I would have to say the 1977 mustang II thats a real pile of crap.

yeah the mustang II is just terrible. i dont even really recognize it as a mustang.

late 70's early 80's all sucked

Yea, Mustang IIs = Pinto

im sorry but i think the 88 style is sick. the only way they should be driven is if they have a 5.0. if not then they should be driven off a cliff allong with the owner.

http://www.nwlink.com/~nsnow/pics/cars/mustang.JPG border=

Is it just the '88 or do you detest all Fox bodies? I personally think that all 4 and 6 cyl Mustangs are a waste of a good chassis, but I don't hold it against the owner or the car itself. There's always time for a swap.

lol no that was a lil harsh what i said i just dislike the body styling. and if it doesnt have a v8 or if its not gettin one they belong to a grandma. that one is nice though.

And if it doesn't have a 5.0 it should be driven off a cliff...Does that mean the new 4.6's should be driven off a cliff too <img border="0" src=smileys/smiley19.gif border="0">

I don't belive I'd drive any of them off a cliff, but if I were to pick and I'm throwing out the late 70's - early 80's I'd say I'm not a huge fan of the change they made in '94. It's not bad, butI just don't care for them as much as the others. Since then though they've seen to improve upon it and they are once again one of my favorites.</P>

the mustangII and fox, definatley mustangII over fox but still, im starting to like foxes more now though :)

you dont like the 94 style look at my photo album most people say they like it more than most modles. but thats mostly my friends opinion.