Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

RE: Me Vs. SRT-4

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip >> RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 2:40:32 AM   
Mach1


Posts: 1176
Joined: 10/19/2003
From: martinez, ca
Status: offline
Dude those car will put 235 whp. I consider that VERY powerful especially for a sport compact. Some bolt ons those cars are running low 13s. Dont take this the wrong way but you dont know what your talking about.

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
Post #: 21
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 3:33:47 AM   
Guest
quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08


quote:

ORIGINAL: OICW


quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08

SRT-4's are the most overrated piles ever. When they came out people thought it was a gift from god, they suck. I have never even come close to losing to a SRT-4, ever. waste of 20k


Name another car under $21,000 that can match an SRT-4, and that can match the SRT-4's tuning potential - 500+ fwhp on stock internals.

you spend a lot more to get 500hp though. it comes stock with not a lot of hp, but to get to 500hp you need to go through expensive stages. so the car will end up being close to thirty. If i spent that on my car I would romp the SRT-4 any day of the week


It comes stock putting down 230 front wheel hp. A MOPAR stage 3 turbo kit bumps you up to a CLAIMED 310 hp, but much like LS1s the cars were underrated from the factory so I wouldn't put too much money on it actually only making 310 with that kit.

and I agree with Mach I. saleen you spend lots of time instigating arguements about this car, but you never seem to have anything to back up your arguements except with "it's still a neon."

Well, your saleen is STILL just a Mustang under it's over priced saleen badges and body kit.

< Message edited by 2000Si -- 12/2/2004 3:35:09 AM >

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
  Post #: 22
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 4:00:02 AM   
sionix

 

Posts: 92
Joined: 11/30/2004
Status: offline
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!!!!!!!
but seriously, why would anyone care to drive a fwd car.....

_____________________________

sionix
2001 Crown Vic w/ P&H package
marauder air box w/ 80mm mass air and k&n panel
70mm Tbody and ported plenum
sway bars, plugs, tstat, and superchip
and so many mods yet to go...

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
Post #: 23
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 4:14:53 AM   
Mach1


Posts: 1176
Joined: 10/19/2003
From: martinez, ca
Status: offline
Fwd is a hell of a lot safer thats for sure. Less drive train loss to.

(in reply to sionix)
Post #: 24
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 10:00:31 AM   
RollinThunder

 

Posts: 709
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline
safer in the snow yea...but Idk about racing when that tq steer come's in...I wouldnt kno for sure tho as I have never drivin a high power fwd car...

_____________________________

03 White GT,
Bassani midlength headers, Bassani X pipe no cats, Magnapack catback, C&L 85mm MAF w/ K&N filter, C&L inlet tube, C&L upper intake, BBK 75mm t/b, FRPP 3.73's, Custom tuned chip....271RWHP 316TQ...

(in reply to Mach1)
Post #: 25
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 10:04:09 AM   
RollinThunder

 

Posts: 709
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OICW


quote:

ORIGINAL: RollinThunder

iwrxit...yea I run low 13's I really dont have much trouble taking out mach's and such



Don't Machs dyno the same as you stock? But I guess your 373 gears must help launching out from a stop.


let me rephrase that...from a stop its always a drivers race and most of the machs I race from a stop I can out drive them and yes my gears help me out big time even tho they arent that famous 4.10's I still get good punch off the line w/ my 3.73's....but I have to admit from a role the mach ones would prolly pass me do to there 4v and higher redline...I never raced a mach from a role so I cant say for sure but I'd prolly give the win to the mach...


_____________________________

03 White GT,
Bassani midlength headers, Bassani X pipe no cats, Magnapack catback, C&L 85mm MAF w/ K&N filter, C&L inlet tube, C&L upper intake, BBK 75mm t/b, FRPP 3.73's, Custom tuned chip....271RWHP 316TQ...

(in reply to OICW)
Post #: 26
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:00:57 AM   
Guest

quote:

ORIGINAL: sionix

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!!!!!!!
but seriously, why would anyone care to drive a fwd car.....


Damn... have any of you saying this pathetic reason for an excuse ever even driven a fwd car?

You don't make any sense, having torque steer in the snow doesn't really apply unless you're mashing the pedal to the floor everytime you try to take off. Which would be retarded.

I'd rather not try to feather my clutch everytime with high torque V8s in the snow and have the ass end spin out into an uncontrollable fish tail every time.

FWD > RWD as far as driving in the snow. Torque steer is NOT a big deal, I can still drive just fine with the car pulling to one side, unlike when you get on it in a rwd car you'd have to let off before you're looking at where you just came from.

daily driving in any weather; AWD > FWD> RWD
racing, i'll give it the benefit; AWD > RWD > FWD

Now for the love of God please shut the hell up with that gay excuse "OMG TORQUE STEER! I don't want it!"

(in reply to sionix)
  Post #: 27
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:07:47 AM   
2001_SaleenS281_08



Posts: 2064
Joined: 4/14/2004
From: Madison, WI
Status: offline
2001_SaleenS281_08's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mach1

Fwd is a hell of a lot safer thats for sure. Less drive train loss to.

why did you buy RWD then? sounds like you think FWD is better, sell the mach and buy a civic

_____________________________

“A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.”-- Edward Abbey


(in reply to Mach1)
Post #: 28
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:08:54 AM   
2001_SaleenS281_08



Posts: 2064
Joined: 4/14/2004
From: Madison, WI
Status: offline
2001_SaleenS281_08's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si


quote:

ORIGINAL: sionix

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!!!!!!!
but seriously, why would anyone care to drive a fwd car.....


Damn... have any of you saying this pathetic reason for an excuse ever even driven a fwd car?

You don't make any sense, having torque steer in the snow doesn't really apply unless you're mashing the pedal to the floor everytime you try to take off. Which would be retarded.

I'd rather not try to feather my clutch everytime with high torque V8s in the snow and have the ass end spin out into an uncontrollable fish tail every time.

FWD > RWD as far as driving in the snow. Torque steer is NOT a big deal, I can still drive just fine with the car pulling to one side, unlike when you get on it in a rwd car you'd have to let off before you're looking at where you just came from.

daily driving in any weather; AWD > FWD> RWD
racing, i'll give it the benefit; AWD > RWD > FWD

Now for the love of God please shut the hell up with that gay excuse "OMG TORQUE STEER! I don't want it!"

AWD is crap for high hp racing

_____________________________

“A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.”-- Edward Abbey


(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 29
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:10:24 AM   
slo93aod

 

Posts: 228
Joined: 11/9/2004
Status: offline
Actually Mrs. Smarty Pants, My car is a 93 and in 97 I was offered $11,000 for it and in 98 some girl wanted to give my $12K.... you should speak about something you know...

BTW do you know what a GT sold for in 93? Do the math, thats a wee bit better then 63.5484884% of its orgianl value

_____________________________

another slow 302

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
Post #: 30
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:12:31 AM   
Guest
quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mach1

Fwd is a hell of a lot safer thats for sure. Less drive train loss to.

why did you buy RWD then? sounds like you think FWD is better, sell the mach and buy a civic


Dude, seriously. knock it off. He bought RWD because he loves his car, just because he didn't buy a FWD car doesn't mean that it's not cheaper to mass produce, easier to install, and safer driving on ice and in adverse weather conditions.

Let it go.


quote:

ORIGINAL: slo93aod

Actually Mrs. Smarty Pants, My car is a 93 and in 97 I was offered $11,000 for it and in 98 some girl wanted to give my $12K.... you should speak about something you know...

BTW do you know what a GT sold for in 93? Do the math, thats a wee bit better then 63.5484884% of its orgianl value


You got lucky, someone retarded wanted to buy your car. That doesn't mean it was actually worth that much.

< Message edited by 2000Si -- 12/2/2004 11:13:40 AM >

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
  Post #: 31
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:15:47 AM   
2001_SaleenS281_08



Posts: 2064
Joined: 4/14/2004
From: Madison, WI
Status: offline
2001_SaleenS281_08's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08


quote:

ORIGINAL: OICW


quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08

SRT-4's are the most overrated piles ever. When they came out people thought it was a gift from god, they suck. I have never even come close to losing to a SRT-4, ever. waste of 20k


Name another car under $21,000 that can match an SRT-4, and that can match the SRT-4's tuning potential - 500+ fwhp on stock internals.

you spend a lot more to get 500hp though. it comes stock with not a lot of hp, but to get to 500hp you need to go through expensive stages. so the car will end up being close to thirty. If i spent that on my car I would romp the SRT-4 any day of the week


It comes stock putting down 230 front wheel hp. A MOPAR stage 3 turbo kit bumps you up to a CLAIMED 310 hp, but much like LS1s the cars were underrated from the factory so I wouldn't put too much money on it actually only making 310 with that kit.

and I agree with Mach I. saleen you spend lots of time instigating arguements about this car, but you never seem to have anything to back up your arguements except with "it's still a neon."

Well, your saleen is STILL just a Mustang under it's over priced saleen badges and body kit.

f*ck you, I didn't even say "it's still a neon" go back and read it, that wasn't me. In my car you forget about the suspension kit, reflashed ECU, gears, pullies, TB that my car came with. I have never loss to a stock or mildly modded GT, or an SRT-4 with a stage 2 kit, whatever the **** that means. just chill out. They are not gods gift to sport compacts, they were over hyped. By the way I bought my car wrecked so it wasn't overpriced at all, try $6750 two years ago. I wasn't instigating an argument, just speaking what I thought. wtf is with you lately, you seem to hate everyone, and feel everyone is against you and trying to start sh!t with you. chill.
I do have info to back it up! I have raced several different SRT-4's and they aren't fast!!! and if you hate mustangs so much, why are you here? see bold above.

< Message edited by 2001_SaleenS281_08 -- 12/2/2004 11:18:08 AM >


_____________________________

“A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.”-- Edward Abbey


(in reply to Guest)
Post #: 32
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:22:09 AM   
slo93aod

 

Posts: 228
Joined: 11/9/2004
Status: offline
No, I thought it was "only worth as much as you could get for it..."



_____________________________

another slow 302

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
Post #: 33
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:25:45 AM   
iwrxit

 

Posts: 1366
Joined: 12/12/2003
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08
AWD is crap for high hp racing


i guess they should have told audi that when the quattro got banned from all forms of road racing. and i guess skylines suck too, right?

stop whining about torque steer. modded awd's get torque steer. thats what happens when you put down power.

_____________________________


03 WRX
05 Ninja 250
05 FZR6
90 Ninja 600R
86 Volvo 740 turbo

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
Post #: 34
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:31:54 AM   
2001_SaleenS281_08



Posts: 2064
Joined: 4/14/2004
From: Madison, WI
Status: offline
2001_SaleenS281_08's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: iwrxit


quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08
AWD is crap for high hp racing


i guess they should have told audi that when the quattro got banned from all forms of road racing. and i guess skylines suck too, right?

stop whining about torque steer. modded awd's get torque steer. thats what happens when you put down power.

again, it wasn't me whining about torque steer!!!!! read the f.ucking posts!!!! I could care less about torque steer. All I'm saying is if AWD is better than RWD in EVERY scenario, why are there no 6sec AWD cars?

_____________________________

“A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.”-- Edward Abbey


(in reply to iwrxit)
Post #: 35
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:33:41 AM   
Guest

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08


quote:

ORIGINAL: OICW


quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08

SRT-4's are the most overrated piles ever. When they came out people thought it was a gift from god, they suck. I have never even come close to losing to a SRT-4, ever. waste of 20k


Name another car under $21,000 that can match an SRT-4, and that can match the SRT-4's tuning potential - 500+ fwhp on stock internals.

you spend a lot more to get 500hp though. it comes stock with not a lot of hp, but to get to 500hp you need to go through expensive stages. so the car will end up being close to thirty. If i spent that on my car I would romp the SRT-4 any day of the week


It comes stock putting down 230 front wheel hp. A MOPAR stage 3 turbo kit bumps you up to a CLAIMED 310 hp, but much like LS1s the cars were underrated from the factory so I wouldn't put too much money on it actually only making 310 with that kit.

and I agree with Mach I. saleen you spend lots of time instigating arguements about this car, but you never seem to have anything to back up your arguements except with "it's still a neon."

Well, your saleen is STILL just a Mustang under it's over priced saleen badges and body kit.

f*ck you, I didn't even say "it's still a neon" go back and read it, that wasn't me. In my car you forget about the suspension kit, reflashed ECU, gears, pullies, TB that my car came with. I have never loss to a stock or mildly modded GT, or an SRT-4 with a stage 2 kit, whatever the **** that means. just chill out. They are not gods gift to sport compacts, they were over hyped. By the way I bought my car wrecked so it wasn't overpriced at all, try $6750 two years ago. I wasn't instigating an argument, just speaking what I thought. wtf is with you lately, you seem to hate everyone, and feel everyone is against you and trying to start sh!t with you. chill.
I do have info to back it up! I have raced several different SRT-4's and they aren't fast!!! and if you hate mustangs so much, why are you here? see bold above.



bahahahahahahahahhaha I pissed saleen off lmao

I never said I hated mustangs, and I think I've been over why I'm here a million times.

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
  Post #: 36
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 11:44:01 AM   
iwrxit

 

Posts: 1366
Joined: 12/12/2003
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2001_SaleenS281_08
again, it wasn't me whining about torque steer!!!!! read the f.ucking posts!!!! I could care less about torque steer. All I'm saying is if AWD is better than RWD in EVERY scenario, why are there no 6sec AWD cars?


i wasnt aiming at you, just the population in general. these are the people that still believe in turbo lag.

now, my preposition...does pro stock allow AWD cars?
second, 6 second timeslips are coming. just 5 years ago imports couldnt hit 10's, now street cars have done it. hks has the fastest awd in the world with a 7.671@181.98mph.
when cars get that fast there is a tradeoff. most teams prefer the lighter car over the increades drivetrain. not to mention, when you start getting into cars like that, you have to pay for 2 of everything. it's just goor business sense to build a RWD drag car.

_____________________________


03 WRX
05 Ninja 250
05 FZR6
90 Ninja 600R
86 Volvo 740 turbo

(in reply to 2001_SaleenS281_08)
Post #: 37
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 12:16:44 PM   
Bowdy04

 

Posts: 149
Joined: 8/29/2004
Status: offline
RollinThunder...tell me about your Bassani optimum length headers....What kind of numbers could i expect if i got them....are they worth the extra $$ over other shorties? how though are they to install (like LT's or more like shorties)? LT's would run me $350 to install from my guy, i know regular shorties would be less...Thanks

_____________________________

04 Prem GT
K&N FIPK
Steeda Tri-ax
Steeda Stage II suspension complete
3.90 gears
Bassani Catted X-Pipe
Diablosport Predator tuner
Steeda UD pulleys
Magnaflow Cat-back
Accufab 70mm TB & Plenum

(in reply to RollinThunder)
Post #: 38
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 12:18:06 PM   
RollinThunder

 

Posts: 709
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline
guys seriously y is it that whenever someone post's anything about the srt4 they always end up getting bashed along w/ other compact cars...seriously it gets annoying and its been argued to death!

_____________________________

03 White GT,
Bassani midlength headers, Bassani X pipe no cats, Magnapack catback, C&L 85mm MAF w/ K&N filter, C&L inlet tube, C&L upper intake, BBK 75mm t/b, FRPP 3.73's, Custom tuned chip....271RWHP 316TQ...

(in reply to RollinThunder)
Post #: 39
RE: Me Vs. SRT-4 - 12/2/2004 1:09:06 PM   
gilamonster

 

Posts: 228
Joined: 11/6/2004
Status: offline
have you guys ever been to the dodge website. they have a neon soundclip that doesnt sound like a 4-banger. yet, everytime in person since my neighbor has one it sounds like one. but anyway, they are pretty quick for a 20k car. and i've seen some pretty quick ones some at the strip.

_____________________________

''For a wounded man shall say to his assailant, ''If I live I will kill you, If I die you are forgiven.'' Such is the rule of honor.''

(in reply to RollinThunder)
Post #: 40
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17752
nanaki14679
88bluegt14516
dan04cobra14505
addermk213833
ride of the 13601
hotrods_n_bo13286
2000gt4.612490
mustangman0211872
1slo8511637

New Vendors
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.