Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

grammar

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs >> grammar Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
grammar - 4/20/2007 6:52:25 PM   
mayh3m

 

Posts: 374
Joined: 10/24/2005
From: new orleans
Status: offline
mayh3m's photo gallery
It's time we get this straightened up.  It urks the crap out of me when people don't know the difference between their, there, they're, to, too, its and it's.

Their - reference to someone's property - Where is their 67 Mustang?
There - reference to general location - The 67 Mustang is over there.
They're - abbreviation for they are - They're getting the 67 Mustang today.

They're on their way to get the 67 Mustang over there.

To - usually connects subject to predicate - They are going to pick up the 67 Mustang.
Too - used in agreeance with, additional, also - He is going with them, too.

He is going to get the mustang, too.   He too will be there to get it.

Its - possessive, ownership (no apostrophe, unlike other possessive words) - The 67 Mustang is on its way.
It's - it is - It's time to go get the 67 Mustang.

End of lesson.

_____________________________


yes, i'm getting a new intake
Post #: 1
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 6:54:45 PM   
ponyx2


Posts: 208
Joined: 8/30/2006
Status: offline
I is be going over they're to be seein my mushtang. Trust me...it irks the hell outta me too.

_____________________________

1967 Coupe:
Dead stock - ALL original
2006 GT with:
Wal-Mart floor mats
SuperCharger
Other Stuff

(in reply to mayh3m)
Post #: 2
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 6:55:25 PM   
mayh3m

 

Posts: 374
Joined: 10/24/2005
From: new orleans
Status: offline
mayh3m's photo gallery


_____________________________


yes, i'm getting a new intake

(in reply to ponyx2)
Post #: 3
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:09:11 PM   
Soaring



Posts: 17565
Joined: 10/29/2004
Status: offline
Soaring's photo gallery
Yeah, this isn't English class and you are not going to educate proper grammar on this site.  I totally agree with you, but again, this is not the place to educate about proper grammar.  Some of the worst cases actually post some of the best information. You just have to sift through all the bad grammar to understand what they are saying. 

(in reply to mayh3m)
Post #: 4
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:15:55 PM   
baddog671


Posts: 3509
Joined: 5/4/2005
From: Western MD
Status: online
baddog671's photo gallery
Glen, weren't you a teacher or something at one time?

_____________________________

67coupe-351W-new modded suspension-new manual steering-front Granada disc-sound proofed-braced

"Wether you think you can or can't, you're probably right" -Henry Ford

(in reply to Soaring)
Post #: 5
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:16:59 PM   
longlive289s


Posts: 626
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline
ya i fell into the bad grammer phase due to constent text messaging and forums. i've been trying to clean it up but hard to get out of old habits such as: u, ne way, rolf, ftw...and all that jazz. the o/t section rots your brain

_____________________________


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2590051
289 C Code
rebuilt: engine, tranny. grab-a-track suspension
engine pretty's and hooker comp headers

(in reply to Soaring)
Post #: 6
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:27:41 PM   
66GTKFB

 

Posts: 2623
Joined: 3/26/2007
Status: offline
If I received a message, memo or letter from a subordinate written in the manner that some of these post are composed, there would be manditory schooling to make English the primary language for that employee - or the door. In a post about a week or two ago, there was someone from New Caladonia that apologized for the poor English used in their posts saying the written word was easier than the spoken. All the messages were easily understood. To that party, thank you. But I guess it's a reflection of today -
Jim

(in reply to longlive289s)
Post #: 7
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:31:34 PM   
ponyx2


Posts: 208
Joined: 8/30/2006
Status: offline
My bwain is NOT be roten!

_____________________________

1967 Coupe:
Dead stock - ALL original
2006 GT with:
Wal-Mart floor mats
SuperCharger
Other Stuff

(in reply to 66GTKFB)
Post #: 8
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:39:37 PM   
mat11089


Posts: 693
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline
This isnt school.Although it may be difficult get over it or dont read it.

(in reply to ponyx2)
Post #: 9
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:44:38 PM   
BlackLX


Posts: 1576
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
BlackLX's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: longlive289s
rolf, ftw


See, those are different because they're acronyms. They're perfectly fine to use.


quote:

ORIGINAL: longlive289s
s such as: u, ne way,


These on the other hand, are annoying and make you look like a 12 year old girl that talks on AIM too much.


_____________________________

No good

(in reply to longlive289s)
Post #: 10
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:45:10 PM   
JamesW



Posts: 2084
Joined: 9/8/2006
From: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Status: online
JamesW's photo gallery
How's ya momma an'nem?

_____________________________


If you're reading this, thank a Teacher.
If you're reading this in English, thank an American Soldier.

JamesW's Website

(in reply to mayh3m)
Post #: 11
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:49:35 PM   
longlive289s


Posts: 626
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline
aha I'm trying to remeber the last time I used aim....been a long ass time

_____________________________


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2590051
289 C Code
rebuilt: engine, tranny. grab-a-track suspension
engine pretty's and hooker comp headers

(in reply to JamesW)
Post #: 12
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 7:52:45 PM   
Soaring



Posts: 17565
Joined: 10/29/2004
Status: offline
Soaring's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: baddog671

Glen, weren't you a teacher or something at one time?

Yeah, but I was a high school band director.  English grammar was not my forte.  However, I do enjoy written conversations with folks who know proper grammar usage.  I have a master's degree, and in order to achieve that goal, you have to write an extensive research paper.  So, without proper grammar usage, I would not have achieved that goal. 

(in reply to baddog671)
Post #: 13
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 8:08:43 PM   
Galactusz


Posts: 890
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
De que chingados estás hablando, buey?



_____________________________



Hector

(in reply to Soaring)
Post #: 14
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 8:19:21 PM   
Soaring



Posts: 17565
Joined: 10/29/2004
Status: offline
Soaring's photo gallery
What mofos are talking?  Did I come close to the correct translation?  

< Message edited by Soaring -- 4/20/2007 8:23:05 PM >

(in reply to Galactusz)
Post #: 15
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 8:25:53 PM   
baddog671


Posts: 3509
Joined: 5/4/2005
From: Western MD
Status: online
baddog671's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Galactusz

De que chingados estás hablando, buey?



Chingados?

_____________________________

67coupe-351W-new modded suspension-new manual steering-front Granada disc-sound proofed-braced

"Wether you think you can or can't, you're probably right" -Henry Ford

(in reply to Galactusz)
Post #: 16
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 10:28:25 PM   
eZ


Posts: 1210
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: So. California
Status: offline



Are you kidding me?  I thought i was in a mustang forum.  Some of the best advice in this forums comes from all the dumb hicks.  This thread reminds me of a female on pms, just looking for a reason to B*tch about something.



quote:

ORIGINAL: mayh3m

It's time we get this straightened up.  It urks the crap out of me when people don't know the difference between their, there, they're, to, too, its and it's.

Their - reference to someone's property - Where is their 67 Mustang?
There - reference to general location - The 67 Mustang is over there.
They're - abbreviation for they are - They're getting the 67 Mustang today.

They're on their way to get the 67 Mustang over there.

To - usually connects subject to predicate - They are going to pick up the 67 Mustang.
Too - used in agreeance with, additional, also - He is going with them, too.

He is going to get the mustang, too.   He too will be there to get it.

Its - possessive, ownership (no apostrophe, unlike other possessive words) - The 67 Mustang is on its way.
It's - it is - It's time to go get the 67 Mustang.

End of lesson.

(in reply to mayh3m)
Post #: 17
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 11:18:39 PM   
JMD


Posts: 3156
Joined: 1/18/2007
From: Las Cruces, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mayh3m

It's time we get this straightened up.  It urks the crap out of me when people don't know the difference between their, there, they're, to, too, its and it's.

Their - reference to someone's property - Where is their 67 Mustang?
There - reference to general location - The 67 Mustang is over there.
They're - abbreviation for they are - They're getting the 67 Mustang today.

They're on their way to get the 67 Mustang over there.

To - usually connects subject to predicate - They are going to pick up the 67 Mustang.
Too - used in agreeance with, additional, also - He is going with them, too.

He is going to get the mustang, too.   He too will be there to get it.

Its - possessive, ownership (no apostrophe, unlike other possessive words) - The 67 Mustang is on its way.
It's - it is - It's time to go get the 67 Mustang.

End of lesson.


Sorry Mayh3m,

When I need to write a good business letter I can do as well as anyone by using spell checker, and going over and over the letter and making revisions and such. In doing so I have both impressed lawyers and I have been mistaken for a lawyer. trust me on this (you might have to really try hard).

But I am not going to put that much effort and time into 99.9 % of my forum posts, often I ignore spelling and gramar issues that I notice prior to posting, and hit the post button anyway, hell, I'm neither getting graded or paid for my posts, and I'm really not looking to impress anyone. If I can convey the thought, that will do for me.

BTW I think I misspelled grammar at least once in this post.mispelled??? I could spell check these,, but nah...

_____________________________

66 Coupe
I-6 Conversion, 408 Windsor, Tremec TKO 600
Wilwood fronts, SSBC Rears
9" Track Loc.

"It is never cool to be a coulo!"

(in reply to mayh3m)
Post #: 18
RE: grammar - 4/20/2007 11:25:15 PM   
rmodel65

 

Posts: 6876
Joined: 10/10/2005
From: brunstank ga
Status: offline
rmodel65's photo gallery
i dont care to use correct grammar i mean honestly its the net not english class i type with typos if you dont like it sorry i  dont use punctuation either and i never reread anything to make sure it logical thats just me im easy going bye and bye

_____________________________

Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

(in reply to JMD)
Post #: 19
RE: grammar - 4/21/2007 1:19:02 AM   
gothand



Posts: 2051
Joined: 11/9/2006
From: South Shores, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mayh3m

It's time we get this straightened up.  It urks the crap out of me when people don't know the difference between their, there, they're, to, too, its and it's.



... this coming from the fellow who misspelled his screen name?   j/k  Yeah, it "urks" (sic) me too!  still kidding, ha ha!

To be honest, I am far less bothered by poor grammar, spelling and diction as I am by lack of capitalization and punctuation (i.e. periods at ends of sentences).  However, it is not because I am uppity with the English language, it is simply because I find it more difficult to read.

FWIW, some of the smartest people I know have terrible spelling and poor writing skills.

(in reply to mayh3m)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang >> Ford Mustang Tech >> Classic Mustangs
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
dan04cobra14536
88bluegt14536
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511780

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.