1982 GT 351w(.060),10.7:1 flat top pistons, ported & polished heads, 1.94/1.60 valves,stealth intake, 750 holley dp, Comp 274XE cam, C-4 tranny with 3700 stall converter, 8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes,electric fan. Tons of mods that are too much to list
MD, I accept money orders- no personal checks and no paypal. And personally I think that Roundmans times are a little slow for all the mods that are done, but I've also seen GT40 engines with AODs go slower then him.
I would live to invite my friends to this site, but you wouldnt believe them anyway. And yah let me go back and video that 90Gt that ran the 13.90 all stock from 7 years ago...
Hopefully I can get fastang90 (or something like that) in here so he can help me convince you that mustangs arent dogs when they are stock...
Why would I lie about some slo stock cars??? I have a freakin 398, and all of my friends went the same route, or turbo or blower(look up Blaine King, Eric Stubbs for example).... We race 13 second cars in a F250 4x4.... Have some confidence in your foxes they are not slow.
Talk to Ed Curtis of FlowTechInduction Systems... Ask someone who knows... And dont disagree with them b/c of some math equation you came up with after 5 years on a forum. It has been done too many times
Posts: 8826
Joined: 9/2/2003 From: United States Status: offline
Bottom line is you lied by saying your near stock 5.0 trapped at 103 mph, nothin more to say. You've lost all your credibility. You can say all you want, bottom line is you haven't proved anything I've said wrong and you've got no proof to back up your bold claim of a 103 trap speed. I never said 5.0's were dogs, your putting words into my mouth. I said a midly modded 5.0 can't run 13's without sticky tires. Thats it. You said a car with just a few bolt-ons, not even 25hp worth of bolt-ons, ran a 13.6 and trapped at 103. Not happenin, you lied, your a chump. In a blue moon would I beleive a 13.9 with mild bolt-ons like what you said plus gears and sticky tires... yea sure I will but not with a 103 trap... lmao dude your lying.
this is slo93aod friend he is not lieing about the trap speeds nor the times. my first mustang was a 86 coupe (been a few years) it had race crank pulley, full 2.5 exhaust with stock headers off road h pipe and 373 gears still had ac,ps, smog pump.tps was @.999, timing was @ 18 and we pulled the water lines off cause its hot in texas and we dont need hot water flowing in the egr spacer. the car had a 1.8? 60 foot and ran 13.40 @105. may still have tapes. by the way the tires were 265/something street tires. ever car any of us had ran in the mid 13s with exhaust, pulley and gear had timing @16-18, and the water lines pulled. it has been about ten years since my first mustang i had a 86,88,90,89 and a 93 any this is the only car that has not ran a 13 bolt ons becasue it is a 4 banger! come to texas if your car is not a beater with a million miles on we can have it running a mid to low 13 with the same things we had on our cars
Hmmm...now the E.T is 13.4@105 What happened to 13.6@103??????? Now which is it? I'm getting my hip boots on now
Something tells me a big silver lock is coming this way. MD..get that lock ready cause were're closing in on that 7 pager!
_____________________________
1982 GT 351w(.060),10.7:1 flat top pistons, ported & polished heads, 1.94/1.60 valves,stealth intake, 750 holley dp, Comp 274XE cam, C-4 tranny with 3700 stall converter, 8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes,electric fan. Tons of mods that are too much to list
Printable Version
RE: 13's with simple bolt ons..some say no and I say yeah - 
What happened to 13.6@103??????? 
