Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

'02 GT Vs. '05 V6

  Printable Version
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 2005 - 2008 Mustangs >> 4.0L V6 Specific >> '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
'02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/3/2006 5:26:00 PM   
HurricaneStang

 

Posts: 1115
Joined: 6/27/2006
Status: offline
So i was on my way home from town earlier today and ahead of me is this loser, i call him a loser because he's goin out with my dirty ex, and he's got his 02 GT mustang and of course the ho is with him. Well he thought he would be funny and rev it up and blow me out of the water. Well little did he know that i just switched to 93 tune today and the car was running good as ever. I dont know how hard he was trying to beat me but i kept up with him only being about 1 car's worth away up to 100mph when i let off. I know that is was irresponsible but i hate them so i did it.

I actually thought it would pull further away but i was surprised how close i stayed with him.

_____________________________

''05 Mineral Gray GT Coupe
Premium Trim
Shaker 1000, Leather, IUP
Post #: 1
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/3/2006 5:58:22 PM   
petepete

 

Posts: 2250
Joined: 6/10/2006
Status: offline
sounds like your girlfriend left you for he guy with the bigger engine o_O

_____________________________


4.0L 2005 Mustang Supercharged

(in reply to HurricaneStang)
Post #: 2
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/3/2006 6:20:45 PM   
Sonic3v

 

Posts: 1345
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline
Sounds like he was getting road head and couldnt drive.

Pete, that is a DOPE v6 man. What #'s are you getting? Wanna trade for a day?

_____________________________

Yep...

(in reply to petepete)
Post #: 3
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/3/2006 6:32:38 PM   
petepete

 

Posts: 2250
Joined: 6/10/2006
Status: offline
heh thanks i havent dynoed it since the reinstall of the supercharger but the numbers were 298rwhp and 299 rwtq or somethin gliek that ill have to check when i get home i need to go get it dynoed now just havent had time recently o_O

_____________________________


4.0L 2005 Mustang Supercharged

(in reply to Sonic3v)
Post #: 4
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/3/2006 10:18:48 PM   
HurricaneStang

 

Posts: 1115
Joined: 6/27/2006
Status: offline
Hey hey hey i dumped that dirty girl and besides there will always be a car with a bigger engine so that wasnt the thing, just thought it was a story that i'd put in here. Just happens she was there though.

And also i wouldnt doubt if she was goin down on him -- shes a bottom feeding trashbag ho haha chris jericho

_____________________________

''05 Mineral Gray GT Coupe
Premium Trim
Shaker 1000, Leather, IUP

(in reply to petepete)
Post #: 5
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/3/2006 11:37:03 PM   
8cd03gro


Posts: 3070
Joined: 3/26/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HurricaneStang

Hey hey hey i dumped that dirty girl and besides there will always be a car with a bigger engine so that wasnt the thing, just thought it was a story that i'd put in here. Just happens she was there though.

And also i wouldnt doubt if she was goin down on him -- shes a bottom feeding trashbag ho haha chris jericho


your car looks better ;)

_____________________________


FOR SALE - http://www.mustangforums.com/m_4890329/tm.htm

(in reply to HurricaneStang)
Post #: 6
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/4/2006 12:09:35 AM   
HurricaneStang

 

Posts: 1115
Joined: 6/27/2006
Status: offline
haha thanks i think so to. Not to hate on mustangs but i like s197s better :)

_____________________________

''05 Mineral Gray GT Coupe
Premium Trim
Shaker 1000, Leather, IUP

(in reply to 8cd03gro)
Post #: 7
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/4/2006 1:05:47 AM   
SparkYZ

 

Posts: 397
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline
Bro, We both know street racing is bad.
But damn, Stuff like that is TEMPTING!
I'm proud of you! He was probably pissed that you were on his a$$.
Good sh!t......good shi!t..

(in reply to HurricaneStang)
Post #: 8
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/4/2006 4:09:18 PM   
flomoloko


Posts: 45
Joined: 3/20/2006
From: Missouri
Status: offline
Bottom feeding ho trashbag.. I'm guessing you don't like her anymore. Is she hot? Maybe she should go on Springer. j/k.

_____________________________

2006 Satin Silver w/Pony Package - Bone Stock
My skittle is faster, but my Pony is cooler.

(in reply to SparkYZ)
Post #: 9
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/4/2006 4:47:38 PM   
Tubra


Posts: 223
Joined: 9/12/2006
Status: offline
I was about a car length ahead of my encounter with an 02' GT. Shocked the hell out of me. The asked: "Is that a V6?"

_____________________________



Mods: Dual FRPP GTAs, custom H-Pipe

My Cardomain page with more pics!

(in reply to flomoloko)
Post #: 10
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/4/2006 7:55:47 PM   
05MustangSally


Posts: 1468
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
People say to me that the new 05-07 V6 Stangs have more power than the old GTs (anything below 05). Is this true? I've raced an 2003 GT and I beat him...of course I don't know how hard he was trying lol. But my boyfriend raced a Saturn Sky and smoked it and a Turbo Charged Tiburon and smoked it too. So I guess the new stangs are better... What are your opinions and experiences?

Thanks <3

(in reply to Tubra)
Post #: 11
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/4/2006 9:10:05 PM   
pallidamors


Posts: 690
Joined: 8/15/2006
From: Miami Florida
Status: offline
99-04 gt> 05 + v6


_____________________________

Cars....

2005 Mustang v6

2004 Pontiac Gto...the slow one

200 Ford Focus..DD

(in reply to 05MustangSally)
Post #: 12
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/4/2006 9:20:08 PM   
SparkYZ

 

Posts: 397
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pallidamors

99-04 gt> 05 + v6



+1.

94-98 GT's, we stand a chance. I dont know why, but I've done very well against a few.
94-04 V6....We eat them for breakfast.

(in reply to pallidamors)
Post #: 13
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/5/2006 11:43:17 AM   
mustangman02232


Posts: 11995
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Ludlow, Mass
Status: offline
mustangman02232's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: SparkYZ

quote:

ORIGINAL: pallidamors

99-04 gt> 05 + v6



+1.

94-98 GT's, we stand a chance. I dont know why, but I've done very well against a few.
94-04 V6....We eat them for breakfast.


94-95 was the 5.slow
96-98 was really crappy heads

94-98 was a single port V6, watch out for supercoupe swaped ones though
99-04 run high 15s, s197s run low 15s sometimes high 14s depending on driver, were more of a light snack then a whole breakfast

_____________________________

91 f350 7.3 IDI
02 v6 auto: SOLD and on a mission to buy her back
15.801 @ 88.99 mph, 2.4 60, LTs, cat H force pros
http://s106.photobucket.com/albums/m244/mustangman02232/?action=view¤t=HPIM0571.flv

(in reply to SparkYZ)
Post #: 14
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/5/2006 2:38:05 PM   
SparkYZ

 

Posts: 397
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline
Light snack. lol.
People are getting 600 horses out of those 3.8 pushrods....

(in reply to mustangman02232)
Post #: 15
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/5/2006 2:53:17 PM   
05MustangSally


Posts: 1468
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
Thanks guys! Still like to see more experiences though :)

(in reply to SparkYZ)
Post #: 16
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/5/2006 8:19:47 PM   
mustangman02232


Posts: 11995
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Ludlow, Mass
Status: offline
mustangman02232's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: SparkYZ

Light snack. lol.
People are getting 600 horses out of those 3.8 pushrods....


3.8s are great motors for build ups, not so great for responding to bolt ons like the 4.0s though

_____________________________

91 f350 7.3 IDI
02 v6 auto: SOLD and on a mission to buy her back
15.801 @ 88.99 mph, 2.4 60, LTs, cat H force pros
http://s106.photobucket.com/albums/m244/mustangman02232/?action=view¤t=HPIM0571.flv

(in reply to SparkYZ)
Post #: 17
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/5/2006 8:39:34 PM   
mustangfanatic

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 10/5/2006
From: Eveleth
Status: offline
in stock Vs. Stock the GT all the way the 05 has 210 HP and 240 tq 96 gt 215hp 292tq the 99 and up with pi heads is rated at 260 hp and 300 tq in my stock 96 GT i blew away a 05 V6

(in reply to mustangman02232)
Post #: 18
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/5/2006 9:34:30 PM   
mustangman02232


Posts: 11995
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Ludlow, Mass
Status: offline
mustangman02232's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: mustangfanatic

in stock Vs. Stock the GT all the way the 05 has 210 HP and 240 tq 96 gt 215hp 292tq the 99 and up with pi heads is rated at 260 hp and 300 tq in my stock 96 GT i blew away a 05 V6


i doubt you blew it away, i got half a car put on my split port auto vert by an NPI

_____________________________

91 f350 7.3 IDI
02 v6 auto: SOLD and on a mission to buy her back
15.801 @ 88.99 mph, 2.4 60, LTs, cat H force pros
http://s106.photobucket.com/albums/m244/mustangman02232/?action=view¤t=HPIM0571.flv

(in reply to mustangfanatic)
Post #: 19
RE: '02 GT Vs. '05 V6 - 10/6/2006 12:19:25 AM   
mustangfanatic

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 10/5/2006
From: Eveleth
Status: offline
well it sure wasnt close i took him by at least 2 car lenghts mind you this was from a stop light and the 05 was a auto

(in reply to mustangman02232)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 2005 - 2008 Mustangs >> 4.0L V6 Specific
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17932
nanaki14694
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14536
addermk214016
ride of the 13720
hotrods_n_bo13332
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211995
1slo8511780

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.