Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

GT500 -ford's big mistake?

  Printable Version
Mustang >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip >> GT500 -ford's big mistake? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:09:53 PM   
Birdieman4


Posts: 3016
Joined: 10/13/2003
Status: offline
I am a Ford fan through and through, but I also call 'em as I see 'em.
Over the last month I have seen several gt500's go down the 1/4 mile, and recently saw one being autox'd. If I was Ford i'd be g'danmd embarassed. Several people I have talked to about their recent gt500 purchases are upset. Most all say they expected more car. (I hardly feel sorry for the poor bastards that paid 10k+ over sticker for an early one) Most I see at the track can barely break into the 12's (if that).
Lets go back to the 04 cobra vs. 06 gt500 comparison for a sec. For about half as much $, Ford was able to produce a car that performed at a very similar level to the gt500. The only corner Ford cut on the terminator was going with a roots Eaton and not a screw. Several corners have been cut in the gt500, and it still is very pricey for what you get. To me, the terminator was a MUCH BETTER value. Yeah, maybe if you put a gt 500 in a time capsule and open it in 30 years, it might be a good value. In the gt500, Ford produced a marginally performing car for a pretty big price tag. A C6 vette is about the same price as a gt500, and the vette beats it in every category. (BTW, IMO, the C6 vette is possibly the best performance value in the world) Was Ford even attempting to compete with GM? I doubt it; I don't think they cared about anything more thhan making a few bucks. If they did care about this car's performance, they would have done a screw blower and an aluminum block. But those got scrapped because of cost, which backs up my logic.
I don't see much aftermarket following with the gt5000 compared to the terminator. Who wants a 4000 lb project drag car (or autox, for that matter). I think that this car will fizzle away pretty fast. My point is that the terminator will live on at the strip and the autox, but the gt500 will not. And that hurts Ford. The gt500 was created for 1 reason and 1 reason only; to make $, exploiting the Shelby name. That's the bottom line.

_____________________________

02 S281E #60 R.I.P.
01 S281 #582 Procharged
07 S281E sometime right before hell freezes over
http://www.ihra.com/profile/topfuel/rick_cooper.html
http://ihra.com/statistics/points/2006/TF.htm
Post #: 1
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:19:33 PM   
ByPopularDemand


Posts: 4686
Joined: 1/25/2005
Status: offline
ByPopularDemand's photo gallery
When has ford competed with GM power wise

_____________________________

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LegallyTorchRED
"Condomless Sex".... is like speeding without a radar detector........ "sooner or later, you're gonna get caught"









(in reply to Birdieman4)
Post #: 2
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:20:45 PM   
BicketyBam



Posts: 3301
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline
Aren't these cars $40,000? That's $15,000 less than the 'Vette.

_____________________________

-Ed-


(in reply to Birdieman4)
Post #: 3
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:22:15 PM   
4Stangs


Posts: 1452
Joined: 6/15/2006
Status: offline
4Stangs's photo gallery
You picked the right section of this forum to bash the new Shelby...

Let the games begin...

Another thread that belongs somewhere else...

(in reply to Birdieman4)
Post #: 4
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:31:21 PM   
Birdieman4


Posts: 3016
Joined: 10/13/2003
Status: offline
It's not so much Im bashing the new Shelby, I'm bashing Ford for releasing it.
quote:

Aren't these cars $40,000? That's $15,000 less than the 'Vette.

The c6 vette bases at around 44k; pretty close to the GT500's base.
It's not like the gt500's price wasn't already high-ish. Ford should have just done the aluminum block and screw blower, raised the car's price, and they would have had more satisfied customers. I just don't like Ford 'hedging' on a 'Shelby' product.


_____________________________

02 S281E #60 R.I.P.
01 S281 #582 Procharged
07 S281E sometime right before hell freezes over
http://www.ihra.com/profile/topfuel/rick_cooper.html
http://ihra.com/statistics/points/2006/TF.htm

(in reply to 4Stangs)
Post #: 5
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:35:48 PM   
SSteele


Posts: 543
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
Even though she is a bit porky, there ain't nothing wrong with the GT500. Besides, Evan Smith ran one to a 12.23@118, so don't go blaming the car for other people not being able to drive. You could say the same thing about the Terminator when it first came out; considerably heavier than the GT or Mach and most people were having trouble running low 13s with it. Besides, that motor in it has plenty of potential. When an eventual KB set-up comes out, probably making 650rwhp with supporting mods, then you'll be glad the car weights five gazillion pounds, at least you'll get traction. Besides, there is always weight reduction...

_____________________________

Pearlescent Teal 1995 Z28 M6
K&N CAI, Flowmaster Cat-back Exhaust
American Racing Torque Thrust IIs
Richmond 4.10s



(in reply to 4Stangs)
Post #: 6
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:45:04 PM   
4Stangs


Posts: 1452
Joined: 6/15/2006
Status: offline
4Stangs's photo gallery
Here, let's just save some time.

http://www.mustangforums.com/m_1912668/tm.htm

(in reply to Birdieman4)
Post #: 7
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:53:58 PM   
redass02gt



Posts: 7040
Joined: 4/21/2005
Status: offline
I think it would be one hell of a daily driver, just like how most people use a corvette. from what I hear, it's got a sh*tload of power right off idle. it's more versatile than any corvette, extra seats and a decent trunk (I assume the trunk space is the same as a v6 or gt). so basically, it seems like I'd buy a vette if I wanted a 2 seat coupe, or a gt500 if I wanted more space.

_____________________________

Pitchforks and torches are the answers to all of our nation's problems. KOBE4MVP

(in reply to 4Stangs)
Post #: 8
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 12:57:52 PM   
BicketyBam



Posts: 3301
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Birdieman4

It's not so much Im bashing the new Shelby, I'm bashing Ford for releasing it.
quote:

Aren't these cars $40,000? That's $15,000 less than the 'Vette.

The c6 vette bases at around 44k; pretty close to the GT500's base.
It's not like the gt500's price wasn't already high-ish. Ford should have just done the aluminum block and screw blower, raised the car's price, and they would have had more satisfied customers. I just don't like Ford 'hedging' on a 'Shelby' product.



What does an equipped C6 go for? It's way more than $44,000. $44k must be for a no option vehicle that is a mythilogical creature in the real word. The new C6's held in inventory are over $50k.

If I could get a GT500 for $40k (or thereabouts), I'd have one in my garage. No questions asked. First mod would be a dyno tune. Next would be some DR's. That should be around $1,000. If it then couldn't run into the 12's I'd be shocked.

_____________________________

-Ed-


(in reply to Birdieman4)
Post #: 9
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 1:21:53 PM   
stanger88

 

Posts: 1543
Joined: 7/22/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ByPopularDemand

When has ford competed with GM power wise



In the 80's and EARLY 90's, lmao

(in reply to ByPopularDemand)
Post #: 10
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 1:46:15 PM   
72MachOne99GT


Posts: 5560
Joined: 12/17/2004
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Status: offline
72MachOne99GT's photo gallery
I think it's shocking that anyone is surprised by Ford wanting to make some money. Seriously, the company is in the ****ter, which bothers me because I have always been an avid Ford fan, be it trucks or cars (Mustang specifically).

However, I think the GT500 (primarily because of it's Shelby designation) is the "Rich Mans" Mustang, if there ever was such a thing. Obviously it is not meant for the average blue collar worker making 30-60K a year at their job. However, it is these average blue collar people who would take a car and play with it, not just sit it in a garage and admire it while it's value continues to climb. No offense to anyone who had the money to buy one, but MOST of them will be preserved.

The base GT in my opinion, is still the 'best buy' despite the numerous threads convincing people otherwise. 26K or so for a straight line performer with the basic comforts for a nice daily driver. Then, use that 20K+ that you saved to do with as you like. If you want to go straight, then go straight. If you happen to like turns, make it a turner.

As much as I like the GT500, and would not hesitate if I found an unbelievable deal on one sometime, I don't think it is meant to be a strip monster. Many people will disagree with me, and sure, I could be wrong in some of my thoughts, but based on many things I have read and seen, that is where I stand.

GT500=Collector / Bulavard Cruiser
GT= Dime a Dozen / Street-Strip Car

_____________________________

Hopefully running by the weekend.
Gonna run her good too!

(in reply to stanger88)
Post #: 11
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 1:48:39 PM   
4Stangs


Posts: 1452
Joined: 6/15/2006
Status: offline
4Stangs's photo gallery
I'll agree with that thought process. Makes sense.

(in reply to 72MachOne99GT)
Post #: 12
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 2:19:56 PM   
S281 E

 

Posts: 2682
Joined: 3/30/2006
Status: offline
As much as I don't like the GT500 I would still own one for the right price. I think there biggest mistake was allowing the dealers to mark it by so much.

(in reply to 4Stangs)
Post #: 13
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 2:58:14 PM   
BicketyBam



Posts: 3301
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: S281 E

As much as I don't like the GT500 I would still own one for the right price. I think there biggest mistake was allowing the dealers to mark it by so much.


It would have been nice if they could have/would have controlled that. One of the big selling points that it was going to be a $40,000 500 hp car, when in reality you can't buy one for sticker.

_____________________________

-Ed-


(in reply to S281 E)
Post #: 14
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 3:50:39 PM   
danyz

 

Posts: 195
Joined: 7/14/2006
Status: offline
I think ford got it right with the new GT500.
Overall it's the best package they have ever put together for the money.
You can't hold them responsible for the dealer's marking up the selling price. As long as people are willing to pay 10,000 and up from the suggested retail price that's what the cart's will be selling for.
A few year's from now when they start showing up in the auto trader mags and such they will become more affordable, just like the terminator's.
I also believe that as more people get used to rowing the gear's in their new ride's you will see a lot more of them deep into the twelve's.
Especially once they slp on some drag radial's.
Don't write off the Shelby just yet.

_____________________________

2001 Z-28
SLP lid, Magnaflow, Fuddle 3000 stall, Pacesetter LT's,
SLP underdrive pulley,Nitto DR's, Zex 125 shot

(in reply to BicketyBam)
Post #: 15
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 3:59:07 PM   
BicketyBam



Posts: 3301
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline
There was a vid of one running in the 11's with a tune and some DR's. I have no doubt that the car can do it. Just because there are people out there that can't, doesn't mean the car won't.

_____________________________

-Ed-


(in reply to danyz)
Post #: 16
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 4:08:07 PM   
breyton


Posts: 1200
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BicketyBam

quote:

ORIGINAL: S281 E

As much as I don't like the GT500 I would still own one for the right price. I think there biggest mistake was allowing the dealers to mark it by so much.


It would have been nice if they could have/would have controlled that. One of the big selling points that it was going to be a $40,000 500 hp car, when in reality you can't buy one for sticker.


Greed makes you do stupid things. Desperation makes you do even more stupid things. Unfortunately Ford is both. Just look at the state they are in. Production has been slowed, they have no sedans really worth buying. Their entire product line is medicore and sub-par with the only acception being the Mustang and their full size trucks. Problem with the trucks is people aren't buying them because gas has gotten so expensive. If you look at Ford entirely the GT500 should really not surprise you.

_____________________________


Steeda Intake, MagnaFlow CatBack Exhaust, X-Pipe/No Cats, Diablo PCM, 2.8" Pulley, Lots Of Kenny Brown Suspension & Chassis Goodies

"I'm slow because I'm a short bus riding window licker."

(in reply to BicketyBam)
Post #: 17
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 4:12:23 PM   
Derf00

 

Posts: 5460
Joined: 2/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: breyton

quote:

ORIGINAL: BicketyBam

quote:

ORIGINAL: S281 E

As much as I don't like the GT500 I would still own one for the right price. I think there biggest mistake was allowing the dealers to mark it by so much.


It would have been nice if they could have/would have controlled that. One of the big selling points that it was going to be a $40,000 500 hp car, when in reality you can't buy one for sticker.


Greed makes you do stupid things. Desperation makes you do even more stupid things. Unfortunately Ford GM and Chrysler are both. Just look at the state they are in. Production has been slowed, they have no sedans really worth buying. Their entire product line is medicore and sub-par with the only acception being the Mustang and their full size trucks. Problem with the trucks is people aren't buying them because gas has gotten so expensive. If you look at Ford GM or Chrysler entirely the GT500, Last Impala SS or Charger should really not surprise you.


Fixed for accuracy :)

(in reply to breyton)
Post #: 18
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 4:28:38 PM   
breyton


Posts: 1200
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Derf00


quote:

ORIGINAL: breyton

quote:

ORIGINAL: BicketyBam

quote:

ORIGINAL: S281 E

As much as I don't like the GT500 I would still own one for the right price. I think there biggest mistake was allowing the dealers to mark it by so much.


It would have been nice if they could have/would have controlled that. One of the big selling points that it was going to be a $40,000 500 hp car, when in reality you can't buy one for sticker.


Greed makes you do stupid things. Desperation makes you do even more stupid things. Unfortunately Ford GM and Chrysler are both. Just look at the state they are in. Production has been slowed, they have no sedans really worth buying. Their entire product line is medicore and sub-par with the only acception being the Mustang and their full size trucks. Problem with the trucks is people aren't buying them because gas has gotten so expensive. If you look at Ford GM or Chrysler entirely the GT500, Last Impala SS or Charger should really not surprise you.


Fixed for accuracy :)


LOL! Actually I'm not certain how well the Challenger is going to do seeing as I just read that the base price, V6 model, is going to be around $22,000. I had a feeling they were going to price it over the Mustang.

Oh and I liked the last rear drive Impala SS. My mom had one. Was a pretty nice car for its size.

< Message edited by breyton -- 9/7/2006 4:31:22 PM >


_____________________________


Steeda Intake, MagnaFlow CatBack Exhaust, X-Pipe/No Cats, Diablo PCM, 2.8" Pulley, Lots Of Kenny Brown Suspension & Chassis Goodies

"I'm slow because I'm a short bus riding window licker."

(in reply to Derf00)
Post #: 19
RE: GT500 -ford's big mistake? - 9/7/2006 4:34:25 PM   
Derf00

 

Posts: 5460
Joined: 2/22/2005
Status: offline
wasn't the 4door 'muscle' car that's been out a few years from chyrsler the charger? As for the Impalla, I'm talkin about the FWD one. And I think I meant the new Chevy Impala that is FWD

(in reply to breyton)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

 

 
Mustang Forums >> Speed Zone >> Street/Strip
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17922
nanaki14685
88bluegt14536
dan04cobra14532
addermk214002
ride of the 13716
hotrods_n_bo13329
2000gt4.612516
mustangman0211994
1slo8511751

New Vendors
Extreme Dimension
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.