put tons of money into something that they will never get a return on. IMO, we do not need another SRT. Chevy just wants to get a piece of that "uneducated" tuner market. Its A FRIGGIN GRAMMA CAR!!! Done!
For someone that doesn't care, you sure did take some time to look up specs, find a picture and insult it. This has nothing to do with my Civic, this has something to do with you talking about "uneducated" tuner, yet the only thing you educate yourself with is basic specs and the car instantly sucks. The only return you see from putting money into ANY CAR AT ALL is reduced 1/4 ETs. IMO, we DO need more tuner cars out there like the Cobalt SS taking on the Big Ego tuners such as yourself showing you what a "GRAMMA" car can run.
actually i think all those specs are on the website, probably wasnt too hard to find. and simiarilarily same for the pic as well. and some cars that are hyped still do suck ya know. if you swap out everything about it though maybe it wouldnt suck. and if he has an '00 gt, that car wont ever be taking him on...
_____________________________
sionix 2001 Crown Vic w/ P&H package marauder air box w/ 80mm mass air and k&n panel 70mm Tbody and ported plenum sway bars, plugs, tstat, and superchip and so many mods yet to go...
Posts: 1366
Joined: 12/12/2003 From: United States Status: offline
quote:
ORIGINAL: IdontOwnaMustangYet i was afraid id have to go import but this thing looks impressive.
this is very sad my friend. why would you rather own one of these over an import. have an open mind. you would buy an unproven car over a proven import. why not keep an open mind. dont buy the first year of a new vehicle...too many problems.
Posts: 56
Joined: 9/23/2003 From: United States Status: offline
yes stay away fom imports. i just dont get it people complain that jobs r going over seas but they dtive around in there honda. im not saying they're bad cars but if the import trend continues then all cars might be moved over seas. i do know that all the main over seas car makers r either owned or have a partnership one of the big three. my 2 cents i just rather my money go 2 american factory workers
For someone that doesn't care, you sure did take some time to look up specs, find a picture and insult it. This has nothing to do with my Civic, this has something to do with you talking about "uneducated" tuner, yet the only thing you educate yourself with is basic specs and the car instantly sucks. The only return you see from putting money into ANY CAR AT ALL is reduced 1/4 ETs. IMO, we DO need more tuner cars out there like the Cobalt SS taking on the Big Ego tuners such as yourself showing you what a "GRAMMA" car can run.
The specs are from Chevy's website. I went there to see the difference in the Cobalt and the SRT. They are not out yet, at least around here, so I have not seen one go down the strip to see what kind of times they produce. About the education level at question, if I need to explain why not to 1) Buy a Chevy, 2) A Four Bangger and 3) An SRT look a-like on a MUSTANG forum then there are some real problems here! So the obvious facts are all that’s necessary! Your lame excuse for "we need more..." BLA BLA BLA, just because you can not afford a Muscle car of tradition doesn’t mean that any time some one dislikes a "GRAMMA" car you can pipe in and start your "imports are cool" bull-****! Guess what? As already stated this is a Mustang forum, we are supposed to not like the baby cars that have potential to be competition. So go bitch and moan some place else, no one here cares about your passion to convert the world to gay import lovers!
RE: Chevy cobalt ss supercharged?? - 12/8/2004 10:28:33 PM
Guest
quote:
ORIGINAL: 00GT00
The specs are from Chevy's website. I went there to see the difference in the Cobalt and the SRT. They are not out yet, at least around here, so I have not seen one go down the strip to see what kind of times they produce. About the education level at question, if I need to explain why not to 1) Buy a Chevy, 2) A Four Bangger and 3) An SRT look a-like on a MUSTANG forum then there are some real problems here! So the obvious facts are all that’s necessary! Your lame excuse for "we need more..." BLA BLA BLA, just because you can not afford a Muscle car of tradition doesn’t mean that any time some one dislikes a "GRAMMA" car you can pipe in and start your "imports are cool" bull-****! Guess what? As already stated this is a Mustang forum, we are supposed to not like the baby cars that have potential to be competition. So go bitch and moan some place else, no one here cares about your passion to convert the world to gay import lovers!
Yes the specs are obviously from CHevy's site. but you still cared enough to go look them up, that was the point that completely negated your sudden about face on telling me you don't care.
I still don't see how you think that looks like an SRT4, it looks nothing like it. Your predisposed biased opinion is just completely off base, which is what i have the problem with. Your lame excuse for "we dont' need..." is perplexing... but I understand why you said it.
You don't understand the underdog sleeper prowess, so that means everyone needs to sit in 3500 lb tank with RWD and a V8 to give them the overly played out illusion that their dick is bigger than it actually is.
You can dislike it all you want but when you start calling it a "neon look alike" or some other lame retarded excuse as to why you don't like it (mind you this is without you even seeing one in person, driving it or even sitting in it), you're daaaaaamn skippy I'm going to jump on your comments. If you don't have anything even remotely educated to say about the car, say you just don't like it and I really won't care. Now as for the "imports" thing that YOU keep bringing up... this has nothing to do with imports or anything of the nature, this is solely about you trying to make some bogus comparison, and to someone like me, it makes as much sense as putting whip cream on a cheeseburger.
I couldn't care ANY less about if this is a Mustang forum or not, YOU came into a thread called "Chevy cobalt ss supercharged??" knowing it WASN'T going to be about Mustangs, and now you're throwing the "this is a Mustang forum" defense back at me. I don't understand where the hell your logic is behind this arguement?
Printable Version
Chevy cobalt ss supercharged?? - 
