Post your mods or Sig., Octane, Trannyand Dyno Sheets. Keep in mind all cars were not created equal from the factory, but if we get enough replies we can see an average and how increasing mods increase HP. No sheet no reply please. If you have an inquiry use PMs.
Your info will be added to this VERY COOL database!
http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls

http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q232/vwillo1/Dyno.jpg

Here's mine:
KB supercharger (8lbs, intercooled). Totally stock exhaust. Hot engine. Warm summer night.

local://upfiles/35567/97A4047D9BA84AD0A5E09D0EFA5EC469.jpg

I you have any stock dyno sheets please post them.

here is mine...auto tranny...mods below
local://upfiles/42783/463F31F276F44B6487E824659FE4526A.jpg

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m234/Lynwood78/Dyno.jpg

Screw canned tunes.

Car is automatic.

I dont have a picture of my sheet yet ... but i got mine dynoed after about three hours of driving on a day at about 90 degrees and i got a 278 rwhp but they were telling me i had a spike in my torque converter so id prob be around 270 it was on a portable dyno as well...

I think the canned tunes are good but when you want more the dyno tune is really the best .. i think once i add some more mods im going to visit a good speed shop and get a dyno tune .

Im auto as well

ORIGINAL: VWILLO

Post your mods or Sig., Trannyand Dyno Sheets. Keep in mind all cars were not created equal from the factory, but if we get enough replies we can see an average and how increasing mods increase HP. No sheet no reply please. If you have an inquiry use PMs.
06 GT Auto


Great numbers how do you like the TI CAI?

315HP/333TQ

dyno sheet is on my angelfire profile. the link is at the bottom of my sig

Here's mine. BTW how do I post my pic and show it directly in the post.
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/9861/dynograph001bn0.jpg

here's mine. going back in 2 weeks for retune after rearend/gears install and to upgrade MAF and increase rpms.

http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s76/forensicsteve/06ProchargerSTD.jpg

HP: 303
TQ: 314

5-spd, with 3.55s and still on stock 17s

MODS: C&L Cold Air (street), Steeda UDP, Roush Axle-Backs, C&L canned Predator tune running 91 octane

local://upfiles/20699/121C05A401BD4971B0DE35E6BA2A009F.jpg

Procharged 8psi / Magnaflow high flow catted x-pipe and 3inch magnapack exhaust. If i brought it to redline at 6300 ill have 450 but i wanted to be safe on the dyno and cut it at 5800

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/YokDriver/12-27-445.jpg

Wow, maybe its the scale they have it at but that tq curve looks crazy.

That torque curve is much steeper thanmy twin screw curve. The centrifical blowers really favor the top end. I'm not sure what those bumps are either. Will belt slippage do that?

ORIGINAL: BigDave

That torque curve is much steeper thanmy twin screw curve. The centrifical blowers really favor the top end. I'm not sure what those bumps are either. Will belt slippage do that?
Yeah, I heard the TSs are more steady... the bumps are what I was really talking about... that power is like, all over the place.

Here's mine but this dyno was before my Xcal with 91 brenspeed tune.

local://upfiles/52595/FBF3CE3905DA4171B8ACCCACA700BD7D.jpg

saleen on 4lbs. i cant complain

local://upfiles/13649/5D43030D99FB43DEA7951B512F327054.jpg

That's very good for 4lbs!
Any exhaust work?

full exaust all the way. i got 442 but i didnt want that much hp on stock internals. i just want to be as safe as i can.. so i had him give me 3 tunes, 442. 422. and 400. i only have sheet for 422. and i still get 31mpg and the interstate

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e331/amznblue/Dyno.jpg
http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e331/amznblue/mb.jpg

This is stock except for axel back pypes muffers.
Max Power=276.98 Max Torque=299.38

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/7140/06mustangdynorun1pc0.jpg

Heres mine.

Vortech on a Saleen.

http://www.350zonline.com/gallery/albums/album761/m_7.jpg
http://www.350zonline.com/gallery/albums/album761/m_8.jpg
http://www.350zonline.com/gallery/albums/album749/P1010028.sized.jpg

I like this thread because people can actually post there dyno sheets, the only thing i have to say is that the majority of these dyno pulls are on a dyno jet. Dynojets are made to give you a number as opposed to your real horsepower. This is why guys that have dynoed on a Mustang Dyno show numbers less than a guy who has dynoed on a dynojet with the same mods. Let me explain,

First it is important to have an understanding of how DynoJet gets their horsepower numbers. Power in mechanical terms is the ability to accomplish a specified amount of work in a given amount of time. By definition, one horsepower is equal to applying a 550 pound force through a distance of 1 foot in one second. In real terms, it would take 1 HP to raise a 550 pound weight up 1 foot in 1 second. So to measure horsepower, we need to know force (in pounds) and velocity (in feet per second). Dynojet's inertial dynamometer measures power according to the terms just described. It measures velocity directly by measuring the time it takes to rotate two heavy steel drums one turn. It measures force at the surface of the drum by indirectly measuring it's acceleration. Acceleration is simply the difference in velocity at the surface of the drums from one revolution to the next. The force applied to the drums is calculated from acceleration using Newton's 2nd law, Force = Mass * Acceleration. Since the mass of the drums is know and acceleration has been measured, Power (horsepower) can now be calculated. Torque is then calculated using the horsepower number: Torque = Horsepower * 5252 / RPM.

Once they have these numbers a series of correction factors are applied, some made public, some hidden as proprietary secrets. The public correction factor is the SAE correction factor. This formula assumes a mechanical efficiency of 85%. The formula used is: Where: CF= 1.18 * (29.22/Bdo) * ((Square Root(To+460)/537)) – 0.18. To = Intake air temperature in degrees F, Bdo = Dry ambient absolute barometric pressure. This correction factor is meant to predict output in varying atmospheric conditions and is a +/- 7%. The proprietary correction factor is supposed to reflect the loss of power from the crankshaft to the rear wheels.

A Loading Dynamometer applies resistance to the dyne's roller(s) , typically using either a water brake or a current eddy brake. In either case, the amount of force is measure using a strain gauge. The measured force is torque which is a real, indisputable measurement of the actual output at the wheel. Horsepower than can be calculated: Hp = Trq * 5252 / RPM.

A Dynamometer can only measure actual power at the output location. Actual power produced AND delivered by an engine will be highest if measured at the crankshaft, lower at the transmission output shaft and even lower, but more meaningful, still, at the rear wheels. The power that you use is the power at the rear wheels. Some Dynamometer companies add to measured rear wheel power readings a factor that is based on ESTIMATED rear wheel power losses (under what power conditions? 3.0 ltr.? 5.0 ltr.? Under coasting conditions? with a 185/70/15 radial tire? a 335/35/18 radial tire? New heavy radial tire vs. worn old, light, racing tire? Who knows?) In short, there is NO meaningful "average" tire to get a correct rear tire power transmission loss measurement for all cars - so obviously, unless they actually measure the power lost in the rear tires, under driven load conditions, NO dyno company should BE ADDING incorrect power figures into the measured power. It's simply wrong. The fact that they add varying amounts of power to the actual, "true" amount of power delivered and measured to the surface of the drive roller creates a situation that makes it an onerous task to compare power figures from different brands of dynamometer systems. On simple inertial dynamometers, some (most) companies use an average for the inertial mass value of the engine, transmission, driveshaft, axles and rear wheels. This is saying that a 4 cylinder, 2.0 ltr. Porsche 914 has the same rotating mass and same rear wheels as a 8 cylinder, 5.0 ltr. Porsche 928 S+4. This simply is not so and wrong.

It's expensive to measure frictional losses in the engine and drivetrain, requiring the dyno to be able to drive the vehicle with engine off. Add the cost of a 50+hp electric motor, controlled power supply, etc. It's just not likely that $20,000 dyno will be equipped with that equipment. It is also common for dynamometer companies to add to the power readings by adding transmission and driveshaft losses back into the measured power readings. Some companies make a concerted effort try to measure frictional losses and, optionally, add the power to the measured readings. Other companies - some that would surprise you - say that it's not important and give a blanket, single factor for frictional losses in every engine. Some simply say that there is a meaningful "average" for every car,( 4 stroke/ 4 cylinder/ 4 speed transmission, 4 stroke/ 8 cylinder/ automatic transmission) and apply it to every car and that it is not a significant difference. Blanket estimates of "average" losses and corrections are, quite simply, incorrect. At the upper levels of the industry, (we are talking about $150,000 - $500,000 AC or DC 4 quadrant dynamometers) it is not tolerated - shouldn't be - and needn't be. There is a dyno company that actually has different versions of software that displays their own identical data files as different amounts of power depending on whether you use the DOS version or the Windows version of their software!!

True, rear wheel horsepower is the standard of measuring the power that is actually delivered to the rear wheels. It is honest, true, fair and duplicable. It is the ONLY standard that can be duplicated by the entire industry - regardless of the dyno manufacturer. From my experience and that of many others, when comparing True, rear wheel horsepower to DJHP you must apply a factor. It appears that this is a sliding scale based on horsepower but the best estimate is 1.05 to 1.21 (maybe higher). What this means is that for those of you trying to calculate what your crankshaft horsepower is based on DJHP, and are adding 15%, the most common number I hear, you are actually doubling (at least) the factor. Why? Because DJHP already has a puff number added into their DJHP. Lets say DJHP shows 200 hp and you add 15%, you get 230 hp crankshaft horsepower. In reality DJ has already added in 15 or 20% to their 200 DJHP number. How does this help us.? It does not, and is fact harmful to the many dynamometer test facilities that report only what the dyno actually measured. I can not tell you of the many discussions that we have had as to why the horsepower numbers we recorded lower than that of DJ. For those manufacturers that use DJHP as proof of their claims, can you imagine the shock your customers get when the horsepower number of a vehicle tested on a load bearing dyno do not come close to their claim.

Proper tuning, especially on highly modified engines greatly affect the power difference. Due to the fact that the DJ dyno's sweep so quickly on sweep hp tests, there is no way to properly tune a fuel map. What you get is the acceleration and full throttle maps both triggered during the test, ending up over-rich, affecting the horsepower. The other factor that needs to be taken into account is that DJ dynos assume that every vehicle has the same rotating mass - they don't - and that disregard is another reason why the hp conversion figures are different. The most accurate measurement of rear wheel horsepower is in Steady State Mode (inertia is not a factor in power equation.) The inertial mass changes on each car affects the DJ power, but not the true, rear wheel horsepower. There's another message in the above example, besides the average true, rear wheel horsepower to DJHP conversion factor - It's up to the m

wow thats too much for my A.D.D. to read but i dyno'd on our dynapack

2005 Mustang GT Automatic Trans
here is mine. Done by Chris at Excessive Motorsport (http://www.Excessivemotorsport.net)in Manassas, Virginia

Only had MAC Exhaust and K&N Air Charger.

local://upfiles/25187/AAC69AF61AAA4BF294558C5435EF0A73.jpg

we need more dyno sheets

Here you go! 307 whp and 330 wtq

local://upfiles/31250/5E3AB6D69CD94EF8B3ADF98D2E092B8A.jpg

local://upfiles/31250/585C06F923044D0189FE03A85DB35778.jpg

local://upfiles/31250/B045BF16714C45679A833E785C4F8655.jpg

Here is mine - 5 speed manual with 92 octane tune

local://upfiles/28393/4C7DD1366C8B4C62A56B183E838A3652.jpg

+1 on alot to read and focus my attention. Most are on dynojet and a mustang dyno can show less HP, but they're so many factors. i've seen a ford focus dyno a certain number on a dynojet, then it was later dyno'd on a mustang dyno, thinking it would put down less when in fact the HP numbers were higher than the dynojet. Usually it's a 10HP decrease from a dynojet to a mustang dyno but all the factors will make it vary. Just like when people dyno from SAE or STD, usually STD will add about 10HP more, but the factors will play a part too.

you might dyno 300rwhp and another car will dyno 280rwhp, you take them to the track and the 280 gets a better time and beats the 300, so...you might make certain numbers to the wheels but its all abouthow you drive it. Numbers to the wheelsis one thing but the 1/4 is what i'm concered about.

surely more people have dyno sheets to post.

Didn't get a dyno run after the last tune getting too hot... but it sure feels sweet! :)

http://digitalman.smugmug.com/photos/122953966-L.jpg

Lol you must have gotten the pick of the litter stock. Thats 3 less hp then me with CAI,Tune, UD pulleys, and an x-pipe.

ORIGINAL: Jurnymn

This is stock except for axel back pypes muffers.
Max Power=276.98 Max Torque=299.38

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/7140/06mustangdynorun1pc0.jpg

Knock on wood. I've had good luck when I've bought cars. It's got 16k on it now, just good and broke in.

here is mine

local://upfiles/56790/3D04DF79679E43E1B41188AE4EA27EB4.jpg

local://upfiles/56790/A6C0DDB17A1A480CAE5BD0BC3D7FC95E.jpg

local://upfiles/56790/EBBF077234664BF8B4DC13771F267648.jpg

RWHP 319.9 RWTQ 331.4

[IMG]http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r294/manshow003/DynoSheet.jpg[IMG]

2006 Pony Package 4.0 Automatic

309rwhp/355rwtq Mustang Dyno SAE

http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m264/buckman69/dyno_0021.jpg

I had about 1100 miles on the car when I went to the dyno. '06 5-speed - totally stock - on a dynojet.

265 rwhp
286 trq



local://upfiles/32560/4D01AD1F94844AEF93FA48EF7F410713.jpg

ORIGINAL: 331StrokerFox



Does altitude make any difference at all in horsepower? The engine couldn't give 2 hoots at what altitude it is tested at - it only cares what the air pressure, temperature and humidity is. Sea level at 28.02 inches baro is exactly the same as 4000 ft at 28.02 inches, as far as the engine is concerned. When tested at 5000 ft, we get virtually exactly the same power (corrected to atmospheric conditions, of course) as we do at sea level - It's just about 24%-25% less on the track! I am confused why some dyno operators insist on putting altitude on their charts and swear that it's a factor.



It does if not then tell me why climbers that climb everest usually take oxygen with them? Why because the air is less dense and has less oxygen per cc^3. If the density of oxygen in the air is lower then there will be a lesser explosion. Engines are nothing else than an air pump.

Andrew

flewbyu.comdyno.pdf (http://ripway.com/members/getfile.asp?file=%5Cflewbyu%2Ecomdyno%2Epdf)

-93 Oct Performance tune
-4.10 FRPP Gears
-Cmcv delete
-C&L Air Intake
-Steeda Udp's
-Kooks Long Tube Headers
-Kooks High Flow Catted X pipe
-Mac AB's
-Royal Purple front to back

Could someone tell me how much it costs to have my car dyno'd? I'll probably use a facility with a Dynojet. I've never read what anyone said they paid.

HAHA this is gonna hurt some of the guys here, but in PR it is $20 for 3 passes with A/F. In the state the norm is around 75. Dont know how much they charge per hour over there. Here it is $60 per hour with a/f and if you are more than one hour they usually cut you a deal like $50 an hour.

Andrew

bump

Going this monday for another dyno and will post it. Recent mods are 91 Brenspeed tune and Motion delete plates. Hoping for around 300

Just going to add to this one, got it dyno'd, pushing 293rwhp and 308rwtp
Will add the sheet soon.

If you can post this at the beginning of the thread I will keep an ongoing record for a future program I am creating to calculate realworld HP when you select the Mods you are planning
This is the start of the database.
http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls

if you want to be on this list and your not, please post your Dyno
Stock or with mods (list all mods) if you have multiple dynos with different mods
please list those. I really need your hrlp on creating this program,

http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls (http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls)

2K05GT - that's some spreadsheet you put together... nice work

I'm unable to access the spreadsheet, I'm on a Macintosh. I have MS Excel but no luck with it. Any suggestions, other than going with a windows machine, how to see this info?

2K05GT, looks really good. I noticed mine is saying it's all stock for my car. i wish those were stock numbers for my car

Heres mine with the 100 Shot Zex kit. Not quite happy yet. My tuner wasn't really the best. Plan on finding a new tuner, got some killer torque gains though.
Max Hp: 338.1 Max Torque: 397.2

http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/7/web/2347000-2347999/2347294_12_full.jpg

Post yourmods or Sig., Year,Octane, Trannyand Dyno Sheets. Keep in mind all cars were not created equal from the factory, but if we get enough replies we can see an average and how increasing mods increase HP. No sheet no reply please. If you have an inquiry use PMs.
Your info will be added to this VERY COOL database!
http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls (http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls)

Add me to the spread sheet my dyno is right there above your post

Ok made some more updates
http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls (http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls)

Included some other sheets I found around the site, I need more sheets from 06 and 07 stangs
Stock and Modded, so please get those numbers to me.

This sheet should be Macintosh Compatable, If you are having problems please PM me and I will help if I can

I was able to get my dyno sheet onto the pc...... here ya go




http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/7910/dynosheetin8.jpg

435 RWHP - 6350 RPM-- 373 Ftlbs Torque

Here is mine with the Powerdyne SC, Kooks LT's and 93 octane dyno tuned by Joe at Dynospeed Racing

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y167/Ruffnuts/Dyno.jpg

http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w223/GTJUNKIE/dynorun.jpg
Here is my first sheet from STANGHI I don't know why the torque was not listed but the #'s are in my sig.

bump....lets get some more responses 2k05gt is working his butt of on this.. .help the guy out....

Dave

bump

ORIGINAL: Stkjock

bump....lets get some more responses 2k05gt is working his butt of on this.. .help the guy out....

Dave


What Dave Said .... :D

Thanks for the reminder.


local://upfiles/61548/F30C9D250A18448FA12779F9A81C2C43.jpg

img/http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p16/k9hilco/destonn.jpg/img

Here is my sheet after a BBR stage 1 cam install with C&L street intake on 91 oct pump gas. 2007 GT with manual transhttp://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p16/k9hilco/destonn.jpg

Now i pay 60 bucks for 2 pulls with A/F monitoring. It's different wherever you go. Some cheaper and some more expensive.

http://www.mustangforums.com/upfiles/38668/171E196F21E14AEAABD62B48E40C0C8B.jpg

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s298/camalfi/Dyno.jpg

Mods are in the sig. 93 octane used in all pulls.
Pull 1: B amachips 93 Race tune
Pull 2 and 3: Brenspeed 93 octane tune

FRPP Stingers
FRPP X pipe
FRPP Shorty Headers
FRPP 90mm CAI
FRPP Tune
Husrt Shifter
Full synthetic fluids
Steeda UDP to come next week will Dyno Again.
I was running 94 Octane

Cheers ALL!


local://upfiles/65226/337C0F01219543718858EC8917D9095C.jpg

local://upfiles/65226/921942A80C794DE29FEF19579104E245.jpg

DeStonn,
I need the Year of car, Tranny type, and complete list of Mods,
thanks

Scott< I will post my new dyno sheets as soon as I go to the same dyno to compare apples to apples..sometime next week..
TJ

2005 Mustang GT
Standard 5 speed
3.55 gears
FRPP Stingers
FRPP X pipe
FRPP Shorty Headers
FRPP 90mm CAI
FRPP Tune
Husrt Shifter
Full synthetic fluids
Steeda UDP to come next week will Dyno Again.
I was running 94 Octane

326 RWHP 334.3 torque as per previous post.


Cheers ALL!

Got rid of the nitrous and through on a saleen supercharger here is my new dyno on a dynojet. I have a feeling it wont be long beofre i up the boost and i'll be back with another.




local://upfiles/25007/F3C26149AE594D01ACB9E93CFAB61F19.jpg

2005 5-speed. 93 octane. Vortech HO and Pypes O/R H-pipe stock mufflers.
438 HP 397 TQ

(big graph warning) http://home.comcast.net/~robworld/wsb/media/400051/site1656.jpg (http://home.comcast.net/%7Erobworld/wsb/media/400051/site1656.jpg)

ORIGINAL: blkstang39

2005 Mustang GT
Standard 5 speed
3.55 gears
FRPP Stingers
FRPP X pipe
FRPP Shorty Headers
FRPP 90mm CAI
FRPP Tune
Husrt Shifter
Full synthetic fluids
Steeda UDP to come next week will Dyno Again.
I was running 94 Octane

326 RWHP 334.3 torque as per previous post.


Cheers ALL!


maaaan those are some good numbers IMO for ur mods

Big Kudos to 2k05gt for his spreadsheet http://home.comcast.net/~swieduwilt01/Mustangforums_Dynos.xls. This isthe responseI hopedfor when I started this thread. Hopefully we can get a "sticky" so it stays in view, it certainly receives a lot of interest. Much better than other forum's attempts.

Guess I should've posted this update a while ago. Mod's in sig.


local://upfiles/61548/1AD37BBD03DF4680A01802BE1CDF327E.jpg

Stock TB
FRPP CAI
Custom PC Tune
Stock UDP
CMDP N/A
Stock Headers
MagnaFlow Midpipe
Stock Cats
MagnaPak axle backs
Stock Cams
Whipple Charged
10 psi boost
91 Octane
3.55 Gears
DynoJet

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/4632/dynosheetbq8.jpg

Here is mine....

local://upfiles/48058/12DBDFEFC45E476C9F2ED1FC4BC62470.jpg

here is my new numbers after Saleen and custom tune by Justin at vmptuning........

local://upfiles/42783/DA8F740549FD433AA9C6B2E0AC7C5218.jpg

http://image60.webshots.com/460/2/14/64/2123214640098751679cWzEpP_fs.jpg

bump

http://www.mkeeler.com/mustang/alternativeauto.jpg

452rwhp 444 torque. About 78 degrees, low humidity. Whipple @11psi. 60lb injectors. 91 Octane. X-pipe + FRPP Stingers.

How bad did your fingers hurt after that ?

Post your mods or Sig., Octane, Trannyand Dyno Sheets. Keep in mind all cars were not created equal from the factory, but if we get enough replies we can see an average and how increasing mods increase HP. No sheet no reply please. If you have an inquiry use PMs.

Here is mine........STD

local://upfiles/34882/7AE89B0691FF4FD7B3E6B416344E0E82.jpg

Max Power: 451.77
Max Torque: 437.12
Run Conditions: 102.62 F
Humidity: 25%



local://upfiles/40675/AE69B864611C485E9F24FACD83E8BCF6.jpg

Here's mine with 9 and 11 PSI. I have a powerhouse turbo setup.
http://aycu35.webshots.com/image/20874/2004088633511548452_rs.jpg

Steeda CIA & elbow, Steeda UDP's, Steeda CMCV delete, 91 octane tune

local://upfiles/63299/AACE29E798CD4C9CA9A42266DABA4383.jpg

http://www.mustangforums.com/upfiles/33124/AB8F268D2D7D4B25B90A8B30DC30EBFC.jpg

bump

ttt

2 of many passes on the dyno after 3 hrs of tuning




http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h293/slv343/DavidRobinsonWhippleDynoGraph.jpg

I can't make it show up normal size. The 38lb injecters fell flat at 6200rpms.. I need 60lb injectors


ORIGINAL: blueherd02gt

2 of many passes on the dyno after 3 hrs of tuning




http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h293/slv343/DavidRobinsonWhippleDynoGraph.jpg

http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee251/jdeprato/AfterProchargerLTs.jpg
I started leaning out with 39# injectors and once I get 60# injectors I will get it retuned and I should be up over 500rwhp after that...

I feel your pain man, how many lbs of boost?

I am running 10.5#'s on my D1SC...how much boost are you running? I should be over 500 once I get the 60# injectors...those will have to wait though because I need to quiet down the car a bit the neighbors are getting a little pissy with me :D

'07 GT
Whipple HO Supercharger
Mac Axlebacks
10PSI
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c62/ramairgt1/Mustang/dyno_jheath.jpg
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c62/ramairgt1/Mustang/dyno_jheath.jpg)

That's weird I thought TS blowers put down more torque than that? Your curve is obviously more instantaneous, but at your rwhp level I thought they were making more tq, great numbers by the way...With long tubes I know you can eclipse the 500rwhp if you so choose :Dmy issue was injectors...Do you know what your AFR was? and the Degrees of timing?

They do..You gotta have LT's to see it..
I'm at 11lb.boost


ORIGINAL: Black05StangGT

I am running 10.5#'s on my D1SC...how much boost are you running? I should be over 500 once I get the 60# injectors...those will have to wait though because I need to quiet down the car a bit the neighbors are getting a little pissy with me :D

[8D]


Here is a better file..He sent me a .bmp file. We made probably 10 passes and these were our first two.

ttt

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a130/mrogers629/dyno.jpg

I put it on the Dyno to see where I am at now and I will do another run after I install the Hot Rod Cams.

Heres mine but this was before I went back to adj the A/F ratio...... I now have the HP and TQ in my sig! See that a/f ratio at 6000 rpms........pig rich!!!!!! now 11.2-11.5 across the board
Note 93 degrees and 69% humidity and at sea level

http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s241/mygt500_album/P9050115.jpg

This was when I was having fuel issues, My second pump was not turning on at all.

Performance mods:
Whipple H.O 500hp kit.

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f381/explicit69/Alex_2-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f381/explicit69/Alex_1.jpg

curious to see what you put down after the second pump is actully working;)! ^^^^^^^^

^^^+1

Bump

bump

bump

307 rwhp, 328 rwtq


local://upfiles/63861/3C11608263004C02ACC7CC8EC8D5B2D8.jpg